Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: purposes and perspectives

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
ZDM – Mathematics Education Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Over the last decades, digital technologies (DTs) have become ubiquitous in mathematics education. Still, their integration into classroom teaching and learning varies enormously. In this narrative overview, we focus on the different purposes for which DTs are used in mathematics education in order to study how the effectiveness of DTs depends on researchers’ underlying goals and perspectives. We set up an experience- and literature-based framework including five different purposes. Applying this framework gave rise to the following results: (1) there is evidence for the benefit of using DTs for mathematics learning; (2) research on DTs leads to new theoretical developments and (3) to new design paradigms; (4) issues of equity with respect to access to and use of DTs are important but under-researched; and (5) DTs challenge curricula and teaching and assessment practices. While early research on the use of DTs focused on questions such as “does it work?” or “does it work better?”, the maturing of the field has shifted to more nuanced questions. As a future research agenda, we recommend further study of how the use of DTs in mathematics education impacts the time required for learning as well as the temporality of teaching and learning, how it changes the nature of doing mathematics and the relation to basic skills and higher-order skills in particular, how curricula, teaching practices, and assessment might change due to the availability of sophisticated mathematical tools, how DTs and other resources might be combined in teaching and learning, and how they may help to address equity issues in education. These questions will prompt the development of new theoretical constructs and approaches.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Availability of data

Upon request.

Notes

  1. https://pisa2022-maths.oecd.org/#Overview.

References

Key publications are market by (**) in the reference list and annotated, and other main contributions are indicated with (*)

  • *Abrahamson, D., Flood, V. J., Miele, J. A., & Siu, Y. (2018). Enactivism and ethnomethodological conversation analysis as tools for expanding universal design for learning: The case of visually impaired mathematics students. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(2), 291–303. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0998-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bozkurt, G., & Ruthven, K. (2017). Classroom-based professional expertise: A mathematics teacher’s practice with technology. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 94, 309–328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-016-9732-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Bray, A., & Tangney, B. (2017). Technology usage in mathematics education research—A systematic review of recent trends. Computers & Education, 114, 255–273. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2017.07.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Chan, M. C. E., Sabena, C., & Wagner, D. (2021). Mathematics education in a time of crisis—a viral pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10113-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Chen, X., Zou, D., Cheng, G., & Xie, H. (2020). Detecting latent topics and trends in educational technologies over four decades using structural topic modeling: A retrospective of all volumes of computers & education. Computers & Education, 151, 103855. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103855

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Clark-Wilson, A., & Hoyles, C. (2019). A research-informed web-based professional development toolkit to support technology-enhanced mathematics teaching at scale. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 102, 343–359. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9836-1. (This study reports on the scaling of Cornerstone Maths, technology-enhanced curriculum units for lower secondary mathematics that embed dynamic mathematical technology. The units include web-based DTs, materials for students and teachers, and teacher professional development. For the latter, the authors use the Mathematical Pedagogical Technology Knowledge model. Teacher professional development, as a conclusion, is a key element in the scaling up process).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **de Freitas, E., Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2019). The coordinated movements of collaborative mathematical tasks: the role of affect in transindividual sympathy. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 51(2), 305–318. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-1007-4. (This study examines the sympathetic coordinate movements that arise while students collaboratively explore the dynamic aspects of mathematical figures. Diverse kinds of body movement (gesture, face, eye, foot, etc) are considered as are three scales of analysis: (1) the micro-phenomenological scale of the pre-individual affect, (2) the individual scale of human movement, and (3) the transindividual scale of collective endeavours.de Freitas, E., & Sinclair, N. (2014). <Emphasis Type="Italic">Mathematics and the body: Material entanglements in the classroom.</Emphasis> Cambridge University Press).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Dimmel, J., Pandiscio, E., & Bock, C. (2021). The geometry of movement: Encounters with spatial inscriptions for making and exploring mathematical figures. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 7, 122–148. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00078-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Drijvers, P., Thurm, D., Vandervieren, E., Klinger, M., Moons, F., Van der Ree, H., Mol, A., Barzel, B., & Doorman, M. (2021). Distance mathematics teaching in Flanders, Germany and the Netherlands during COVID-19 lockdown. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 108, 35–64. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10094-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Emprin, F., & Petitfour, É. (2021). Using a simulator to help students with dyspraxia learn geometry. Digitital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 7, 99–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00077-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Engelbrecht, J., Borba, M. C., & Kaiser, G. (2023). Will we ever teach mathematics again in the way we used to before the pandemic? ZDM - Mathematics Education, 55, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-022-01460-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Ferrara, F., & Ferrari, G. (2022). Kindergarten children and early learning of number: embodied and material encounters within the classroom. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-022-00117-y. (This study explores the opportunities of multi-touch technology, in combination with physical paper strips, for 5-year-old childrens’ understanding of number. Drawing on assemblage theory, the design invites students to explore ordinal and relational aspects of number. After using a number strip, the children work with the multi-touch <Emphasis Type="Italic">TouchCount</Emphasis> app on an iPad. The authors conclude that the notion of assemblage was helpful in noticing how movement animates the mathematical activity, and as such enriches their understanding of how the notion of number emerges from the activities).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Haspekian, M., Kieran, C., Drijvers, P., Bråting, K., & Tabach, M. (2023). Algebra education and digital resources; a long-distance relationship? In B. Pepin, G. Gueudet, & J. Choppin (Eds.), Handbook of digital resources in mathematics education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95060-6_16-1. (This chapter considers how technology impacts on mathematics education from the perspective of instrumental distance: the qualitative gap between the ways of approaching school mathematics in the paper-and-pencil environment and in digital environments. After providing examples of the use of three types of digital tools for algebra, the authors conclude that this lens indeed reveals how digital technology may create distance with respect to the regular algebraic contents and procedures carried out in the paper-and-pencil environment).

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Gueudet, G., Buteau, C., Muller, E., Mgombelo, J., Sacristán, A. I., & Santacruz Rodriguez, M. (2022). Development and evolution of instrumented schemes: A case study of learning programming for mathematical investigations. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110, 353–377. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10133-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hegedus, S. J., & Otálora, Y. (2023). Mathematical strategies and emergence of socially mediated metacognition within a multi-touch Dynamic Geometry Environment. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112, 289–307. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10170-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Herfort, J. D., Tamborg, A. L., Meier, F., Allsopp, B. B., & Misfeldt, M. (2023). Twenty years of research on technology in mathematics education at CERME: A literature review based on a data science approach. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112, 309–336. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10202-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hillmayr, D., Ziernwald, L., Reinhold, F., Hofer, S., & Reiss, K. M. (2020). The potential of digital tools to enhance mathematics and science learning in secondary schools: A context-specific meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 153, 103897. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compedu.2020.103897

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Hoogland, K., & Tout, D. (2018). Computer-based assessment of mathematics into the twenty-first century: Pressures and tensions. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 50, 675–686. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-018-0944-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Huang, X., Huang, R., & Trouche, L. (2023). Teachers’ learning from addressing the challenges of online teaching in a time of pandemic: A case in Shanghai. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 112, 103–121. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-022-10172-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Inglis, M., & Foster, C. (2018). Five decades of mathematics education research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 49(4), 462–500. https://doi.org/10.5951/jresematheduc.49.4.0462

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Jankvist, U. T., Misfeldt, M., & Aguilar, M. S. (2019). What happens when CAS procedures are objectified?—The case of “solve” and “desolve.” Educational Studies in Mathematics, 101, 67–81. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-019-09888-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Kallia, M., Van Borkulo, S. P., Drijvers, P., Barendsen, E., & Tolboom, J. (2021). Characterising computational thinking in mathematics education: A literature informed Delphi study. Research in Mathematics Education, 23(2), 159–187. https://doi.org/10.1080/14794802.2020.1852104. (This article investigates the relationship between computational and mathematical thinking, that, according to a literature study, seem to have common ground. Results from a literature-based Delphi study involving 25 mathematics and computer science experts highlight three important aspects of CT to be addressed in mathematics education: problem solving, cognitive processes, and transposition).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Karavakou, M., & Kynigos, C. (2022). Mathematical creativity in coding dancing animations: a fallibilistic view. In J. Hodgen, E. Geraniou, G. Bolondi & F. Ferretti (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twelfth Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education (CERME12). ERME / Free University of Bozen-Bolzano. https://hal.science/hal-03748407/. Accessed 17 Oct 2023.

  • **Leigh-Lancaster, D., & Stacey, K. (2022). Evolution over two decades of CAS-active senior secondary mathematics curriculum and assessment. Mathematics, 10(13), 2333. https://doi.org/10.3390/math10132333. (This contribution summarizes 20 years of experience with using computer algebra in high-stakes summative assessment in Victoria (Australia). The authors describe the changes over time, also caused by device capabilities and increasing teachers expertise. In their examples, the authors show that having sophisticated DTs at hand does not necessarily make the assessment easy. The authors conclude that changing assessment is not just a technical, but also a tactical affair, which should involve stakeholders and needs time).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Leonard, J., Barnes-Johnson, J., & Evans, B. R. (2019). Using computer simulations and culturally responsive instruction to broaden urban students’ participation in STEM. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 5, 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-018-0048-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Mariotti, M. A., & Montone, A. (2020). The potential synergy of digital and manipulative artefacts. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 109–122. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00064-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Maschietto, M., Milici, P., & Tournès, D. (2019). Semiotic potential of a tractional machine: a first analysis. In U. T. Jankvist, M. van den Heuvel-Panhuizen, & M. Veldhuis (Eds.), Proceedings of the Eleventh Congress of the European Society for Research in Mathematics Education. Freudenthal Group & Freudenthal Institute, Utrecht University and ERME. https://hal.science/hal-02421865/. Accessed 17 Oct 2023

  • *Mithalal, J., & Balacheff, N. (2019). The instrumental deconstruction as a link between drawing and geometrical figure. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 161–176. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9862-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Nemirovsky, R., Ferrara, F., Ferrari, G., & Adamuz-Povedano, N. (2020). Body motion, early algebra, and the colours of abstraction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 104, 261–283. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-020-09955-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ng, O.-L., & Tsang, W. K. (2021). Constructionist learning in school mathematics: Implications for education in the fourth industrial revolution. ECNU Review of Education, 6(2), 328–339. https://doi.org/10.1177/2096531120978414

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Ng, O.-L., & Ye, H. (2022). Mathematics learning as embodied making: Primary students’ investigation of 3D geometry with handheld 3D printing technology. Asia Pacific Educational Review, 23, 311–323. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12564-022-09755-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Olsher, S., Chazan, D., Drijvers, P., Sangwin, C., & Yerushalmy, M. (2023). Digital assessment and the “machine.” In B. Pepin, G. Gueudet, & J. Choppin (Eds.), Handbook of Digital Resources in Mathematics Education. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-95060-6_44-1

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Palatnik, A., & Abrahamson, D. (2018). Rhythmic movement as a tacit enactment goal mobilizes the emergence of mathematical structures. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 99, 293–309. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9845-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Popper, P., & Yerushalmy, M. (2022). Online example-based assessment as a resource for teaching about quadrilaterals. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 110, 83–100. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10109-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Price, S., Yiannoutsou, N., & Vezzoli, Y. (2020). Making the body tangible: Elementary geometry learning through VR. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education, 6, 213–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-020-00071-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Radford, L., Arzarello, F., Edwards, L., & Sabena, C. (2017). The multimodal material mind: Embodiment in mathematics education. In J. Cai (Ed.), Compendium for research in mathematics education (pp. 700–721). The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics Inc. (The National Council of Teachers of Mathematics, Inc. This chapter provides an overview of embodiment in mathematics education, with an observation of a grade-5 student working on properties of a regular prism as an illustrative case. After sketching rationalist and empirical epistemologies, the authors summarize Kant’s and Piaget’s views. For mathematics education, approaches such as APOS, the three worlds of mathematics, and semiotic bundles are described, highlighting that mathematical meanings are multimodal, and stressing the cognitive role of embodiment.)

    Google Scholar 

  • *Ruchniewicz, H., & Barzel, B. (2019). Technology supporting student self-assessment in the field of functions—A design-based research study. In G. Aldon & J. Trgalová (Eds.), Technology in mathematics teaching (pp. 49–74). Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-19741-4_3

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Sandoval, I., & Trigueros, M. (2022). Analysis of Primary School Teachers’ Roles in the Dynamics of Mathematics Lessons That Integrate Technology Resources in Challenging Socio-economic Contexts. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era. Mathematics education in the digital era. (Vol. 16). Springer. 10.1007/978-3-031-05254-5_9.

    Google Scholar 

  • **Shvarts, A., Alberto, R., Bakker, A., Doorman, M., & Drijvers, P. (2021). Embodied instrumentation in mathematics learning as the genesis of a body-artifact functional system. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107, 447–469. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10053-0. (This article reconsiders the instrumental approach from a radical embodiment perspective. Rather than focusing on mental schemes, the authors see a key role for body-artifact functional systems, in which an intentionality, a bodily experience, a practice of using artefacts, and a mathematical conceptualization come together. This notion of artifacts being included in the perception-action loops of instrumented actions is illustrated by an empirical example).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Sinclair, N., Chorney, S., Güneş, C., & Bakos, S. (2020). Disruptions in meanings: teachers’ experiences of multiplication in TouchTimes. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52, 1471–1482. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01163-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Sinclair, N., Haspekian, M., Robutti, O., & Clark-Wilson, A. (2022). Revisiting theories that frame research on teaching mathematics with digital technology. In A. Clark-Wilson, O. Robutti, & N. Sinclair (Eds.), The mathematics teacher in the digital era. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-05254-5_15 This chapter offers an overview of theory development in the research on teaching mathematics with digital technology. The authors provide a fascinating map of this landscape, which clearly illustrates how dynamic the research field is developing nowadays, and focus on the multiple ways in which the instrumental approach has evolved over time. Also, they stress the importance of the underlying philosophical assumptions on which these theories are based.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • *Soldano, C., Luz, Y., Arzarello, F., & Yerushalmy, M. (2019). Technology-based inquiry in geometry: Semantic games through the lens of variation. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 100, 7–23. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-018-9841-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Soury-Lavergne, S. (2021). Duos of digital and tangible artefacts in didactical situations. Digital Experiences in Mathematics Education., 7, 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40751-021-00086-8. This article elaborates the notion of “duo of artefacts”, a model of the complex interplay between various manipulatives in use in mathematics classrooms. Exemplified by the case of the the pascaline and the e·pascaline for the learning of place-value base 10 notation of numbers, the paper shows the complex process of interweaving the tangible and the digital worlds into a joint instrumental genesis. In this transformation of the duo into a (system of) instruments, teachers play an important role.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Thurm, D., & Barzel, B. (2022). Teaching mathematics with technology: A multidimensional analysis of teacher beliefs. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 109, 41–63. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10649-021-10072-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • **Trouche, L., Rocha, K., Gueudet, G., & Pepin, B. (2020). Transition to digital resources as a critical process in teachers’ trajectories: the case of Anna’s documentation work. ZDM - Mathematics Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01164-8. This paper addresses the impact of digital resources on mathematics teachers’ work and professional development. Based on the Documentational Approach to Didactics, the authors describe a case study of a teacher using digital resources. The paper shows the development of the teacher’s resource system, and, as such, her professional development over time.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Yerushalmy, M., & Olsher, S. (2020). Online assessment of students’ reasoning when solving example-eliciting tasks: using conjunction and disjunction to increase the power of examples. ZDM - Mathematics Education, 52, 1033–1049. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-020-01134-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • *Young, J. (2017). Technology-enhanced mathematics instruction: A second-order meta-analysis of 30 years of research. Educational Research Review, 22, 19–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.edurev.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding is involved.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands

    Paul Drijvers

  2. Simon Fraser University, Burnaby, Canada

    Nathalie Sinclair

Authors
  1. Paul Drijvers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Nathalie Sinclair
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Paul Drijvers.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

No conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Drijvers, P., Sinclair, N. The role of digital technologies in mathematics education: purposes and perspectives. ZDM Mathematics Education (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11858-023-01535-x

Keywords

Search

Navigation