Abstract
Firms are embedded in complex networks, where diverse ideas combine and generate new ideas. Shareholders of firms are often seen as critical external resources that have significant influence on firm innovation. The current literature tends to focus on the relationship between firms and their shareholders, while paying less attention to the connections between firms with the same shareholders. This article identifies two types of network spillover effects, intra-city network effect and inter-city network effect, by visualizing the co-ownership networks in China’s electric vehicle (EV) industry. We find that firms with the same shareholders, which are defined as co-owned EV firms, are more innovative than non-co-owned ones. Furthermore, there are two dominant types of firm co-ownership ties formed by corporate and financial institution shareholders. While corporate shareholders help exploiting local tacit knowledge, financial institutions are more active in bridging inter-city connections. The conclusion is confirmed at both firm and city levels. This paper theorizes the firm co-ownership network as a new form of institutional proximity and tested the result empirically. For policy consideration, we have emphasized the importance of building formal or informal inter-firm network, and the government should further enhance the knowledge flow channel by institutional construction.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Allen J W, Phillips G M, 2000. Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. The Journal of Finance, 55(6): 2791–2815. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/0022-1082.00307
Ascani A, Bettarelli L, Resmini L et al., 2020. Global networks, local specialisation and regional patterns of innovation. Research Policy, 49(8): 104031. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eesool.0200.104031
Bagley M J O, 2019. Networks, geography and the survival of the firm. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 29(4): 1173–1209. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00191-019-00616-z
Balland P A, Rigby D, 2017. The geography of complex knowledge. Economic Geography, 93(1): 1–23. doi: https://doi.org/10.0800/00130095.2016.1205947
Balland P A, Jara-Figueroa C, Petralia S G et al., 2020. Complex economic activities concentrate in large cities. Nature Human Behaviour, 4(3): 248–254. doi: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-019-0803-3
Bathelt H, Malmberg A, Maskell P, 2004. Clusters and knowledge: local buzz, global pipelines and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28(1): 31–56. doi: https://doi.org/10.1191/0309132504ph469oa
Belso-Martínez J A, Molina-Morales F X, Martínez-Cháfer L, 2015. Contributions of brokerage roles to firms’ innovation in a confectionery cluster. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 27(9): 1014–1030. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/095377255.0055.1045858
Boari C, Riboldazzi F, 2014. How knowledge brokers emerge and evolve: the role of actors’ behaviour. Research Policy, 43(4): 683–695. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2014.01.007
Borgstedt P, Neyer B, Schewe G, 2017. Paving the road to electric vehicles: a patent analysis of the automotive supply industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167: 75–87. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.161
Boschma R, 2005. Proximity and innovation: a critical assessment. Regional Studies, 39(1): 61–74. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340052000320887
Boschma R, 2015. Do spinoff dynamics or agglomeration externalities drive industry clustering? A reappraisal of Steven Klepper’s work. Industrial and Corporate Change, 24(4): 859–873. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtv024
Brooks C, Chen Z, Zeng Y Q, 2018. Institutional cross-ownership and corporate strategy: the case of mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Corporate Finance, 48: 187–216. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2017.11.003
Brown S, Pyke D, Steenhof P, 2010. Electric vehicles: the role and importance of standards in an emerging market. Energy Policy, 38(7): 3797–3806. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2010.02.059
Castells M, 2000. The rise of the network society: the information age: economy, society, and culture volume I Wiley.
Chang S J, Hong J, 2000. Economic performance of group-affiliated companies in Korea: intragroup resource sharing and internal business transactions. Academy of Management Journal, 43(3): 429–448. doi: https://doi.org/10.5465/1556403
Chang S J, Chung C N, Mahmood I P, 2006. When and how does business group affiliation promote firm innovation? A tale of two emerging economies. Organization Science, 17(5): 637–656. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1060.0202
Chen Y Y, Li Q Y, Ng J et al., 2021. Corporate financing of investment opportunities in a world of institutional cross-ownership. Journal of Corporate Finance, 69: 102041. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2021.102041
Choi S B, Lee S H, Williams C, 2011. Ownership and firm innovation in a transition economy: evidence from China. Research policy, 40(3): 441–452. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2011.01.004
Corsi C, Prencipe A, 2018. Foreign ownership and innovation in independent SMEs. A cross-European analysis. Journal of Small Business & Entrepreneurship, 30(5): 397–430. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/08276331.2017.1413751
Cowan R, Hultén S, 1996. Escaping lock-in: the case of the electric vehicle. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 53(1): 61–79. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0040-1625(96)00059-5
Crowley F, McCann P, 2015. Innovation and productivity in Irish firms. Spatial Economic Analysis, 10(2): 181–204. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/17421772.2015.1023340
Davids M, Frenken K, 2018. Proximity, knowledge base and the innovation process: towards an integrated framework. Regional Studies, 52(1): 23–34. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2017.1287349
Derudder B, Taylor P, 2016. Change in the world city network, 2000 -2012. The Professional Geographer, 68(4): 624–637. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00330124.2016.1157500
Du J Y, Ouyang M G, Chen J F, 2017. Prospects for Chinese electric vehicle technologies in 2016–2020: ambition and rationality. Energy, 120: 584–596. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2016.11.114
Dunning J H, 1994. Multinational enterprises and the globalization of innovatory capacity. Research Policy, 23(1): 67–88. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0048-7333(94)90027-2
Eisenman M, Paruchuri S, 2019. Inventor knowledge recombination behaviors in a pharmaceutical merger: the role of intrafirm networks. Long Range Planning, 52(2): 189–201. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lrp.2018.03.005
Freeman K, 2023. Overlapping Ownership Along the Sppply Chain. Kelley School of Business Research Paper, 16–84.
Gao K J, Shen H X, Gao X et al., 2019. The power of sharing: evidence from institutional investor cross-ownership and corporate innovation. International Review of Economics & Finance, 63: 284–296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.iref.2019.01.008
Gu Weinan, Liu Hui, 2020. Spatial structure, hierarchy and formation mechanisms of scientific collaboration networks: evidence of the belt and road regions. Chinese Geographical Science, 30(6): 959–975. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-020-1161-9
Haberly D, Wójcik D, 2017. Earth incorporated: centralization and variegation in the global company network. Economic Geography, 93(3): 241–266. doi: https://doi.org/10.1800/00300955.0016.1267561
Hagedoorn J, Duysters G, 2002. The effect of mergers and acquisitions on the technological performance of companies in a high-tech environment. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 14(1): 67–85. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09537320220125892
Haščič I, Migotto M, 2015. Measuring Environmental Innovation Using Patent Data. Paris: Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD).
He J, Huang J K, 2017. Product market competition in a world of cross-ownership: evidence from institutional blockholdings. The Review of Financial Studies, 30(8): 2674–2718. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhx028
He J, Huang J K, Zhao S, 2019. Internalizing governance externalities: the role of institutional cross-ownership. Journal of Financial Economics, 134(2): 400–418. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.07.019
He J, Li L, Yeung P E, 2020. Two Tales of Monitoring: Effects of Institutional Cross-Blockholding on Accruals. Available at: SSRN 3152044
Hou K W, 2007. Industry information diffusion and the lead-lag effect in stock returns. The Review of Financial Studies, 20(4): 1113–1138. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/revfin/hhm003
Hu J N, Wang S J, Xie F X, 2018. Environmental responsibility, market valuation, and firm characteristics: evidence from China. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 25(6): 1376–1387. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1646
Jacobs W, Koster H R A, van Oort F, 2014. Co-agglomeration of knowledge-intensive business services and multinational enterprises. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(2): 443–475. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbs055
Jung M J, 2013. Investor overlap and diffusion of disclosure practices. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(1): 167–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-012-9209-4
Kang J K, Luo J, Na H S, 2018. Are institutional investors with multiple blockholdings effective monitors? Journal of Financial Economics, 128(3): 576–602. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2018.03.005
Keister L A, 1998. Engineering growth: business group structure and firm performance in China’s transition economy. American Journal of Sociology, 104(2): 404–440. doi: https://doi.org/10.1086/210043
Kenney M, 2011. How venture capital became a component of the US National System of Innovation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 20(6): 1677–1723. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtr061
Kirat T, Lung Y, 1999. Innovation and proximity: territories as loci of collective learning processes. European Urban and Regional Studies, 6(1): 27–38. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/096977649900600103
Kumar P, Liu X J, Zaheer A, 2022. How much does the firm’s alliance network matter? Strategic Management Journal, 43(8): 1433–1468. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.3379
Lai K R, 2012. Differentiated markets: Shanghai, Beijing and Hong Kong in China’s financial Centre network. Urban Studies, 49(6): 1275–1296. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098011408143
Lavie D, 2007. Alliance portfolios and firm performance: a study of value creation and appropriation in the U.S. software industry. Strategic Management Journal, 28(12): 1187–1212. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.637
Li S M, 2004. Why is property right protection lacking in China? An institutional explanation. California Management Review, 46(3): 100–115. doi: https://doi.org/10.2307/41166223
Ling D C, Wang C Y, Zhou T Y, 2021. Institutional common ownership and firm value: evidence from real estate investment trusts. Real Estate Economics, 49(1): 187–223. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/1540-6229.12312
Massa M, Zaldokas A, 2017. Information transfers among co-owned firms. Journal of Financial Intermediation, 31: 77–92. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfi.2016.11.002
O’Leary M B, Mortensen M, 2010. Go (Con)figure: subgroups, imbalance, and isolates in geographically dispersed teams. Organization Science, 21(1): 115–131. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1090.0434
Pan F H, Bi W K, Liu X J et al., 2020. Exploring financial centre networks through inter-urban collaboration in high-end financial transactions in China. Regional Studies, 54(2): 162–172. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2018.1475728
Ponds R, van Oort F, Frenken K, 2010. Innovation, spillovers and university-industry collaboration: an extended knowledge production function approach. Journal of Economic Geography, 10(2): 231–255. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp036
Renski H, 2011. External economies of localization, urbanization and industrial diversity and new firm survival. Papers in Regional Science, 90(3): 473–502. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2010.00325.x
Roper S, Love J H, Ashcroft B et al., 2000. Industry and location effects on UK plants’ innovation propensity. The Annals of Regional Science, 34(4): 489–302. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001680000026
Sacomano Neto M, do Carmo M J, Ribeiro E M S et al., 2020. Corporate ownership network in the automobile industry: owners, shareholders and passive investment funds. Research in Globalization, 2: 100016. doi: https://doi.org/10.10161/.resglo.2020.100016
Schmidt A, Ivanova A, Schäfer M S, 2013. Media attention for climate change around the world: a comparative analysis of newspaper coverage in 27 countries. Global Environmental Change, 23(3): 1233–1248. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.07.020
Sick N, Nienaber A M, Liesenkötter B et al., 2016. The legend about sailing ship effects: is it true or false? The example of cleaner propulsion technologies diffusion in the automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 137: 405–413. doi: https://doi.org/10.10161/./clepro.2016.07.083
Sperling D, Gordon D, 2010. Two Billion Cars: Driving Toward Sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Storper M, Venables A J, 2004. Buzz: face-to-face contact and the urban economy. Journal of Economic Geography, 4(4): 331–370. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jnlecg/lbh027
Stucki T, 2019. Which firms benefit from investments in green energy technologies? The effect of energy costs. Research Policy, 48(3): 346–333. doi: https://doi.org/10.10161/.respol.2018.09.010
Sturgeon T, Van Biesebroeck J, Gereffi G, 2008. Value chains, networks and clusters: reframing the global automotive industry. Journal of Economic Geography, 8(3): 297–321. doi: https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbn007
Tambe P, Hitt L M, 2014. Measuring information technology spillovers. Information Systems Research, 23(1): 1–203. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/isre.2013.0498
Tsai W, 2002. Social structure of ‘coopetition’ within a multiunit organization: coordination, competition, and intraorganizational knowledge sharing. Organization Science, 13(2): 179–190. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.13.2.179.336
Turner K L, Makhija M V, 2006. The role of organizational controls in managing knowledge. Academy of Management Review, 31(1): 197–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.5463/amr.2006.19379631
Wang L W, Jin J L, Banister D, 2019. Resources, state ownership and innovation capability: evidence from Chinese automakers. Creativity and Innovation Management, 28(2): 203–217. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/caim.12303
Wen H, Zhang Q G, Zhu S J et al., 2021. Inter- and inti-city networks: how networks are shaping China’s film industry. Regional Studies, 33(3): 333–343. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2020.1807492
Wesseling J H, Faber J, Hekkert M P, 2014. How competitive forces sustain electric vehicle development. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 81: 134–164. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2013.02.003
Wesseling J H, Niesten E M M I, Faber J et al., 2013. Business strategies of incumbents in the market for electric vehicles: opportunities and incentives for sustainable innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 24(6): 318–331. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1834
Wu L, Jin F J, Hitt L M, 2018. Are all spillovers created equal? A network perspective on information technology labor movements. Management Science, 64(7): 2973–3486. doi: https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2017.2778
Wu T H, Ting P J L, Lin M C et al., 2022. Corporate ownership and firm performance: a mediating role of innovation efficiency. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 31(4): 292–319. doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/10438399.2020.1799140
Wu Y Q, Li C J, Zhang Q Q, 2017. The analysis of transdisciplinary integration characteristic for China’s pure electric vehicles technology from patent perspective. Energy Procedia, 103: 2478–2483. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.03.717
Wu Y W, Gu F, Ji Y J et al., 2020. Technological capability, eco-innovation performance, and cooperative R&D strategy in new energy vehicle industry: evidence from listed companies in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 261: 121137. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.121137
Yang B F, Zhu S J, 2022. Public funds in high-tech industries: a blessing or a curse. Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, 83: 101037. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.seps.2021.101037
Yeung H W C, 2003. The firm as social networks: an organisational perspective. Growth and Change, 36(3): 307–328. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.146852237.2003.00279.x
Yiu D, Bruton G D, Lu Y, 2003. Understanding business group performance in an emerging economy: acquiring resources and capabilities in order to prosper. Journal of Management Studies, 42(1): 183–206. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.146756486.2003.00493.x
Zhang D Y, Rong Z, Ji Q, 2019a. Green innovation and firm performance: evidence from listed companies in China. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 144: 48–33. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resconrec.2019.01.023
Zhang F, Jiang G H, Cantwell J A, 2019b. Geographically dispersed technological capability building and MNC innovative performance: the role of intra-firm flows of newly absorbed knowledge. Journal of International Management, 23(3): 100669. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2019.04.002
Zhang X, Ma X F, Wang Y et al., 2016. What drives the intenationalization of Chinese SMEs? The joint effects of international entrepreneurship characteristics, network ties, and firm ownership. International Business Review, 23(2): 322–334. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2013.09.001
Zhao X, Doering O C, Tyner W E, 2013. The economic competitiveness and emissions of battery electric vehicles in China. Applied Energy, 136: 666–673. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2013.07.063
Zhou K Z, Gao G Y, Zhao H X, 2017. State ownership and firm innovation in China: an integrated view of institutional and efficiency logics. Administrative Science Quarterly, 62(2): 373–404. doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0001839216674437
Zook M A, 2004. The knowledge brokers: venture capitalists, tacit knowledge and regional development. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 28(3): 621–641. doi: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.030951317.2004.00340.x
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Both authors contributed to the study conception and design. JIN Zerun: methodology, software, writing-original draft; ZHU Shengjun: writing-review and editing, conceptualization, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Foundation item: Under the auspices of Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 42122006, 41971154)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Jin, Z., Zhu, S. Innovation and Firm Co-ownership Network in China’s Electric Vehicle Industry. Chin. Geogr. Sci. 34, 195–209 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-023-1403-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11769-023-1403-8