Abstract
The article proposes a re-examination of the role and position of the so-called “Disney villains” within the narrative framework of animated films and popular culture as a whole. In the first part, the historical evolution in the representation of these villains will be explored according to the practice of “queer coding,” which involves attributing stereotypically queer traits to them without explicitly stating their gender and sexual identity. It will be observed how their non-conforming gender and sexuality, used to mark their moral deviance, challenge and defy dominant gender and narrative norms. It is precisely through their queer performance and camp aesthetic that “evil stepmothers,” “sissy-villains,” and “drag-queen-like” sea witches can emancipate themselves from their traditional roles as antagonists (narrative level) and as social outcasts (discursive level) to seize the spotlight through the screen (manifest surface). This study combines tools of Greimasian text analysis, including the canonical narrative schema and the generative trajectory of meaning, with Lotman’s theory and notion of “semiosphere,” to investigate the centrality and criticality of these “quillains” within the heteronormative narrative framework and the broader cultural context. To capture (or being captured by) the queer aspect of these characters and their stories, the invitation is to look at their visage not as a coded symbol of an underlying identity and truth, but as an image that exceeds any defined meaning thanks to its iconic power.
-
Research funding: This publication results from a project that has received funding from the European Research Council (ERC) under the European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme (grant agreement No. 819649 – FACETS).
References
Alexandrov, Vladimir. 2000. Biology, semiosis, and cultural difference in Lotman’s semiosphere. Comparative Literature 52(4). 339–362. https://doi.org/10.1215/-52-4-339.Search in Google Scholar
Baudrillard, Jean. 1990. La transparence du mal. Paris: Galilée.Search in Google Scholar
Bell, Elizabeth, Linda Haas & Laura Sells. 1995. Introduction: Walt’s in the movies. In Elizabeth Bell, Linda Haas & Laura Sells (eds.), From mouse to mermaid: The politics of film, gender, and culture, 1–17. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Benshoff, Harry M. & Sean Griffin. 2006. Queer images: A history of gay and lesbian film in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Search in Google Scholar
Brown, Adelia. 2021. Hook, Ursula, and Elsa: Disney and queer-coding from the 1950s to the 2010s. The Macksey Journal 2. 1–15.Search in Google Scholar
Butler, Judith. 2004. Imitation and gender insubordination. In Sara Salih & Judith Butler (eds.), The Judith Butler reader, 119–137. Malden, MA: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Davis, Amy M. 2006. Good girls and wicked witches: Women in Disney’s feature animation. New Barnet: John Libbey.Search in Google Scholar
Doty, Alexander. 1993. There’s something queer here: Making things perfectly queer: Interpreting mass culture. Minneapolis, MN: University of Minnesota Press.Search in Google Scholar
Doty, Alexander. 2000. Flaming classics: Queering the film canon. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Dyer, Richard. 2002. The culture of queers. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Edelman, Lee. 2004. No future: Queer theory and the death drive. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822385981Search in Google Scholar
Fontanille, Jacques. 2008. Pratiques sémiotiques. Paris: PUF.10.3917/puf.font.2008.01Search in Google Scholar
Footit, Allison K. 2013. Grotesque drag queens and toxic matriarchs: Motherhood and the subversive female body in Disney animated films. Mansfield: University of Connecticut Master’s thesis.Search in Google Scholar
Gherlone, Laura. 2013. Lotman’s epistemology: Analogy, culture, world. Sign Systems Studies 41(2–3). 312–338. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2013.41.2-3.09.Search in Google Scholar
Gherlone, Laura. 2015. La cultura come intreccio: Testo e testualità in Jurij Lotman. In Matteo Bertelé, Angela Bianco & Alessia Cavallaro (eds.), Le muse fanno il girotondo: Jurij Lotman e le arti, 51–59. Venice: Edizioni Ca’ Foscari.Search in Google Scholar
Gherlone, Laura, Remo Gramigna & Massimo Leone (eds.). 2022. Re-thinking Jurij Lotman in the twenty-first century. Special issue, Lexia, 39–40. Turin: Aracne.Search in Google Scholar
Greimas, Algirdas Julien. 1966. Sémantique structurale. Paris: Larousse.Search in Google Scholar
Griffin, Sean. 2011. Tinker belles and evil queens: The Walt Disney company from the inside out. New York: New York University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Halberstam, Judith. 2011. The queer art of failure. Durham, NC: Duke University Press.10.1215/9780822394358Search in Google Scholar
Johnston, Ollie & Frank Thomas. 1993. The Disney villain. New York: Hyperion.Search in Google Scholar
Kim, Koeun. 2017. Queer-coded villains (and why you should care). Dialogues@RU 2017. 156–165.Search in Google Scholar
Kristeva, Julia. 1982. Powers of horror: An essay on abjection. New York: Columbia University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Kull, Kalevi. 1999. Towards biosemiotics with Juri Lotman. Semiotica 127(1). 115–131.10.1515/semi.1999.127.1-4.115Search in Google Scholar
Li-Vollmer, Meredith & Mark E. LaPointe. 2003. Gender transgression and villainy in animated film, popular communication. International Journal of Media and Culture 1(2). 89–109. https://doi.org/10.1207/s15405710pc0102_2.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 1988. The semiotics of culture and the concept of a text. Soviet Psychology 26. 52–58. https://doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405260352.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 1990. Universe of the mind: A semiotic theory of culture. Indianapolis, IN: Indiana University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 2002. Umwelt and semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 30(1). 33–40. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2002.30.1.03.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 2005. On the semiosphere. Sign Systems Studies 33(1). 215–239. https://doi.org/10.12697/sss.2005.33.1.09.Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 2009. Culture and explosion. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.10.1515/9783110218473Search in Google Scholar
Lotman, Jurij. 2013. The unpredictable workings of culture. Tallinn: Tallinn University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Lumby, Catharine. 1998. Music and camp: Popular music performance in Priscilla and Muriel’s wedding. In Rebecca Coyle (ed.), Screen scores: Studies in contemporary Australian film music, 78–88. North Ryde: Australian Film Television & Radio School.Search in Google Scholar
Mallan, Kerry & Roderick McGillis. 2005. Between a frock and a hard place: Camp aesthetics and children’s culture. Canadian Review of American Studies 35(1). 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1353/crv.2006.0005.Search in Google Scholar
McLeod, Sheridan. 2016. Unmasking the quillain: Queerness and villainy in animated Disney films. Wollogong: University of Wollogong PhD dissertation.Search in Google Scholar
Medhurst, Andrew. 1994. Batman, deviance, and camp. In Sonia Maasin & Jack Solomon (eds.), Signs of life in the USA: Readings on popular culture for writers, 323–339. Boston, MA: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Search in Google Scholar
Meyer, Moe. 1994. Introduction: Reclaiming the discourse of camp. In Moe Meyer (ed.), The politics and poetics of camp, 1–22. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Mitchell, William John Thomas. 2005. What do pictures want?: The lives and loves of images. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.10.7208/chicago/9780226245904.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Propp, Vladimir. 1968. Morphology of the folktale. Austin, TX: University of Texas Press.Search in Google Scholar
Putnam, Amanda. 2013. Mean ladies: Transgendered villains in Disney films. In Johnson Cheu (ed.), Diversity in Disney films: Critical essays on race, ethnicity, gender, sexuality and disability, 147–162. Jefferson, NC: McFarland.Search in Google Scholar
Russo, Vito. 1987. The celluloid closet: Homosexuality in the movies. New York: Harper and Row.Search in Google Scholar
Russo, Mary. 1994. The female grotesque: Risk, excess, and modernity. London: Routledge.Search in Google Scholar
Sontag, Susan. 2000. Notes on “camp”. In Joyce Carol Oates & Robert Atwan (eds.), The best American essays of the century, 288–302. Boston, MA: Houghton Mifflin.Search in Google Scholar
Wellman, Nathalie S. 2020. Disney’s portrayal of women: An analysis of female villains and princesses. Concordia Journal of Communication Research 7(1). 3–20. https://doi.org/10.54416/seuy6814.Search in Google Scholar
West, Candace & Don H. Zimmerman. 1987. Doing gender. Gender & Society 1. 125–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0891243287001002002.Search in Google Scholar
Zoylan, Suren. 2022. Semio-poiesis: On the emergence of the semiosphere within the biosphere. Lexia 39–40. 101–120.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
