Abstract
Men often dominate political discussion on social media. Our research investigates when women’s political discussion increases to close the gender gap in political discussion. We argue that women’s political discussion will increase when gender is a highly salient political topic. These increases in women’s political discussion will most likely occur among “resource-poor” women and women of color who often lack the conventional resources thought to facilitate political discussion, such as education and income. We analyzed the gendered dynamics of political discussion on Twitter using a novel dataset of tweets spanning a four-year period before and after the 2016 presidential election—a period when gender and women’s issues shifted from having a low level of salience to a high level of salience. We found that women and men engage in political discussion at comparable rates regardless of their resource levels and during periods of high-gender salience and low-gender salience. We also found that both women of color and white women increase their political discussion during times of high-gender salience relative to low-gender salience. Our results show that social media is a platform that can close the gender gap in political discussion between women and men regardless of women’s resource levels or the salience of gender in politics.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
Replication data is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
AAUW. (2016). Barriers and bias: The status of women in leadership. American Association of University Women. https://www.aauw.org/resources/research/barrier-bias
ABA. (2017). A current glance at women in the law. American Bar Association. https://www.americanbar.org/groups/diversity/women/resources/statistics
Agresti, A., Franklin, C., & Kingenberg, B. (2016). Statistics: The art and science of learning from data (4th edition). Pearson Publishers.
Al-Rawi, A., Kane, O., & Bizimana, A. J. (2021). Topic modeling of public Twitter discourses, part bot, part active human user, on climate change and global warming. Journal of Environmental Media, 2(1), 31–53. https://doi.org/10.1386/jem_00025_1
Azmat, G., & Ferrer, R. (2017). Gender gaps in performance: Evidence from young lawyers. Journal of Political Economy, 125(5), 1306–1355. https://doi.org/10.1086/693686
Barberá, P., Casas, A., Nagler, J., Egan, P. J., Bonneau, R., Jost, J. T., & Tucker, J. A. (2019). Who leads? Who follows? Measuring issue attention and agenda setting by legislators and the mass public using social media data. American Political Science Review, 113(4), 883–901. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055419000352
Bauer, N. M. (2020). The qualification gap: Why women must be more qualified than men to win political office. Cambridge University Press.
Bauer, N. M., & Taylor, T. (2023). Selling them short? Differences in news coverage of female and male candidate qualifications. Political Research Quarterly, 76(1), 308–322. https://doi.org/10.1177/10659129221086024
Bennett, L. L., & Bennett, S. E. (1989). Enduring gender differences in political interest: The impact of socialization and political dispositions. American Politics Quarterly, 17(1), 105–122. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X8901700106
Berry, M., & Chenoweth, E. (2018). Who made the women’s march? In D.S. Meyer. and S. Tarrow (Eds.), The resistance: The dawn on the anti-trump opposition movement (pp. 75–89). Oxford University Press.
Bigler, R. S., & Lieben, L. S. (2006). A developmental intergroup theory of social stereotypes and prejudice. Advances in Child Development and Behavior, 34, 39–89. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2407(06)80004-2
Blei, D. M., Ng, A. Y., & Jordan, M. I. (2003). Latent dirichlet allocation. Journal of Machine Learning Research, 3(Jan), 993–1022.
Bode, L. (2012). Facebooking it to the polls: A study in online social networking a political behavior. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 9(4), 352–369. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2012.709045
Bode, L. (2017). Closing the gap: Gender parity in political engagement on social media. Information, Communication & Society, 20(4), 587–603. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2016.1202302
Bode, L., Vraga, E. K., Borah, P., & Shah, D. V. (2014). A new space for political behavior: Political social networking and its democratic consequences. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 19(3), 414–429. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12048
Bos, A. L., Greenlee, J. S., Holman, M. R., Oxley, Z. M., & Lay, J. C. (2022). This one’s for the boys: How gendered political socialization limits girls’ political ambition and interest. American Political Science Review, 116(2), 484–501. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0003055421001027
Boulianne, S. (2015). Social media use and participation: A meta-analysis of current research. Information, Communication & Society, 18(5), 524–538. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1008542
Boulianne, S., Koc-Michalska, K., & Vedel, T. (2019). Gender and online politics: Digital media as friend and foe in times of change. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 175–180. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865511
Brock, A. (2020). Distributed blackness: African American cybercultures. NYU Press.
Brock, A. (2012). From the blackhand side: Twitter as a cultural conversation. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 56(4), 529–549. https://doi.org/10.1080/08838151.2012.732147
Brown, K., Plummer, M., Bell, A., Combs, M., Gates-Burgess, B., Mitchel, A., Sparks, M., McLemore, M. R., & Jackson, A. (2022). Black women’s lived experiences of abortion. Qualitative Health Research, 32(7), 1099–1113. https://doi.org/10.1177/10497323221097622
Brown, N. E. (2014). Political participation of women of color: An intersectional analysis. Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 35(4), 315–348. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2014.955406
Brown, N. E., & Lemi, D. C. (2021). Sister style: The politics of appearance for black women political elites. Cambridge University Press.
Burns, N., Schlozman, K. L., & Verba, S. (2004). The private roots of public action: Gender, equality, and political participation. Harvard University Press.
Campbell, A., Converse, P. E., Miller, W. E., & Stokes, D. E. (1960). The American voter. Wiley.
Campbell, R., & Winters, K. (2008). Understanding men’s and women’s political interests: Evidence from a study of gendered political attitudes. Journal of Elections, Public Opinion and Parties, 18(1), 53–74. https://doi.org/10.1080/17457280701858623
Catalyst. (2019). Women in management: Quick take. Catalyst Researchers. https://www.catalyst.org/research/women-in-management
Center for American Women and Politics (CAWP). (2023). Gender differences in voter turnout. Center for American Women and Politics, Eagleton Institute of Politics, Rutgers University-New Brunswick. https://cawp.rutgers.edu/facts/voters/gender-differences-voter-turnout
Chen, G. M. (2011). Tweet this: A uses and gratifications perspective on how active twitter use gratifies a need to connect with others. Computers in Human Behavior, 27(2), 755–762. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2010.10.023
Coe, K., Kenski, K., & Rains, S. A. (2014). Online and uncivil? Patterns and determinants of incivility in newspaper website comments. Journal of Communication, 64(4), 658–679. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcom.12104
Coffé, H., & Bolzendahl, C. (2010). Same game, different rules? Gender differences in political participation. Sex Roles, 62(5), 318–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-009-9729-y
Collins, P. H. (2000). Gender, black feminism, and black political economy. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 568(1), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.1177/000271620056800105
Conroy, M. (2015). Masculinity, media, and the American presidency. Palgrave McMillan.
Converse, P. (1972). Change in the American electorate. In A. Campbell & P. Converse (Eds.), The human meaning of social change (pp. 263–337). Russell Sage Foundation.
Correal, A. (2016, November 8). Pantsuit Nation, a ‘secret’ Facebook hub, celebrates Clinton. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2016/11/09/us/politics/facebook-pantsuit-nation-clinton.html
Crenshaw, K. W. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43(6), 1241–1299. https://doi.org/10.2307/1229039
Crenshaw, K. W., Ritchie, A. J., Anspach, R., Gilmer, R., & Harris, L. (2015). Say her name: Resisting police brutality against black women. Center for Intersectionality and Social Policy Studies. https://scholarship.law.columbia.edu/faculty_scholarship/3226
Deal, B., Martinez, L. S., Spitzberg, B. H., & Tsou, M. (2020). “I definitely did not report it when I was raped… #WeBelieveChristine #MeToo": A content analysis of disclosures of sexual assault on Twitter. Social Media + Society, 6(4), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120974610
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1992). The gender gap in political knowledge. The Public Perspective, 3(5), 23–26.
Delli Carpini, M. X., & Keeter, S. (1996). What Americans know about politics and why it mattesr. Yale University Press.
Diesner, J. (2014). ConText: Software for the integrated analysis of text data and network. The Social and Semantic Networks in Communication Research Preconference at Conference of International Communication Association (ICA), Seattle, WA. http://jdiesnerlab.ischool.illinois.edu/calls/ICA2014/Diesner_ICA_2014.pdf
Diesner, J., Aleyasen, A., Kim, J., Mishra, S., & Soltani, K. (2013). Using socio-semantic network analysis for assessing the impact of documentaries [Paper presentation]. Workshop of Information in Networks, New York, NY. https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&type=pdf&doi=d09ace1091c96a7309278ecee37ee358a1997e2b
Elliott, R. (2022, April 14). Elon Musk urges greater transparency at Twitter, calling platform the ‘de facto town square’. The Wall Street Journal. https://www.wsj.com/articles/elon-musk-urges-greater-transparency-at-twitter-calling-platform-the-de-facto-town-square-11649959658
ElSherief, M., Belding, E., & Nguyen, D. (2017, May). #notokay: Understanding gender-based violence in social media. Proceedings of the International AAAI Conference on Web and Social Media, 11(1), 52–61. https://doi.org/10.1609/icwsm.v11i1.14877
Evans, H. K., & Clark, J. H. (2016). “You tweet like a girl!" How female candidates campaign on Twitter. American Politics Research, 44(2), 326–352. https://doi.org/10.1177/1532673X15597747
Farris, E. M., & Holman, M. R. (2014). Social capital and solving the puzzle of Black women’s political participation. Politics, Groups, and Identities, 2(3), 331–349. https://doi.org/10.1080/21565503.2014.925813
Flamino, J., Galeazzi, A., Feldman, S., Macy, M. W., Cross, B., Zhou, Z., & Szymanski, B. K. (2023). Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections. Nature Human Behaviour, 7, 904–916. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8
Frey, W. H. (2016). Women could make a big difference in a Clinton-Trump match-up. Brookings Institute. https://www.brookings.edu/blog/the-avenue/2016/04/29/women-could-make-a-big-difference-in-a-clinton-trump-match-up/
(GAO) U.S. Government Accountability Office. (2022). Women in the workforce: The gender pay gap is greater for certain racial and ethnic groups and varies by education level. https://www.gao.gov/products/gao-23-106041
Gil de Zúñiga, H., Jung, N., & Valenzuela, S. (2012). Social media use for news and individu’ls’ social capital, civic engagement and political participation. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 17(3), 319–336. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1083-6101.2012.01574.x
Guo, H., Liang, Q., & Li, Z. (2016). An improved AD-LDA topic model based on weighted Gibbs sampling. In 2016 IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), 1978–1982. https://doi.org/10.1109/IMCEC.2016.7867563
Hansen, S. B. (1997). Talking about politics: Gender and contextual effects on political proselytizing. The Journal of Politics, 59(1), 73–103.
Hargittai, E., & Litt, E. (2011). The tweet smell of celebrity success: Explaining variation in Twitter adoption among a diverse group of young adults. New Media & Society, 13(5), 824–842. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444811405805
Herring, M., Sweet-Cushman, J., Prough, E., & Vultee, F. (2020). Who dominates the conversation? The effect of gender, discussion medium, and controversy on political discussion. Feminist Media Studies, 22(3), 1522–1570. https://doi.org/10.1080/14680777.2020.1808036
Hill, M. L. (2018). “Thank you, black Twitter”: State violence, digital counterpublics, and pedagogies of resistance. Urban Education, 53(2), 286–302. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042085917747124
Hillygus, S. D. (2005). The missing link: Exploring the relationship between higher education and political engagement. Political Behavior, 27(1), 25–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-005-3075-8
Holman, M. R., Schneider, M. C., & Pondel, K. (2015). Gender targeting in political advertisements. Political Research Quarterly, 68(4), 816–829. https://doi.org/10.1177/1065912915605182
Huckfeldt, R., Beck, P. A., Dalton, R. J., & Levine, J. (1995). Political environments, cohesive social groups, and the communication of public opinion. American Journal of Political Science, 39(4), 1025–1045. https://doi.org/10.2307/2111668
Huckfeldt, R., & Sprague, J. (1995). Citizens, politics, and social communication: Information and influence in an election campaign. Cambridge University Press.
Huddy, L., Cassese, E., & Lizotte, M. K. (2008). Gender, public ppinion, and political reasoning. In C. Wolbrecht, K. Beckwith, & L. Baldez (Eds.), Political women and American democracy. Cambridge University Press.
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1966). Party identification at multiple levels of government. American Journal of Sociology, 72(1), 86–101. https://doi.org/10.1086/224263
Jennings, M. K., & Niemi, R. G. (1974). The political character of adolescence. Princeton University Press.
Jerit, J., & Barabas, J. (2017). Revisiting the gender gap in political knowledge. Political Behavior, 39(4), 817–838. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11109-016-9380-6
Jones, L., Chałupnik, M., Mackenzie, J., & Mullany, L. (2022). ‘STFU and start listening to how scared we are’: Resisting misogyny on Twitter via #NotAllMen. Discourse, Context & Media, 47(100596), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dcm.2022.100596
Kahn, C. (2016, March 17). Half of U.S. women have ‘very unfavorable’ views of Trump: Poll. Reuters. https://www.reuters.com/article/us-usa-election-trump-women/half-of-u-s-women-have-very-unfavorable-view-of-trump-poll-idUSKCN0WJ155
Kanthak, K., & Woon, J. (2015). Women don’t run? Election aversion and candidate entry. American Journal of Political Science, 59(3), 595–612. https://doi.org/10.1111/ajps.12158
Kaplan, A. M. (2015). Social media, the digital revolution, and the business of media. International Journal on Media Management, 17(4), 197–199. https://doi.org/10.1080/14241277.2015.1120014
Karpowitz, C. F., & Mendelberg, T. (2014). The silent sex: Gender, deliberation, and institutions. Princeton University Press.
Katz, E. (1957). The two-step flow of communication: An up-to-date report on an hypothesis. Public Opinion Quarterly, 21(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1086/266687
Kelly, A. (2016, June 6). Hillary Clinton becomes first woman to top major-party ticket. NPR. https://www.npr.org/2016/04/27/475765145/clintons-road-to-the-nomination-was-paved-by-other-women-who-ran
Kim, J. W., Guess, A., Nyhan, B., & Reifler, J. (2021). The distorting prism of social media: How self-selection and exposure to incivility fuel online comment toxicity. Journal of Communication, 71(6), 922–946. https://doi.org/10.1093/joc/jqab034
Koc-Michalska, K., Schiffrin, A., Lopez, A., Boulianne, S., & Bimber, B. (2021). From online political posting to mansplaining: The gender gap and social media in political discussion. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 197–210. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319870259
Koenig, A. M., Eagly, A. H., Mitchell, A. A., & Ristikari, T. (2011). Are leader stereotypes masculine? A meta-analysis of three research paradigms. Psychological Bulletin, 137(4), 616. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0023557
Koenig, A. M., & Eagly, A. H. (2014). Evidence for the social role theory of stereotype content: Observations of groups’ roles shape stereotypes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 107(3), 371–392. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0037215
Kuper, S. (2018, October 11). How pantsuit nation founder Libby Chamberlain took on Trump. Financial Times. https://www.ft.com/content/51fcd900-cc1c-11e8-b276-b9069bde0956
Lazarsfeld, P. F., Berelson, B. R., & Gaudet, H. (1948). The people’s choice. Columbia University Press.
Lee-Won, R. J., White, T. N., & Potocki, B. (2017). The black catalyst to tweet: The role of discrimination experience, group identification, and racial agency in black Americans’ instrumental use of Twitter. Information, Communication & Society, 21(8), 1097–1115. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2017.1301516
Li, M., Turki, N., Izaguirre, C. R., DeMahy, C., Thibodeaux, B. L., & Gage, T. (2020). Twitter as a tool for social movement: An analysis of feminist activism on social media communities. Journal of Community Psychology, 49(3), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1002/jcop.22324
Lutz, C., Hoffmann, C. P., & Meckel, M. (2014). Beyond just politics: A systematic literature review of online participation. First Monday, 19(7), 1–36. https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v19i7
Madden, M., Lenhart, A., Cortesi, S., Gasser, U., Duggan, M., & Smith, A. (2013). Teens, social media, and privacy. Pew Internet and American Life Project. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2013/05/21/teens-social-media-and-privacy
McGregor, S. C. (2019). Social media as public opinion: How journalists use social media to represent public opinion. Journalism, 20(8), 1070–1086. https://doi.org/10.1177/1464884919845458
McGregor, S. C., & Mourao, R. R. (2016). Talking politics on Twitter: Gender, elections, and social networks. Social Media + Society, 2(3), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305116664218
Meeks, L. (2016). Gendered styles, gendered differences: Candidates’ use of personalization and interactivity on Twitter. Journal of Information Technology & Politics, 13(4), 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1080/19331681.2016.1160268
Mendez, J. M., & Osborn, T. (2010). Gender and the perception of knowledge in political discussion. Political Research Quarterly, 63(2), 269–279. https://doi.org/10.1080/15544770903501384
Mendoza, S. A., & DiMaria, M. G. (2018). Not “with her”: Gendered political slogans affect conservative women’s perceptions of female leaders. Sex Roles, 80, 1–10. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-018-0910-z
Mondak, J. J. (2001). Developing valid knowledge scales. American Journal of Political Science, 45(1), 224–238. https://doi.org/10.2307/2669369
Murthy, D., Gross, A., & Pensavalle, A. (2016). Urban social media demographics: An exploration of Twitter use in major American cities. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 21(1), 33–49. https://doi.org/10.1111/jcc4.12144
Mutz, D. C. (2002). The consequences of cross-cutting networks for political participation. American Journal of Political Science, 46(4), 838–855. https://doi.org/10.2307/3088437
Nemer, D. (2016). Online favela: The use of social media by the marginalized in Brazil. Information Technology for Development, 22(3), 364–379. https://doi.org/10.1080/02681102.2015.1011598
Oxley, Z. M., Holman, M. R., Greenlee, J. S., Bos, A. L., & Lay, J. C. (2020). Children’s views of the American presidency. Public Opinion Quarterly, 84(1), 141–157. https://doi.org/10.1093/poq/nfaa007
Park, C. S. (2019). Learning politics from social media: Interconnection of social media use for political news and political issue and process knowledge. Communication Studies, 70(3), 253–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/10510974.2019.1581627
Pereira, F. B. (2019). Gendered political contexts: The gender gap in political knowledge. The Journal of Politics, 81(4), 1480–1493. https://doi.org/10.1086/704599
Peterson-Salahuddin, C. (2022). Posting back: Exploring platformed black feminist communities on Twitter and Instagram. Social Media+ Society, 8(1). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211069051
Pew Research Center. (2019a). Social media fact sheet. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/fact-sheet/social-media
Pew Research Center. (2019b). Sizing up Twitter users. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2019/04/24/sizing-up-twitter-users/
Pew Research Center. (2021). A record number of women are serving in the 117th congress. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2021/01/15/a-record-number-of-women-are-serving-in-the-117th-congress/
Pew Research Center. (2022). Politics on Twitter: One-third of tweets from U.S. adults are political. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2022/06/16/politics-on-twitter-one-third-of-tweets-from-u-s-adults-are-political
Pew Research Center. (2023). 118th congress has a record number of women. https://www.pewresearch.org/fact-tank/2023/01/03/118th-congress-has-a-record-number-of-women/
Plutzer, E., & Zipp, J. F. (1996). Identity politics and voting for women candidates. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 60(1), 30–57. https://doi.org/10.1086/297738
Polletta, F., & Chen, P. C. B. (2013). Gender and public talk: Accounting for women’s variable participation in the public sphere. Sociological Theory, 31(4), 291–317. https://doi.org/10.1177/0735275113515172
Reiter-Haas, M., Klösch, B., Hadler, M., & Lex, E. (2022). Polarization of opinions on COVID-19 measures: Integrating Twitter and survey data. Social Science Computer Review, 41(5), 1811–1835. https://doi.org/10.1177/08944393221087662
Robnett, B., & Bany, J. A. (2011). Gender, church involvement, and African-American political participation. Sociological Perspectives, 54(4), 689–712. https://doi.org/10.1525/sop.2011.54.4.689
Schneider, M. C., Holman, M. R., Diekman, A. B., & McAndrew, T. (2016). Power, conflict, and community: How gendered views of political power influence women’s political ambition. Political Psychology, 37(4), 515–531. https://doi.org/10.1111/pops.12268
Schouten, F. (2016, August 3). Hillary Clinton’s bid draws legions of female donors. USA TODAY. https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/politics/elections/2016/08/03/hillary-clinton-female-donors/87961646/
Schuster, J. (2013). Invisible feminists? Social media and young women’s political participation. Political Science, 65(1), 8–24. https://doi.org/10.1177/0032318713486474
Scott, J., Brown, N., Frasure, L., & Pinderhughes, D. (2021). Destined to run? The role of political participation on black women’s decision to run for elected office. National Review of Black Politics, 2(1), 22–52. https://doi.org/10.1525/nrbp.2021.2.1.22
Semega, J., & Kollar, M. (2022). Income in the United States: 2021. The United States census bureau. https://www.census.gov/library/publications/2022/demo/p60-276.html
Shah, D. V., Cho, J., Eveland, W. P., Jr., & Kwak, N. (2005). Information and expression in a digital age: Modeling internet effects on civic participation. Communication Research, 32(5), 531–565. https://doi.org/10.1177/0093650205279209
Sharma, S. (2013). Black Twitter? Racial hashtags, networks and contagion. New Formations, 78, 46–64. https://doi.org/10.3898/NewF.78.02.2013
Smith, A. (2014). African Americans and technology use: A demographic portrait. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/2014/01/African-Americans-and-Technology-Use.pdf
Smith, A., & Raine, L. (2010). 8% of online Americans use Twitter. http://www.pewinternet.org/files/old-media//Files/Reports/2010/PIP-Twitter-Update-2010.pdf
Southern, R., & Harmer, E. (2021). Twitter, incivility and “everyday” gendered othering: An analysis of tweets sent to UK members of parliament. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 259–275. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319865519
Stolle, D., & Micheletti, M. (2013). The gender gap reversed: Political consumerism as a women-friendly form of civic and political engagement. In E. Gidengil & B. O’Neill (Eds.), Gender and social capital (pp. 45–72). Routledge.
Sweet-Cushman, J. (2016). Gender, risk assessment, and political ambition. Politics and the Life Sciences, 35(2), 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1017/pls.2016.13
Sweet-Cushman, J., Herring, M., Prough, E., & Vultee, F. (2023). Prone to agreement: Does context matter for men and women in political discussions? Journal of Women, Politics & Policy, 44(2), 206–222. https://doi.org/10.1080/1554477X.2022.2113658
Tillery, A. B. (2019). What kind of movement is black lives matter? The view from twitter. Journal of Race, Ethnicity, and Politics, 4, 297–323. https://doi.org/10.1017/rep.2019.17
Tromble, R. (2018). Thanks for (actually) responding! How citizen demand shapes politicians interactive practices on Twitter. New Media & Society, 20(2), 676–697. https://doi.org/10.1177/1461444816669158
Uldam, J., & Vestergaard, A. (2015). Civic engagement and social media: Political participation beyond protest. Springer.
Van Duyn, E., Peacock, C., & Stroud, N. J. (2019). The gender gap in online news comment sections. Social Science Computer Review, 39(2), 181–196. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439319864876
Van Duyn, E. (2021). Democracy lives in darkness: How and why people keep their politics a secret. Oxford University Press.
Verba, S., Burns, N., & Schlozman, K. L. (1997). Knowing and caring about politics: Gender and political engagement. The Journal of Politics, 59(4), 1051–1072.
Verba, S., Schlozman, K. L., & Brady, H. E. (1995). Voice and equality: Civic voluntarism in American politics. Cambridge University Press.
Vochocova, L. (2018). Witty divas, nice mothers and tough girls in a sexist world: Experiences and strategies of female influencers in online political debates. Media, Culture & Society, 40(4), 535–550. https://doi.org/10.1177/0163443717729211
Vochocova, L., Stetka, V., & Mazak, J. (2016). Good girls don’t comment on politics? Gendered character of online political participation in the Czech Republic. Information, Communication & Society, 19(10), 1321–1339. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2015.1088881
Weber, L. M., Loumakis, A., & Bergman, J. (2003). Who participates and why? An analysis of citizens on the internet and the mass public. Social Science Computer Review, 21(1), 26–42. https://doi.org/10.1177/0894439302238969
Western, B. (1995). Concepts and suggestions for robust regression analysis. American Journal of Political Science, 39(3), 786–817.
Wolfinger, R., & Rosenstone, S. J. (1980). Who votes? Yale University Press.
Zipp, J. F., & Plutzer, E. (1985). Gender differences in voting for female candidates: Evidence from the 1982 election. The Public Opinion Quarterly, 49(2), 179–197. https://doi.org/10.1086/268913
Acknowledgements
The authors are grateful to the Social Media and Analysis Lab which assisted with the data collection for this project, as well as the research seminar participants at the Manship School at LSU. Please contact the corresponding author for replication data file.
Funding
The authors have no funding to report for this data.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The authors contributed equally to this data collection, development, and theory-building in this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
The research was conducted involving human subjects and the protocol was approved with the authors’ Institutional Review Board Approval.
Consent to Participate
Participants provided informed consent about the risks and benefits associated in taking part in the study before any data collections occurred.
Human and Animal Ethics
This project followed IRB guidelines in collecting data using human subjects. This project did not use animals in the data collection or analyses.
Consent for Publication
The authors consent to this manuscript being published, if accepted, at this journal.
Competing Interests
The authors have no potential conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Oden, A., Bauer, N.M., Jiang, K. et al. Women’s Engagement in Political Discussion on Twitter: The Role of Gender Salience, Resources, and Race/Ethnicity. Sex Roles 90, 250–266 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01439-w
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-023-01439-w