Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Syntax for the Martial Intercorporeality: The Case of Aikido and Kenpo

  • Empirical Study / Analysis
  • Published:
Human Studies Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This article provides arguments to show that there is a form of syntax specific to the bodily movements of certain martial arts. This syntax of bodily mouvements is different from that usually identified in multimodal conversational analysis which consists of the addition of bodily extensions to speech turns Keevallik (Res Lang Soc Interact 46(1):1–21, 2013) and (Res Lang Soc Interact 51(1):1–21, 2018). Based on an analysis of video extracts from two martial arts (Aikido and Kenpo), the article shows that martial arts movements, accomplished within a martial intercorporeality, acquire syntactic characteristics that make it possible to anticipate trajectories accomplished simultaneously, before and during body contact. The article presents the four movement-units common to these two martial arts and the way participants combine them, in a sequentiality of simultaneity.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Armstrong, D. F., Stokoe, W. C., Wilcox, S. E. (1995). Gesture and the nature of language. Cambridge University Press.

  • Hall T. Edward (1968). Proxemics [and Comments and Replies]. Current Anthropology, 9(2/3), 83–108.

  • Hofstetter, E., & Keevallik, L. (2023). Prosody is used for real-time exercising of other bodies. Language & Communication, 88, 52–72. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.langcom.2022.11.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hofstetter, E., Keevallik, L., & Löfgren, A. (2021). Suspending syntax: Bodily strain and progressivity in talk. Frontiers in Communication. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.663307

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keevallik, L. (2013). The interdependence of bodily demonstrations and clausal syntax. Research on Language & Social Interaction, 46(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2013.753710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keevallik, L. (2018). What does embodied interaction tell us about grammar? Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 1–21. https://doi.org/10.1080/08351813.2018.1413887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kendon, A. (2004). Gesture: Visible Action as Utterance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511807572

  • Lefebvre, A. (2020). To touch and to be touched: The coordination of touching-whole-body-mouvements in Aikido practice. In A. Cekaite & L. Mondada (Eds.), Touch in social Interaction. Touch, language, and body (pp. 150–169). Routledge.

  • Lefebvre, A. (2016a). The coordination of moves in Aikido interaction. Gestures, 15(2), 123–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lefebvre, A. (2016b). The pacific philosophy of Aikido: an interactional approach. Martial Arts Studies, 2, 91–109.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merleau-Ponty, M. (1960). Signes Paris. Gallimard.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, C., & Wedelstaedt, U. v. (2017). Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction: New perspectives on moving bodies in interaction. In C. Meyer & U. v. Wedelstaedt (Eds.), Moving bodies in Interaction—Interacting bodies in motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports (pp. 1–23). John Benjamins.

  • Mondada, L. (2018). Multiple temporalities of language and body in interaction: Challenges for transcribing multimodality. Research on Language and Social Interaction, 51(1), 85–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mondada, L. (2021). Language and the sensing body: How sensoriality permeates syntax in interaction. Frontires in Communication, 6, 664430. https://doi.org/10.3389/fcomm.2021.664430

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sacks, H., Schegloff, E. A., & Jefferson, G. (1974). A simplest systematics for the organisation of turn-taking in conversation. Language, 50(4), 696–735.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schegloff, E. (1996). Turn organization: One intersection of grammar and interaction. In E. Ochs, E. Schegloff, & S. Thompson (Eds.), Interaction and Grammar (Studies in Interactional Sociolinguistics, pp. 52–133). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511620874.002

  • Schindler, L. (2017). Teaching bodies: Visual and haptic communication in martial arts. In C. Meyer & U. v. Wedelstaedt (Eds.), Moving bodies in interaction - Interacting bodies in motion: Intercorporeality, interkinesthesia, and enaction in sports (pp. 245–265). John Benjamins.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. CIEH Sorbonne Nouvelle Paris 3, Paris, France

    Augustin Lefebvre

Authors
  1. Augustin Lefebvre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Augustin Lefebvre.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lefebvre, A. A Syntax for the Martial Intercorporeality: The Case of Aikido and Kenpo. Hum Stud 46, 783–806 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09695-1

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10746-023-09695-1

Keywords

Search

Navigation