Skip to main content
Log in

Neighborhood satisfaction in large housing estates of Central and East European cities: insights from Novi Sad, Serbia

  • Article
  • Published:
Journal of Housing and the Built Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There is an extensive body of literature exploring the changes that large housing estates (LHE) in Central and East European (CEE) cities have undergone since the beginning of the post-socialist transition. Although some studies discussed residents’ satisfaction with the transformed neighborhood environment within these estates, analyzing differences at the national, CEE and pan-European levels, they have primarily focused on cities in fast-track reforming countries, leaving the non-EU context unexplored. In addition, more recent analyses are generally scarce, while little is known about how LHEs, particularly unrefurbished ones, compare to newer housing types of similar densities in these terms. The paper aims to contribute to filling these research gaps by investigating neighborhood satisfaction in two unrefurbished LHEs and one recently built residential district in Novi Sad, the second largest city in Serbia. The research data was collected from 162 structured ‘traditional’ (in-person) face-to-face interviews involving a Likert-type questionnaire supplemented with open-ended questions. It was processed in the SPSS 23.0 software package. ANOVA and Scheffe post-hoc tests were used to determine differences and Chronbach’s Alpha to measure internal consistency. Through a series of descriptive comparative analyses, the paper examines the variations in evaluations of specific neighborhood features and the correlation between residents’ satisfaction, their potential mobility and the housing market position of the studied areas. The research results indicate that the majority of LHE residents are satisfied with their neighborhood environment, live in the neighborhood of preference and do not feel ‘trapped’, while the situation in the newly built residential district is somewhat different, revealing the shortcomings of post-socialist urbanism. The concluding section discusses the research results against the backdrop of previous studies, questions the stability of neighborhood satisfaction in unrefurbished CEE LHEs, highlights the importance of regeneration, and proposes directions for future investigations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Source: GeoSrbija (https://a3.geosrbija.rs/). Liman II and Liman III

Fig. 2

Source: aerial view—GeoSrbija (https://a3.geosrbija.rs/); photos—authors

Fig. 3

Source: aerial view—GeoSrbija (https://a3.geosrbija.rs/); photos—authors

Fig. 4

Source: aerial view—GeoSrbija (https://a3.geosrbija.rs/); photos—PE Urbanizam (e) and authors

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Not applicable.

Code availability

Not applicable.

Notes

  1. “High enough that an elevator is required” (Wassenberg, 2018: 38).

  2. Restructuring Large Housing Estates in European Cities: Good Practices and New Visions for Sustainable Neighbourhoods and Cities, funded under Key Action 4 "City of Tomorrow and Cultural Heritage".

  3. Zakon o nadziđivanju zgrada i pretvaranju zajedničkih prostorija u stanove (Law on Superstructures and Conversion of Common Areas into Dwellings). Sl. glasnik RS, No. 46/94.

  4. Zakon stanovanju i održavanju zgrada (Law on Housing and Building Maintenance). Sl. glasnik RS, No. 104/2016 i 9/2020-dr. zakon.

  5. PE Informatika: Broj stanovnika po naseljima (Population by Settlements). Retrieved from https://www.nsinfo.co.rs/cyr/broj-stanovnika-po-naseljima (accessed 26 March 2023).

  6. Generalni urbanistički plan Novog Sada do 2005. godine; Sl. list Grada Novog Sada, No. 16/1985.

  7. Generalni plan Grada Novog Sada do 2021. godine; Sl. list Grada Novog Sada, No. 24/2000; Odluka o izmenama i dopunama Generalnog plana Grada Novog Sada do 2021. godine; Sl. List Grada Novog Sada, No. 10/2006.

  8. The final version of the questionnaire was developed after pilot testing that included 10 participants.

  9. Confidence level 90%; margin of error 10%.

  10. In relation to the targeted 70 respondents from each case study area, the response rate for Liman II and Liman III was 75.7% and for Grbavica 80% (77.1% in total).

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

The paper was written within the project “Innovative Approaches and Advancement of Processes and Methods in Higher Education in Architecture, Urbanism and Scene Design” of the Department of Architecture and Urban Planning (Faculty of Technical Sciences, University of Novi Sad, Serbia) and project No. 179037 of the Ministry of Education, Science and Technological Development of the Republic of Serbia.

Funding

The authors received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors have contributed to the study. Conceptualization: DN, MŠ, MMO & DP; Methodology: DN & MŠ; Statistical analysis: MMO; Formal analysis: DN & MŠ; Investigation: DN, MŠ & MMO; Survey: DN, MŠ, MMO & DP; Resources: DN, MŠ & DP; Writing—original draft: DN; Writing—review and editing: MŠ; Visualization: DP; Supervision: DN & MŠ; Revisions: DN, MŠ, MMO & DP.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Dejana Nedučin.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Consent for publication

All respondents were informed that the survey data would be published and gave their consent.

Ethical approval

Not applicable.

Consent to participate

Respondents voluntarily participated in the survey. They were fully informed about the purpose of the survey and agreed to participate. The research did not use any identifiable information about the respondents.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendices

Appendix

Appendix 1 Questionnaire

figure a

Appendix 2

See Table 7.

Table 7 Age and gender structure of the sample and population of Novi Sad proper (%)

Appendix 3

See Table 8.

Table 8 Differences in the satisfaction with particular features of the neighborhood physical environment (Scheffe post-hoc test)

Appendix 4

See Table 9.

Table 9 Differences in the satisfaction with particular features of the neighborhood social environment (Scheffe post-hoc test)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nedučin, D., Škorić, M., Marić Ognjenović, M. et al. Neighborhood satisfaction in large housing estates of Central and East European cities: insights from Novi Sad, Serbia. J Hous and the Built Environ 39, 413–451 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10079-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10901-023-10079-1

Keywords

Navigation