Skip to main content
Log in

Assessing Spatial Stationarity and Segmenting Spatial Processes into Stationary Components

  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural, Biological and Environmental Statistics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this research, we propose a novel technique for visualizing nonstationarity in geostatistics, particularly when confronted with a single realization of data at irregularly spaced locations. Our method hinges on formulating a statistic that tracks a stable microergodic parameter of the exponential covariance function, allowing us to address the intricate challenges of nonstationary processes that lack repeated measurements. We implement the fused lasso technique to elucidate nonstationary patterns at various resolutions. For prediction purposes, we segment the spatial domain into stationary sub-regions via Voronoi tessellations. Additionally, we devise a robust test for stationarity based on contrasting the sample means of our proposed statistics between two selected Voronoi subregions. The effectiveness of our method is demonstrated through simulation studies and its application to a precipitation dataset in Colorado. Supplementary materials accompanying this paper appear online.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Algorithm 1
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anselin L (1995) Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geogr Anal 27:93–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bandyopadhyay S, Rao SS (2017) A test for stationarity for irregularly spaced spatial data. J R Stat Soc Ser B 79:95–123

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Cressie N, Hawkins DM (1980) Robust estimation of the variogram: I. Math Geol 12:115–125

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Fuentes M (2005) A formal test for non-stationarity of spatial stochastic processes. J Multivar Anal 96:30–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guinness J, Fuentes M (2015) Likelihood approximations for big nonstationary spatial temporal lattice data. Stat Sin 25:329–349

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Jun M, Genton M (2012) A test for stationarity of spatio-temporal random fields on planar and spherical domains. Stat Sin 22:1737–1764

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Matérn B (1986) Spatial variation, 2nd edn. Springer-Verlag, Berlin

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Muyskens A, Guinness J, Fuentes M (2022) Partition-based nonstationary covariance estimation using the stochastic score approximation. J Comput Graph Stat 31:1025–1036

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Paciorek CJ, Schervish MJ (2006) Spatial modelling using a new class of nonstationary covariance functions. Environmetrics 17:483–506

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Qadir GA, Sun Y, Kurtek S (2021) Estimation of spatial deformation for nonstationary processes via variogram alignment. Technometrics 63:548–561

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Rand WM (1971) Objective criteria for the evaluation of clustering methods. J Am Stat Assoc 66:846–850

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwarz G (1978) Estimating the dimension of a model. Ann Stat 6:461–464

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Tibshirani R, Saunders M, Rosset S, Zhu J, Knight K (2005) Sparsity and smoothness via the fused lasso. J Roy Stat Soc B 67:91–108

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Voronoi G (1908) Nouvelles applications des paramètres continus à la théorie des formes quadratiques. Premier mémoire. Sur quelques propriétés des formes quadratiques positives parfaites. J Für die reine Angewandte Mathematik (Crelles Journal) 1908:97–102

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang H (2004) Inconsistent estimation and asymptotically equal interpolations in model-based geostatistics. J Am Stat Assoc 99:250–261

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Hsin-Cheng Huang’s research was supported by Academia Sinica Investigator Award AS-IA-109-M05 and ROC National Science and Technology Council grant 111- 2118-M-001-011-MY3. ShengLi Tzeng’s research was supported by ROC National Science and Technology Council grant 110-2628-M-110-001-MY3. The authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hsin-Cheng Huang.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file 1 (zip 10 KB)

Appendix A

Appendix A

This section contains Figs. 7, 8, 9 and 10 showing the distributions of p-values for diverse scenarios under the null hypothesis \(H_0\), as discussed in Sect. 4.1.

Fig. 7
figure 7

The distributions of p-values under \(H_0\) for various scenarios with \(\tau ^2=0\) under a uniform sampling design

Fig. 8
figure 8

The distributions of p-values under \(H_0\) for various scenarios with \(\tau ^2=0.01\) under a uniform sampling design

Fig. 9
figure 9

The distributions of p-values under \(H_0\) for various scenarios with \(\tau ^2=0\) under a clustered sampling design

Fig. 10
figure 10

The distributions of p-values under \(H_0\) for various scenarios with \(\tau ^2=0.01\) under a clustered sampling design

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tzeng, S., Chen, BY. & Huang, HC. Assessing Spatial Stationarity and Segmenting Spatial Processes into Stationary Components. JABES 29, 301–319 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00588-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13253-023-00588-5

Keywords

Navigation