1932
0
  1. Home
  2. A-Z Publications
  3. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior
  4. Volume 11, 2024
  5. Article

Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior

Volume 11, 2024

Person-Centered Modeling: Techniques for Studying Associations Between People Rather than Variables

Abstract

The goal of person-centered methods is to identify subpopulations of individuals based on within-group similarity of data relative to between-group variability. In this article, we provide an overview of specific person-centered methods, thus shifting the attention from studying relations between variables to studying relations between people or entities of interest. Next, we present a selective and critical review of recent research utilizing person-centered modeling approaches, highlighting key trends in the organizational psychology and organizational behavior literature from both the methodological and the conceptual perspectives. Lastly, we conclude with reflections and recommendations, highlighting several areas that need careful consideration when conducting person-centered research.

Keyword(s): cluster analysis, growth mixture model, latent class, latent profile, mixture modeling, person-centered
Loading

Article metrics loading...

/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
2024-01-22
2024-04-27
Loading full text...

Full text loading...

/deliver/fulltext/organ/11/1/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646.html?itemId=/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646&mimeType=html&fmt=ahah

Literature Cited

  1. Achnak S, Vantilborgh T. 2021. Do individuals combine different coping strategies to manage their stress in the aftermath of psychological contract breach over time? A longitudinal study. J. Vocat. Behav. 131:103651
     [Google Scholar]
  2. Allport GW. 1921. Personality and character. Psychol. Bull. 18:9441–55
     [Google Scholar]
  3. Arabie P, Hubert L, De Soete G 1996. Clustering and Classification Singapore: World Sci.
  4. Auvinen E, Huhtala M, Kinnunen U, Tsupari H, Feldt T. 2020. Leader motivation as a building block for sustainable leader careers: the relationship between leadership motivation profiles and leader and follower outcomes. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103428
     [Google Scholar]
  5. Blustein DL, Perera HN, Diamonti AJ, Gutowski E, Meerkins T et al. 2020. The uncertain state of work in the U.S.: profiles of decent work and precarious work. J. Vocat. Behav. 122:103481
     [Google Scholar]
  6. Borsboom D, Deserno MK, Rhemtulla M, Epskamp S, Fried EI et al. 2021. Network analysis of multivariate data in psychological science. Nat. Rev. Methods Prim. 1:158
     [Google Scholar]
  7. Bouckenooghe D, Kanar A, Klehe U-C. 2022. A latent transition analysis examining the nature of and movement between career adaptability profiles. J. Vocat. Behav. 136:103728
     [Google Scholar]
  8. Bramble RJ, Duerk EK, Baltes BB. 2020. Finding the nuance in eldercare measurement: latent profiles of eldercare characteristics. J. Bus. Psychol. 35:129–43
     [Google Scholar]
  9. Bray BC, Lanza ST, Collins LM. 2010. Modeling relations among discrete developmental processes: a general approach to associative latent transition analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. 17:4541–69
     [Google Scholar]
  10. Campion ED, Csillag B. 2022. Multiple jobholding motivations and experiences: a typology and latent profile analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 107:81261–87 https://doi.org/10.1037/apl0000920
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  11. Carter NT, Lowery MR, Williamson Smith R, Conley KM, Harris AM et al. 2020. Understanding job satisfaction in the causal attitude network (CAN) model. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:9959–93
     [Google Scholar]
  12. Cattell R. 1944. A note on correlation clusters and cluster search methods. Psychometrika 9:169–84
     [Google Scholar]
  13. Cattell RB. 1946. Personality structure and measurement. I. The operational determination of trait unities. Br. J. Psychol. 36:88–102
     [Google Scholar]
  14. Chawla N, Gabriel AS, Rosen CC, Evans JB, Koopman J et al. 2021. A person-centered view of impression management, inauthenticity, and employee behavior. Pers. Psychol. 74:4657–91
     [Google Scholar]
  15. Chawla N, MacGowan RL, Gabriel AS, Podsakoff NP. 2020. Unplugging or staying connected? Examining the nature, antecedents, and consequences of profiles of daily recovery experiences. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:119–39
     [Google Scholar]
  16. Chen X, Morin AJ, Parker PD, Marsh HW. 2015. Developmental investigation of the domain-specific nature of the life satisfaction construct across the post-school transition. Dev. Psychol. 51:81074–85
     [Google Scholar]
  17. Choi J, Hong S. 2022. The impact of imposing equality constraints on residual variances across classes in regression mixture models. Front. Psychol. 12:736132
     [Google Scholar]
  18. Clark SL, Muthén B, Kaprio J, D'Onofrio BM, Viken R, Rose RJ. 2013. Models and strategies for factor mixture analysis: an example concerning the structure underlying psychological disorders. Struct. Equ. Model. 20:681–703
     [Google Scholar]
  19. Clatworthy J, Buick D, Hankins M, Weinman J, Horne R. 2005. The use and reporting of cluster analysis in health psychology: a review. Br. J. Health Psychol. 10:Pt. 3329–58
     [Google Scholar]
  20. Conner TS, Tennen H, Fleeson W, Barrett LF. 2009. Experience sampling methods: a modern idiographic approach to personality research. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 3:292–313
     [Google Scholar]
  21. Cruz M, Nagy N. 2022. Profiles in persistence: a latent profile analysis of multilevel coping strategies enacted among women in the sciences. J. Organ. Behav. In press. https://doi.org/10.1002/job.2657
    [Crossref] [Google Scholar]
  22. De Boeck P, Wilson M, Acton GS. 2005. A conceptual and psychometric framework for distinguishing categories and dimensions. Psychol. Rev. 112:1129–58
     [Google Scholar]
  23. Diallo TM, Morin AJ, Lu H. 2016. Impact of misspecifications of the latent variance-covariance and residual matrices on the class enumeration accuracy of growth mixture models. Struct. Equ. Model. 23:4507–31
     [Google Scholar]
  24. Diefendorff JM, Gabriel AS, Nolan MT, Yang J. 2019. Emotion regulation in the context of customer mistreatment and felt affect: an event-based profile approach. J. Appl. Psychol. 104:7965–83
     [Google Scholar]
  25. Duffy RD, Spurk D, Perez G, Kim HJ, Rosa AD. 2022. A latent profile analysis of perceiving and living a calling. J. Vocat. Behav. 134:103694
     [Google Scholar]
  26. Dziak JJ, Lanza ST, Tan X. 2014. Effect size, statistical power and sample size requirements for the bootstrap likelihood ratio test in latent class analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. 21:4534–52
     [Google Scholar]
  27. Edelsbrunner PA, Flaig M, Schneider M. 2023. A simulation study on latent transition analysis for examining profiles and trajectories in education: recommendations for fit statistics. J. Res. Educ. Eff. 16:2350–75
     [Google Scholar]
  28. Edmondson AC, McManus SE. 2007. Methodological fit in management field research. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:41246–64
     [Google Scholar]
  29. Ezugwu AE, Ikotun AM, Oyelade OO, Abualigah L, Agushaka JO et al. 2022. A comprehensive survey of clustering algorithms: state-of-the-art machine learning applications, taxonomy, challenges, and future research prospects. Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell. 110:104743
     [Google Scholar]
  30. Fan W, Moen P, Kelly EL, Hammer LB, Berkman LF. 2019. Job strain, time strain, and well-being: a longitudinal, person-centered approach in two industries. J. Vocat. Behav. 110:102–16
     [Google Scholar]
  31. Fernet C, Morin AJS, Austin S, Gagné M, Litalien D et al. 2020. Self-determination trajectories at work: a growth mixture analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 121:103473
     [Google Scholar]
  32. Finch WH, French BF. 2014. Multilevel latent class analysis: parametric and nonparametric models. J. Exp. Educ. 82:3307–33
     [Google Scholar]
  33. French KA, Allen TD, Hughes Miller M, Kim ES, Centeno G. 2020. Faculty time allocation in relation to work-family balance, job satisfaction, commitment, and turnover intentions. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103443
     [Google Scholar]
  34. Gabriel AS, Calderwood C, Bennett AA, Wong EM, Dahling JJ, Trougakos JP. 2019. Examining recovery experiences among working college students: a person-centered study. J. Vocat. Behav. 115:103329
     [Google Scholar]
  35. Gagnon É, Ratelle CF, Guay F, Duchesne S. 2019. Developmental trajectories of vocational exploration from adolescence to early adulthood: the role of parental need supporting behaviors. J. Vocat. Behav. 115:103338
     [Google Scholar]
  36. Garfield ZH, Hagen EH. 2020. Investigating evolutionary models of leadership among recently settled Ethiopian hunter-gatherers. Leadersh. Q. 31:2101290
     [Google Scholar]
  37. Gates KM, Lane ST, Varangis E, Giovanello K, Guiskewicz K. 2017. Unsupervised classification during time-series model building. Multivar. Behav. Res. 52:2129–48
     [Google Scholar]
  38. Gates KM, Molenaar PC. 2012. Group search algorithm recovers effective connectivity maps for individuals in homogeneous and heterogeneous samples. NeuroImage 63:1310–19
     [Google Scholar]
  39. Grosemans I, De Cuyper N. 2021. Career competencies in the transition from higher education to the labor market: examining developmental trajectories. J. Vocat. Behav. 128:103602
     [Google Scholar]
  40. Hancock AJ, Gellatly AR, Walsh MM, Arnold KA, Connelly CE. 2021. Good, bad, and ugly leadership patterns: implications for followers’ work-related and context-free outcomes. J. Manag. 49:2640–76
     [Google Scholar]
  41. He Y, Lee J, Huang Y, Yao X, Courtney TK. 2023. Error disclosure climate and safety climate trajectories: the mediating role of counterfactual sharing. J. Bus. Psychol. 38:907–24
     [Google Scholar]
  42. Hirschi A, Steiner R, Burmeister A, Johnston CS. 2020. A whole-life perspective of sustainable careers: the nature and consequences of nonwork orientations. J. Vocat. Behav. 117:103319
     [Google Scholar]
  43. Hofmans J, De Clercq B, Kuppens P, Verbeke L, Widiger TA. 2019. Testing the structure and process of personality using ambulatory assessment data: an overview of within-person and person-specific techniques. Psychol. Assess. 31:4432–43
     [Google Scholar]
  44. Hofmans J, Wille B, Schreurs B. 2020. Person-centered methods in vocational research. J. Vocat. Behav. 118:103398
     [Google Scholar]
  45. Hopwood CJ, Bleidorn W, Wright AGC. 2022. Connecting theory to methods in longitudinal research. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 17:3884–94
     [Google Scholar]
  46. Houle SA, Morin AJS, Fernet C, Vandenberghe C, Tóth-Királya I. 2020. A latent transition analysis investigating the nature, stability, antecedents, and outcomes of occupational commitment profiles for school principals. J. Vocat. Behav. 121:103460
     [Google Scholar]
  47. Howard MC, Hoffman ME. 2018. Variable-centered, person-centered, and person-specific approaches: where theory meets the method. Organ. Res. Methods 21:4846–76
     [Google Scholar]
  48. Huyghebaert-Zouaghi T, Morin AJS, Fernet C, Austin S, Gillet N. 2022. Longitudinal profiles of work-family interface: their individual and organizational predictors, personal and work outcomes, and implications for onsite and remote workers. J. Vocat. Behav. 134:103695
     [Google Scholar]
  49. Jung T, Wickrama KAS. 2008. An introduction to latent class growth analysis and growth mixture modeling. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Compass 2:1302–17
     [Google Scholar]
  50. Klug K, Drobnič S, Brockmann H. 2019. Trajectories of insecurity: young adults’ employment entry, health and well-being. J. Vocat. Behav. 115:103308
     [Google Scholar]
  51. Lazarsfeld PF 1950. The logical and mathematical foundation of latent structure analysis. Measurement and Prediction SA Stouffer, L Guttman, EA Suchman, PF Lazarsfeld, SA Star, JA Clausen 362–472 Princeton, NJ: Princeton Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  52. Liu S, Bamberger P, Wang M, Nahum-Shani I, Larimer M, Bacharach SB. 2023. Behavior change versus stability during the college-to-work transition: life course and the “stickiness” of alcohol misuse at career entry. Pers. Psychol. 76:3945–75
     [Google Scholar]
  53. Lo Y, Mendell NR, Rubin DB. 2001. Testing the number of components in a normal mixture. Biometrika 88:3767–78
     [Google Scholar]
  54. Lubke GH, Muthén B. 2005. Investigating population heterogeneity with factor mixture models. Psychol. Methods 10:21–39
     [Google Scholar]
  55. Lubke GH, Neale MC. 2006. Distinguishing between latent classes and continuous factors: resolution by maximum likelihood?. Multivar. Behav. Res. 41:4499–532
     [Google Scholar]
  56. Mäkikangas A, Schaufeli W. 2021. A person-centered investigation of two dominant job crafting theoretical frameworks and their work-related implications. J. Vocat. Behav. 131:103658
     [Google Scholar]
  57. Masyn KE. 2013. Latent class analysis and finite mixture modeling. The Oxford Handbook of Quantitative Methods: Statistical Analysis TD Little 551–611 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  58. McKay AS, Grimaldi EM, Sayre GM, Hoffman ME, Reimer RD, Mohammed S. 2020. Types of union participators over time: toward a person-centered and dynamic model of participation. Pers. Psychol. 73:2271–304
     [Google Scholar]
  59. McLachlan GJ, Peel D. 2000. Finite Mixture Models Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
  60. Meyer JP, Morin AJS. 2016. A person-centered approach to commitment research: theory, research, and methodology. J. Organ. Behav. 37:4584–612
     [Google Scholar]
  61. Meyer JP, Morin AJS, Rousseau V, Boudrias J-S, Brunelle E. 2021. Profiles of global and target-specific work commitments: why compatibility is better and how to achieve it. J. Vocat. Behav. 128:103588
     [Google Scholar]
  62. Molenaar PCM. 2004. A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 2:4201–18
     [Google Scholar]
  63. Morgan GB. 2014. Mixed mode latent class analysis: an examination of fit index performance for classification. Struct. Equ. Model. 22:176–86
     [Google Scholar]
  64. Morin AJS, Bujacz A, Gagné M. 2018. Person-centered methodologies in the organizational sciences: introduction to the feature topic. Organ. Res. Methods 21:4803–13
     [Google Scholar]
  65. Morin AJS, Litalien D. 2017. Webnote: Longitudinal Tests of Profile Similarity and Latent Transition Analyses. Montreal, Can.: Subst. Methodol. Synerg. Res. Lab.
  66. Morin AJS, Marsh HW. 2015. Disentangling shape from level effects in person-centered analyses: an illustration based on university teachers’ multidimensional profiles of effectiveness. Struct. Equ. Model. 22:139–59
     [Google Scholar]
  67. Morin AJS, McLarnon MJ, Litalien D. 2020. Mixture modeling for organizational behavior research. Handbook on the Temporal Dynamics of Organizational Behavior Y Griep, SD Hansen 351–79 Lodnon: Edward Elgar Publishing
     [Google Scholar]
  68. Morin AJS, Meyer JP, Creusier J, Biétry F. 2016. Multiple-group analysis of similarity in latent profile solutions. Organ. Res. Methods 19:2231–54
     [Google Scholar]
  69. Morin AJS, Wang JCK 2016. A gentle introduction to mixture modeling using physical fitness data. An Introduction to Intermediate and Advanced Statistical Analyses for Sport and Exercise Scientists N Ntoumanis, N Myers 183–210 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley
     [Google Scholar]
  70. Mühlenmeier M, Rigotti T, Baethge A, Vahle-Hinz T. 2022. The ups and downs of the week: a person-centered approach to the relationship between time pressure trajectories and well-being. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 27:3286–98
     [Google Scholar]
  71. Muthén BO. 2002. Beyond SEM: general latent variable modeling. Behaviormetrika 29:81–117
     [Google Scholar]
  72. Naranjo A, Shoss M, Gebben A, DiStaso M, Su S. 2021. When minor insecurities project large shadows: a profile analysis of cognitive and affective job insecurity. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 26:5421–36
     [Google Scholar]
  73. Nesselroade JR, Gerstorf D, Hardy SA, Ram N. 2007. Focus article: idiographic filters for psychological constructs. Meas. Interdiscip. Res. Perspect. 5:4217–35
     [Google Scholar]
  74. Nylund KL, Asparouhov T, Muthén BO. 2007. Deciding on the number of classes in latent class analysis and growth mixture modeling: a Monte Carlo simulation study. Struct. Equ. Model. 14:4535–69
     [Google Scholar]
  75. Nylund-Gibson K, Choi AY. 2018. Ten frequently asked questions about latent class analysis. Transl. Issues Psychol. Sci. 4:4440–61
     [Google Scholar]
  76. Nylund-Gibson K, Garber AC, Carter DB, Chan M, Arch DAN et al. 2023. Ten frequently asked questions about latent transition analysis. Psychol. Methods 28:284–300
     [Google Scholar]
  77. Nylund-Gibson K, Masyn KE. 2016. Covariates and mixture modeling: results of a simulation study exploring the impact of misspecified effects on class enumeration. Struct. Equ. Model. 23:6782–97
     [Google Scholar]
  78. Parker SL, Dawson N, Van den Broeck A, Sonnentag S, Neal A. 2021. Employee motivation profiles, energy levels, and approaches to sustaining energy: a two-wave latent-profile analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 131:103659
     [Google Scholar]
  79. Parmentier M, Dangoisse F, Zacher H, Pirsoul T. 2021. Anticipatory emotions at the prospect of the transition to higher education: a latent transition analysis. J. Vocat. Behav. 125:103543
     [Google Scholar]
  80. Peugh J, Fan X. 2012. How well does growth mixture modeling identify heterogeneous growth trajectories? A simulation study examining GMM's performance characteristics. Struct. Equ. Model. 19:2204–26
     [Google Scholar]
  81. Peugh J, Fan X. 2013. Modeling unobserved heterogeneity using latent profile analysis: a Monte Carlo simulation. Struct. Equ. Model. 20:4616–39
     [Google Scholar]
  82. Poirier L-AC, Morin AJS, Boudrias J-S. 2017. On the merits of coherent leadership empowerment behaviors: a mixture regression approach. J. Vocat. Behav. 103:Pt. B66–75
     [Google Scholar]
  83. Qi M, Liu Z, Kong Y, Yang Z. 2022. The influence of identity faultlines on employees’ team commitment: the moderating role of inclusive leadership and team identification. J. Bus. Psychol. 37:1299–311
     [Google Scholar]
  84. Ram N, Grimm KJ. 2009. Growth mixture modeling: a method for identifying differences in longitudinal change among unobserved groups. Int. J. Behav. Dev. 33:6565–76
     [Google Scholar]
  85. Reknes I, Notelaers G, Iliescu D, Einarsen SV. 2021. The influence of target personality in the development of workplace bullying. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 26:4291–303
     [Google Scholar]
  86. Renner K-H, Klee S, von Oertzen T. 2020. Bringing back the person into behavioural personality science using Big Data. Eur. J. Pers. 34:5670–86
     [Google Scholar]
  87. Revelle W, Wilt J, Condon DM. 2011. Individual differences and differential psychology: a brief history and prospect. The Wiley-Blackwell Handbook of Individual Differences T Chamorro-Premuzic, S von Stumm, A Furnham 3–38 Hoboken, NJ: Wiley-Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  88. Rodríguez-Muñoz A, Antino M, Ruiz-Zorrilla P, Sanz-Vergel AI, Bakker AB. 2020. Short-term trajectories of workplace bullying and its impact on strain: a latent class growth modeling approach. J. Occup. Health Psychol. 25:5345–56
     [Google Scholar]
  89. Salter NP, Sawyer K, Gebhardt ST. 2021. How does intersectionality impact work attitudes? The effect of layered group memberships in a field sample. J. Bus. Psychol. 36:61035–52
     [Google Scholar]
  90. Schmiege SJ, Masyn KE, Bryan AD. 2018. Confirmatory latent class analysis: illustrations of empirically driven and theoretically driven model constraints. Organ. Res. Methods 21:4983–1001
     [Google Scholar]
  91. Shimizu AB, Dik BJ, Conner BT. 2019. Conceptualizing calling: cluster and taxometric analyses. J. Vocat. Behav. 82:3176–87
     [Google Scholar]
  92. Shipp AJ, Gabriel AS, Lambert LS. 2022. Profiles in time: understanding the nature and outcomes of profiles of temporal focus. J. Appl. Psychol. 107:91640–54
     [Google Scholar]
  93. Shockley KM, Clark MA, Dodd H, King EB. 2021. Work-family strategies during COVID-19: examining gender dynamics among dual-earner couples with young children. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:15–28
     [Google Scholar]
  94. Shockley KM, Gabriel AS, Yuan Z. 2022. Profiles of attribution for work-family conflict episodes and their relation to negative emotions. J. Organ. Behav. 43:4643–61
     [Google Scholar]
  95. Slaughter JE, Gabriel AS, Ganster ML, Vaziri H, MacGowan RL. 2021. Getting worse or getting better? Understanding the antecedents and consequences of emotion profile transitions during COVID-19-induced organizational crisis. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:81118–36
     [Google Scholar]
  96. Swanson SA, Lindenberg K, Bauer S, Crosby RD. 2012. A Monte Carlo investigation of factors influencing latent class analysis: an application to eating disorder research. Int. J. Eating Disord. 45:5677–84
     [Google Scholar]
  97. Takeuchi R, Li Y, Wang M. 2019. Expatriates’ performance profiles: examining the effects of work experiences on the longitudinal change patterns. J. Manag. 45:2451–75
     [Google Scholar]
  98. Tan P-N, Steinbach M, Karpatne A, Kumar V. 2019. Introduction to Data Mining New York: Pearson
  99. Tay L, Diener E, Drasgow F, Vermunt JK. 2011. Multilevel mixed-measurement IRT analysis: an explication and application to self-reported emotions across the world. Organ. Res. Methods 14:1177–207
     [Google Scholar]
  100. Tein JY, Coxe S, Cham H. 2013. Statistical power to detect the correct number of classes in latent profile analysis. Struct. Equ. Model. 20:4640–57
     [Google Scholar]
  101. Tofighi D, Enders C. 2008. Identifying the correct number of classes in growth mixture models. Advances in Latent Variable Mixture Models GR Hancock, KM Samuelsen 317–41 Charlotte, NC: Inf. Age
     [Google Scholar]
  102. Tordera N, Peiró JM, Ayala Y, Villajos E, Truxillo D. 2020. The lagged influence of organizations’ human resources practices on employees’ career sustainability: the moderating role of age. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103444
     [Google Scholar]
  103. van de Brake HJ, Berger S. 2023. Can I leave my hat on? A cross-level study of multiple team membership role separation. Pers. Psychol. 76:1221–48
     [Google Scholar]
  104. Vaziri H, Casper WJ, Wayne JH, Matthews RA. 2020. Changes to the work-family interface during the COVID-19 pandemic: examining predictors and implications using latent transition analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 105:101073–87
     [Google Scholar]
  105. Vermunt JK. 2003. Multilevel latent class models. Sociol. Methodol. 33:1213–39
     [Google Scholar]
  106. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. 2002. Latent class cluster analysis. Applied Latent Class Analysis J Hagenaars A McCutcheon 89–106 Cambridge, UK: Cambridge Univ. Press
     [Google Scholar]
  107. Vermunt JK, Magidson J. 2004. Local independence. The SAGE Encyclopedia of Social Science Research Methods MS Lewis-Beck, A Bryman, TF Liao 732–33 London: Sage
     [Google Scholar]
  108. Wang M. 2007. Profiling retirees in the retirement transition and adjustment process: examining the longitudinal change patterns of retirees' psychological well-being. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:2455–74
     [Google Scholar]
  109. Wedel M, DeSarbo WS 1994. A review of recent developments in latent class regression models. Advanced Methods of Marketing Research RP Bagozzi 352–88 Cambridge, UK: Blackwell
     [Google Scholar]
  110. Wedel M, DeSarbo WS. 1995. A mixture likelihood approach for generalized linear models. J. Classif. 12:21–55
     [Google Scholar]
  111. Weiss H, Rupp D. 2011. Experiencing work: an essay on a person-centric work psychology. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 4:183–97
     [Google Scholar]
  112. Woo SE, Jebb AT, Tay L, Parrigon S. 2018. Putting the “person” in the center: review and synthesis of person-centered approaches and methods in organizational science. Organ. Res. Methods 21:4814–45
     [Google Scholar]
  113. Wurpts IC, Geiser C. 2014. Is adding more indicators to a latent class analysis beneficial or detrimental? Results of a Monte-Carlo study. Front. Psychol. 5:920
     [Google Scholar]
  114. Zevon MA, Tellegen A. 1982. The structure of mood change: an idiographic/nomothetic analysis. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 43:1111–22
     [Google Scholar]
  115. Zhao P, Xu X, Peng Y, Matthews RA. 2020. Justice, support, commitment, and time are intertwined: a social exchange perspective. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103432
     [Google Scholar]
  116. Zhong R, Paluch RM, Shum V, Zatzick CD, Robinson SL. 2021. Hot, cold, or both? A person-centered perspective on death awareness during the COVID-19 pandemic. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:6839–55
     [Google Scholar]
  117. Zubin J. 1938. A technique for measuring like-mindedness. J. Abnorm. Soc. Psychol. 33:4508–16
     [Google Scholar]
  118. Zyphur MJ. 2009. When mindsets collide: switching analytical mindsets to advance organization science. Acad. Manag. Rev. 34:4677–88
     [Google Scholar]
  119. Zyphur MJ, Bonner CV, Tay L. 2023. Structural equation modeling in organizational research: the state of our science and some proposals for its future. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 10:495–517
     [Google Scholar]
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
Loading
Person-Centered Modeling: Techniques for Studying Associations Between People Rather than Variables
Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior 11, 453 (2024); https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
/content/journals/10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-110721-045646
Loading

Data & Media loading...

Supplemental Material

Supplementary Data

  • Article Type: Review Article

Most Cited Most Cited RSS feed

This is a required field
Please enter a valid email address
Approval was a Success
Invalid data
An Error Occurred
Approval was partially successful, following selected items could not be processed due to error