Challenges in the New Economy: A New Era for Work Design

Literature Cited

1. Achdut N, Stier H. 2021. The role of monetary and non-monetary job quality components in determining welfare exit. J. Soc. Policy 50:179–103
   [Google Scholar]
2. Bakker AB, Demerouti E, Sanz-Vergel A. 2023. Job demands–resources theory: ten years later. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 10:25–53
   [Google Scholar]
3. Baldwin RE. 2019. The Globotics Upheaval: Globalisation, Robotics, and the Future of Work London: Weidenfeld & Nicolson
4. Benach J, Vives A, Amable M, Vanroelen C, Tarafa G, Muntaner C. 2014. Precarious employment: understanding an emerging social determinant of health. Annu. Rev. Public Health 35:229–53
   [Google Scholar]
5. Bidadanure JU. 2019. The political theory of universal basic income. Annu. Rev. Political Sci. 22:481–501
   [Google Scholar]
6. Blustein DL, Lysova EI, Duffy RD. 2023. Understanding decent work and meaningful work. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 10:289–314
   [Google Scholar]
7. Brougham D, Haar J. 2018. Smart technology, artificial intelligence, robotics, and algorithms (STARA): employees’ perceptions of our future workplace. J. Manag. Organ. 24:2239–57
   [Google Scholar]
8. Browne I, Misra J. 2003. The intersection of gender and race in the labor market. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 29:487–513
   [Google Scholar]
9. Cadiz DM, Brady GM, Yaldiz LM, Zaniboni S, Truxillo DM. 2022. Age stereotypes do matter: looking through the lens of the attraction-selection-attrition model. Work Aging Retire. 8:4339–42
   [Google Scholar]
10. Campion MA, Fink AA, Ruggeberg BJ, Carr L, Phillips GM, Odman RB. 2011. Doing competencies well: best practices in competency modeling. Pers. Psychol. 64:1225–62
    [Google Scholar]
11. Carter KM, Hetrick AL, Chen M, Humphrey SE, Morgeson FP, Hoffman BJ. 2023. How culture shapes the influence of work design characteristics: a narrative and meta-analytic review. J. Manag. https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063231179405
    [Google Scholar]
12. Cascio WF, Montealegre R. 2016. How technology is changing work and organizations. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 3:349–75
    [Google Scholar]
13. Chancel L, Piketty T. 2021. Global income inequality, 1820–2020: the persistence and mutation of extreme inequality. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 19:63025–62
    [Google Scholar]
14. Charlesworth TES, Banaji MR. 2019. Patterns of implicit and explicit attitudes: long-term change and stability from 2007 to 2016. Psychol. Sci. 30:2174–92
    [Google Scholar]
15. Chavez LJ, Ornelas IJ, Lyles CR, Williams EC. 2015. Racial/ethnic workplace discrimination. Am. J. Prev. Med. 48:142–49
    [Google Scholar]
16. Cheng MM, Hackett RD. 2021. A critical review of algorithms in HRM: definition, theory, and practice. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 31:1100698
    [Google Scholar]
17. Christina S, Dainty A, Daniels K, Tregaskis O, Waterson P. 2017. Shut the fridge door! HRM alignment, job redesign and energy performance. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 27:3382–402
    [Google Scholar]
18. Cleveland JN, Shore LM, Anderson K, Huebner L-A, Sanchez D. 2018. Moving forward from inequality and discrimination: historical global perspectives. The Oxford Handbook of Workplace Discrimination AJ Colella, EB King 423–34 Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press
    [Google Scholar]
19. Corbière M, Zaniboni S, Lecomte T, Bond G, Gilles PY et al. 2011. Job acquisition for people with severe mental illness enrolled in supported employment programs: a theoretically grounded empirical study. J. Occup. Rehabil. 21:3342–54
    [Google Scholar]
20. Cortes P, Pan J. 2017. Cross-country evidence on the relationship between overwork and skilled women's job choices. Am. Econ. Rev. 107:5105–9
    [Google Scholar]
21. Daniels K, Gedikli C, Watson D, Semkina A, Vaughn O. 2017. Job design, employment practices and well-being: a systematic review of intervention studies. Ergonomics 60:91177–96
    [Google Scholar]
22. Di Stasio V, Larsen EN. 2020. The racialized and gendered workplace: applying an intersectional lens to a field experiment on hiring discrimination in five European labor markets. Soc. Psychol. Q. 83:3229–50
    [Google Scholar]
23. Diekman AB, Clark EK, Belanger AL. 2019. Finding common ground: synthesizing divergent theoretical views to promote women's STEM pursuits. Soc. Issues Policy Rev 13:1182–210
    [Google Scholar]
24. Dierdorff EC, Morgeson FP. 2013. Getting what the occupation gives: exploring multilevel links between work design and occupational values. Pers. Psychol. 66:3687–721
    [Google Scholar]
25. Duggan J, Sherman U, Carbery R, McDonnell A. 2020. Algorithmic management and app-work in the gig economy: a research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Hum. Resour. Manag. J. 30:1114–32
    [Google Scholar]
26. Ellemers N. 2018. Gender stereotypes. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 69:275–98
    [Google Scholar]
27. Fauzi MA, Kamaruzzaman ZA, Abdul Rahman H. 2022. Bibliometric review on human resources management and big data analytics. Int. J. Manpow. 44:71307–27
    [Google Scholar]
28. Fazi L, Zaniboni S, Estreder Y, Truxillo DM, Fraccaroli F. 2019. The role of age in the relationship between work social characteristics and job attitudes. J. Workplace Behav. Health 34:277–95
    [Google Scholar]
29. Fiske ST, Taylor SE. 2010. Social Cognition: From Brains to Culture London: SAGE
30. Flage A. 2019. Discrimination against gays and lesbians in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis. Int. J. Manpow. 41:6671–91
    [Google Scholar]
31. Fraccaroli F, Zaniboni S, Truxillo DM. 2017. Job design and older workers. Advanced Series in Management 17 Age Diversity in the Workplace S Profili, A Sammarra, L Innocenti 139–59 Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
32. Goos M, Manning A, Salomons A. 2014. Explaining job polarization: routine-biased technological change and offshoring. Am. Econ. Rev. 104:82509–26
    [Google Scholar]
33. Grant AM. 2007. Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial difference. Acad. Manag. Rev. 32:2393–417
    [Google Scholar]
34. Grant AM, Fried Y, Parker SK, Frese M. 2010. Putting job design in context: introduction to the special issue. J. Organ. Behav. 31:2/3145–57
    [Google Scholar]
35. Grote G, Guest D. 2017. The case for reinvigorating quality of working life research. Hum. Relat. 70:2149–67
    [Google Scholar]
36. Guest D, Knox A, Warhurst C. 2022. Humanizing work in the digital age: lessons from socio-technical systems and quality of working life initiatives. Hum. Relat. 75:81461–82
    [Google Scholar]
37. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1975. Development of the job diagnostic survey. J. Appl. Psychol. 60:2159–70
    [Google Scholar]
38. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1976. Motivation through the design of work: test of a theory. Organ. Behav. Hum. Perform. 16:2250–79
    [Google Scholar]
39. Hackman JR, Oldham GR. 1980. Work Redesign Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley
40. Hall EV, Hall AV, Galinsky AD, Phillips KW. 2019. MOSAIC: a model of stereotyping through associated and intersectional categories. Acad. Manag. Rev. 44:3643–72
    [Google Scholar]
41. Halonen JI, Mänty M, Pietiläinen O, Kujanpää T, Kanerva N et al. 2020. Physical working conditions and subsequent disability retirement due to any cause, mental disorders and musculoskeletal diseases: Does the risk vary by common mental disorders?. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 55:81021–29
    [Google Scholar]
42. Hertel G, Stone DL, Johnson RD, Passmore J 2017. The psychology of the Internet @ work. The Wiley Blackwell Handbook of the Psychology of the Internet at Work G Hertel, DL Stone, RD Johnson, J Passmore 1–18 Chichester, UK: Wiley
    [Google Scholar]
43. Hiilamo A, Shiri R, Kouvonen A, Mänty M, Butterworth P et al. 2019. Common mental disorders and trajectories of work disability among midlife public sector employees—a 10-year follow-up study. J. Affect. Disord. 247:66–72
    [Google Scholar]
44. Holman D. 2013a. An explanation of cross-national variation in call centre job quality using institutional theory. Work Employ. Soc. 27:121–38
    [Google Scholar]
45. Holman D. 2013b. Job types and job quality in Europe. Hum. Relat. 66:4475–502
    [Google Scholar]
46. Holman D, Rafferty A. 2018. The convergence and divergence of job discretion between occupations and institutional regimes in Europe from 1995 to 2010. J. Manag. Stud. 55:4619–47
    [Google Scholar]
47. Holvino E, Feldman BM, Merrill-Sands D. 2004. Creating and sustaining diversity and inclusion in organizations: strategies and approaches. The Psychology and Management of Workplace Diversity MS Stockdale 245–76 Malden, MA: Blackwell
    [Google Scholar]
48. Hornung S, Rousseau DM, Glaser J, Angerer P, Weigl M. 2010. Beyond top-down and bottom-up work redesign: customizing job content through idiosyncratic deals. J. Organ. Behav. 31:2/3187–215
    [Google Scholar]
49. Humphrey SE, Nahrgang JD, Morgeson FP. 2007. Integrating motivational, social, and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension of the work design literature. J. Appl. Psychol. 92:51332–56
    [Google Scholar]
50. Jabagi N, Croteau AM, Audebrand LK, Marsan J. 2019. Gig-workers’ motivation: thinking beyond carrots and sticks. J. Manag. Psychol. 34:4192–213
    [Google Scholar]
51. Jatobá MN, Ferreira JJ, Fernandes PO, Teixeira JP. 2023. Intelligent human resources for the adoption of artificial intelligence: a systematic literature review. J. Organ. Change Manag. In press. http://doi.org/10.1108/JOCM-03-2022-0075
    [Google Scholar]
52. Johns G. 2006. The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Acad. Manag. Rev. 31:2386–408
    [Google Scholar]
53. Jones KP, Peddie CI, Gilrane VL, King EB, Gray AL. 2016. Not so subtle: a meta-analytic investigation of the correlates of subtle and overt discrimination. J. Manag. 42:61588–613
    [Google Scholar]
54. Joshi A, Son J, Roh H. 2015. When can women close the gap? A meta-analytic test of sex differences in performance and rewards. Acad. Manag. J. 58:51516–45
    [Google Scholar]
55. Kellogg KC, Valentine MA, Christin A 2020. Algorithms at work: the new contested terrain of control. Acad. Manag. Ann. 14:1366–410
    [Google Scholar]
56. Knight C, Parker SK. 2021. How work redesign interventions affect performance: an evidence-based model from a systematic review. Hum. Relat. 74:169–104
    [Google Scholar]
57. Kolade O, Owoseni A. 2022. Employment 5.0: the work of the future and the future of work. Technol. Soc. 71:102086
    [Google Scholar]
58. Kouvonen A, Mänty M, Lallukka T, Lahelma E, Rahkonen O. 2016. Changes in psychosocial and physical working conditions and common mental disorders. Eur. J. Public Health 26:3458–63
    [Google Scholar]
59. Kramer A, Kramer KZ. 2020. The potential impact of the Covid-19 pandemic on occupational status, work from home, and occupational mobility. J. Vocat. Behav. 119:103442
    [Google Scholar]
60. Lahelma E, Laaksonen M, Lallukka T, Martikainen P, Pietiläinen O et al. 2012. Working conditions as risk factors for disability retirement: a longitudinal register linkage study. BMC Public Health 12:309
    [Google Scholar]
61. Laine H, Saastamoinen P, Lahti J, Rahkonen O, Lahelma E. 2014. The associations between psychosocial working conditions and changes in common mental disorders: a follow-up study. BMC Public Health 14:588
    [Google Scholar]
62. Lau B, Shiryaeva O, Ruud T, Victor M. 2019. What are they returning to? Psychosocial work environment as a predictor of returning to work among employees in treatment for common mental disorders: a prospective observational pre-post study. PLOS ONE 14:4e0215354
    [Google Scholar]
63. Law PCF, Too LS, Butterworth P, Witt K, Reavley N, Milner AJ. 2020. A systematic review on the effect of work-related stressors on mental health of young workers. Int. Arch. Occup. Environ. Health 93:5611–22
    [Google Scholar]
64. Lesener T, Gusy B, Wolter C. 2019. The job demands-resources model: a meta-analytic review of longitudinal studies. Work Stress 33:176–103
    [Google Scholar]
65. Lin W, Shao Y, Li G, Guo Y, Zhan X. 2021. The psychological implications of COVID-19 on employee job insecurity and its consequences: the mitigating role of organization adaptive practices. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:3317–29
    [Google Scholar]
66. Llorens A, Tzovara A, Bellier L, Bhaya-Grossman I, Bidet-Caulet A et al. 2021. Gender bias in academia: a lifetime problem that needs solutions. Neuron 109:132047–74
    [Google Scholar]
67. Lopes H, Calapez T. 2021. Job polarisation: capturing the effects of work organisation. Econ. Labour Relat. Rev. 32:4594–613
    [Google Scholar]
68. Malhotra A. 2021. The postpandemic future of work. J. Manag. 47:51091–102
    [Google Scholar]
69. McCarthy JM, Truxillo DM, Bauer TN, Erdogan B, Shao Y et al. 2021. Distressed and distracted by COVID-19 during high-stakes virtual interviews: the role of job interview anxiety on performance and reactions. J. Appl. Psychol. 106:81103–17
    [Google Scholar]
70. McFadden C. 2020. Discrimination against transgender employees and jobseekers. Handbook of Labor, Human Resources and Population Economics KF Zimmermann 1–14 Cham, Switz: Springer
    [Google Scholar]
71. Melaku TM. 2019. You Don't Look Like a Lawyer: Black Women and Systemic Gendered Racism Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield
72. Mize TD. 2016. Sexual orientation in the labor market. Am. Soc. Rev. 81:61132–60
    [Google Scholar]
73. Mor Barak ME. 2005. Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 1st ed.
74. Mor Barak ME. 2022. Managing Diversity: Toward a Globally Inclusive Workplace Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE, 5th ed.
75. Morgeson FP, Brannick MT, Levine EL. 2020. Job and Work Analysis: Methods, Research, and Applications for Human Resource Management London: SAGE, 3rd ed..
76. Morgeson FP, Dierdorff EC, Hmurovic JL. 2010. Work design in situ: understanding the role of occupational and organizational context. J. Organ. Behav. 31:2/3351–60
    [Google Scholar]
77. Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. 2006. The Work Design Questionnaire (WDQ): developing and validating a comprehensive measure for assessing job design and the nature of work. J. Appl. Psychol. 91:61321–39
    [Google Scholar]
78. Morgeson FP, Humphrey SE. 2008. Job and team design: toward a more integrative conceptualization of work design. Research in Personnel and Human Resource Management JJ Martocchio 39–91 Bingley, UK: Emerald
    [Google Scholar]
79. Morgeson FP, Mitchell TR, Liu D. 2015. Event system theory: an event-oriented approach to the organizational sciences. Acad. Manag. Rev. 40:4515–37
    [Google Scholar]
80. Natl. Acad. Sci. Eng. Med. 2022. Human–AI Teaming: State-of-the-Art and Research Needs Washington, DC: Natl. Acad. https://doi.org/10.17226/26355
81. Nevala-Puranen N, Seuri M, Simola A, Elo J. 1999. Physically disabled at work: need for ergonomic interventions. J. Occup. Rehabil. 9:4215–25
    [Google Scholar]
82. Ng TWH, Feldman DC. 2008. The relationship of age to ten dimensions of job performance. J. Appl. Psychol. 93:2392–423
    [Google Scholar]
83. Ng TWH, Feldman DC. 2015. Ethical leadership: meta-analytic evidence of criterion-related and incremental validity. J. Appl. Psychol. 100:3948–65
    [Google Scholar]
84. Nigatu YT, Liu Y, Uppal M, McKinney S, Gillis K et al. 2017. Prognostic factors for return to work of employees with common mental disorders: a meta-analysis of cohort studies. Soc. Psychiatry Psychiatr. Epidemiol. 52:101205–15
    [Google Scholar]
85. OECD. 2018. Good Jobs for All in a Changing World of Work: The OECD Jobs Strategy Paris: OECD
86. Olinto MTA, Garcez A, Henn RL, Macagnan JBA, Paniz VMV, Pattussi MP. 2017. Sleep-related problems and minor psychiatric disorders among Brazilian shift workers. Psychiatry Res 257:412–17
    [Google Scholar]
87. O'Shea D, Peiró JM, Truxillo DM 2024. Conceptualizing underemployment as a type of precarious work: identifying career-stage antecedents of underemployment in order to address it. Tackling Precarious Work: Toward Sustainable Livelihoods SC Carr, V Hopner, D Hodgetts, M Young pp. 349–83 New York: Routledge
    [Google Scholar]
88. Osterman P. 2010. Job design in the context of the job market. J. Organ. Behav. 31:2/3401–11
    [Google Scholar]
89. Oswald FL, Behrend TS, Putka DJ, Sinar E. 2020. Big data in industrial-organizational psychology and human resource management: forward progress for organizational research and practice. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 7:505–33
    [Google Scholar]
90. Pan Y, Froese FJ. 2023. An interdisciplinary review of AI and HRM: challenges and future directions. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 33:1100924
    [Google Scholar]
91. Parent-Rocheleau X, Parker SK. 2022. Algorithms as work designers: how algorithmic management influences the design of jobs. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 32:3100838
    [Google Scholar]
92. Parker SK. 2014. Beyond motivation: job and work design for development, health, ambidexterity, and more. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 65:661–91
    [Google Scholar]
93. Parker SK, Grote G. 2022. Automation, algorithms, and beyond: why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Appl. Psychol. 71:41171–204
    [Google Scholar]
94. Parker SK, Jorritsma K. 2021. Good work design for all: multiple pathways to making a difference. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 30:3456–68
    [Google Scholar]
95. Parker SK, Morgeson FP, Johns G. 2017. One hundred years of work design research: looking back and looking forward. J. Appl. Psychol. 102:3403–20
    [Google Scholar]
96. Pethig F, Kroenung J. 2022. Biased humans, (un)biased algorithms?. J. Bus. Ethics 183:1637–52
    [Google Scholar]
97. Plug E, Berkhout P. 2004. Effects of sexual preferences on earnings in the Netherlands. J. Popul. Econ. 17:1117–31
    [Google Scholar]
98. Pozniak H. 2021. Plug the gap: retrain for net zero: Workers at all levels need new skills for the green economy. Government and employers must act now to build a coherent strategy and invest in training. Eng. Technol. 16:101–4
    [Google Scholar]
99. Preston A, Birch E, Timming AR. 2019. Sexual orientation and wage discrimination: evidence from Australia. Int. J. Manpow. 41:6629–48
    [Google Scholar]
100. Putka DJ, Oswald FL 2016. Implications of the big data movement for the advancement of I-O science and practice. Big Data at Work: The Data Science Revolution and Organizational Psychology S Tonidandel, EB King, JM Cortina 181–212 New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis
     [Google Scholar]
101. Putka DJ, Oswald FL, Landers RN, Beatty AS, McCloy RA, Yu MC. 2023. Evaluating a natural language processing approach to estimating KSA and interest job analysis ratings. J. Bus. Psychol. 38:2385–410
     [Google Scholar]
102. Raisch S, Krakowski S. 2021. Artificial intelligence and management: the automation–augmentation paradox. Acad. Manag. Rev. 46:1192–210
     [Google Scholar]
103. Rudolph CW, Allan B, Clark M, Hertel G, Hirschi A et al. 2021. Pandemics: implications for research and practice in industrial and organizational psychology. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 14:1/21–35
     [Google Scholar]
104. Sanchez JI, Levine EL. 2012. The rise and fall of job analysis and the future of work analysis. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 63:397–425
     [Google Scholar]
105. Shore LM, Cleveland JN, Sanchez D. 2018. Inclusive workplaces: a review and model. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 28:2176–89
     [Google Scholar]
106. Shultz KS, Wang M, Crimmins EM, Fisher GG. 2010. Age differences in the demand–control model of work stress: an examination of data from 15 European countries. J. Appl. Gerontol. 29:121–47
     [Google Scholar]
107. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2018. Principles for the Validation and Use of Personnel Selection Procedures Bowling Green, OH: Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol., 5th ed..
108. Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol. 2023. Considerations and Recommendations for the Validation and Use of AI-Based Assessments for Employee Selection Bowling Green, OH: Soc. Ind. Organ. Psychol.
109. Spreitzer GM, Cameron L, Garrett L. 2017. Alternative work arrangements: two images of the new world of work. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ. Behav. 4:473–99
     [Google Scholar]
110. Stainback K, Jason K, Walter C 2018. Organizational context and the well-being of Black workers: Does racial composition affect psychological distress?. Research in the Sociology of Work 32 Race, Identity, and Work EL Mickey, AH Wingfield 137–64 Bingley, UK: Emerald
     [Google Scholar]
111. Strah N, Rupp DE. 2022. Are there cracks in our foundation? An integrative review of diversity issues in job analysis. J. Appl. Psychol. 107:71031–51
     [Google Scholar]
112. Tordera N, Peiró JM, Ayala Y, Villajos E, Truxillo DM. 2020. The lagged influence of organizations’ human resources practices on employees’ career sustainability: the moderating role of age. J. Vocat. Behav. 120:103444
     [Google Scholar]
113. Trist EL, Bamforth KW. 1951. Some social and psychological consequences of the longwall method of coal-getting: an examination of the psychological situation and defences of a work group in relation to the social structure and technological content of the work system. Hum. Relat. 4:13–38
     [Google Scholar]
114. Truxillo DM, Cadiz DM, Rineer JR, Zaniboni S, Fraccaroli F. 2012. A lifespan perspective on job design: fitting the job and the worker to promote job satisfaction, engagement, and performance. Organ. Psychol. Rev. 2:4340–60
     [Google Scholar]
115. Tunstall ED 2020. Decolonizing design innovation: design anthropology, critical anthropology, and indigenous knowledge. Design Anthropology: Theory and Practice W Gunn, T Otto, RC Smith 221–40 Abingdon, UK: Routledge/Taylor & Francis
     [Google Scholar]
116. Urbanetto JS, Magalhaes MCC, Maciel VO, Sant'Anna VM, Gustavo AS et al. 2013. [Work-related stress according to the demand-control model and minor psychic disorders in nursing workers. Rev. Esc. Enferm. USP 47:51180–86 in Portuguese
     [Google Scholar]
117. Valfort MA. 2017. LGBTI in OECD countries: a review. Soc. Employ. Migr. Work. Pap. 198 OECD Paris:
     [Google Scholar]
118. Vanroelen C, Julià M, Van Aerden K. 2021. Precarious employment: an overlooked determinant of workers’ health and well-being?. Flexible Working Practices and Approaches C Korunka 231–55 Cham, Switz: Springer
     [Google Scholar]
119. Villotti P, Corbière M, Zaniboni S, Lecomte T, Fraccaroli F. 2015. Evaluating the motivation to obtain and sustain employment in people with psychiatric disabilities. Psicol. Soc. 10:157–70
     [Google Scholar]
120. Warhurst C, Knox A. 2022. Manifesto for a new quality of working life. Hum. Relat. 75:2304–21
     [Google Scholar]
121. Wegman LA, Hoffman BJ, Carter NT, Twenge JM, Guenole N. 2018. Placing job characteristics in context: cross-temporal meta-analysis of changes in job characteristics since 1975. J. Manag. 44:1352–86
     [Google Scholar]
122. Wingfield AH, Chavez K. 2020. Getting in, getting hired, getting sideways looks: organizational hierarchy and perceptions of racial discrimination. Am. Soc. Rev. 85:131–57
     [Google Scholar]
123. Zacher H, Dirkers BT, Korek S, Hughes B. 2017. Age-differential effects of job characteristics on job attraction: a policy-capturing study. Front. Psychol. 8:1124
     [Google Scholar]
124. Zacher H, Frese M. 2011. Maintaining a focus on opportunities at work: the interplay between age, job complexity, and the use of selection, optimization, and compensation strategies. J. Organ. Behav. 32:2291–318
     [Google Scholar]
125. Zacher H, Schmitt A. 2016. Work characteristics and occupational well-being: the role of age. Front. Psychol. 7:1411
     [Google Scholar]
126. Zaniboni S, Kmicinska M, Truxillo DM, Kahn K, Paladino MP, Fraccaroli F. 2019. Will you still hire me when I am over 50? The effects of implicit and explicit age stereotyping on resume evaluations. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 28:4453–67
     [Google Scholar]
127. Zaniboni S, Truxillo DM, Fraccaroli F. 2013. Differential effects of task variety and skill variety on burnout and turnover intentions for older and younger workers. Eur. J. Work Organ. Psychol. 22:3306–17
     [Google Scholar]
128. Zaniboni S, Truxillo DM, Fraccaroli F, McCune AE, Bertolino M. 2014. Who benefits from more tasks? Older versus younger workers. J. Manag. Psychol. 29:5508–23
     [Google Scholar]
129. Zaniboni S, Truxillo DM, Rineer JR, Bodner TE, Hammer LB, Krainer M. 2016. Relating age, decision authority, job satisfaction, and mental health: a study of construction workers. Work Aging Retire 2:4428–35
     [Google Scholar]
130. Zschirnt E, Ruedin D. 2016. Ethnic discrimination in hiring decisions: a meta-analysis of correspondence tests 1990–2015. J. Ethn. Migr. Stud. 42:71115–34
     [Google Scholar]