Skip to main content
Log in

A study on the role of information cues in E-commerce live streaming: evidence from self-reported and fNIRS data

  • Published:
Electronic Commerce Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Unlike general e-commerce, live streaming commerce innovatively allows live streamers to use instant social functions to communicate with viewers and present products in a more vivid way. However, little research has been done to understand the effects of multiple information cues in live streaming commerce. Drawing on the stimulus–organism–response (S–O–R) theory, we develop a two-phase research framework to examine how the combination of endogenous and exogenous cues can influence viewers’ information processing and arouse purchase intention when watching e-commerce live streaming. We also propose that product involvement may moderate the effects of information cues. To investigate the above effects, we conduct a laboratory experiment using self-report and functional near-infrared spectroscopy. In summary, the experimental results show that the richer the cues provided by the live streaming, the better the effect on viewers’ product knowledge accessibility for low-involvement products. However, complex information cues have a negative effect on the viewers’ cognitive processing of high-involvement products, which may distract viewers’ attention from the products and reduce consumers’ product knowledge accessibility. In addition, the introduction of the live streamer, the real-time comments, and the detailed product list aroused the viewers' positive emotions among the viewers and thus stimulated their purchase intention. These findings can help platforms, businesses, and live streamers improve their marketing strategies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ang, T., Wei, S., & Anaza, N. A. (2018). Livestreaming vs pre-recorded: How social viewing strategies impact consumers’ viewing experiences and behavioral intentions. European Journal of Marketing, 52(9/10), 2075–2104.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Boas, D. A., Elwell, C. E., Ferrari, M., & Taga, G. (2014). Twenty years of functional near-infrared spectroscopy: Introduction for the special issue. NeuroImage, 85, 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Boje, D. M., Oswick, C., & Ford, J. D. (2004). Language and organization: The doing of discourse. Academy of management Review, 29(4), 571–577.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Bradley, M. M., & Lang, P. J. (1994). Measuring emotion: The self-assessment manikin and the semantic differential. Journal of behavior therapy experimental psychiatry, 25(1), 49–59.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cenfetelli, R., Benbasat, I. (2019). The influence of e-commerce live streaming on lifestyle fit uncertainty and online purchase intention of experience products. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences 2019(HICSS-52).

  6. Cho, Y. N., Thyroff, A., Rapert, M. I., Park, S. Y., & Lee, H. J. (2013). To be or not to be green: exploring individualism and collectivism as antecedents of environmental behavior. Journal of Business Research, 66(8), 1052–1059.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Cui, X., Bray, S., & Reiss, A. L. (2010). Functional near infrared spectroscopy (NIRS) signal improvement based on negative correlation between oxygenated and deoxygenated hemoglobin dynamics. NeuroImage, 49(4), 3039–3046.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Daft, R.L., Lengel, R.H., & Trevino, L.K. (1987). Message equivocality, media selection, and manager performance: Implications for information systems. MIS Quarterly, 355–366.

  9. Davidson, R.J., Putnam, K.M., Larson, C.L. (2000). Dysfunction in the neural circuitry of emotion regulation--a possible prelude to violence. Science, 289 (5479), 591–594.

  10. Dieler, A. C., Plichta, M. M., Dresler, T., & Fallgatter, A. J. (2010). Suppression of emotional words in the Think/No-Think paradigm investigated with functional near-infrared spectroscopy. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 78(2), 129–135.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Doi, H., Nishitani, S., & Shinohara, K. (2013). NIRS as a tool for assaying emotional function in the prefrontal cortex. Frontiers in human neuroscience, 7, 770.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Fei, M., Tan, H., Peng, X., Wang, Q., & Wang, L. (2021). Promoting or attenuating? An eye-tracking study on the role of social cues in e-commerce livestreaming. Decision Support Systems, 142, 113466.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Ferrari, M., & Quaresima, V. (2012). A brief review on the history of human functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) development and fields of application. NeuroImage, 63(2), 921–935.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Fox, E. (2008). Emotion science: An integration of cognitive and neuroscience approaches. Palgrave Macmillan.

  15. Hilvert-Bruce, Z., Neill, J. T., Sjöblom, M., & Hamari, J. (2018). Social motivations of live-streaming viewer engagement on Twitch. Computers in Human Behavior, 84, 58–67.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hong, I. B. (2015). Understanding the consumer’s online merchant selection process: The roles of product involvement. Perceived Risk, and Trust Expectation International Journal of Information Management, 35(3), 322–336.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hoshi, Y., Huang, J., Kohri, S., Iguchi, Y., Naya, M., Okamoto, T., & Ono, S. (2011). Recognition of human emotions from cerebral blood flow changes in the frontal region: A study with event-related near-infrared spectroscopy. Journal of Neuroimaging, 21(2), e94–e101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hou, F., Guan, Z., Li, B., & Chong, A. Y. L. (2020). Factors influencing people’s continuous watching intention and consumption intention in live streaming: Evidence from China. Internet Research, 30(1), 141–163.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Hu, M., Zhang, M., & Wang, Y. (2017). Why do audiences choose to keep watching on live video streaming platforms? An explanation of dual identification framework. Computers in Human Behavior, 75, 594–606.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacoby, J. (2002). Stimulus-organism-response reconsidered: An evolutionary step in modeling (consumer) behavior. Journal of consumer psychology, 12(1), 51–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2004). Virtual product experience: Effects of visual and functional control of products on perceived diagnosticity and flow in electronic shopping. Journal of Management Information Systems, 21(3), 111–147.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2007). The effects of presentation formats and task complexity on online consumers' product understanding. Mis Quarterly, 475–500.

  23. Jiang, Z., Chan, J., Tan, B. C., & Chua, W. S. (2010). Effects of interactivity on website involvement and purchase intention. Journal of the Association of Information Systems, 11(1), 34–59.

  24. Juslin, P. N., & Västfjäll, D. (2008). Emotional responses to music: The need to consider underlying mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 31(5), 559–575.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kamboj, S., Sarmah, B., Gupta, S., & Dwivedi, Y. (2018). Examining branding co-creation in brand communities on social media: Applying the paradigm of stimulus-organism-response. International Journal of Information Management, 39, 169–185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Li, Y., Li, X., & Cai, J. (2021). How attachment affects user stickiness on live streaming platforms: A socio-technical approach perspective. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 60, 102478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Lin, G.-Y., Wang, Y.-S., Wang, Y.-M., & Lee, M.-H. (2021). What drives people’s intention toward live stream broadcasting. Online Information Review, 45(7), 1268–1289.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Lin, S.-C., Tseng, H.-T., Shirazi, F., Hajli, N., Tsai, P.-T., 2022. Exploring factors influencing impulse buying in live streaming shopping: a stimulus-organism-response (SOR) perspective. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics (ahead-of-print).

  29. Liye., Z., Denghua., Y., & Jingyi., Z. (2017). The impact of online user reviews quality and commentators rank on consumer purchasing intention—the moderating role of product involvement. Management Review, 29(002), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Liyin, J. (2007). The effects of WOM information on consumer purchase decision: An experimental study. Economic Management, 000(022), 36–42.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Luo, H., Cheng, S., Zhou, W., Yu, S., & Lin, X. (2021). A study on the impact of linguistic persuasive styles on the sales volume of live streaming products in social E-commerce environment. Mathematics, 9(13), 1576.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Maslowska, E., Segijn, C. M., Vakeel, K. A., & Viswanathan, V. (2020). How consumers attend to online reviews: An eye-tracking and network analysis approach. International Journal of Advertising, 39(2), 282–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Meng, L. M., Duan, S., Zhao, Y., Lü, K., & Chen, S. (2021). The impact of online celebrity in livestreaming E-commerce on purchase intention from the perspective of emotional contagion. Journal of Retailing Consumer Services, 63, 102733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Menon, G., Raghubir, P., & Schwarz, N. (1995). Behavioral frequency judgments: An accessibility-diagnosticity framework. Journal of Consumer Research, 22(2), 212–228.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Ni., L., Qi., L., Zhilin., Q., & Rui., C. (2020). Source of product information recommended by friends on consumer perception and purchase intention—A case study on Wechat platform. Management Review, 32(04), 185–195.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Park, H. J., & Lin, L. M. (2020). The effects of match-ups on the consumer attitudes toward internet celebrities and their live streaming contents in the context of product endorsement. Journal of Retailing Consumer Services, 52, 101934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Park, O. C., Hopkins, R. (1992). Instructional conditions for using dynamic visual displays: A review. Instructional science, 21, 427–449.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Pavlou, P. A., & Fygenson, M. (2006). Understanding and predicting electronic commerce adoption: An extension of the theory of planned behavior. Mis Quarterly, 30(1), 115–143.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Philippe., A., & Ngobo., P.-V. (1999). Assessment of consumer knowledge and its consequences: A multi-component approach. Advances in Consumer Research, 26(4), 569–575.

    Google Scholar 

  40. Posner, M. I. (1980). Orienting of attention. Quarterly Journal Of Experimental Psychology, 32(1), 3–25.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Qi., L., Xiaojing, R. (2017). Research on how conflictive additional reviews affect perceived helpfulness. Journal of Management Science, 030(004), 139–150.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Rumen, P., W. Verbeke, W., Van Strien, J.W. & Bagozzi, R.P. (2015). Merely being with you increases my attention to luxury products: Using EEG to understand consumers’ emotional experience with luxury branded products. Journal of Marketing Research, 52(4), 546–558.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Sun, Y., & Wang, S. (2019). Understanding consumers’ intentions to purchase green products in the social media marketing context. Asia Pacific Journal of Marketing and Logistics, 32(4), 860–878.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Serences, J. T., & Yantis, S. (2007). Spatially selective representations of voluntary and stimulus-driven attentional priority in human occipital, parietal, and frontal cortex. Cerebral cortex, 17(2), 284–293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Shi, Y., Ma, C., & Zhu, Y. (2021). The impact of emotional labor on user stickiness in the context of livestreaming service—evidence From China. Frontiers in Psychology, 12, 698510.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Shixiong., L., Pengyan., C., & Geng., D. (2019). Product involvement, language attitude and the effectiveness of ads with internet slang. Journal of Psychological Science, 42(1), 124–129.

    Google Scholar 

  47. Srdjan, M., Nikolaos, S., & Konstantinos, R. (2020). Consumers’ purchase intentions towards novel dairy products: evidence from Greece and Serbia. Studies in Business Economics, 15(3), 152–167.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Sreejesh, S., Paul, J., Strong, C., & Pius, J. (2020). Consumer response towards social media advertising: Effect of media interactivity, its conditions and the underlying mechanism. International Journal of Information Management, 54, 102155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Sun, W., Gao, W., Geng, R. (2021). The impact of the interactivity of internet celebrity anchors on consumers’ purchase intention. Frontiers in Psychology 12.

  50. Sun, Y., Shao, X., Li, X., Guo, Y., & Nie, K. (2019). How live streaming influences purchase intentions in social commerce: An IT affordance perspective. Electronic Commerce Research Applications, 37, 100886.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Szymanski, D. M., & Hise, R. T. (2000). E-satisfaction: An initial examination. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 309–322.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Tang, F. (2020). The more interactivity the better? Investigating interactivity, task complexity, and product knowledge in online purchase decisions. Information Technology Management, 21(3), 1–11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Tang, Y. C., Hsieh, Y. C., & Chiu, H. C. (2017). Purchase decision: Does too much choice leave us unhappy? European Journal of Marketing, 51(7–8), 1248–1265.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Te’eni-Harari, T., Lehman-Wilzig, S., & Lampert, S.I.(2009). The importance of product involvement for predicting advertising effectiveness among young people. International Journal of Advertising, 28(2), 203–229.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  55. Wei., Z., Ting., Y., & Wukang., Z. (2020). A Study into the effect of mobile shopping situational factors on impulsive purchasing intention. Management Review, 032(002), 174–183.

    Google Scholar 

  56. Winkielman, P., Knutson, B., Paulus, M., & Trujillo, J. L. (2007). Affective influence on judgments and decisions: Moving towards core mechanisms. Review of General Psychology, 11(2), 179–192.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Xuemei., T., Shengqiang., & L., Min., Z. (2012). Influence of eWOM message on receivers’ re-diffusion intention. Journal of Intelligence, 31(04), 133–137.

    Google Scholar 

  58. Yang, Z., Cai, S., Zhou, Z., & Zhou, N. (2005). Development and validation of an instrument to measure user perceived service quality of information presenting web portals. Information Management, 42(4), 575–589.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Yang., L., Qi., L., & Meng., Y. (2020). Research on the influence of webcast shopping features on consumer buying behavior. Soft Science, 34(6), 108–114.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Yantis, S. (2000). Goal-directed and stimulus-driven determinants of attentional control. Attention and Performance, 18 (Chapter 3), 73–103.

  61. Yi, C., Jiang, Z., & Benbasat, I. (2015). Enticing and engaging consumers via online product presentations: The effects of restricted interaction design. Journal of Management Information Systems, 31(4), 213–242.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  62. Yingnan., Z., Xin., W., Quansheng., W., Chao., M., & Xiaowei., C. (2020). Impact of default good reviews on consumer purchase behavior. Journal of Management Science, 42(11), 125–140.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Yu, L., Shaozheng, Q., Guillén, F., Yu, Z., Floris, K., & Hong, L. (2014). Emotion perception and executive control interact in the salience network during emotionally charged working memory processing. Human Brain Mapping, 35(11), 5606–5616.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Zaichkowsky, J. L. (1994). The personal involvement inventory: reduction, revision, and application to advertising. Journal of Advertising, 23(4), 59–70.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  65. Zajonc, R. B. (1965). Social facilitation. Science, 149(3681), 269–274.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  66. Zhou, J., Zhou, J., Ding, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). The magic of danmaku: A social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electronic Commerce Research Applications, 34, 100815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Zhou, J., Zhou, J., Ding, Y., & Wang, H. (2019). The magic of danmaku: A social interaction perspective of gift sending on live streaming platforms. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 34, 100815.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  68. Zongwei., L., Yanhui., Z., & Dongqing., L. (2017). What factors influence consumers’online purchasing decisions?—Customer perceived value drivers. Management Review, 29(8), 136–146.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work described in this paper was supported by grants from the Fundamental Research Funds of Philosophy and Social Sciences in Jiangsu Universities (No. 2020SJZDA065), the Social Science Funds Project of Jiangsu Province (No. 22GLB037), and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72074101, No 71971101 and No. 71972090).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yajing Diao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

On behalf of all authors, the corresponding author states that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

1.1 Glasses

  1. 1.

    What is the weight of the glasses?

    A. 6 g B.8 g C.10 g D.16 g

  2. 2.

    What is the category of the glasses frame?

    A. Full frame B. Half frame C. No frame.

  3. 3.

    What kind of people are the glasses suitable for?

    A. Male B. Female C. Unisex .

  4. 4.

    What are the colors of the glasses? [Multiple choice].

    A. Black gold B. Golden C. Gold and silver D.Slivery.

  5. 5.

    What material is used for this glasses frame?

    A. Carbon fiber B. Monel C. Enclosure Material D. Hawksbill.

1.2 Toothpaste

  1. 1.

    The main component of this toothpaste is bamboo salt, which is refined after many times of training?

    A. 6 B. 7 C. 8 D. 9

  2. 2.

    What flavor is this toothpaste?

    A. Peppermint B. Fresh Lime C. Fragrant Tea D. Fresh Peach and Mint

  3. 3.

    What is the net content of this toothpaste?

    A. 60 g B.120 g C.180 g D.220 

  4. 4.

    What are the main causes of tooth stains? [Multiple choice]

    A. Tea B. Coffee C. Smoking D. Drinking water with excessive fluoride

  5. 5.

    What are the main advantages of bamboo salt in this toothpaste?[Multiple choice questions]

    A. Reduce the salty taste of salt

    B. Absorbed minerals from bamboo and other raw materials

    C. The impurities contained in the sun salt are removed .

    D. Repair enamel.

1.3 Mobile phone

  1. 1.

    What is the screen size of this phone?

    A. 4.57 inch B. 5.57 inch C. 6.57 inch D. 7.57 inch

  2. 2.

    How many megapixels is the rear main camera of this mobile phone?

    A. 12 megapixel B. 24 megapixel C. 32 megapixel D. 38 megapixel

  3. 3.

    What are the chip parameters of this mobile phone?

    A. A14bionic B. Snapdragon 865 C. Phecda 800U D. Kirin 990.

  4. 4.

    How many watts of fast charging does this phone support?

    A. 20 W B. 40W C. 60W D. 80W

  5. 5.

    What are the options for storage capacity of this phone? [Multiple choice]

    A. 8+18G B.16 + 128G C.8 + 256G D.16 + 256G

  6. 6.

    6.How many degree is the mobile phone portrait wide-angle lens?

    A. 65° B. 85° C.95° D.105°

  7. 7.

    7.How many colors are available for this phone?

    A. 3 B. 4 C. 5 D. 6

1.4 Laptop

  1. 1.

    What are the CPU parameters of this laptop?

    A. i5 B. i7 C. R5 D. i9.

  2. 2.

    How long can the laptop's battery capacity be used for daily office work?

    A. 2-3 h B. 3-4 Wh C. 5-6 h D.8-9 h

  3. 3.

    What is the size of this laptop monitor?

    A. 12 inch B.13 inch C. 14 inch D.15 inch

  4. 4.

    What is the weight of this notebook?

    A. 0.5 kg B. 1.5 kg C. 2.5 kg D. 3.5 kg

  5. 5.

    What are the parameters of this laptop graphics card?

    A.MX450-2G Discrete graphics card.

    B. Beast Core graphics card.

    C.4 G Core graphics card

    D.GTX1650-4G Discrete graphics card.

  6. 6.

    What is the memory capacity and hard disk capacity of this labtop?

    A. 8 GB+ 256 GB B.8  GB + 512 GB C. 16 GB + 256 GB D.1 6 GB + 512 GB

  7. 7.

    What interfaces does this laptop have? [Multiple choice]

    A.USB B. card reader C.HDMI D. Headset microphone connector.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Diao, Y., Yang, Q., Ge, S. et al. A study on the role of information cues in E-commerce live streaming: evidence from self-reported and fNIRS data. Electron Commer Res (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09772-8

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10660-023-09772-8

Keywords

Navigation