Abstract
Tamarindus indica L. is a multipurpose monotypic agroforestry species, possessing numerous domestic and industrial applications. It grows naturally in subtropical and semi-arid tropical regions of the world. Sixteen quantitative traits of T. indica were used in this study to unravel the phenotypic diversity on a large scale (422 accessions sourced from 12 districts of 8 Indian states) using multivariate analysis. Significant difference between the provenances were recorded for all the traits (P < 0.001). In terms of total pod weight, shell weight, fiber weight, pulp weight, real pulp value, and seed weight, Karnataka outperformed the other states. There were strong positive associations between real value of pulp (RVP) and all pod size traits ranging from 0.37 to 0.93. Titratable acidity was found to have a significant positive relationship with pod size and pulp recovery (r = 0.513–0.742); sugar/acid ratio with seed percent (r = 0.718) and shell percent (r = 0.537). According to the principal component analysis (PCA), the first five principal components accumulated 98.61% of the variation. Morphological cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters with high diversity. A unique accession from Karnataka was selected by participatory breeding, enabling the farmer to establish a successful nursery and conserve the valuable genotype. Our study provides valuable information about phenotypic diversity, in situ evaluation, selection indices for plus trees and conservation of tamarind genetic resources in India.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Algabal AQAY, Papanna N, Ajay BC, Eid A (2012) Studies on genetic parameters and interrelationships for pulp yield and its attributes in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.). Intern J Plt Breed 6(1):65–69
Álvarez H, Limongi R, Peña G, Navarrete B, Zambrano E, Viera W (2019) Agro-morphological characterization" in situ" of Tamarindus indica L. in the dry forest of ecuador. Pertanika J Tropical Agri Sci 42(3):94–102
AOAC (2005) Official method of analysis, 18th edn. Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C.
Ayala-Silva T, Gubbuk H, Winterstein M, Mustiga G (2016) Pomological and physicochemical characterization of Tamarindus indica (tamarind) grown in Florida. J Agric Univ PR 100(2):141–154
Bhavani BPVSG, Nirmala Devi G, Lakshmi K, Lakshmi J (2021) Comparative evaluation study on the physicochemical composition of three different tamarind varieties. J Pharma Phytochem 10(1):60–66
Coates-Palgrave K (1988) Trees of Southern Africa-Tamarindus indica. LCS Striuk Publ Cape Town 10:278–279
Coombe BG (1987) Influence of temperature on composition and quality of grapes. Acta Hortic 206:23–35
Des Gachons CP, Leeuwen CV, Tominaga T, Soyer JP, Gaudillère JP, Dubourdieu D (2005) Influence of water and nitrogen deficit on fruit ripening and aroma potential of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc in field conditions. J Sci Food Agri 85(1):73–85
Diallo BO, Mckey D, Chevallier M, Joly HI, Hossaert-Mckey M (2008) Breeding system and pollination biology of the semidomesticated fruit tree, Tamarindus indica L. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Implications for fruit production, selective breeding, and conservation of genetic resources. Afr J Biotech 7(22):94–101
Divakara BN (2009) Variation and character association for various pulp biochemical traits in Tamarindus indica L. Indian Forester 135(1):99
Dokoozlian N, Peacock B, Luvisi D, Vasquez S (2000) Cultural practices for Crimson Seedless table grapes. Pub TB 16(00):4
El-Siddig KE, Gunasena HPM, Prasad BA, Pushpakumar DK, Ramana KVR, Vijayanand P (2006) Tamarind, Tamarindus indica; Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops: Southampton, UK
Fandohan AB, Assogbadjo AE, Kakaï RLG, Sinsin B, Van Damme P (2010) Impact of habitat type on the conservation status of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) populations in the W National Park of Benin. Fruits 65(1):11–19
Feungchan S, Yimsawat T, Chindaprasert S, Kitpowsong P (1996) Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Plant genetic resources in Thailand. Thai J Agri Sci 1(1):1–11
Food Data Central (2022) https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167763/nutrients. Accessed 24 Sep 22
Glicksman M (2020) Tamarind seed gum. In: Food hydrocolloids, CRC press, pp 191–202
Hasan SK, Salam A, Wahid MA (1978) A reinvestigation of tamarind fruit [Tamarindus indica]. Pak J Sci 1(1):10–16
Hazarika TK, Lalrinpui (2020) Studies on Genetic diversity and selection of elite germplasm of local Tamarind from Mizoram. India Indian J Hort 77(2):246
Iezzoni AF, Pritts MP (1991) Applications of principal component analysis to horticultural research. HortSci 26(4):334–338
Israel KS, Murthy C, Hosamani BPDR (2019) Value addition of tamarind products in Karnataka. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 8(6):726–730
Kanupriya C, Tripathi PC, Singh P, Venugopalan R, Radhika V (2019) Analysis of morphological, biochemical and molecular diversity in Karonda (Carissa carandas L.) germplasm. Fruits 74(3):130–140
Kanupriya C, Karunakaran G, Singh P (2020) A promising new tamarind selection-Lakshamana: linking biodiversity with livelihood. J Hort Sci 15(2):221–224
Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K (2014) Morphological characterization of Prunus scoparia using multivariate analysis. Plt Sys Evol 300(6):1361–1372
Khaing MM, Thu MK, Kyaw T, Tin T, Lwin T (2018) Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using tropical plants and their characterizations. Int J Sci Eng Res 9(8):1627–1725
Kliewer MW, Lider LA (1970) Effects of day temperature and light intensity on growth and composition of Vitis vinifera L. fruits. J Am Soc Hort Sci 95:766–769
Kulkarni RS, Gangaprasad S, Swamy GSK (1993) Tamarind: economically an important minor forest product. Minor Forest Prod News 3:6
Luan S, Chiang TY, Gong XUN (2006) High genetic diversity versus low genetic differentiation in Nouelia insignis (Asteraceae), a narrowly distributed and endemic species in China, revealed by ISSR fingerprinting. Annals Bot 98(3):583–589
Maia MCC, de Araújo LB, dos Santos Dias CT, de Oliveira LC, Vasconcelos LFL, de Carvalho Júnior JEV, Simeão M, Bastos YGM (2016) Selection of mango Rosa genotypes in a breeding population using the multivariate-biplot method. Ciência Rural 46:1689–1694
Mamathashree MN, Prakash BG, Fakrudin B (2022) Genetic variability for biochemical parameters among identified distinct genotypes of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) in niche areas of Karnataka. Pharma Innov J 11(3):2111–2118
Mignard P, Beguería S, Giménez R, Font I Forcada C, Reig G, Moreno MÁ (2022) Effect of genetics and climate on apple sugars and organic acids profiles. Agronomy 12(4):827
Mishra DS, Berwal MK, Singh A, Singh AK, Rao VA, Yadav V, Sharma BD (2022) Phenotypic diversity for fruit quality traits and bioactive compounds in red-fleshed guava: insights from multivariate analyses and machine learning algorithms. South Afr J Bot 149:591–603
Nagarajan B, Nicodemus A, Mandal AK, Verma RK, Gireesan K, Mahadevan NP (1998) Phenology and controlled pollination studies in Tamarind. Silvae Genetica 47(5):237–240
Okello J, Okullo JB, Eilu G, Nyeko P, Obua J (2017) Mineral composition of Tamarindus indica LINN (Tamarind) pulp and seeds from different agro-ecological zones of Uganda. Food Sci Nutr 5(5):959–966
Pareek OP, Awasthi OP (2002) Genetic resources of tamarind. Indian J Plant Gen Res 15(3):197–202
Prasad SG, Rajkumar SMH, Ravikumar RL, Angadi SG, Nagaraja TE, Shanthakumar G (2009) Genetic variability in pulp yield and morphological traits in a clonal seed orchard of plus trees of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.). My Forest 45:4411–4418
Praveenakumar R, Gopinath G, Shyamalamma S, Ramesh S, Vasundhara M, Chandre Gowda M (2020) Studies on phytochemical evaluation of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) genotypes prevailing in eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Ind J Pure App Biosci 8(5):320–324
Prohens J, Blanca JM, Nuez F (2005) Morphological and molecular variation in a collection of eggplants from a secondary center of diversity: implications for conservation and breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:54–63
Raut UA, Jadhav SB, Mahalle SP (2022) Character association studies in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) for yield and yield contributing characters. Pharma Innov J 11(11):973–982
Ruiz M, Vernooy R (2012) The custodians of biodiversity. Sharing access to and benefits of genetic resources. Earthscan from Abingdon, Routledge and Ottawa, International Development Research Centre. Available: https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/custodiansbiodiversity-sharing-access-and-benefitsgenetic-resources
Shanthi A (2003) Studies on variations and association in selected populations, plantations and clones in tamarind (Tamarindus indica Linn), Coimbatore, India: PhD Thesis Bharathiar University
Sharma DK, Aklade SA, Virdia HM (2015) Genetic variability in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) from south Gujarat. Curr Hort 3(2):43–46
Singh S, Singh AK (2005) Studies on variability in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) from Gujarat. Prog Hort 37:280–284
Skinner DZ, Bauchan GR, Auricht G, Hughes S (1999) A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Sci 39:1237–1242
Soloviev P, Niang TD, Gaye A, Totte A (2004) Variability of fruit physicochemical characters for three harvested woody species in Senegal: Adansonia digitata, Balanites aegyptiaca and Tamarindus indica [French]. Fruits 59:109–119
Sthapit B, Lamers HAH, Ramanatha Rao V (2016) Custodians of tropical fruit tree diversity: identifying and strengthening the role and rights of custodian farmers. In: Sthapit B et al (eds) Tropical fruit tree diversity: good practices for in situ and on-farm conservation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 67–79
Van den Bilcke N, Alaerts K, Ghaffaripour S, Simbo DJ, Samson R (2014) Physico-chemical properties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) fruits from Mali: selection of elite trees for domestication. Gen Res Crop Evo 61(2):537–553
Acknowledgements
We are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research for providing funding for this study. We are particularly grateful to Forest Department of Chhattisgarh and Karnataka, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (Hyderabad and Ranchi Centers), Krishi Vigyana Kendra of Aizawl, Mizoram; Koraput, Odisha; Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh and BAIF Development Research Foundation, Pune for their kind assistance in conducting effective surveys. We sincerely appreciate the reviewers for providing relevant and valuable comments
Funding
This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
CK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Data Curation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Reviewing, and Editing. PS: Methodology, Validation, Reviewing GK and DS: Germplasm collection and maintenance PK and RV: Data Curation, Supervision, Statistical analysis
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kanupriya, C., Karunakaran, G., Singh, P. et al. Phenotypic diversity in Tamarindus indica L. sourced from different provenances in India. Agroforest Syst 98, 477–490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00925-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00925-0