Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal investment decision for photovoltaic projects in China: a real options method

  • Published:
Journal of Combinatorial Optimization Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an uncertain environment, it is important to investigate whether to postpone, abandon or immediately invest in photovoltaic (PV) projects. This paper applies a real options model to explore the optimal investment decision for investors and the government’s optimal incentive strategy in China’s distributed PV market. The uncertainties of feed-in tariffs (FIT) and investment costs are included in this study as critical factors affecting the options value of PV projects. Multiple scenarios are designed from different dimensions, including various subsidy durations, different resource areas, and distinct regulatory policies. The results show that not only the current FIT and investment cost affect the investment choice, but also the potential change trend of FIT and investment cost affect the investor’s preference. The results also reveal that appropriate FIT regulation can effectively induce investors who abandon investment to choose to delay investment, and significantly shorten the delay time. These conclusions can provide valuable insights for investors to optimize investment decisions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data will be made available on request.

References

  • Agaton C, Guno C, Villanueva R, Villanueva R (2020) Economic analysis of waste-to-energy investment in the Philippines: a real options approach. Appl Energy 275:115265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Akinsipe O, Moya D, Kaparaju P (2020) Design and economic analysis of off-grid solar PV system in Jos–Nigeria. J Clean Prod 287(4):125055

    Google Scholar 

  • Cardin M, Zhang S, Nuttall W (2017) Strategic real option and flexibility analysis for nuclear power plants considering uncertainty in electricity demand and public acceptance. Energy Econ 64:226–237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chaianong A, Bangviwat A, Menke C, Breitschopf B, Eichhammer W (2020) Customer economics of residential PV–battery systems in Thailand. Renew Energy 146:297–308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen Z, Wang T (2022) Photovoltaic subsidy withdrawal: an evolutionary game analysis of the impact on Chinese stakeholders’ strategic choices. Sol Energy 241:302–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Zeng Y, Xu C (2019) Energy storage subsidy estimation for microgrid: a real option game-theoretic approach. Appl Energy 239:373–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheng C, Wang Z, Liu M, Chen Q, Gbatu AP, Ren X (2017) Defer option valuation and optimal investment timing of solar photovoltaic projects under different electricity market systems and support schemes. Energy 127:594–610

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen W, Wei P (2018) Socially optimal deployment strategy and incentive policy for solar photovoltaic community microgrid: A case of China. Energy Policy 116:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • China PV Industry Development Roadmap (2016) China photovoltaic industry association. http://www.chinapv.org.cn/index.html

  • China PV Industry Development Roadmap (2019) China photovoltaic industry association. http://www.chinapv.org.cn/index.html

  • D’Adamo I, Falcone P, Gastaldi M, Morone P (2020) The economic viability of photovoltaic systems in public buildings: evidence from Italy. Energy 207:118316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das G (2021) Using real options to study the impact of capacity additions and investment expenditures in renewable energies in India. Energy Policy 148:111916

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Das S, Hittinger E, Williams E (2020) Learning is not enough: diminishing marginal revenues and increasing abatement costs of wind and solar. Renew Energy 156:634–644

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dong C, Zhou R, Li J (2021) Rushing for subsidies: the impact of feed-in tariffs on solar photovoltaic capacity development in China. Appl Energy 281:116007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gahrooei M, Zhang Y, Ashuri B, Augenbroe G (2016) Timing residential photovoltaic investments in the presence of demand uncertainties. Sustain Cities Soc 20:109–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hsieh T, Dye C, Ouyang L (2008) Determining optimal lot size for a two-warehouse system with deterioration and shortages using net present value. Eur J Oper Res 191(1):182–192

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Kim K, Park H, Kim H (2017) Real options analysis for renewable energy investment decisions in developing countries. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 75:918–926

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knoke T, Gosling E, Paul C (2020) Use and misuse of the net present value in environmental studies. Ecol Econ 174:106664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin B, Luan R (2020) Do government subsidies promote efficiency in technological innovation of China’s photovoltaic enterprises? J Clean Prod 254:120108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu J, Peng X, Zhao J (2023) Analyzing the spatial association of household consumption carbon emission structure based on social network. J Comb Optim 45:79

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Locatelli G, Mancini M, Lotti G (2020) A simple-to-implement real options method for the energy sector. Energy 197:117226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luan R, Lin B (2022) Positive or negative? Study on the impact of government subsidy on the business performance of China’s solar photovoltaic industry. Renew Energy 189:1145–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mundaca L, Samahita M (2020) What drives home solar PV uptake? Subsidies, peer effects and visibility in Sweden. Energy Res Soc Sci 60:101319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Myers S (1977) Determinants of corporate borrowing. J Financ Econ 5(2):147–175

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narita D, Requate T (2021) Price vs. quantity regulation of volatile energy supply and market entry of RES-E operators. Energy Econ 101:105425

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • National Development and Reform Commission (2019). https://xueqiu.com/6741242618/125942493

  • National Development and Reform Commission (2020). https://baijiahao.baidu.com/s?id=1663553797357853622&%20wfr=spider&for=pc

  • Penizzotto F, Pringles R, Olsina F (2019) Real options valuation of photovoltaic power investments in existing buildings. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 114:109308

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapol S, Szajnfarber Z (2020) Revisiting flexibility in design: an analysis of the impact of implementation uncertainty on the value of real options. J Mech Des 142(12):1–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sayed E, Wilberforce T, Elsaid K, Rabaia M, Olabi A (2020) A critical review on environmental impacts of renewable energy systems and mitigation strategies: wind, hydro, biomass and geothermal. Sci Total Environ 766:144505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Setyawati D (2020) Analysis of perceptions towards the rooftop photovoltaic solar system policy in Indonesia. Energy Policy 144:111569

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shuai J, Cheng X, Ding L, Yang J, Leng Z (2019) How should government and users share the investment costs and benefits of a solar PV power generation project in China? Renew Sustain Energy Rev 104:86–94

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tian L, Shan H, Zhu N (2016) Analysis of the real options in nuclear investment under the dynamic influence of carbon market. Energy Procedia 104:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y, He J, Chen W (2021) Distributed solar photovoltaic development potential and a roadmap at the city level in China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 141:110772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wesseh P, Lin B (2016) A real options valuation of Chinese wind energy technologies for power generation: Do benefits from the feed-in tariffs outweigh costs? J Clean Prod 112:1591–1599

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xiong Y, Yang X (2016) Government subsidies for the Chinese photovoltaic industry. Energy Policy 99:111–119

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xu T, Ma J (2021) Feed-in tariff or tax-rebate regulation? Dynamic decision model for the solar photovoltaic supply chain. Appl Math Model 89(2):1106–1123

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang Z (2023) Research on the influencing factors of living energy consumption and carbon emissions based on spatiotemporal model. J Comb Optim 45:25

    Article  MathSciNet  MATH  Google Scholar 

  • Yang X, He L, Xia Y, Chen Y (2019) Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: the threshold effect. Energy Policy 132:156–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Zhou D, Zhou P, Liu G (2016) Optimal feed-in tariff for solar photovoltaic power generation in china: a real options analysis. Energy Policy 97:181–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Zhou D, Zhou P, Chen H (2017) Optimal design of subsidy to stimulate renewable energy investments: the case of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 71:873–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhang M, Liu L, Wang Q, Zhou D (2020) Valuing investment decisions of renewable energy projects considering changing volatility. Energy Economics 92:104954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu X, Liao B, Yang S (2021) An optimal incentive policy for residential prosumers in Chinese distributed photovoltaic market: a Stackelberg game approach. J Clean Prod 308:127325

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors are supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 72201089) and the Introducing and Stabilizing Talent Project of Anhui Agriculture University (No. rc402202).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Baoyu Liao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have not disclosed any competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhu, X., Liao, B. Optimal investment decision for photovoltaic projects in China: a real options method. J Comb Optim 46, 30 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01096-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10878-023-01096-5

Keywords

Navigation