Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Equity, diversity, and…exclusion? A national mixed methods study of “belonging” in Canadian undergraduate medical education

  • Research
  • Published:
Advances in Health Sciences Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Equity, diversity, and inclusion remain a prominent focus in medical schools, yet the phenomenon of “belonging” has arguably been overlooked. Little is known regarding how belonging is experienced by medical students from groups that face systemic oppression and exclusion. We employed a sequential explanatory mixed methods design to explore how students from equity-deserving groups (EDGs) experience belonging during medical school, including those who are women, racialized, Indigenous, disabled, and 2SLGBTQIA+. First, we conducted a national cross-sectional survey of medical students (N = 480) measuring four constructs: belonging, imposter syndrome, burnout, and depression. Belonging scores were overall lower for students from EDGs and, more specifically, significantly lowest amongst racialized students. Structural equation models show that poor sense of belonging precedes imposter syndrome and further exacerbates burnout and depression. Next, we sampled and interviewed students (N = 16) from the EDG whose belonging scores were significantly lowest. Participants described the essence of belonging as being able to exist as one’s “true self” while emphasizing feelings of acceptance, comfort, and safety as well as being valued and seen as an equal - yet described how routine experiences of “othering” inhibited a sense of belonging, often due to differences in social identity and structural privilege. Poor sense of belonging negatively affected learners’ well-being and career trajectory. We illuminate the range of psychological and professional consequences associated with diminished sense of belonging and highlight the need to expand traditional notions of equity, diversity, and inclusion to consider structural barriers to belonging.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This project was funded by the Canadian Association for Medical Education Foundation through the 2022 Learner Health Professions Education Grant, and by the Office of Health and Medical Education at the University of Calgary through the 2021 Equity, Diversity & Inclusion Scholarship in Health and Medical Education Funding Competition. The authors also wish to thank the following medical students who pilot tested and translated the survey instrument: Santanna Hernandez, Tyler Warnock, Whitney Ereyi-Osas, Claire Connors, Ines Zuna, Jeremy Moreau.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. All statistical analysis and modelling were conducted by Allison Brown. Interviews were conducted by Priatharsini Sivananthajothy, Adibba Adel, Shima Afhami and Nina Castrogiovanni. Adibba Adel reviewed all transcripts for accuracy and to remove identifiable information. Initial analysis of qualitative data was conducted by Priatharsini Sivananthajothy, Adibba Adel, Shima Afhami, Nina Castrogiovanni, and Allison Brown. Subsequent analysis of qualitative data was led by Priatharsini Sivananthajothy, Adibba Adel, and Allison Brown. Figure 1 was prepared by AB. Figure 2 was prepared by PS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Priatharsini Sivananthajothy and Allison Brown, and all authors reviewed and commented on draft manuscripts. All authors read and approved the final manuscript. All authors meet the ICMJE criteria for authorship.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Allison Brown.

Ethics declarations

Competing interests

The authors declare no competing interests.

Ethics approval

Ethics approval was granted by the University of Calgary Conjoint Health Research Ethics Board [CHREB ID: 21-1076]. This study was performed in line with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki. Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Other disclosures

The authors recognize how language can be a tool to reclaim power and did their best to use inclusive language practices as they understood them at the time of writing this article. We use “equity-deserving groups” as a central term throughout to refer to medical students who share social identities and lived experiences with groups that are recognized in the Federal Employment Act of Canada.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sivananthajothy, P., Adel, A., Afhami, S. et al. Equity, diversity, and…exclusion? A national mixed methods study of “belonging” in Canadian undergraduate medical education. Adv in Health Sci Educ (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10265-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10459-023-10265-4

Keywords

Navigation