Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The Possibilities of On-Board Gravimetric and Hydromagnetic Surveys in Solving Engineering-Geological Problems on the Shelf

  • Published:
Moscow University Geology Bulletin Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The possibilities of using on-board gravimetry and hydromagnetometry together with high-resolution seismic surveying in the framework of engineering-geological surveying in the Arctic shelf area of the Russian Federation are considered. The surveys were carried out in the southern part of the Kara Sea shelf in a study area of 25 km2 in order to identify potentially hazardous zones for setting up a floating drilling rig. The studies were carried out using a regular survey grid, consisting of 51 row and 26 secant profiles. The length of each profile was 5 km. The gravity surveys were performed with a Chekan-AM marine on-board gravimeter. The magnetometer surveys were conducted using SeaSPY 2 towed marine magnetometers. The dense survey grid, high-precision equipment, and field work procedure made it possible to obtain high accuracy of surveys: 0.14 mGal and 1.12 nT. The depth of research in engineering-geological surveying by the presented set of methods varied from the first hundred meters to 1 km. The long-term experience in engineering-geological surveys in the Arctic shelf area by personnel of Marine Arctic Exploration Expedition JSC shows that paleoincisons and paleovalleys are common hazards of a geological nature in this region. These structures are conventionally filled with weakly consolidated, often gas-saturated, sediments with inclusions of large-rock fragments. Paleoincisions clearly manifest themselves in the high-frequency component of the magnetic field; the local component of the anomalous magnetic field was calculated to detect them. As a result of complex interpretation of gravity field anomalies and magnetic survey data, a curved linear zone intersecting the entire study area has been localized. The identified anomalous zone is confined to the boundaries of the paleoincision, which was originally discovered according to the data of seismoacoustic studies. Based on the results of interpreting the magnetometer surveys, an area of negative magnetic anomalies was found in the eastern part of the study area. According to the materials of seismoacoustic studies, paleoincisions of a complex spatial and deep configuration are traced in this zone. It is noteworthy that these structures do not occur in the magnetic field. Based on the obtained values of the gravity field and seismoacoustic data, a seismic-density section of meridional strike was constructed across the entire area. As a result of 2D seismo-density modeling, the densities for the undercut paleoincision were selected and two decompacted areas were found at a depth of 200 m. The decompacted areas can be caused by the gas saturation of the sedimentary stratum and need to be considered in installing a floating drilling rig. The interpretation of the anomalous gravity field in the specified complex of geophysical methods with a priori geological information allows the prediction of the density structure of the study rock mass and provides recommendations for future research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.

REFERENCES

  1. Andreev, O.P., Kobylkin, D.N., Akhmedsafin, S.K., et al., Gravimetricheskii kontrol' razrabotki gazovykh i gazokondensatnykh mestorozhdenii. Sostoyanie, problemy, perspektivy (Gravimetric Control of Development of Gas and Gas Condensate Fields. Status, Problems, Prospects), Moscow: OOO “Izd. Dom Nedra,” 2012.

  2. Blokh, Yu.I., Teoreticheskie osnovy kompleksnoi magnitorazvedki (Theoretical Foundations of Integrated Magnetic Prospecting), Moscow, 2012.

    Google Scholar 

  3. Boyce, J.I. and Reinhardt, E.G., Marine magnetic survey of a submerged Roman Harbour, Caesarea Maritima, Israel, The Int. J. Nautical Archaeol., 2004, vol. 33, pp. 122–136.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bychkov, S.G., Genik, I.V., Prostolupov, G.V., and Shcherbinina, G.P., Modern gravimetric prospecting for oil and gas exploration, Geofizika, 2013, no. 5, pp. 42–45.

  5. Eiken, O., et al., Four decades of gravity monitoring of the Groningen: gas field, in First EAGE Workshop on Practical Reservoir Monitoring, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2017, 505-0030.

  6. Glaznev, V.N. and Yakuba, I.A., The thickness of the Earth’s crust in the territory of the Republic of the Niger based on the stochastic interpretation of the gravitational field, Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ. Ser.: Geol., 2020, no. 4, pp. 46–58.

  7. Gordin, V.M., Roze, E.N., and Uglov, B.D., Morskaya magnitometriya (Marine Magnetometry), Moscow: Nedra.

  8. Kochetov, M.V., Imitation modelling of differential hydromagnetic survey in stochastic environments, Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ. Ser. Geol., 2019, no. 3, pp. 99–103.

  9. Kochetov, M.V. and Zhuravlev, V.A., Optimization of the differential hydromagnetic survey, Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ. Ser. Geol., 2018, no. 2, pp. 127–131.

  10. Kolyubakin, A.A., Mironyuk, S.G., Roslyakov, A.G., et al., Application of the complex of geophysical methods to reveal dangerous geological processes and phenomena on the Laptev Sea, Inzh. Izysk., 2016, nos. 10–11, pp. 38–51.

  11. Kostitsyn, V.I., Metody povysheniya tochnosti i geologicheskoi effektivnosti detal 'noi gravirazvedki (Methods of Increasing the Accuracy and the Geological Efficiency of the Detailed Gravity Prospecting), Perm: Perm. Gos. Univ., 2002.

  12. Kozlov, S.A., Assessment of the stability of the geological environment in offshore hydrocarbon deposits in the Arctic, Neftegaz. Delo, 2005, no. 1.

  13. Krahenbuhl, R.A. and Li, Y., 4D gravity modeling: integrating seismic data with highly co nstrained gravity inversions for effective reservoir monitoring, in Proc. 12th Int. Congr. Brazilian Geophys. Soc., European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2011, 264-00072.

  14. Mironov, V.S., Kurs gravirazvedki: Uchebnoe posobie (A Course in Gravity Exploration. Textbook), Leningrad: Nedra. Leningrad. Otd., 1980.

  15. Nikitin, A.A. and Khmelevskoi, V.K., Kompleksirovanie geofizicheskikh metodov (Integration of Geophysical Methods), Tver: GERS, 2004.

  16. Novikov, K.V., Magnitorazvedka (The Magnetic Exploration), Moscow, 2013, Pt. 1.

  17. Peshekhonov, V.G., Stepanov, O.A., Avgustov, L.I., et al., Sovremennye metody i sreds tva izmereniya parametrov gravitatsionnogo polya Zemli (Modern Methods and Means for Measuring the Earth’s Gravity Field Parameters), Peshekhonov, V. G. and Stepanov O. A., Eds., St. Petersburg: GNTs RF. AO “Kontsern “TsNII "Elektropribor,” 2017.

  18. Ruiz, H., Lien, M., and Lindgard, J.E., 4D gravity and subsidence monitoring as cost-effective alternatives to 4D seismic, in EAGE Seabed Seismic Today: from Acquisition to Application, European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2020, no. 1, pp. 1–5.

  19. Semevskii, R.B., Averkiev, V.V., and Yarotskii, V.A., Spetsial’naya magnitometriya (Special Magnetometry), St. Petersburg: Nauka, 2002.

  20. Shepelev, A.A. and Zhilin, F.E., Comparison of processing results of magnetometric data using magnetic base station and gradiometer in offshore engineering survey, Engineering and Mining Geophysics. European Association of Geoscientists & Engineers, 2021, no. 1, pp. 1–7.

  21. Shepelev, A.A., Zhilin, F.E., and Demonov, A.P., Effectiveness of hydromagnetic gradiometric studies using a geomagnetic-variation station during engineering-geological surveys on the continental Arctic shelf, Eng. Surv., 2021, vol. 15, nos. 3–4, pp. 32–41.

    Google Scholar 

  22. SP (Code) 47.13330.2016: Engineering Research for Construction. Basic Provisions. Updated Version of SNIP 11-02-96.

  23. Starikov, V.S., Methods of geophysics engineering in the search for technogenic structures in shallow waters, Vestn. Voronezh. Gos. Univ. Ser. Geol., 2021, no. 1, pp. 75–81.

  24. Weiss, E., Ginzburg, B., Cohen, T.R., et al., High resolution marine magnetic survey of shallow water littoral area, Sensors, 2007, vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 1697–1712.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zhuravlev, V.A., On the issue of accuracy assessment of adjusted geophysical survey, in Sb. Dokl. Mezhd. Nauchn. shkoly-sem.: “Voprosy teorii i praktiki kompleksnoi geologicheskoi interpretatsii gravitatsionnykh, magnitnykh i elektricheskikh polei” (Proc. Int. Sci. School-Sem. “Problems in the Theory and Practice of Geological Interpretation of Gravity, Magnetic, and Electric Fields”), Ukhta: Izd. UGTU, 2000, pp. 57–62.

  26. Zhuravlev, V.A., Chelyshev, S.V., and Kochetov, M.V., A case study of Chekan gravimeter and development outlook for marine gravimetry at JSC MAGE, in Mater. 47-i sess. Mezhd. nauchn. sem. D.G. Uspenskogo–V.N. Strakhova “Voprosy teorii i praktiki geologicheskoi interpretatsii geofizicheskikh polei” (Proc. 48th D.G. Uspensky–V.N. Strakhov Sess. Int. Sci. Sem. “Problems of Theory and Practice of Geological Interpretation of Geophysical Fields”), Voronezh, 2020, pp. 124–127.

Download references

ACKNOWLEDGMENTS

We are grateful to Dr. Sci (Phys.–Math.) Prof. V.N. Glaznev and Cand. Sci. (Geol.-Mineral.) M.V. Kosnyreva for reviewing, conceptual recommendations, and productive discussion of the work results.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. JSC Marine Arctic Exploration Expedition, 121609, Moscow, Russia

    M. V. Kochetov, A. A. Shepelev & S. V. Chelyshev

  2. Moscow State University, 119991, Moscow, Russia

    A. A. Shepelev & S. V. Chelyshev

Authors
  1. M. V. Kochetov
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. A. A. Shepelev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. S. V. Chelyshev
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to M. V. Kochetov, A. A. Shepelev or S. V. Chelyshev.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by L. Mukhortova

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kochetov, M.V., Shepelev, A.A. & Chelyshev, S.V. The Possibilities of On-Board Gravimetric and Hydromagnetic Surveys in Solving Engineering-Geological Problems on the Shelf. Moscow Univ. Geol. Bull. 78, 531–540 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875223040087

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S0145875223040087

Search

Navigation