Skip to main content
Log in

Phenotypic diversity in Tamarindus indica L. sourced from different provenances in India

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tamarindus indica L. is a multipurpose monotypic agroforestry species, possessing numerous domestic and industrial applications. It grows naturally in subtropical and semi-arid tropical regions of the world. Sixteen quantitative traits of T. indica were used in this study to unravel the phenotypic diversity on a large scale (422 accessions sourced from 12 districts of 8 Indian states) using multivariate analysis. Significant difference between the provenances were recorded for all the traits (P < 0.001). In terms of total pod weight, shell weight, fiber weight, pulp weight, real pulp value, and seed weight, Karnataka outperformed the other states. There were strong positive associations between real value of pulp (RVP) and all pod size traits ranging from 0.37 to 0.93. Titratable acidity was found to have a significant positive relationship with pod size and pulp recovery (r = 0.513–0.742); sugar/acid ratio with seed percent (r = 0.718) and shell percent (r = 0.537). According to the principal component analysis (PCA), the first five principal components accumulated 98.61% of the variation. Morphological cluster analysis revealed four distinct clusters with high diversity. A unique accession from Karnataka was selected by participatory breeding, enabling the farmer to establish a successful nursery and conserve the valuable genotype. Our study provides valuable information about phenotypic diversity, in situ evaluation, selection indices for plus trees and conservation of tamarind genetic resources in India.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Algabal AQAY, Papanna N, Ajay BC, Eid A (2012) Studies on genetic parameters and interrelationships for pulp yield and its attributes in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.). Intern J Plt Breed 6(1):65–69

    Google Scholar 

  • Álvarez H, Limongi R, Peña G, Navarrete B, Zambrano E, Viera W (2019) Agro-morphological characterization" in situ" of Tamarindus indica L. in the dry forest of ecuador. Pertanika J Tropical Agri Sci 42(3):94–102

    Google Scholar 

  • AOAC (2005) Official method of analysis, 18th edn. Association of Officiating Analytical Chemists, Washington D.C.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ayala-Silva T, Gubbuk H, Winterstein M, Mustiga G (2016) Pomological and physicochemical characterization of Tamarindus indica (tamarind) grown in Florida. J Agric Univ PR 100(2):141–154

    Google Scholar 

  • Bhavani BPVSG, Nirmala Devi G, Lakshmi K, Lakshmi J (2021) Comparative evaluation study on the physicochemical composition of three different tamarind varieties. J Pharma Phytochem 10(1):60–66

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Coates-Palgrave K (1988) Trees of Southern Africa-Tamarindus indica. LCS Striuk Publ Cape Town 10:278–279

    Google Scholar 

  • Coombe BG (1987) Influence of temperature on composition and quality of grapes. Acta Hortic 206:23–35

    Google Scholar 

  • Des Gachons CP, Leeuwen CV, Tominaga T, Soyer JP, Gaudillère JP, Dubourdieu D (2005) Influence of water and nitrogen deficit on fruit ripening and aroma potential of Vitis vinifera L. cv. Sauvignon blanc in field conditions. J Sci Food Agri 85(1):73–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Diallo BO, Mckey D, Chevallier M, Joly HI, Hossaert-Mckey M (2008) Breeding system and pollination biology of the semidomesticated fruit tree, Tamarindus indica L. (Leguminosae: Caesalpinioideae): Implications for fruit production, selective breeding, and conservation of genetic resources. Afr J Biotech 7(22):94–101

    Google Scholar 

  • Divakara BN (2009) Variation and character association for various pulp biochemical traits in Tamarindus indica L. Indian Forester 135(1):99

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Dokoozlian N, Peacock B, Luvisi D, Vasquez S (2000) Cultural practices for Crimson Seedless table grapes. Pub TB 16(00):4

    Google Scholar 

  • El-Siddig KE, Gunasena HPM, Prasad BA, Pushpakumar DK, Ramana KVR, Vijayanand P (2006) Tamarind, Tamarindus indica; Southampton Centre for Underutilised Crops: Southampton, UK

  • Fandohan AB, Assogbadjo AE, Kakaï RLG, Sinsin B, Van Damme P (2010) Impact of habitat type on the conservation status of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) populations in the W National Park of Benin. Fruits 65(1):11–19

    Google Scholar 

  • Feungchan S, Yimsawat T, Chindaprasert S, Kitpowsong P (1996) Tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) Plant genetic resources in Thailand. Thai J Agri Sci 1(1):1–11

    Google Scholar 

  • Food Data Central (2022) https://fdc.nal.usda.gov/fdc-app.html#/food-details/167763/nutrients. Accessed 24 Sep 22

  • Glicksman M (2020) Tamarind seed gum. In: Food hydrocolloids, CRC press, pp 191–202

  • Hasan SK, Salam A, Wahid MA (1978) A reinvestigation of tamarind fruit [Tamarindus indica]. Pak J Sci 1(1):10–16

    Google Scholar 

  • Hazarika TK, Lalrinpui (2020) Studies on Genetic diversity and selection of elite germplasm of local Tamarind from Mizoram. India Indian J Hort 77(2):246

    Google Scholar 

  • Iezzoni AF, Pritts MP (1991) Applications of principal component analysis to horticultural research. HortSci 26(4):334–338

    Google Scholar 

  • Israel KS, Murthy C, Hosamani BPDR (2019) Value addition of tamarind products in Karnataka. J Pharmacogn Phytochem 8(6):726–730

    Google Scholar 

  • Kanupriya C, Tripathi PC, Singh P, Venugopalan R, Radhika V (2019) Analysis of morphological, biochemical and molecular diversity in Karonda (Carissa carandas L.) germplasm. Fruits 74(3):130–140

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kanupriya C, Karunakaran G, Singh P (2020) A promising new tamarind selection-Lakshamana: linking biodiversity with livelihood. J Hort Sci 15(2):221–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Khadivi-Khub A, Anjam K (2014) Morphological characterization of Prunus scoparia using multivariate analysis. Plt Sys Evol 300(6):1361–1372

    Google Scholar 

  • Khaing MM, Thu MK, Kyaw T, Tin T, Lwin T (2018) Green synthesis of zinc oxide nanoparticles using tropical plants and their characterizations. Int J Sci Eng Res 9(8):1627–1725

    Google Scholar 

  • Kliewer MW, Lider LA (1970) Effects of day temperature and light intensity on growth and composition of Vitis vinifera L. fruits. J Am Soc Hort Sci 95:766–769

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kulkarni RS, Gangaprasad S, Swamy GSK (1993) Tamarind: economically an important minor forest product. Minor Forest Prod News 3:6

    Google Scholar 

  • Luan S, Chiang TY, Gong XUN (2006) High genetic diversity versus low genetic differentiation in Nouelia insignis (Asteraceae), a narrowly distributed and endemic species in China, revealed by ISSR fingerprinting. Annals Bot 98(3):583–589

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Maia MCC, de Araújo LB, dos Santos Dias CT, de Oliveira LC, Vasconcelos LFL, de Carvalho Júnior JEV, Simeão M, Bastos YGM (2016) Selection of mango Rosa genotypes in a breeding population using the multivariate-biplot method. Ciência Rural 46:1689–1694

    Google Scholar 

  • Mamathashree MN, Prakash BG, Fakrudin B (2022) Genetic variability for biochemical parameters among identified distinct genotypes of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) in niche areas of Karnataka. Pharma Innov J 11(3):2111–2118

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mignard P, Beguería S, Giménez R, Font I Forcada C, Reig G, Moreno MÁ (2022) Effect of genetics and climate on apple sugars and organic acids profiles. Agronomy 12(4):827

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mishra DS, Berwal MK, Singh A, Singh AK, Rao VA, Yadav V, Sharma BD (2022) Phenotypic diversity for fruit quality traits and bioactive compounds in red-fleshed guava: insights from multivariate analyses and machine learning algorithms. South Afr J Bot 149:591–603

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Nagarajan B, Nicodemus A, Mandal AK, Verma RK, Gireesan K, Mahadevan NP (1998) Phenology and controlled pollination studies in Tamarind. Silvae Genetica 47(5):237–240

    Google Scholar 

  • Okello J, Okullo JB, Eilu G, Nyeko P, Obua J (2017) Mineral composition of Tamarindus indica LINN (Tamarind) pulp and seeds from different agro-ecological zones of Uganda. Food Sci Nutr 5(5):959–966

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Pareek OP, Awasthi OP (2002) Genetic resources of tamarind. Indian J Plant Gen Res 15(3):197–202

    Google Scholar 

  • Prasad SG, Rajkumar SMH, Ravikumar RL, Angadi SG, Nagaraja TE, Shanthakumar G (2009) Genetic variability in pulp yield and morphological traits in a clonal seed orchard of plus trees of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.). My Forest 45:4411–4418

    Google Scholar 

  • Praveenakumar R, Gopinath G, Shyamalamma S, Ramesh S, Vasundhara M, Chandre Gowda M (2020) Studies on phytochemical evaluation of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) genotypes prevailing in eastern dry zone of Karnataka. Ind J Pure App Biosci 8(5):320–324

    Google Scholar 

  • Prohens J, Blanca JM, Nuez F (2005) Morphological and molecular variation in a collection of eggplants from a secondary center of diversity: implications for conservation and breeding. J Am Soc Hortic Sci 130:54–63

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Raut UA, Jadhav SB, Mahalle SP (2022) Character association studies in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) for yield and yield contributing characters. Pharma Innov J 11(11):973–982

    Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz M, Vernooy R (2012) The custodians of biodiversity. Sharing access to and benefits of genetic resources. Earthscan from Abingdon, Routledge and Ottawa, International Development Research Centre. Available: https://www.idrc.ca/en/book/custodiansbiodiversity-sharing-access-and-benefitsgenetic-resources

  • Shanthi A (2003) Studies on variations and association in selected populations, plantations and clones in tamarind (Tamarindus indica Linn), Coimbatore, India: PhD Thesis Bharathiar University

  • Sharma DK, Aklade SA, Virdia HM (2015) Genetic variability in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) from south Gujarat. Curr Hort 3(2):43–46

    Google Scholar 

  • Singh S, Singh AK (2005) Studies on variability in tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) from Gujarat. Prog Hort 37:280–284

    Google Scholar 

  • Skinner DZ, Bauchan GR, Auricht G, Hughes S (1999) A method for the efficient management and utilization of large germplasm collections. Crop Sci 39:1237–1242

    Google Scholar 

  • Soloviev P, Niang TD, Gaye A, Totte A (2004) Variability of fruit physicochemical characters for three harvested woody species in Senegal: Adansonia digitata, Balanites aegyptiaca and Tamarindus indica [French]. Fruits 59:109–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Sthapit B, Lamers HAH, Ramanatha Rao V (2016) Custodians of tropical fruit tree diversity: identifying and strengthening the role and rights of custodian farmers. In: Sthapit B et al (eds) Tropical fruit tree diversity: good practices for in situ and on-farm conservation. Routledge, Abingdon, pp 67–79

    Google Scholar 

  • Van den Bilcke N, Alaerts K, Ghaffaripour S, Simbo DJ, Samson R (2014) Physico-chemical properties of tamarind (Tamarindus indica L.) fruits from Mali: selection of elite trees for domestication. Gen Res Crop Evo 61(2):537–553

    CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We are thankful to Indian Council of Agricultural Research and Director, Indian Institute of Horticultural Research for providing funding for this study. We are particularly grateful to Forest Department of Chhattisgarh and Karnataka, National Bureau of Plant Genetic Resources (Hyderabad and Ranchi Centers), Krishi Vigyana Kendra of Aizawl, Mizoram; Koraput, Odisha; Ratlam, Madhya Pradesh and BAIF Development Research Foundation, Pune for their kind assistance in conducting effective surveys. We sincerely appreciate the reviewers for providing relevant and valuable comments

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

CK: Conceptualization, Investigation, Formal analysis, Methodology, Visualization, Data Curation, Validation, Writing - original draft, Reviewing, and Editing. PS: Methodology, Validation, Reviewing GK and DS: Germplasm collection and maintenance PK and RV: Data Curation, Supervision, Statistical analysis

Corresponding author

Correspondence to C. Kanupriya.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 953 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kanupriya, C., Karunakaran, G., Singh, P. et al. Phenotypic diversity in Tamarindus indica L. sourced from different provenances in India. Agroforest Syst 98, 477–490 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00925-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00925-0

Keywords

Navigation