Abstract
Wetlands play an essential role in overland flow generation by retaining water and providing an environment for the hydrogeochemical functions of a watershed. Few studies have addressed the restoration of past wetlands using wetland-corrected land-use land-cover (LULC) datasets. We evaluated the impacts of wetlands on hydrology and nutrient (nitrogen) loading by comparing Present, Past, and Restored scenarios. A GIS-based data processing procedure was proposed for generating a wetland-corrected proxy LULC raster to mimic the past wetland distribution. This was subsequently incorporated in the Soil and Water Assessment Tool (SWAT) to simulate discharge and nitrogen loading. In addition, two models, with and without using the proxy LULC dataset, were developed to examine the impacts of the proxy LULC on the model performance. The effect of hydroclimatic variations was also assessed by comparing the simulated peak flows and nutrient loads in dry and wet years. The results demonstrated the necessity of using the wetland-corrected proxy LULC data in the water quantity and quality modeling, especially for wet years. Our modeling approach and wetland-oriented LULC correction procedure can be applied to other wetland-dominated watersheds to improve hydrologic and water quality modeling.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
All data generated or analyzed during this study are included in this published article.
References
Abbaspour KC (2022) The fallacy in the use of the best-fit solution in hydrologic modeling. Sci Total Environ 802:149713. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149713
Abbaspour KC, Vaghefi SA, Srinivasan R (2017) A guideline for successful calibration and uncertainty analysis for soil and water assessment: a review of papers from the 2016 international SWAT conference. Water 10(1):6. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10010006
Arnold JG, Allen PM, Morgan DS (2001) Hydrologic model for design and constructed wetlands. Wetlands 21(2):167–178. https://doi.org/10.1672/0277-5212(2001)021[0167:HMFDAC]2.0.CO;2
Bauwe A, Eckhardt KU, Lennartz B (2022) Potential of constructed wetlands to reduce nitrate pollution in agricultural catchments. Ecol Eng 178:106597. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2022.106597
Cho J, Vellidis G, Bosch DD, Lowrance R, Strickland T (2010) Water quality effects of simulated conservation practice scenarios in the Little River experimental watershed. J Soil Water Conserv 65(6):463–473. https://doi.org/10.2489/jswc.65.6.463
Chu X (2017) Delineation of pothole-dominated wetlands and modeling of their threshold behaviors. J Hydrol Eng 22(1):1–11. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0001224
Chu X, Yang J, Chi Y, Zhang J (2013) Dynamic puddle delineation and modeling of puddle-to-puddle filling-spilling-merging-splitting overland flow processes. Water Resources Research 49(6):3825–3829. https://doi.org/10.1002/wrcr.20286
De Laney TA (1995) Benefits to downstream Flood attenuation and water quality as a result of constructed wetlands in agricultural landscapes. Journal of Soil and Water Conservation 50(6):620–626
Djebou DCS, Szogi AA, Stone KC, Novak JM (2020) Watershed scale nitrate-N abatement of instream wetlands: an appraisal using the soil and water assessment tool. Appl Eng Agric 36(3):387–397. https://doi.org/10.13031/aea.13736
Eckhardt K (2005) How to construct recursive digital filters for baseflow separation. Hydrol Process 19(2):507–515. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.5675
Evenson GR, Golden HE, Lane CR, D’Amico E (2015) Geographically isolated wetlands and watershed hydrology: a modified model analysis. J Hydrol 529:240–256. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.07.039
Fluet-Chouinard E, Stocker BD, Zhang Z, Malhotra A, Melton JR, Poulter B, Kaplan JO, Goldewijk KK, Siebert S, Minayeva T, Hugelius G, Joosten H, Barthelmes A, Prigent C, Aires F, Hoyt AM, Davidson N, Finlayson CM, Lehner B, Jackson RB, McIntyre PB (2023) Extensive global wetland loss over the past three centuries. Nature 614(7947):281–286. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-022-05572-6
Franzen DW (2010) North Dakota fertilizer recommendation: tables and equations. NDSU Extension Service, Fargo, ND
Fretwell JD (1996) National water summary on wetland resources, vol 2425. US Government Printing Office, Washington, D.C.
Hansen AT, Dolph CL, Foufoula-Georgiou E, Finlay JC (2018) Contribution of wetlands to nitrate removal at the watershed scale. Nat Geosci 11(2):127–132. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41561-017-0056-6
Hantush MM, Kalin L, Isik S, Yucekaya A (2013) Nutrient dynamics in flooded wetlands. I: model development. J Hydrol Eng 18(12):1709–1723. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000741
Hayashi M, Quinton WL, Pietroniro A, Gibson JJ (2004) Hydrologic functions of wetlands in a discontinuous permafrost basin indicated by isotopic and chemical signatures. J Hydrol 296(1–4):81–97. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2004.03.020
Huang J, Reneau RB Jr, Hagedorn C (2000) Nitrogen removal in constructed wetlands employed to treat domestic wastewater. Water Research 34(9):2582–2588. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00018-X
Ikenberry CD, Crumpton WG, Arnold JG, Soupir ML, Gassman PW (2017) Evaluation of existing and modified wetland equations in the SWAT model. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Association 53(6):1267–1280. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12570
Jalowska AM, Yuan Y (2019) Evaluation of SWAT impoundment modeling methods in water and sediment simulations. JAWRA J Am Water Resour Association 55(1):209–227. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12715
Kalin L, Hantush M, Isik S, Yucekaya A, Jordan T (2013) Nutrient dynamics in flooded wetlands. II: model application. Journal of Hydrologic Engineering 18(12):1724–1738. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)HE.1943-5584.0000750
Kazezyılmaz-Alhan CM, Medina MA Jr, Richardson CJ (2007) A wetland hydrology and water quality model incorporating surface water/groundwater interactions. Water Resources Research 43(4):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1029/2006WR005003
Lee ER, Mostaghimi S, Wynn TM (2002) A model to enhance wetland design and optimize nonpoint source pollution control. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 38(1):17–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1752-1688.2002.tb01531.x
Lee S, Yeo IY, Lang MW, Sadeghi AM, McCarty GW, Moglen GE, Evenson GR (2018) Assessing the cumulative impacts of geographically isolated wetlands on watershed hydrology using the SWAT model coupled with improved wetland modules. J Environ Manage 223:37–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2018.06.006
Lee S, Yeo IY, Lang MW, McCarty GW, Sadeghi AM, Sharifi A, Jin H, Liu Y (2019) Improving the catchment scale wetland modeling using remotely sensed data. Environ Model Softw 122:104069. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsoft.2017.11.001
Lin Z, Anar MJ, Zheng H (2015) Hydrologic and water-quality impacts of agricultural land use changes incurred from bioenergy policies. J Hydrol 525:429–440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.04.001
Liu Y, Yang W, Wang X (2008) Development of a SWAT extension module to simulate riparian wetland hydrologic processes at a watershed scale. Hydrological Processes: An International Journal 22(16):2901–2915. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.6874
Martinez-Martinez E, Nejadhashemi AP, Woznicki SA, Adhikari U, Giri S (2015) Assessing the significance of wetland restoration scenarios on sediment mitigation plan. Ecol Eng 77:103–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.11.031
Mengistu SG, Golden HE, Lane CR, Christensen JR, Wine ML, D’Amico E, …, Hill RA (2020) Wetland flowpaths mediate nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations across the Upper Mississippi River Basin. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12885
Moriasi DN, Gitau MW, Pai N, Daggupati P (2015) Hydrologic and water quality models: performance measures and evaluation criteria. Trans ASABE 58(6):1763–1785. https://doi.org/10.13031/trans.58.10715
Mushet DM, Goldhaber MB, Mills CT et al (2015) Chemical and biotic characteristics of prairie lakes and large wetlands in south-central North Dakota—effects of a changing climate. US Geological Survey. Scientific Investigations Report 2015–5126.https://doi.org/10.3133/sir20155126
NASA (2022) NASA Power, Data Sources. https://power.larc.nasa.gov/docs/methodology/data/sources/ Accessed on 06 June 2022
Nash JE, Sutcliffe JV (1970) River flow forecasting through conceptual models part I - A discussion of principles. J Hydrol 10(3):282–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1694(70)90255-6
ND GIS Hub (2022) National Wetlands Inventory. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://gishubdata-ndgov.hub.arcgis.com/datasets/ndgishub-wetlands/. Accessed 07 Jul 2022
Neitsch SL, Arnold JG, Kiniry JR, Williams JR (2011) Soil and water assessment tool theoretical documentation, version 2009. Texas Water Resources Institute, Technical Report No. 406, Temple, Texas
Niraula R, Meixner T, Norman LM (2015) Determining the importance of model calibration for forecasting absolute/relative changes in streamflow from LULC and climate changes. J Hydrol 522:439–451. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2015.01.007
Ouyang W, Huang H, Hao F, Guo B (2013) Synergistic impacts of land-use change and soil property variation on non-point source nitrogen pollution in a freeze-thaw area. J Hydrol 495:126–134. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2013.04.037
Perez-Valdivia C, Cade-Menun B, McMartin DW (2017) Hydrological modeling of the pipestone creek watershed using the Soil Water Assessment Tool (SWAT): assessing impacts of wetland drainage on hydrology. Journal of Hydrology: Regional Studies 14:109–129. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejrh.2017.10.004
PRISM Climate Group (2022) Parameter-elevation Regressions on Independent Slopes Model (PRISM), Climate Group, Oregon State University, NACES. https://prism.oregonstate.edu. Accessed 06 June 2022
Qi T, Khanaum MM, Boutin K, Otte M, Lin Z, Chu X (2023) Incorporating wetland delineation and impacts in watershed-scale hydrologic modeling. Water 15(14):2518. https://doi.org/10.3390/w15142518
Rajib A, Golden HE, Lane CR, Wu Q (2020) Surface depression and wetland water storage improves major river basin hydrologic predictions. Water Resour Res 56(7):e2019WR026561. https://doi.org/10.1029/2019WR026561
Ranalli AJ, Macalady DL (2010) The importance of the riparian zone and in-stream processes in nitrate attenuation in undisturbed and agricultural watersheds - a review of the scientific literature. J Hydrol 389(3–4):406–415. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2010.05.045
Rashid H, Yang K, Zeng A, Ju S, Rashid A, Guo F, Lan S (2021) The influence of landcover and climate change on the hydrology of the Minjiang River watershed. Water 13(24):3554. https://doi.org/10.3390/w13243554
Records RM, Arabi M, Fassnacht SR, Duffy WG, Ahmadi M, Hegewisch KC (2014) Climate change and wetland loss impacts on a western river’s water quality. Hydrology and Earth System Sciences 18(11):4509–4527. https://doi.org/10.5194/hess-18-4509-2014
Shabani A, Zhang X, Chu X, Dodd TP, Zheng H (2020) Mitigating impact of devils lake flooding on the sheyenne river sulfate concentration. JAWRA Journal of the American Water Resources Association 56(2):297–309. https://doi.org/10.1111/1752-1688.12825
Tahmasebi Nasab M, Zhang J, Chu X (2017) A new depression-dominated delineation (D-cubed) method for improved watershed modelling. Hydrological Processes 31(19):3364–3378. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.11261
Tahmasebi Nasab M, Grimm K, Bazrkar MH, Zeng L, Shabani A, Zhang X, Chu X (2018) SWAT modeling of non-point source pollution in depression-dominated basins under varying hydroclimatic conditions. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 15(11):2492. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph15112492
USDA (2022a) CropScape, center for spatial information science and systems at George Mason University, National Agricultural Statistics Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://nassgeodata.gmu.edu/CropScape/ Accessed 15 Jul 2022
USDA (2022b) Web Soil Survey, Natural Resources Conservation Service, U.S. Department of Agriculture. https://websoilsurvey.nrcs.usda.gov/app/WebSoilSurvey.aspx Accessed 06 Jul 2022
USEPA (2022) Clean Air Status and Trends Network (CASTNET) website, US EPA. https://java.epa.gov/castnet/clearsession.do Accessed 11 Jul 2022
USFWS (2022) National wetlands Inventory. U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. https://www.fws.gov/program/national-wetlands-inventory/wetlands-mapper Accessed 15 Jul 2022
USGS (2022a) The National Map Viewer, U.S. Geological Survey. https://apps.nationalmap.gov/downloader/#/ Accessed on 06/07/2022
USGS (2022b) National Water Information System, U.S. Geological Survey. http://waterdata.usgs.gov/nwis Accessed 11/13/2022
Wang N, Chu X (2020) A new algorithm for delineation of surface depressions and channels. Water 12(1):7. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12010007
Wang X, Yang W, Melesse AM (2008) Using hydrologic equivalent wetland concept within SWAT to estimate streamflow in watersheds with numerous wetlands. Trans ASABE 51(1):55–72. https://doi.org/10.13031/2013.24227
Wang X, Shang S, Qu Z, Liu T, Melesse AM, Yang W (2010) Simulated wetland conservation-restoration effects on water quantity and quality at watershed scale. J Environ Manage 91(7):1511–1525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2010.02.023
Wang G, Yang H, Wang L, Xu Z, Xue B (2014) Using the SWAT model to assess impacts of land use changes on runoff generation in headwaters. Hydrological Processes 28(3):1032–1042. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.9645
Wang P, Ouyang W, Wu Z, Cui X, Zhu W, Jin R, Lin C (2020) Diffuse nitrogen pollution in a forest-dominated watershed: source, transport and removal. J Hydrol 585:124833. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.124833
Winter TC (2003) Hydrological, chemical, and biological characteristics of a prairie pothole wetland complex under highly variable climate conditions: the Cottonwood Lake area, east-central North Dakota. US Geological Survey Professional Paper 1675, Denver
Yang W, Liu Y, Ou C, Gabor S (2016) Examining water quality effects of riparian wetland loss and restoration scenarios in a southern Ontario watershed. J Environ Manage 174:26–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.03.001
Zeng L, Shao J, Chu X (2020) Improved hydrologic modeling for depression-dominated areas. J Hydrol 590:125269. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2020.125269
Zeng L, Shen H, Cui Y, Chu X, Shao J (2022) Incorporating the filling-spilling feature of depressions into hydrologic modeling. Water 14(4):652. https://doi.org/10.3390/w14040652
Acknowledgements
This material is based upon work supported by the United States Environmental Protection Agency under Grant No. CD-95811400. The North Dakota Water Resources Research Institute and the Environmental and Conservation Sciences program at North Dakota State University also provided partial financial support for the first author. Authors would like to thank Dr. Donna Jacob, Dr. Drew Kessler, and Dr. Scott Kronholm from Houston Engineering, Inc., Grit May from the International Water Institute, Aaron Larsen from the North Dakota Department of Environmental Quality, Andrew Nygren and Chance Nolan from the North Dakota Department of Water Resources, and Joel Galloway from the U.S. Geological Survey for their support and contributions to the related research.
Funding
This work was supported by Grant No. CD-95811400. Co-authors, Dr. Marinus L. Otte and Dr. Xuefeng Chu, have received the grant from the United States Environmental Protection Agency.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Conceptualization, Methodology, Formal analysis and investigation, Writing-original draft preparation: Mosammat Mustari Khanaum; Site selection: Mosammat Mustari Khanaum, Tiansong Qi, Kyle D. Boutin, Marinus L. Otte, and Xuefeng Chu; Writing - review and editing: Mosammat Mustari Khanaum, Tiansong Qi, Kyle D. Boutin, Marinus L. Otte, Zhulu Lin, and Xuefeng Chu; Funding acquisition: Marinus L. Otte and Xuefeng Chu; Resources: Xuefeng Chu; Supervision: Xuefeng Chu. All authors have read and agreed to the published version of the manuscript. The first draft of the manuscript was written by Mosammat Mustari Khanaum and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing Interests
The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Raster Data Processing Procedure
A raster data processing procedure was proposed to create wetland-corrected proxy LULC for the Past and Restored scenarios. Figure 12 illustrates the raster data processing procedure used to modify the existing LULC to mimic the past wetland conditions. It was important to ensure that both datasets had the same resolution and used the same projected coordinate system to prevent any errors during the raster processing. First, the NWI dataset was converted to raster data (Fig. 12a) with the same resolution (10 m) as the LULC dataset (Fig. 12b). Then, the converted raster NWI data was reclassified as “0” for all wetland grids and “1” for all non-wetland grids (Fig. 12c). Afterward, the two raster datasets (Fig. 12c and d) were multiplied using the raster calculator (Fig. 12e). For the resulting raster data (Fig. 12e), a value of “195” (since SWAT assigns different values to various land use types, with “195” specifically representing wetlands) was assigned to all cells with a value of “0” (Fig. 12f). Thus, the wetland-corrected proxy LULC raster dataset (Fig. 12g; Table 6), representing the Past scenario in the 1970s, was created. A similar procedure was employed to prepare the proxy LULC for the Restored scenario where the LULC of 2021 was used, assuming that all non-wetland LULC types remain unchanged. In both Past and Restored scenarios, wetland delineation was based on the wetland data in the 1970s.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Khanaum, M.M., Qi, T., Boutin, K.D. et al. Assessing the Impacts of Wetlands on Discharge and Nutrient Loading: Insights from Restoring Past Wetlands with GIS-Based Analysis and Modeling. Wetlands 43, 103 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01752-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13157-023-01752-w