Abstract
This exploration of the works of various authors and artists will bring us to a philosophical contemplation of the portrait as a heterotopic space. On one hand, a portrait represents the faces of the self and others, embodying both individuality and collectivity. On the other hand, the space within the conventional frame of a portrait transforms from a mere representation of documented reality to a co-constructed and reified form of expression. The article is divided in three parts. The first part sinks into Lotman’s epistemic groundwork on culture, space, and especially art as a founding philosophical and analytical reference and will also outline the relationship and difference between the semiophere and the facesphere. The second part focuses on establishing a relationship between the facesphere and the heterotopic idea of space and portrait genre. Here the article explores Michael Foucault’s thought in relation to heterotopic space, later proposed in association with the space of the portrait. The third part is devoted to establishing relationships between the theoretical background and the analysis of case studies belonging to the portrait genre selected from photographic works in “Living Pictures: Photography in Southeast Asia,” an exhibition at the National Gallery in Singapore. I will conclude with some brief considerations to summarize the path taken.
-
Research funding: This article results from a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program (Grant Agreement No. 819649-FACETS; PI: Massimo LEONE).
References
Barthes, Roland. 1980. La chambre claire. Note sur la photographie. Paris: Gallimard.Search in Google Scholar
Basso Fossali, Pierluigi & Maria Giulia Dondero. 2006. Semiotica della fotografia. Investigazioni teoriche e pratiche d’analisi. Rimini: Guaraldi.Search in Google Scholar
Finol, José Henrique. 2015. La corposfera: Antropo-semiótica de las cartografías del cuerpo. Maracaibo: Laboratorio de Investigaciones Semióticas y Antropológicas.Search in Google Scholar
Fontcuberta, Joan. 2018. La furia delle immagini. Note sulla postfotografia. Turin: Einaudi.Search in Google Scholar
Foucault, Michel. 1984. Of other spaces: Utopias and heterotopias. Architecture/Mouvement/Continuité 5. 46–49.Search in Google Scholar
Leone, Massimo. 2021. Introduction: Studying the “facesphere”. Sign System Studies 49(3/4). 270–278. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2021.49.3-4.01.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 1996. Acerca de la semiosfera. In Semiosfera I, Desiderio Navarro (trans.), 10–25. Madrid: Ediciones Catedras.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 1998. Sobre el metalenguaje de las descripciones tipológicas de la cultura. In Semiosfera II, Desiderio Navarro (trans.), 65–87. Madrid: Ediciones Catedras.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. 2011. The place of art among other modelling systems. Sign Systems Studies 39(2/4). 249–270. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2011.39.2-4.10.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Juri M. & Boris A. Uspenskj. 2019. Cultural memory. In Juri Lotman & Marek Tamm (eds.), Culture, memory and history, Brian James Baer (trans.), 139–148. Gewerbestrasse: Palgrave Macmillan.10.1007/978-3-030-14710-5_10Search in Google Scholar
Vilém, Flusser. 1983. Towards a philosophy of photography. London: Reaktion.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston