Research correspondence

DOI: 10.4244/EIJ-D-23-00051

Initial findings with the PATient experience in the CATH Lab (PATCATH) patient-reported experience metric

Sean Fitzgerald1,2, MB BCh; Hannah Wilson1,3, MSc, PhD, RGN; Maureen Brenan1,2, RGN; Himanshu Rai1,2, MSc, PhD; Nicoletta Begossi1,3, MSc; Nial Blake1, MB BCh; Hugh McCann1, MD; Gavin Blake1, MD; Róisín Colleran1,2, PhD, MB BCh; Colm G. Hanratty1, MD; Robert A. Byrne1,2, PhD, MB BCh

In recent years, increasing attention has been given to capturing, evaluating, and improving the patient experience in the cardiac catheterisation laboratory. To this end, the European PATient Experience in the CATHeterisation Laboratory (PATCATH) questionnaire (Supplementary Figure 1) was developed1. This is a novel tool, produced by the Patient Initiatives Committee of the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI), aiming to assess the patient’s experience of cardiac catheterisation. We report the initial experiences of using the tool in a high-volume tertiary referral centre.

The questionnaire was developed by the EAPCI in association with the European Society of Cardiology Patient Forum and divided into 3 domains, assessing experience before, during and after coronary angiography or intervention. Responses were recorded on a scale of strongly agree, agree, disagree, or strongly disagree. The questionnaires were distributed to patients attending the catheterisation lab for angiography or percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) during the time period of the pilot study. A research nurse distributed the questionnaire and explained the rationale for the study but did not assist the patient with completion of the questionnaire. Participation was anonymous and...

Sign in to read
the full article

Forgot your password?
No account yet?
Sign up for free!

Create my pcr account

Join us for free and access thousands of articles from EuroIntervention, as well as presentations, videos, cases from PCRonline.com

Volume 19 Number 10
Dec 4, 2023
Volume 19 Number 10
View full issue


Key metrics

On the same subject

10.4244/EIJV14I10A196 Nov 20, 2018
Patient Focus in Interventional Cardiology: the EAPCI Initiative
Baumbach A
free

Clinical Research

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00856 Jul 22, 2022
Trends and predictors of radiation exposure in percutaneous coronary intervention: the PROTECTION VIII study
Stocker TJ et al
free
Trending articles
338.63

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00904 Apr 1, 2022
Antiplatelet therapy after percutaneous coronary intervention
Angiolillo D et al
free
295.45

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00898 Sep 20, 2022
Intravascular ultrasound guidance for lower extremity arterial and venous interventions
Secemsky E et al
free
226.03

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00426 Dec 3, 2021
Myocardial infarction with non-obstructive coronary artery disease
Lindahl B et al
free
209.5

State-of-the-Art Review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-01034 Jun 3, 2022
Management of in-stent restenosis
Alfonso F et al
free
168.4

Expert review

10.4244/EIJ-D-21-00690 May 15, 2022
Crush techniques for percutaneous coronary intervention of bifurcation lesions
Moroni F et al
free
149.53

State-of-the-Art

10.4244/EIJ-D-22-00776 Apr 3, 2023
Computed tomographic angiography in coronary artery disease
Serruys PW et al
free
103.48

Expert consensus

10.4244/EIJ-E-22-00018 Dec 4, 2023
Definitions and Standardized Endpoints for Treatment of Coronary Bifurcations
Lunardi M et al
free
X

The Official Journal of EuroPCR and the European Association of Percutaneous Cardiovascular Interventions (EAPCI)

EuroPCR EAPCI
PCR ESC
Impact factor: 6.2
2022 Journal Citation Reports®
Science Edition (Clarivate Analytics, 2023)
Online ISSN 1969-6213 - Print ISSN 1774-024X
© 2005-2024 Europa Group - All rights reserved