Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Physical biology of cell–substrate interactions under cyclic stretch

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Biomechanics and Modeling in Mechanobiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Mechanosensitive focal adhesion (FA) complexes mediate dynamic interactions between cells and substrates and regulate cellular function. Integrins in FA complexes link substrate ligands to stress fibers (SFs) and aid load transfer and traction generation. We developed a one-dimensional, multi-scale, stochastic finite element model of a fibroblast on a substrate that includes calcium signaling, SF remodeling, and FA dynamics. We linked stochastic dynamics, describing the formation and clustering of integrins to substrate ligands via motor-clutches, to a continuum level SF contractility model at various locations along the cell length. We quantified changes in cellular responses with substrate stiffness, ligand density, and cyclic stretch. Results show that tractions and integrin recruitments varied along the cell length; tractions were maximum at lamellar regions and reduced to zero at the cell center. Optimal substrate stiffness, based on maximum tractions exerted by the cell, shifted toward stiffer substrates at high ligand densities. Mean tractions varied biphasically with substrate stiffness and peaked at the optimal substrate stiffness. Cytosolic calcium increased monotonically with substrate stiffness and accumulated near lamellipodial regions. Cyclic stretch increased the cytosolic calcium, integrin concentrations, and tractions at lamellipodial and intermediate regions on compliant substrates. The optimal substrate stiffness under stretch shifted toward compliant substrates for a given ligand density. Stretch also caused cell deadhesions beyond a critical substrate stiffness. FA’s destabilized on stiff substrates under cyclic stretch. An increase in substrate stiffness and cyclic stretch resulted in higher fibroblast contractility. These results show that chemomechanical coupling is essential in mechanosensing responses underlying cell–substrate interactions.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alcoser TA, Bordeleau F, Carey SP, Lampi MC, Kowal DR, Somasegar S, Varma S, Shin SJ, Reinhart-King CA (2015) Probing the biophysical properties of primary breast tumor-derived fibroblasts. Cell Mol Bioeng 8:76–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Arora PD, Bibby KJ, McCulloch CAG (1994) Slow oscillations of free intracellular calcium ion concentration in human fibroblasts responding to mechanical stretch. J Cell Physiol 161(2):187–200

    Google Scholar 

  • Balaban NQ, Schwarz US, Riveline D, Goichberg P, Tzur G, Sabanay I, Mahalu D, Safran S, Bershadsky A, Addadi L, Geiger B (2001) Force and focal adhesion assembly: a close relationship studied using elastic micropatterned substrates. Nat Cell Biol 3(5):466–472

    Google Scholar 

  • Bangasser B, Rosenfeld S, Odde D (2013) Determinants of maximal force transmission in a motor-clutch model of cell traction in a compliant microenvironment. Biophys J 105:581–592

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell GI (1978) Models for the specific adhesion of cells to cells. Science 80(200):618–627

    Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Ze’ev A, Farmer SR, Penman S (1980) Protein synthesis requires cell-surface contact while nuclear events respond to cell shape in anchorage-dependent fibroblasts. Cell 21:365–372

    Google Scholar 

  • Besser A, Schwarz US (2007) Coupling biochemistry and mechanics in cell adhesion: a model for inhomogeneous stress fiber contraction. New J Phys 9:425

    Google Scholar 

  • Booth-Gauthier EA, Du V, Ghibaudo M, Rape AD, Dahl KN, Ladoux B (2013) Hutchinson-Gilford progeria syndrome alters nuclear shape and reduces cell motility in three dimensional model substrates. Integr Biol 5:569–577

    Google Scholar 

  • Burridge K, Chrzanowska-Wodnicka M (1996) Focal adhesions, contractility, and signaling. Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol 12:463–518

    Google Scholar 

  • Byron A, Humphries JD, Bass MD, Knight D, Humphries MJ (2011) Proteomic analysis of integrin adhesion complexes. Sci Signal 4:2107–2114

    Google Scholar 

  • Chagnon-Lessard S, Jean-Ruel H, Godin M, Pelling AE (2017) Cellular orientation is guided by strain gradients. Integr Biol. https://doi.org/10.1039/c7ib00019g

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chan CE, Odde DJ (2008) Traction dynamics of filopodia on compliant substrates. Science 322:1687–1691

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapman GB, Durante W, Hellums JD, Schafer AI (2000) Physiological cyclic stretch causes cell cycle arrest in cultured vascular smooth muscle cells. Am J Physiol-Heart Circ Physiol 278(3):H748–H754

    Google Scholar 

  • Chatterjee A, Kondaiah P, Gundiah N (2022) Stress fiber growth and remodeling determines cellular morphomechanics under uniaxial cyclic stretch. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 21(2):553–567. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-021-01548-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cui Y, Hameed FM, Yang B, Lee K, Pan CQ, Park S, Sheetz M (2015) Cyclic stretching of soft substrates induces spreading and growth. Nat Commun 6:6333

    Google Scholar 

  • De R (2018) A general model of focal adhesion orientation dynamics in response to static and cyclic stretch. Commun Biol. https://doi.org/10.1038/s42003-018-0084-9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deeg JA, Louban I, Aydin D, Selhuber-Unkel C, Kessler H, Spatz JP (2011) Impact of local versus global ligand density on cellular adhesion. Nano Lett 11:1469–1476

    Google Scholar 

  • Deshpande VS, McMeeking RM, Evans AG (2006) A bio-chemo-mechanical model for cell contractility. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A 103:14015–14020

    Google Scholar 

  • Elosegui-Artola A, Bazellières E, Allen MD et al (2014) Rigidity sensing and adaptation through regulation of integrin types. Nat Mater 13:631–637

    Google Scholar 

  • Elson EL, Genin GM (2013) The role of mechanics in actin stress fiber kinetics. Exp Cell Res 319:2490–2500. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.yexcr.2013.06.017

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Endlich N, Otey CA, Kriz W, Endlich K (2007) Movement of stress fibers away from focal adhesions identifies focal adhesions as sites of stress fiber assembly in stationary cells. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 64(12):966–976

    Google Scholar 

  • Flück M, Giraud M-N, Tunç V, Chiquet M (2003) Tensile stress-dependent collagen XII and fibronectin production by fibroblasts requires separate pathways. Biochim Biophys Acta Mol Cell Res 1593:239–248

    Google Scholar 

  • Galbraith CG, Yamada KM, Sheetz MP (2002) The relationship between force and focal complex development. J Cell Biol 159:695–705

    Google Scholar 

  • Gallant ND, Michael KE, Garcı J (2005) Cell adhesion strengthening: Contributions of adhesive area, integrin binding, and focal adhesion assembly. Mol Biol Cell 16(9):4329–4340. https://doi.org/10.1091/mbc.E05-02-0170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gardel ML, Sabass B, Ji L, Danuser G, Schwarz US, Waterman CM (2008) Traction stress in focal adhesions correlates biphasically with actin retrograde flow speed. J Cell Biol 183:999–1005

    Google Scholar 

  • Ghibaudo M, Saez A, Trichet L, Xayaphoummine A, Browaeys J, Silberzan P, Buguin A, Ladoux B (2008) Traction forces and rigidity sensing regulate cell functions. Soft Matter 4:1836–1843

    Google Scholar 

  • Grinnell F (1994) Fibroblasts, myofibroblasts, and wound contraction. J Cell Biol 124:401–404

    Google Scholar 

  • Guimarães CF, Gasperini L, Marques AP, Reis RL (2020) The stiffness of living tissues and its implications for tissue engineering. Nat Rev Mater 5:351–370

    Google Scholar 

  • Handorf AM, Zhou Y, Halanski MA, Li W-J (2015) Tissue stiffness dictates development, homeostasis, and disease progression. Organogenesis 11:1–15

    Google Scholar 

  • Herum KM, Choppe J, Kumar A, Engler AJ, McCulloch AD (2017) Mechanical regulation of cardiac fibroblast profibrotic phenotypes. Mol Biol Cell 28:1871–1882

    Google Scholar 

  • Hinz B, Phan SH, Thannickal VJ, Prunotto M, Desmoulière A, Varga J, De Wever O, Mareel M, Gabbiani G (2012) Recent developments in myofibroblast biology: paradigms for connective tissue remodeling. Am J Pathol 180:1340–1355

    Google Scholar 

  • Huang C, Miyazaki K, Akaishi S, Watanabe A, Hyakusoku H, Ogawa R (2013) Biological effects of cellular stretch on human dermal fibroblasts. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg 66(12):e351–e361

    Google Scholar 

  • Humphrey JD, Rajagopal KR (2002) A constrained mixture model for growth and remodeling of soft tissues. Math Model Methods Appl Sci 12(3):407–430

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  • Hynes RO (2002) Integrins: bidirectional, allosteric signaling machines. Cell 110:673–687. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00971-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janmey PA, Winer JP, Murray ME, Wen Q (2009) The hard life of soft cells. Cell Motil Cytoskelet 66(8):597–605. https://doi.org/10.1002/cm.20382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kechagia JZ, Ivaska J, Roca-Cusachs P (2019) Integrins as biomechanical sensors of the microenvironment. Nat Rev (mol Cell Biol) 20:457–473. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41580-019-0134-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolahi KS, Donjacour A, Liu X, Lin W, Simbulan RK, Bloise E, Maltepe E, Rinaudo P (2012) Effect of substrate stiffness on early mouse embryo development. PLoS ONE 7:e41717

    Google Scholar 

  • Kollmannsberger P, Bidan CM, Dunlop JWC, Fratzl P, Vogel V (2018) Tensile forces drive a reversible fibroblast-to-myofibroblast transition during tissue growth in engineered clefts. Sci Adv 4:eaao4881

    Google Scholar 

  • Kumar A, Ouyang M, Van den Dries K, McGhee EJ, Tanaka K, Anderson MD, Groisman A, Goult BT, Anderson KI, Schwartz MA (2016) Talin tension sensor reveals novel features of focal adhesion force transmission and mechanosensitivity. J Cell Biol 213:371–383

    Google Scholar 

  • Liguo S, Qu L, Zhu R, Li H, Xue Y, Liu X, Fan J, Fan H (2016) Effects of mechanical stretch on cell proliferation and matrix formation of mesenchymal stem cell and anterior cruciate ligament fibroblast. Stem Cells Int 2016:1–10

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindsey SH, Tribe RM, Songu-Mize E (2008) Cyclic stretch decreases TRPC4 protein and capacitative calcium entry in rat vascular smooth muscle cells. Life Sci 83:29–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Livne A, Geiger B (2016) The inner workings of stress fibers—from contractile machinery to focal adhesions and back. J Cell Sci 129:1293–1304. https://doi.org/10.1242/jcs.180927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Livne A, Bouchbinder E, Geiger B (2014) Cell reorientation under cyclic stretching. Nat Commun 106:3938

    Google Scholar 

  • Lotz MM, Burdsal CA, Erickson HP, McClay DR (1989) Cell adhesion to fibronectin and tenascin: quantitative measurements of initial binding and subsequent strengthening response. J Cell Biol 109:1795–1805

    Google Scholar 

  • Marinković A, Mih JD, Park J-A, Liu F, Tschumperlin DJ (2012) Improved throughput traction microscopy reveals pivotal role for matrix stiffness in fibroblast contractility and TGF-β responsiveness. Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol 303(3):L169–L180. https://doi.org/10.1152/ajplung.00108.2012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mochitate K, Pawelek P, Grinnell F (1991) Stress relaxation of contracted collagen gels: disruption of actin filament bundles, release of cell surface fibronectin, and down-regulation of DNA and protein synthesis. Exp Cell Res 193:198–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Muller C, Pompe T (2016) Distinct impacts of substrate elasticity and ligand affinity on traction force evolution. Soft Matter 12:272–280

    Google Scholar 

  • Munevar S, Wang Y-L, Dembo M (2004) Regulation of mechanical interactions between fibroblasts and the substratum by stretch-activated Ca2+ entry. J Cell Sci 117:85–92

    Google Scholar 

  • Murata N, Ito S, Furuya K, Takahara N, Naruse K, Aso H, Kondo M, Sokabe M, Hasegawa Y (2014) Ca+2 influx and ATP release mediated by mechanical stretch in human lung fibroblasts. Biochem Biophys Res Comm 453:101–105

    Google Scholar 

  • Nishitani WS, Saif TA, Wang Y (2011) Calcium signaling in live cells on elastic gels under mechanical vibration at subcellular levels. PLoS ONE 6(10):e26181

    Google Scholar 

  • Oh RS, Haak AJ, Smith KMJ, Ligresti G, Choi KM, Xie T, Wang S, Walters PR, Thompson MA, Freeman MR, Manlove LJ, Chu VM, Feghali-Bostwick C, Roden AC, Schymeinsky J, Pabelick CM, Prakash YS, Vassallo R, Tschumperlin DJ (2018) RNAi screening identifies a mechanosensitive ROCK-JAK2-STAT3 network central to myofibroblast activation. J Cell Sci 131:jcs209932

    Google Scholar 

  • Oria R, Wiegand T, Escribano J, Elosegui-Artola A, Uriarte JJ, Moreno-Pulido C, Platzman I, Delcanale P, Albertazzi L, Navajas D, Trepat X, García-Aznar JM, Cavalcanti-Adam EA, Roca-Cusachs P (2017) Force loading explains spatial sensing of ligands by cells. Nature 552:219–224

    Google Scholar 

  • Paddillaya N, Ingale K, Gaikwad C, Saini DK, Pullarkat P, Kondaiah GI, Menon, Gundiah N (2022) Cell adhesion strength and tractions are mechano-diagnostic features of cellular invasiveness. Soft Matter 18:4378–4388

    Google Scholar 

  • Pathak A, Mcmeeking RM, Evans AG, Deshpande VS (2011) An analysis of the cooperative mechano-sensitive feedback between intracellular signaling, focal adhesion development, and stress fiber contractility. J Appl Mech 78(4):41001–41012

    Google Scholar 

  • Pauty J, Nakano S, Usuba R, Nakajima T, Johmura Y, Omori S, Sakamoto N, Kikuchi A, Nakanishi M, Matsunaga YT (2021) A 3D tissue model-on-a-chip for studying the effects of human senescent fibroblasts on blood vessels. Biomater Sci 9:199–211

    Google Scholar 

  • Plotnikov SV, Pasapera AM, Sabass B, Waterman CM (2012) Force fluctuations within focal adhesions mediate ECM-rigidity sensing to guide directed cell migration. Cell 151:1513–1527

    Google Scholar 

  • Rathod ML, Pareek N, Agrawal S, Jaddivada S, Lee DW, Gundiah N (2017) Engineered ridge and micropillar array detectors to quantify the directional migration of fibroblasts. RSC Adv 7:51436–51443

    Google Scholar 

  • Roca-Cusachs P, Iskratsch T, Sheetz MP (2012) Finding the weakest link: exploring integrin-mediated mechanical molecular pathways. J Cell Sci 125:3025–3038

    Google Scholar 

  • Shao Y, Mann JM, Chen W, Fu J (2014) Global architecture of the F-actin cytoskeleton regulates cell shape-dependent endothelial mechanotransduction. Integr Biol 6:300–311

    Google Scholar 

  • Swaminathan V, Kalappurakkal JM, Mehta SB, Nordenfelt P, Moore TI, Koga N, Baker DA, Oldenbourg R, Tani T, Mayor S, Springer TA, Waterman CM (2017) Actin retrograde flow actively aligns and orients ligand-engaged integrins in focal adhesions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 114:10648

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi J, Petre BM, Walz T, Springer TA (2002) Global conformational rearrangements in integrin extracellular domains in outside-in and inside-out signaling. Cell 110:599–611

    Google Scholar 

  • Takagi J, Strokovich K, Springer TA, Walz T (2003) Structure of integrin alpha5beta1 in complex with fibronectin. EMBO J 22:4607–4615

    Google Scholar 

  • Tang X, Tofangchi A, Anand SV, Saif TA (2014) A novel cell traction force microscopy to study multi-cellular system. PLoS Comput Biol 10:e1003631

    Google Scholar 

  • Tiwari S, Askari JA, Humphries MJ, Bulleid NJ (2011) Divalent cations regulate the folding and activation status of integrins during their intracellular trafficking. J Cell Sci 124:1672–1680

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang JHC, Yang G, Li Z, Shen W (2004) Fibroblast responses to cyclic mechanical stretching depend on cell orientation to the stretching direction. J Biomech 37(4):573–576

    Google Scholar 

  • Ward MD, Hammer DA (1993) A theoretical analysis for the effect of focal contact formation on cell-substrate attachment strength. Biophys J 64(3):936–959

    Google Scholar 

  • Watt FM, Jordan PW, O’Neill CH (1988) Cell shape controls terminal differentiation of human epidermal keratinocytes. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85:5576–5580

    Google Scholar 

  • Winograd-Katz SE, Fassler R, Geiger B, Legate KR (2014) The integrin adhesome: from genes and proteins to human disease. Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol 15:273–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Wozniak MA, Modzelewska K, Kwong L, Keely PJ (2004) Focal adhesion regulation of cell behavior. Biochim Biophys Acta 1692:103–119

    Google Scholar 

  • Zeidan A, Nordström I, Dreja K, Malmqvist U, Hellstrand P (2000) Stretch-dependent modulation of contractility and growth in smooth muscle of rat portal vein. Circ Res 87:228–234

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

NG gratefully acknowledges the Science and Engineering Research Board, Government of India (SERB/003640 and SERB POWER) for project support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Mechanical Engineering, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore, 560012, India

    Siddhartha Jaddivada & Namrata Gundiah

Authors
  1. Siddhartha Jaddivada
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Namrata Gundiah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

SJ performed the simulations, analyzed the results, and helped write the manuscript. NG designed the study, supervised the research, analyzed results, and wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Namrata Gundiah.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. All co-authors have seen and agree with the contents of the manuscript and there is no financial interest to report. The submission is not under review in any other journal.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 184 kb)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Jaddivada, S., Gundiah, N. Physical biology of cell–substrate interactions under cyclic stretch. Biomech Model Mechanobiol 23, 433–451 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01783-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10237-023-01783-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation