Abstract
Substantial progress has been made toward connecting design with science in operations management (OM) studies. However, this connection appears to be lopsided, with much more emphasis on theory-to-practice than practice-to-theory in applications of design science (DS). This imbalance tends to impede theoretical progress. To mitigate this imbalance, this paper explores the notion of mechanisms as boundary objects between design and science. First, we outline the problem-solving cycle of DS and the research products it generates. Subsequently, we elaborate on mechanisms, mechanism-based explanations, and law-statements, and how these concepts inform the products of DS research. The argument then turns to how causal mechanisms can be inferred in the DS problem-solving cycle. Finally, we propose a framework for closing the self-reinforcing loop between science and design, which allows OM scholars to more effectively produce practical outputs as well as theoretical breakthroughs.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Not applicable.
References
Ackoff RL (1981) The art and science of mess management, Interfaces 11(1):20–26
Akkermans H, Van Oppen W, Wynstra F, Voss C (2019) Contracting outsourced services with collaborative key performance indicators. J Oper Manag 65(1):22–47. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1002
Antonakis J, Bendahan S, Jacquart P, Lalive R (2010) On making causal claims: a review and recommendations. Leadersh Q 21(6):1086–1120. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.010
Bacharach SB (1989) Organizational theories: some criteria for evaluation. Acad Manage Rev 14(4):496–515. https://doi.org/10.2307/258555
Beer M (2003) Why total Quality Management Programs do not persist: the role of Management Quality and implications for leading a TQM Transformation. Decis Sci 34(4):623–642. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5414.2003.02640.x
Behfar K, Okhuysen GA (2018) Discovery within validation logic: deliberately surfacing, complementing, and substituting abductive reasoning in hypothetico-deductive inquiry. Organ Sci 29(2):323–340. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.2017.1193
Bengtsson B, Hertting N (2014) Generalization by mechanism: thin rationality and Ideal-type analysis in Case Study Research. Philos Social Sci 44(6):707–732. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393113506495
Bertilsson TM (2004) The Elementary forms of Pragmatism: on different types of Abduction. Eur J Social Theory 7(3):371–389. https://doi.org/10.1177/1368431004044199
Bertrand JWM, Fransoo JC (2002) Operations management research methodologies using quantitative modeling. Int J Oper Prod Manage 22(2):241–264. https://doi.org/10.1108/01443570210414338
Bourgeois LJ (1979) Toward a method of middle-range theorizing. Acad Manage Rev 4(3):443–447
Bunge M (1967) Scientific Research II: The Search for Truth. Springer, Berlin
Bunge M (1997) “Mechanism and Explanation”, Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 27(4):410–465, https://doi.org/10.1177/004839319702700402
Bunge M (2004a) How does it work? The search for explanatory mechanisms. Philos Social Sci 34(2):182–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103262550
Bunge M (2004b) Clarifying some misunderstandings about social systems and their mechanisms. Philos Social Sci 34(3):371–381. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393104266860
Bygstad B, Munkvold BE (2011) In search of mechanisms. Conducting a critical realist data analysis. Int Conf Inform Syst 2011 ICIS 2011 3:1978–1992
Bygstad B, Munkvold BE, Volkoff O (2016) Identifying generative mechanisms through affordances: a framework for critical realist data analysis. J Inform Technol 31(1):83–96. https://doi.org/10.1057/jit.2015.13
Chandrasekaran A, de Treville S, Browning T (2020) Editorial: intervention-based research (IBR)—What, where, and how to use it in operations management. J Oper Manag 66(4):370–378. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1093
Coleman JS (1986) Social Theory, Social Research, and a theory of action. Am J Sociol 91(6):1309–1335. https://doi.org/10.1086/228423
Collier A (1994) Critical realism: an introduction to Roy Bhaskar’s philosophy. Verso, London, UK
Collins A (1992) Toward a Design Science of Education. In: Scanlon E, O’Shea T (eds) New directions in Educational Technology. Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 15–22. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-77750-9_2
Corley KG, Gioia DA (2011) Building theory about theory building: What constitutes a theoretical conctribution? Acad Manage Rev 36(1):12–32
Denyer D, Tranfield D, van Aken JE (2008) Developing design propositions through research synthesis. Organ Stud 29(2):249–269. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840607088020
Dimov D, Maula M, Romme AGL (2022) “Crafting and Assessing Design Science Research for Entrepreneurship”, Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, https://doi.org/10.1177/10422587221128271
Dragulinescu S (2016) Inference to the best explanation and mechanisms in medicine. Theoretical Medicine and Bioethics 37(3):211–232. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11017-016-9365-9
Dresch A, Lacerda DP, Antunes JAV, Antunes JAV Jr. (2015) Design Science Research: a method for Science and Technology Advancement, Design Science Research: a method for Science and Technology Advancement, 1st edn. Springer, New York. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-07374-3
Eisenhardt KM (1989) Building theories from case study research. Acad Manage Rev 14:532–550
Elster J (2010) “A plea for mechanisms”, edited by Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. Social Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, No. June 1996, pp. 45–73, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663901.003
Firestone WA (1993) Data as applied to qualitative research, Qualitative Research, 22(4):16–23
Folger R, Stein C (2017) Abduction 101: reasoning processes to aid discovery. Hum Resource Manage Rev Elsevier Inc 27:306–315. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hrmr.2016.08.007
Freitas JSJS, Melo, J.C.F.J.C.F. de, Salerno MSM, Bagno RBBRB, Brasil VCVC (2021) An innovative application of event structure analysis (ESA), MethodsX. 8(101256). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mex.2021.101256
Gauss L, Lacerda DP, Cauchick Miguel PA (2022) Market-driven modularity: design method developed under a design science paradigm. Int J Prod Econ 246:108412. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2022.108412
Glennan SS (1996) Mechanisms and the nature of causation, Erkenntnis. 44(1):49–71. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00172853
Glennan S, Illari P, Weber E (2022) Six theses on mechanisms and mechanistic science. Journal for General Philosophy of Science 53(2):143–161. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10838-021-09587-x
Gomes RFS, Gauss L, Piran FS, Pacheco D (2022) Safety at work: A complex or an exceedingly simple matter? Reliability: Theory and Applications, 1(67):267–287. https://doi.org/10.24412/1932-2321-2022-167-267-287
Groop J, Ketokivi M, Gupta M, Holmström J (2017) “Improving home care: Knowledge creation through engagement and design”, Journal of Operations Management, Elsevier, 53–56(November):9–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2017.11.001
Gross N (2009) A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. Am Sociol Rev 74(3):358–379. https://doi.org/10.1177/000312240907400302
Gundersen S (2018) Mechanism-based explanations versus Autonomy in the Social sciences. Sociol Bull 67(1):35–50. https://doi.org/10.1177/0038022917751976
Haig BD (2005) An abductive theory of scientific method. Psychol Methods 10(4):371–388. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.10.4.371
Halkier B (2011) Methodological practicalities in analytical generalization. Qualitative Inq 17(9):787–797. https://doi.org/10.1177/1077800411423194
Hedström P, Swedberg R (1996) Social mechanisms. Acta Sociol 39(3):281–308. https://doi.org/10.1177/000169939603900302
Hedström P, Swedberg R (2010) Social Mechanisms: An Introductory Essay, edited by Hedström, P. and Swedberg, R. Social Mechanisms, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, https://doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511663901.001
Hedström P, Wennberg K (2017) Causal mechanisms in organization and innovation studies. Innovation: Organ Manage 19(1):91–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/14479338.2016.1256779
Hedström P, Ylikoski P (2010) Causal mechanisms in the social sciences. Ann Rev Sociol 36:49–67. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.012809.102632
Heise DR (1989) Modeling event structures. J Math Sociol 14:2–3. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1989.9990048
Heise DR, Durig A (1997) A frame for organizational actions and macroactions. J Math Sociol 22:95–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0022250X.1997.9990197
Hevner AR, March ST, Park J, Ram S (2004) Design Science in Information Systems Research. MIS Q 28(1):75–105. https://doi.org/10.1021/jm991076c
Holmström J, Romme AGL (2012) Guest editorial: five steps towards exploring the future of operations management. Oper Manage Res 5:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-011-0060-8
Holmström J, Ketokivi M, Hameri AP (2009) Bridging practice and theory: a design science approach. Decis Sci 40(1):65–87. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5915.2008.00221.x
Janiszewski C, van Osselaer SMJ (2022) Abductive Theory Construction. J Consumer Psychol 32(1):175–193. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcpy.1280
Kalaiarasan R, Agrawal TK, Olhager J, Wiktorsson M (2022) Supply chain visibility for improving inbound logistics: a design science approach. Int J Prod Res 61(15):5228-5243 https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2022.2099321
Kim H, Andersen DF (2012) Building confidence in causal maps generated from purposive text data: mapping transcripts of the Federal Reserve. Syst Dynamics Rev 28(4):311–328. https://doi.org/10.1002/sdr.1480
Koskela L, Kroll E (2020) Demonstration, extension, and refinement of the re-proposed notion of design Abduction. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manufacturing: AIEDAM 34(2):286–297. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0890060420000165
Koskela L, Paavola S, Kroll E (2018) The role of Abduction in production of New ideas in Design. Des Res Found. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-73302-9_8
Kruijff GJM (2005) “Peirce’s late theory of abduction: A comprehensive account”, Semiotica, 153(2005):431–454, https://doi.org/10.1515/semi.2005.2005.153-1-4.431
Kunz N, Van Wassenhove LN (2019) Fleet sizing for UNHCR country offices. J Oper Manag 65(3):282–307. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1013
Kuorikoski J (2009) “Two concepts of mechanism: Componential causal system and abstract form of interaction”, International Studies in the Philosophy of Science, 23(2):143–160, https://doi.org/10.1080/02698590903006875
Lacerda DP, Cassel RA, Rodrigues LH (2010) Service process analysis using process engineering and the theory of constraints thinking process. Bus Process Manage J 16(2):264–281. https://doi.org/10.1108/14637151011035598
Land MJ, Thürer M, Stevenson M, Fredendall LD, Scholten K (2021) Inventory diagnosis for flow improvement—A design science approach. J Oper Manag 67(5):560–587. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1133
Laurillard D (2012) Teaching as a Design Science: building pedagogical patterns for learning and technology. Routledge, London
Lewin KF (1951) Field Theory in Social Science: Selected Theoretical Papers (edited by Cartwright D), Harper & Row, New York
Mabsout R (2015) Abduction and economics: the contributions of Charles Peirce and Herbert Simon. J Econ Methodol 22(4):491–516
Magnani L (2001) Abduction, reason and science: processes of Discovery and Explanation. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4419-8562-0
Magnani L (2005) An abductive theory of scientific reasoning, Semiotica, 153(1/4):261–286, https://doi.org/10.1086/690716
Manson N (2006) Is operations research really research? ORiON: The Journal of ORSSA 22(2):155–180. https://doi.org/10.5784/22-2-40
Manzo G (2014) “Data, generative models, and mechanisms: More on the principles of analytical sociology”, in Manzo, G. (Ed.), Analytical Sociology, WILEY, pp. 4–52, https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118762707.ch01
Mcauliffe WHB (2015) “How did Abduction Get Confused with Inference to the Best Explanation?”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce society, 51(3):300–319, https://doi.org/10.2979/trancharpeirsoc.51.3.300
McGrath K (2013) “The potential of generative mechanisms for IS research”, International Conference on Information Systems (ICIS 2013): Reshaping Society Through Information Systems Design, 5:4121–4137
Melloni E, Pesce F, Vasilescu C (2016) Are social mechanisms usable and useful in evaluation research? Evaluation. 22(2):209–227. https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389016643900
Merton RK (1968) On sociological theories of the Middle Range. In: Merton RK (ed) Social Theory and Social structure. Free Press, pp 39–72
Minnameier G (2019) Forms of Abduction and an inferential taxonomy. In: Chiffi D (ed) Handbook of model-based science. Springer, pp 175–195. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_8
Mirzabeiki V, Holmström J, Sjöholm P (2012) Aligning organisational interests in designing rail-wagon tracking. Oper Manage Res 5:3–4. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-012-0072-z
Mohammadian M (2021) Abduction – the context of discovery + underdetermination = inference to the best explanation. Synthese Springer Netherlands 198(5):4205–4228. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02337-z
Öhman M, Hiltunen M, Virtanen K, Holmström J (2021) Frontlog scheduling in aircraft line maintenance: from explorative solution design to theoretical insight into buffer management. J Oper Manag 67(2):120–151. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1108
Oliva R (2019) Intervention as a research strategy. J Oper Manag 65: 710–724. https://doi.org/10.1002/joom.1065
Olsen J, Gjerding A (2019) Modalities of abduction: A philosophy of science-based investigation of abduction. Hum Arenas 2(2):129–152. https://doi.org/10.1007/s42087-018-0044-4
Papachristos G (2018) A mechanism based transition research methodology: bridging analytical approaches, futures, vol 98. Elsevier Ltd, February, pp 57–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.futures.2018.02.006
Pascal A, Thomas C, Romme AGL (2013) Developing a human-centred and Science-based Approach to Design: the knowledge management platform project. Br J Manag 24(2):264–280. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2011.00802.x
Pawson R (2006) Evidence-based policy: a Realist Perspective, 1st edn. SAGE Publications, London, Thousand Oaks, New Delhi
Peffers K, Tuunanen T, Rothenberger MA, Chatterjee S (2007) A Design Science Research Methodology for Information Systems Research. J Manage Inform Syst 24(3):45–78
Pfister R (2022) “Towards a theory of abduction based on conditionals”, Synthese, Springer Netherlands, 200(3):1–30, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-022-03581-6
Philipsen K (2017) Theory building: Using abductive search strategies. In: Freytag P, Young L (eds.), Collaborative Research Design: Working with Business for Meaningful Findings, Singapore: Springer, pp. 45–71, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-5008-4_3
Polit DF, Beck CT (2010) Generalization in quantitative and qualitative research: Myths and strategies, International Journal of Nursing Studies 47(11):1451–1458, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.06.004
Popper KR (1959) The Logic of Scientific Discovery, Hutchinson, London/New York
Pozzoni G, Kaidesoja T (2021) Context in mechanism-based explanation. Philos Social Sci 51(6):523–554. https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393121991657
Raz T, Barnes R, Dvir D (2003) “A Critical Look at Critical Chain Project Management”, Project Management Journal, 33(December):171–175
Ritz B (2020) Comparing Abduction and retroduction in Peircean Pragmatism and critical realism. J Crit Realism Taylor Francis 19(5):456–465. https://doi.org/10.1080/14767430.2020.1831817
Rodrigues MV, Emmeche C (2021) Abduction and styles of scientific thinking. Synthese Springer Netherlands 198(2):1397–1425. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-019-02127-7
Romme AGL (2003) Making a difference: organization as design. Organ Sci 14(5):558–573. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.14.5.558.16769
Romme AGL, Dimov D (2021) Mixing oil with water: Framing and theorizing in management research informed by design science, Designs, 5(1):1–16, https://doi.org/10.3390/designs5010013
Romme AGL, Endenburg G (2006) Construction principles and design rules in the case of circular design. Organ Sci 17(2):287–297. https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.1050.0169
Romme AGL, Reymen IMMJ (2018) Entrepreneurship at the interface of design and science: Toward an inclusive framework, Journal of Business Venturing Insights 10(April):1–8, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbvi.2018.e00094
Rousseau DM (2020) “The realist rationality of evidence-based management”, Academy of Management Learning and Education, 19(3):415–424, https://doi.org/10.5465/AMLE.2020.0050
Sætre AS, Van de Ven A (2021) Generating theory by Abduction. Acad Manage Rev 46(4):684–701. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2019.0233
Saxena D (2019) The search for mechanisms in business research: reflections on retroductive analysis in a multilevel critical realist case study. Electron J Bus Res Methods 17(1):17–27
Schönwandt WL (2002) Planung in Der Krise? Theoretische Orientierungen Für Architektur, Stadt-Und Raumplanung. W. Kohlhammer, Stuttgart, Germany
Schurz G (2008) Patterns of abduction, Synthese, 164(2):201–234, https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-007-9223-4
Schurz G (2016) Common cause Abduction: the formation of theoretical concepts and models in science. Log J IGPL 24(4):494–509. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzw029
Schurz G (2019) Patterns of Abductive Inference. In: Chiffi D (ed) Handbook of model-based science. Springer, pp 151–173. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30526-4_7
Schweitzer B (2015) From malfunction to mechanism. Philosophia Sci 19(1):21–34. https://doi.org/10.4000/philosophiascientiae.1034
Sein MK, Henfridsson O, Purao S, Rossi M, Lindgren R (2011) Action design research. MIS Quarterly: Management Information Systems 35(1):37–56. https://doi.org/10.2307/23043488
Shaffer MJ (2022) Integrating Abduction and Inference to the Best Explanation, European Journal of Pragmatism and American Philosophy, XIV(2):0–18, https://doi.org/10.4000/ejpap.3025
Simon HA (1967) The business school: A problem in organizational design. J Manage Stud 4(1):1–16. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1967.tb00569.x
Simon HA (1969) The Science of the Artificial, 1st edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Simon HA (1996) The sciences of the Artificial, 3rd edn. MIT Press, Cambridge
Simon HA (2002) Forecasting the future or shaping it? Ind Corp Change 11(3):601–605
Star SL, Griesemer JR (1989) Institutional ecology, translations and boundary objects: Amateurs and professionals in Berkeley’s Museum of Vertebrate Zoology, 1907-1939. Social Studies of Science, 19(3):387-420. 10.1177/030631289019003001
Sterman JD (2000) Business dynamics: systems thinking and modeling for a Complex World. Irwin McGraw-Hill
Telles ES, Lacerda DP, Morandi MIWM, Piran FAS (2020) Drum-buffer-rope in an engineering-to-order system: An analysis of an aerospace manufacturer using data envelopment analysis (DEA), International Journal of Production Economics, 222(February):107500, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.09.021
Thatcher SMB, Fisher G (2022) From the editors the nuts and bolts of writing a Theory Paper: a practical guide to getting started. Acad Manage Rev 47(1):1–8. https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2021.0483
Tiddens WW, Tinga T, Braaksma AJJ, Brouwer O (2017) “The business case for condition-based maintenance: A hybrid (Non-) financial approach”, Safety and Reliability - Theory and Applications - Proceedings of the 27th European Safety and Reliability Conference, ESREL 2017, No. June, pp. 821–829, https://doi.org/10.1201/9781315210469-107
Tomiyama T, Takeda H, Yoshioka M, Shimomura Y (2003) “Abduction for creative design”, Proceedings of the ASME Design Engineering Technical Conference, 3:543–552, https://doi.org/10.1115/detc2003/dtm-48650
Tomiyama T, Gu P, Jin Y, Lutters D, Kind C, Kimura F (2009) Design methodologies: Industrial and educational applications. CIRP Annals - Manufacturing Technology 58(2):543–565. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cirp.2009.09.003
Tuzet G (2006) Projectual Abduction. Log J IGPL 14(2):151–160. https://doi.org/10.1093/jigpal/jzk011
Tuzet G (2019) Abduction, IBE and standards of proof. Int J Evid Proof 23:1–2. https://doi.org/10.1177/1365712718813794
Vaishnavi V, Keuchler W (2015) Design Science Research Methods and patterns: Innovating Information and Communication Technology, 2nd edn. CRC Press, Boca Raton. https://doi.org/10.1201/b18448
van Aken JE (2004) Management Research based on the paradigm of the Design sciences: the Quest for Field-Tested and grounded Technological rules. J Manage Stud 41(2):219–246. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2004.00430.x
van Aken JE (2005) Management research as a design science: articulating the research products of mode 2 knowledge production in management. Br J Manag 16(1):19–36. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8551.2005.00437.x
van Aken JE (2007) Design science and organization development interventions: aligning business and humanistic values. J Appl Behav Sci 43(1):67–88. https://doi.org/10.1177/0021886306297761
van Aken JE, Berends H (2018) Problem solving in Organizations: a methodological handbook for business and management students, Problem solving in Organizations: a methodological handbook for business and management students: Third Edition, 3rd edn. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108236164
van Aken JE, Romme AGL (2012) A Design Science Approach to evidence-based management. In: Rousseau DM (ed) The Oxford Handbook of evidence-based management. Oxford University Press, pp 43–60
van Aken JE, Chandrasekaran A, Halman J (2016) Conducting and publishing design science research: inaugural essay of the design science department of the Journal of Operations Management. J Oper Manage Elsevier B V 47–48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2016.06.004
van Strien PJ (1997) Towards a methodology of psychological practice. Theory and Psychology 7(5):683–700
Vaughn L (2020) Concise Guide to critical thinking Student resources, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press
Venable JR, Pries-Heje J, Baskerville R (2016) FEDS: a Framework for evaluation in Design Science Research. Eur J Inform Syst 25(1):77–89. https://doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2014.36
Wacker JG (1998) A definition of theory: research guidelines for different theory-building research methods in operations management. J Oper Manag 16:361–385
Watson KJ, Blackstone JH, Gardiner SC (2007) The evolution of a management philosophy: the theory of constraints. J Oper Manag 25(2):387–402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2006.04.004
Yearworth M, White L (2013) The uses of qualitative data in multimethodology: developing causal loop diagrams during the coding process. Eur J Oper Res Elsevier B V 231(1):151–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2013.05.002
Yin RK (2013) “Validity and generalization in future case study evaluations”, Evaluation, 19(3):321–332, https://doi.org/10.1177/1356389013497081
Ylikoski P (2019) “Mechanism-based theorizing and generalization from case studies”, Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, Elsevier, 78(November):14–22, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsa.2018.11.009
Yu S, Zenker F (2018) Peirce knew why Abduction isn’t IBE—A Scheme and critical questions for Abductive Argument. Argumentation Springer Netherlands 32(4):569–587. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10503-017-9443-9
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the reviewers and editor for providing very helpful comments on an earlier version of this paper. We also thank the Coordination for the Improvement of Higher Education Personnel (CAPES) and the Brazilian National Council for Scientific and Technological Development (CNPq) for funding this research.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Gauss, L., Lacerda, D.P. & Romme, A.G.L. Mechanisms as boundary objects for connecting design with science in operations management research. Oper Manag Res 17, 291–306 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00431-7
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12063-023-00431-7