Skip to main content
Log in

A review of robotic charging for electric vehicles

  • Regular Paper
  • Published:
International Journal of Intelligent Robotics and Applications Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper reviews the technical aspects of robotic charging for Electric Vehicles (EVs), aiming to identify research trends, methods, and challenges. It implemented the Systematic Literature Review (SLR), starting with the formulation of research question; searching and collecting articles from databases, including Web of Science, Scopus, Dimensions, and Lens; selecting articles; and data extraction. We reviewed the articles published from 2012 to 2022 and found that the number of publications increased exponentially. The top five keywords were electric vehicle, robotic, automatic charging, pose estimation, and computer vision. We continued an in-depth review from the points of view of autonomous docking, charging socket detection-pose estimation, plug insertion, and robot manipulator. No article used a camera, Lidar, or Laser as the sensor that reported successful autonomous docking without position error. Furthermore, we identified two problems when using computer vision for the socket pose estimation and the plug insertion: low robustness against different socket shapes and light conditions; inability to monitor excessive plugging force. Using infrared to locate the socket yielded more robustness. However, it requires modification of the socket on the vehicle. A few articles used a camera and force/torque sensors to control the plug insertion based on different control approaches: model-based control and data-driven machine learning. The challenges were to increase the success rate and shorten the time. Most researchers used commercial 6-DOF robot manipulators, whereas a few designed lower-DOF robot manipulators. Another research challenge was developing a 4-DOF robot manipulator with compliance that ensures a 100% success rate of plug insertion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Acosta Calderon, A.C., Ng, B.S., Mohan, E.R., Ng, H.K.: Docking system and power management for autonomous mobile robots. Appl. Mech. Mater. 590, 407–412 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.590.407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Afaq, A., Ahmed, M., Kamal, A., Masood, U., Shahzaib, M., Rashid, N., Tiwana, M., Iqbal, J., & Awan, A.: Development of FPGA-based system for control of an Unmanned Ground Vehicle with 5-DOF robotic arm. 2015 15th International Conference on Control, Automation and Systems (ICCAS) (2015)

  • Akbaripour, H., Masehian, E.: Semi-lazy probabilistic roadmap: a parameter-tuned, resilient and robust path planning method for manipulator robots. Int. J. Adv. Manuf. Technol. 89(5–8), 1401–1430 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-016-9074-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alawadhi, M., Almazrouie, J., Kamil, M., Khalil, K.A.: A systematic literature review of the factors influencing the adoption of autonomous driving. Int. J. Syst. Assur. Eng. Manage. 11(6), 1065–1082 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13198-020-00961-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bang, Y., Lee, Y., Kang, B.: Image-to-image translation-based data augmentation for robust EV charging inlet detection. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 7(2), 3726–3733 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2022.3146939

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Banguero, E., Correcher, A., Pérez-Navarro, Á., Morant, F., Aristizabal, A.: A review on battery charging and discharging control strategies: application to renewable energy systems. Energies (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/en11041021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barrett, E., Reiling, M., Mirhassani, S., Meijering, R. e., Jager, J., & Mimmo, N.: Autonomous Battery exchange of UAVs with a Mobile Ground Base. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA) (2018)

  • Barzegaran, M.R., Zargarzadeh, H., Mohammed, O.A.: Wireless power transfer for electric vehicle using an adaptive robot. IEEE Trans. Magn. 53(6), 1–4 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1109/tmag.2017.2664800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bdiwi, M., Such´y, J., Jockesch, M., & Winkler, A.: Improved Peg-in-Hole (5-Pin Plug) Task: Intended for Charging Electric Vehicles by Robot System Automatically. 2015 12th International Multi-Conference on Systems, Signals & Devices (SSD15), Mahdia, Tunisia (2015)

  • Behl, M., DuBro, J., Flynt, T., Hameed, I., Lang, G., & Park, F.: Autonomous Electric Vehicle Charging System. 2019 Systems and Information Engineering Design Symposium (SIEDS), Charlottesville, VA, USA (2019)

  • Bi, Z., Luo, C., Miao, Z., Zhang, B., Zhang, C.W.J.: Automatic robotic recharging systems—development and challenges. Ind. Robot: Int. J. Robot. Res. Appl. 48(1), 95–109 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1108/ir-05-2020-0109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bucher, J., Knipschild, J., Künne, B.: Development and evaluation of an automatic connection device for electric cars with four DOFs and a control scheme based on infrared markers. Int. J. Mechatron. Autom. 8(4), 175–186 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1504/ijma.2021.120378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cernohorsky, J., & Jandura, P.: Robotic Plug-in Combined Charging System with Improved Robustness The third International Tropical Agriculture Conference (TROPAG 2019), Brisbane, Australia (2019)

  • Cernohorsky, J., Krcmar, L., & Jandura, P.: Robotic Plugging of CCS Type 2 Connector 2022 23rd International Carpathian Control Conference (ICCC) (2022)

  • Chablat, D., Mattacchione, R., & Ottaviano, E.: Design of a robot for the automatic charging of an electric car. ROMANSY 24 - Robot Design, Dynamics and Control, Cham (2022)

  • Chang, C.L., Chang, C.Y., Tang, Z.Y., Chen, S.T.: High-efficiency automatic recharging mechanism for cleaning robot using multi-sensor. Sensors (basel) 18(11), 3911 (2018). https://doi.org/10.3390/s18113911

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Coffman, M., Bernstein, P., Wee, S.: Electric vehicles revisited: a review of factors that affect adoption. Transp. Rev. 37(1), 79–93 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1217282

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cortes, I., & Kim, W.-J.: Autonomous positioning of a mobile robot for wireless charging using computer vision and misalignment-sensing coils. 2018 Annual American Control Conference (ACC), Milwaukee, WI, USA (2018)

  • Dandan, H., Lei, W., Man, W.: Design and realization of automatic exchange station for mobile robot. J. Theor. Appl. Inf. Technol. 44(1), 55–59 (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Di Lillo, P., Di Vito, D., Simetti, E., Casalino, G., & Antonelli, G.: Satellite-Based Tele-Operation of an Underwater Vehicle-Manipulator System. Preliminary Experimental Results. 2018 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Brisbane, QLD, Australia (2018)

  • Dong, X., Ren, Y., Meng, J., Lu, S., Wu, T., & Sun, Q.: Design and implementation of multi-rotor UAV power relay platform. 2018 2nd IEEE Advanced Information Management, Communicates, Electronic and Automation Control Conference (IMCEC), Xi'an, China (2018)

  • Du, Y., Mallajosyula, B., Sun, D., Chen, J., Zhao, Z., Rahman, M., Quadir, M., & Jawed, M. K.: A low-cost robot with autonomous recharge and navigation for weed control in fields with narrow row spacing. 2021 IEEE/RSJ International Conference on Intelligent Robots and Systems (IROS), Prague, Czech Republic (2021)

  • Fang, Y., Cao, Y., Hong, Y., & Zhang, F.: The design of electric vehicle charging robot for the parking lots of the community 2020 International Conference on Robots & Intelligent System (ICRIS), Sanya, China (2020)

  • Farhan, A. S., Bassiouny, A. M., Afif, Y. T., Gamil, A. A., Alsheikh, M. A., Kamal, A. M., Elenany, K. S., Bahour, M. A., Awad, M. I., & Maged, S. A.: Autonomous Non-Destructive Assembly/Disassembly of Electronic Components using A Robotic Arm 2021 16th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Systems (ICCES), Cairo, Egypt (2021)

  • Fisher, T.M., Farley, K.B., Gao, Y., Bai, H., Tse, Z.T.H.: Electric vehicle wireless charging technology: a state-of-the-art review of magnetic coupling systems. Wireless Power Transfer 1(2), 87–96 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1017/wpt.2014.8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fleischer, J., Gerlitz, E., Rieβ, S., Coutandin, S., Hofmann, J.: Concepts and requirements for flexible disassembly systems for drive train components of electric vehicles. Procedia CIRP 98, 577–582 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procir.2021.01.154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Golbabaei, F., Yigitcanlar, T., Bunker, J.: The role of shared autonomous vehicle systems in delivering smart urban mobility: a systematic review of the literature. Int. J. Sustain. Transp. 15(10), 731–748 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1080/15568318.2020.1798571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goli, P., Shireen, W.: PV powered smart charging station for PHEVs. Renew. Energy 66, 280–287 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2013.11.066

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • GS, A. R., & PS, L. P.: Design of Automatic Charging System for Electric Vehicles using Rigid-Flexible Manipulator 2022 Second International Conference on Power, Control and Computing Technologies (ICPC2T), Raipur, India (2022)

  • Gungor, A. K., & Kiyak, I.: Automatic Charging of Electric Driverless Vehicles with Robotic Arm 2021 Innovations in Intelligent Systems and Applications Conference (ASYU), Elazig, Turkey (2021)

  • Guo, D., Xie, L., Yu, H., Wang, Y., & Xiong, R.: Electric Vehicle Automatic Charging System Based on Vision-force Fusion. 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Sanya, China (2021)

  • Harik, E.H.C.: Design and implementation of an autonomous charging station for agricultural electrical vehicles. Appl. Sci. 11(13), 6168 (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/app11136168

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Hersh, M.: Overcoming barriers and increasing independence – service robots for elderly and disabled people. Int. J. Adv. Robot. Syst. (2015). https://doi.org/10.5772/59230

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirz, M., Walzel, B., Brunner, H.: Autonomous charging of electric vehicles in industrial environment. Tehnički Glasnik 15(2), 220–225 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31803/tg-20210428191147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hu, B., Cheng, K., Zhang, W., & Zhang, X.: Prototype Design and Performance Experiment of Passive Compliant Mechanism for the Automatic Charging Robot End Effector. In Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering. pp. 281–287, (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6978-4_34

  • Jiang, W., Wu, G., Fan, F., Wang, W., Zhang, J., Ye, X., Zhou, P.: Autonomous location control of a robot manipulator for live maintenance of high-voltage transmission lines. Ind. Robot: Int. J. 44(5), 671–686 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1108/ir-08-2016-0220

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jiang, J., Wu, F., Zhang, P., Wang, F., Yang, Y.: Pose estimation of automatic battery-replacement system based on ORB and improved keypoints matching method. Appl. Sci. 9(2), 237 (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/app9020237

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jokesch, M., Suchý, J., Winkler, A., Fross, A., & Thomas, U.: Generic Algorithm for Peg-In-Hole Assembly Tasks for Pin Alignments with Impedance Controlled Robots. In Robot 2015: Second Iberian Robotics Conference, pp. 105–117, (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-27149-1_9

  • Kassens-Noor, E., Cai, M., Kotval-Karamchandani, Z., Decaminada, T.: Autonomous vehicles and mobility for people with special needs. Transp. Res. Part a: Policy Pract. 150, 385–397 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2021.06.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Khonji, M., Alshehhi, M., Tseng, C.-M., & Chau, C.-K.: Autonomous Inductive Charging System for Battery-operated Electric Drones Proceedings of the Eighth International Conference on Future Energy Systems (2017)

  • Kitchenham, B., Brereton, O.P., Budgen, D., Turner, M., Bailey, J., Linkman, S.: Systematic literature reviews in software engineering–a systematic literature review. Inf. Softw. Technol. 51(1), 7–15 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemm, S., Essinger, M., & ander, J. O.: Autonomous Multi-Story Navigation for Valet Parking. 2016 IEEE 19th International Conference on Intelligent Transportation Systems (ITSC), Rio de Janeiro, Brazil (2016)

  • Leijon, J., Boström, C.: Charging electric vehicles today and in the future. World Electric Vehicle J. (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/wevj13080139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, T., Jin Long, Z., De Xu, H.: The PID control system for the electric buses battery swap robot. Adv. Mater. Res. 588–589, 1589–1592 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.588-589.1589

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin, H., Quan, P., Liang, Z., Lou, Y., Wei, D., Di, S.: Collision localization and classification on the end-effector of a cable-driven manipulator applied to EV auto-charging based on DCNN-SVM. Sensors (basel) 22(9), 3439 (2022). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093439

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B., Lin, Y., & Min, H.: Electric Vehicle Automatic Charging System Guided Electric by 3D Vision and F/T Sensor 2021 4th International Conference on Intelligent Autonomous Systems (ICoIAS), Wuhan, China (2021)

  • Long, Y., Wei, C., Cao, C., Hu, X., Zhu, B., & Long, F.: Design of High-power Fully Automatic Charging Device. 2019 IEEE Sustainable Power and Energy Conference (iSPEC), Beijing, China (2019)

  • Lou, Y.N., Di, S.: Design of a cable-driven auto-charging robot for electric vehicles. IEEE Access 8, 15640–15655 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2020.2966528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, W., & Shen, L.: Design and Research of an Automatic Charging System for Electric Vehicles. 2020 15th IEEE Conference on Industrial Electronics and Applications (ICIEA), Kristiansand, Norway (2020)

  • Lv, X., Chen, G., Hu, H., & Lou, Y.: A Robotic Charging Scheme for Electric Vehicles Based on Monocular Vision and Force Perception. 2019 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Biomimetics (ROBIO), Dali, China (2019)

  • Magid, E., Zakiev, A., Tsoy, T., Lavrenov, R., Rizvanov, A.: Automating pandemic mitigation. Adv. Robot. 35(9), 572–589 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1080/01691864.2021.1905059

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McLoughlin, S., Prendergast, D., & Donnellan, B.: Autonomous Vehicles for Independent Living of Older Adults: Insights and Directions for a Cross-European Qualitative Study. 7th International Conference on Smart Cities and Green ICT Systems – SMARTGREENS (2018)

  • Miseikis, J., Ruther, M., Walzel, B., Hirz, M., & Brunner, H.: 3D Vision Guided Robotic Charging Station for Electric and Plug-in Hybrid Vehicles. arXiv. (2017) https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.1703.05381

  • Narasipuram, R.P., Mopidevi, S.: A technological overview & design considerations for developing electric vehicle charging stations. J. Energy Storage (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Narvaez, E., Ravankar, A.A., Ravankar, A., Emaru, T., Kobayashi, Y.: Autonomous VTOL-UAV docking system for heterogeneous multirobot team. IEEE Trans. Instrum. Meas. 70, 1–18 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1109/tim.2020.3039649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okunevich, I., Trinitatova, D., Kopanev, P., Tsetserukou, D.: DeltaCharger: charging robot with inverted delta mechanism and CNN-driven high fidelity tactile perception for precise 3D positioning. IEEE Robot. Autom. Lett. 6(4), 7604–7610 (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1109/lra.2021.3098838

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okunevich, I., Trinitatova, D., Kopanev, P., & Tsetserukou, D.: MobileCharger: an Autonomous Mobile Robot with Inverted Delta Actuator for Robust and Safe Robot Charging 2021 26th IEEE International Conference on Emerging Technologies and Factory Automation (ETFA ), Vasteras, Sweden (2021b)

  • Pan, M., Sun, C., Liu, J., Wang, Y.: Automatic recognition and location system for electric vehicle charging port in complex environment. IET Image Proc. 14(10), 2263–2272 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1049/iet-ipr.2019.1138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, K., Kim, D., Kim, S.-H., Choi, K., & Jeong, S.: Electric Vehicle Charging Terminal 3D Docking Method Using Stereo Camera 2021 Twelfth International Conference on Ubiquitous and Future Networks (ICUFN), Jeju Island, Republic of Korea (2021)

  • Peng, J., Xu, W., Liang, B.: An autonomous pose measurement method of civil aviation charging port based on cumulative natural feature data. IEEE Sens. J. 19(23), 11646–11655 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1109/jsen.2019.2934116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petrov, P., Boussard, C., Ammoun, S., & Nashashibi, F.: A hybrid control for automatic docking of electric vehicles for recharging. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation, Saint Paul, MN, USA (2012)

  • Pingpittayakul, T., & Mitsantisuk, C.: Development of EV battery swapping station using automated vision system 2022 19th International Conference on Electrical Engineering/Electronics, Computer, Telecommunications and Information Technology (ECTI-CON), Prachuap Khiri Khan, Thailand (2022)

  • Quan, P., Lou, Y., Lin, H., Liang, Z., Di, S.: Research on fast identification and location of contour features of electric vehicle charging port in complex scenes. IEEE Access 10, 26702–26714 (2022a). https://doi.org/10.1109/access.2021.3092210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Quan, P., Lou, Y., Lin, H., Liang, Z., Wei, D., Di, S.: Research on fast recognition and localization of an electric vehicle charging port based on a cluster template matching algorithm. Sensors (basel) 22(9), 3599 (2022b). https://doi.org/10.3390/s22093599

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rahman, I., Vasant, P.M., Singh, B., Singh, M., Abdullah-Al-Wadud, M., Adnan, N.: Review of recent trends in optimization techniques for plug-in hybrid, and electric vehicle charging infrastructures. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 58, 1039–1047 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.12.353

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rajendran, G., Vaithilingam, C.A., Misron, N., Naidu, K., Ahmed, M.R.: A comprehensive review on system architecture and international standards for electric vehicle charging stations. J. Energy Storage (2021). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.est.2021.103099

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbarzadeh, R., BagherianKasgari, A., Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Anari, S., Naseri, M., Bendechache, M.: Brain tumor segmentation based on deep learning and an attention mechanism using MRI multi-modalities brain images. Sci. Rep. 11(1), 10930 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90428-8

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Ranjbarzadeh, R., Tataei Sarshar, N., Jafarzadeh Ghoushchi, S., Saleh Esfahani, M., Parhizkar, M., Pourasad, Y., Anari, S., Bendechache, M.: MRFE-CNN: multi-route feature extraction model for breast tumor segmentation in Mammograms using a convolutional neural network. Ann. Oper. Res. (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04755-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rao, M.V.S., Shivakumar, M.: IR based auto-recharging system for autonomous mobile robot. J. Robot. Control (JRC) 2(4), 244–251 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18196/jrc.2486

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rocha, C., Sousa, I., Ferreira, F., Sobreira, H., Lima, J., Veiga, G., & Moreira, A. P.: Development of an autonomous mobile towing vehicle for logistic tasks. In Robot 2019: Fourth Iberian Robotics Conference, pp. 669–681 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-35990-4_54

  • Romanov, A. M., & Tararin, A. A.: An Automatic Docking System for Wheeled Mobile Robots 2021 IEEE Conference of Russian Young Researchers in Electrical and Electronic Engineering (ElConRus), St. Petersburg, Moscow, Russia (2021)

  • Sarker, V. K., Qingqing, L., & Westerlund, T.: 3D Perception with Low-cost 2D LIDAR and Edge Computing for Enhanced Obstacle Detection. 2020 IEEE Conference on Industrial Cyberphysical Systems (ICPS), Tampere, Finland (2020)

  • Shen, H., Wang, X., Wang, J., Xie, Y., & Wang, W.: Vision based battery exchange robots for electric vehicle. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Chengdu, China (2012)

  • Siegfried, A.L., Bayne, A., Beck, L.F., Freund, K.: Older adult willingness to use fully autonomous vehicle (FAV) ride sharing. Geriatrics (basel) (2021). https://doi.org/10.3390/geriatrics6020047

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sujati, T., Dewi, T., & Rusdianasari, R.: Charging System Design of a Solar Powered Mobile Manipulator 2021 International Conference on Electrical and Information Technology (IEIT), Malang, Indonesia (2021)

  • Sun, S., Wang, X., Yang, X., & Yang, J.: Accuracy Analysis and Calibration of 3-PUS/S Parallel Battery Swapping Robot. 2014 4th IEEE International Conference on Information Science and Technology, Shenzhen, China (2014)

  • Sun, C., Pan, M., Wang, Y., Liu, J., Huang, H., & Sun, L.: Method for Electric Vehicle Charging Port Recognition in Complicated Environment based on CNN. 2018 15th International Conference on Control, Automation, Robotics and Vision (ICARCV), Singapore (2018)

  • Sun, X., Li, Z., Wang, X., Li, C.: Technology development of electric vehicles: a review. Energies (2019). https://doi.org/10.3390/en13010090

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Traube, J., Lu, F., & Maksimovic, D.: Photovoltaic power system with integrated electric vehicle DC charger and enhanced grid support. 2012 15th International Power Electronics and Motion Control Conference (EPE/PEMC) (2012)

  • Un-Noor, F., Padmanaban, S., Mihet-Popa, L., Mollah, M., Hossain, E.: A comprehensive study of key electric vehicle (EV) components, technologies, challenges, impacts, and future direction of development. Energies (2017). https://doi.org/10.3390/en10081217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vongbunyong, S., Thamrongaphichartkul, K., Worrasittichai, N., Takutruea, A.: Automatic precision docking for autonomous mobile robot in hospital logistics—case-study: battery charging. IOP Conf. Ser.: Mater. Sci. Eng. 1137(1), 012060 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1088/1757-899x/1137/1/012060

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wahono, R.S.: A systematic literature review of software defect prediction. J. Softw. Eng. 1(1), 1–16 (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Walzel, B., Hirz, M., Brunner, H., & Kreutzer, N.: Robot-Based Fast Charging of Electric Vehicles SAE Technical Paper Series 2019–01–0869 (2019)

  • Walzel, B., Hirz, M., Brunner, H.: Robust shape-based matching control of robotic conductive charging systems for electric vehicles. Comput.-Aid. Design Appl. 19(3), 612–623 (2021a). https://doi.org/10.1473/cadaps.2022.612-623

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Walzel, B., Hirz, M., & Brunner, H.: Vision-based Control of Robotic Conductive Charging Systems for Electric Vehicles CAD'21 Proceedings (2021b)

  • Wang, X., Wang, J.: Research on electric vehicle charging & battery swapping robot system. Appl. Mech. Mater. 494–495, 20–23 (2014). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.494-495.20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Liang, H., Guan, D., Wang, X., & Shen, H.: 3-PRS Parallel Robot for Battery Swapping of Electric Vehicle. 2012 IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics and Automation, Chengdu, China (2012a)

  • Wang, X., Zhao, J.L., Lu, S.Y., Tan, L.: A mobile robot for replacing electric vehicle battery. Mech. Electron. Eng. Iii Pts 1–5(130–134), 2409–2412 (2012b). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.130-134.2409

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, X., Wang, J., Zhang, Y.: Research on a current electric bus battery swapping system based on the cartesian coordinate robot. Appl. Mech. Mater. 713–715, 715–718 (2015). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.713-715.715

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, H.: A New Automatic Charging System for Electric Vehicles 2021 2nd International Conference on Computing and Data Science (CDS), Stanford, CA, USA (2021)

  • Weng, J.-F., Lai, C.-C., Su, K.-L.: Autonomous recharging of 4WD mecanum wheel robot via RGB-D sensory fusion. ICIC Express Lett. 10(12), 3017–3022 (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu, Y.M., Liu, S., Zhang, G.Y., Yin, X.Y., Zhao, M.Y., Lu, Z.Y.: Research on pose estimation for electric vehicle’s fast-swap battery box based on visual information. Appl. Mech. Mater. 253–255, 2252–2257 (2012). https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMM.253-255.2252

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Xi, C., Liu, B., & Zhao, M.: Analysis of Key Technologies of Underground Inspection Robot and Design of Its Manipulator 2022 5th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence and Big Data (ICAIBD), Chengdu, China (2022)

  • Yilmaz, M., Krein, P.T.: Review of battery charger topologies, charging power levels, and infrastructure for plug-in electric and hybrid vehicles. IEEE Trans. Power Electron. 28(5), 2151–2169 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1109/tpel.2012.2212917

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yong, J.Y., Ramachandaramurthy, V.K., Tan, K.M., Mithulananthan, N.: A review on the state-of-the-art technologies of electric vehicle, its impacts and prospects. Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev. 49, 365–385 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2015.04.130

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yuan, H., Wu, Q., Zhou, L.: Concept design and load capacity analysis of a novel serial-parallel robot for the automatic charging of electric vehicles. Electronics 9(6), 956 (2020). https://doi.org/10.3390/electronics9060956

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zang, Y., & Wang, Y.: Robotic disassembly of electric vehicle batteries: an overview. 2022 27th International Conference on Automation and Computing (ICAC) (2022)

  • Zhang, H., & Jin, X.: A Method for New Energy Electric Vehicle Charging Hole Detection and Location Based on Machine Vision. Proceedings of the 2016 5th International Conference on Environment, Materials, Chemistry and Power Electronics (2016)

  • Zhang, Z., & Huang, J.: Behavioral Formation Control of Multiple Mecanum-wheeled Mobile Manipulators. 2020 IEEE 16th International Conference on Control & Automation (ICCA) (2020)

  • Zhang, H., Zhu, W., Huang, Y.: A research on the control strategy of automatic charging robot for electric vehicles based on impedance control. J. Phys. Conf. Ser. 2303(1), 012085 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2303/1/012085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Li, L., Fürsterling, A., Durocher, H.J., Mouridsen, J., Zhang, X.: Learning-based object detection and localization for a mobile robot manipulator in SME production. Robot. Comput.-Integrat. Manuf. 73, 102229 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rcim.2021.102229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhou, Z., Li, L., Wang, R., & Zhang, X.: Deep Learning on 3D Object Detection for Automatic Plug-in Charging Using a Mobile Manipulator 2021 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation (ICRA), Xi'an, China (2021)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank the anonymous reviewers for their helpful comments.

Funding

This work was conducted as a part of Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) and Badan Riset dan Inovasi Nasional, Indonesia (BRIN) collaborative research-based postgraduate program under grant number R.J130000.7351.4B734.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

HMS, NSMN, and ER are the main contributors to this paper. All authors read and approved the final version of this paper.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Nur Safwati Mohd Nor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The authors declare no ethical approval is required.

Consent to participate

All authors have consented to participate in this work.

Consent for publication

All authors have consented to publication.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A: Summary of the primary articles

Appendix A: Summary of the primary articles

No

CODE

Articles

Value proposition

Performance: Success rate/accuracy/time

Sensor

ConnectorAlignment

Platform type/processor/microcontroller/additional/other tools

Port type/other object

Method/algorithm; DOF

Primary articles belong\ing to the autonomous docking (AD) cluster

1

AD

Weng et al. (2016)

Category 1:

Auto-docking of small-size mobile robots that use cameras and predefined marks. They have the platforms of four wheels drive (4WD) or two wheels drive (2WD)

CI method improves target estimation performance

RGB-D camera,Laser ranger

N/A

4WD mecanum wheel, 2D SICK laser ranger, Bluetooth Low Energy (BLE)

N/A

Kinematic model, covariance union (CU), covariance intersection (CI), SIFT pattern

2

AD

Cortes and Kim (2018)

Effective power transfer of receiver position: ± 5 mm

Camera, rotary encoder

N/A

Differential-Drive Mobile Robot, Arduino mega, Raspberry Pi B

N/A

Llinear quadratic regulator (LQR), computer vision (OpenCV ver 3)

3

AD

Du et al. (2021)

Circle Hough Transform (CHT) accuracy is 50%, while Circle detection accuracy is 20% higher than CHT

Camera, IMU (BNO05 Absolute orientation)

N/A

Tracked robot, NVIDIA Jetson Nano (OpenCV), Arduino Uno, Adafuit motorshield

Conductive metal pads (circle pattern)

Pre-Contour-Gradient (Color), color-based contour, Def-circle, PID control loop, Line detection: PHT, LSD, FPE

4

AD

Romanov and Tararin (2021)

Accuracy: 5 cm, Min. distance: 58 cm

Camera, LiDAR

N/A

Wheeled mobile robots, ArUco markers

N/A

Differential kinematics, ROS implementations (Gazebo Simulator)

5

AD

Vongbunyong et al. (2021)

Category 2:

Auto-docking of small-size mobile robots that use non-cameras as the sensor, including light detecting and ranging (LIDAR), laser range finder, and infrared (IR) transmitter and receiver

 <  ± 20 mm position error & < 0.05 rad orientation error

LiDAR

Mechanical

AMR “CARVER”, RP- LiDAR A1, Sick LiDAR Tim-781 s, intel-NUC (ROS), BLDC motor

Connector (2P)

Geometrical marker (position & localisation)

6

AD

Rocha et al. (2020)

N/A

Odometry, laser-range finder,

N/A

Hospital car model, LRF SICK S300, Arduino mega, ROS

N/A

TEA, Perfect Match, Beacon-based Localisation, Kalman filter,

7

AD

Acosta Calderon et al. (2014)

The connector moves freely at 30° to reduce misalignment

Infrared, odometry

N/A

Mobile robot

N/A

Mechanism methods; 1-DOF

8

AD

Chang et al. (2018)

The infrared signal range is widened from 60° to 90°

Camera, infrared, encoder, ultrasonic

N/A

IRobot Create2, Arduino Uno, Rasberry pi 3, MPU-6050

N/A

Neural network linear regression, Opcode (Open Interface control instruction)

9

AD

Rao and Shivakumar (2021)

95% success rate; stop charging > 12 V

IR Transceiver, Voltage

N/A

Arduino UNO, Bluetooth HC 05, ALCD Display, L293 Drivers

N/A

Locomotion Control and Docking Method

10

AD

Petrov et al. (2012)

Category 3:

Auto-docking of AEV with front wheels steering systems that use laser scanners and IR cameras

The precision is 10 cm in the longitudinal and lateral direction around the docking point

Infrared camera

N/A

Car

N/A

Kinematics-based control (lateral-longitudinal & path tracking), POSIT algorithm

11

AD

Klemm et al. (2016)

The precision is 2 cm in the longitudinal position

Laser scanners, Odometry

N/A

Car

Type-2

SLAM, RRT-based approach, TOSDF, OSD, EKF

12

AD

Fang et al. (2020)

Category 4:

Battery charging/swapping of mobile robots with 2WD or with XYZ cartesian robot

N/A

Hall sensor

N/A

5-wheel tracking car with manipulator, CPU

N/A

Unified deployment of charging socket, tracking positioning, trolley bus sliding

13

AD, RM

Behl et al. (2019)

N/A

Camera, LiDAR

N/A

TurtleBot 3 WafflePi, Raspberry Pi 3, ROS

Connector (3P)

Hough Transform, Template Matching, SLAM, PID, 4-DOF

14

AD, RM

Wang et al. (2012a, b)

N/A

Sonar, Photoelectric

N/A

Mobile robot, PLC, CPU, AC motor, DMP position

N/A

4-DOF

15

AD

Narvaez et al. (2021)

Category 5:

Not relevant to ground vehicle autonomous docking

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

Primary articles belonging to the port detection (PD) cluster

1

PD

Sun et al. (2018)

Category 1:

Using the camera to recognise the charging socket of EV

99% accuracy of the socket recognition experiment

3D Camera

N/A

Dataset, CPU Intel i7 7800, GPU nvidia, Camera

Type-2

Convolutional Neural Network (CNN)

2

PD

Wang (2021)

83.62% accuracy of the socket recognition experiment

RGBD Camera

N/A

N/A

All type

Very Deep CNN

3

PD

Bang et al. (2022)

From experimental results, the EnT-GAN gave an Average Precision (AP) of 66.5, which is better than the state-of-the-art 63.6

Intel RealSense Depth Camera D435i

N/A

Connector EV dataset (Chevrolet Bolt & Kia Niro)

Type-1 Combo (Chevrolet Bolt, Kia Niro)

DetectoRS: Detecting objects with recursive feature pyramid and switchable atrous convolution; Generative Adversarial Network (GAN); EnT-GAN; ForkGAN

4

PD

Cernohorsky et al. (2019)

N/A

RGBD Camera with IR lens

N/A

UR3 robot, Intel Realsense D435i camera

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

The Image Processing Toolbox in MATLAB; 6-DOF

5

PD

Zhang and Jin (2016)

Category 2:

Using the camera to detect and locate the socket position in the x–y plane

100% accuracy of the charging port localisation

CCD Camera

N/A

Halcon CV; CCD Camera, TOSHIBA PORTEGE M909 computer

Type-2

HSI (hue, saturation, intensity) color model; Mathematical morphology, Canny operator, Tukey weight function

6

PD, RM

Long et al. (2019)

Category 3:

Using a camera and IR-US range finder to detect and locate the socket position in the x–y-z

Only conceptual design; No experiment result

2D monocular Camera, IR-US range finder, UV light source

N/A

Ring ultraviolet light

GB/T

The minimum distance iteration algorithm; The split wide-angle range based on IR-US range finder technology; 6-DOF

7

PD, RM

Pengkun Quan et al. (2022a, b)

Category 4:

Using the camera to detect and locate the socket position in the x–y-z & orientation Rx-Ry-Rz

94.80% success rate of the socket pose estimation experiment

3D Camera, Light source

N/A

GBT 20234.3–2011 DC, AUBO-i5 6-DOF, MER-125-30GM/C-P Mercury Gig PoE, M0814-MP2

GB/T (DC)

Hough circle and Hough line detection; Canny operator; Quadratic Curve Standardization (QCS); Perspective-n-point (PNP) algorithm; Direct Linear Transform (DLT); 6-DOF

8

PD, RM

Miseikis et al. (2017)

Category 5:

Using only cameras as the sensor to detect and locate the charging socket and insert the charging plug into the charging socket

8/10 success rate of the plug-in experiment

Stereo Camera

N/A

Halcon CV

Type-1, Type-2

Shaped-based template matching (SBTM) method; Perspective transformation based on the least squares (LS) fit method; 6-DOF

9

PD, RM

Walzel et al. (2019)

42/42 success rate of the insertion experiment

Stereo Camera

N/A

Halcon CV

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

SBTM method; Perspective transformation based on the LS fit method; 6-DOF

10

PD, RM

Walzel et al. (2021b)

Not available

Stereo Camera

N/A

Halcon CV

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

SBTM method; Perspective transformation based on the LS fit method; 6-DOF

11

PD, RM

Hirz et al. (2021)

Not available

Stereo Camera

N/A

Halcon CV

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

SBTM; Perspective transformation based on the least squares fit method; 6-DOF

12

PD, RM

Walzel et al. (2021a)

42/42 success rate of the plug-in experiments using the same vehicle; 75% to 95% success rates of socket position detection with five different EVs

Stereo Camera

N/A

Halcon CV

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

SBTM method; Perspective transformation based on the LS fit method; 6-DOF

13

PD, RM

Pan et al. (2020)

9/10 success rate of insertion experiment at the best illumination (1618–6151 lx)

Monocular Camera

N/A

MER-125-30UM camera, M0814-MP2 camera lens, LED

GB/T (AC)

CNN; HSI color model, Otshu method; Canny operator; Hough transform ellipse detection; geometric method; 6-DOF

14

PD, RM

Pengkun Quan et al. (2022a, b)

Insertion experiment success rates: indoor 99%, outdoor 93%

Camera

N/A

GBT 20234.3–2011 DC, MER-125-30GM, Camera lens M0814-MP2

GB/T (DC)

Canny operator; cluster template matching algorithm (CTMA); EPnP algorithm; Direct Linear Transform (DLT); 6-DOF

15

PD, RM

Zhou et al. (2021)

100% success rate of the socket detection experiment; 92% success rate of the plug-in experiment

3D Camera with ToF technique

N/A

MiR 200 mobile platform, PMD 3D camera, Robotiq 85-F two finger gripper

Plug charger

The PointVoxel-Recursive Convolutional Neural Network (PV-RCNN); KITTI Vision Benchmark Suite; 6-DOF

16

PD, RM

Lv et al. (2019)

Category 6:

Using the camera and F/T sensor to detect and locate the charging socket and insert the charging plug into the charging socket

92% success rate of socket pose estimation experiments;

2D Camera, F/T sensor

N/A

UR5 robot arm, type-2 charging plug, monocular camera

Template picture

Speeded Up Robust Features (SURF) algorithm, Perspective-n-point (PnP) algorithm, SVM; 6-DOF

17

PD, RM

Guo et al. (2021)

Insertion accuracy 97%; Insertion time 9 s; Initial position error is limited to 5 mm with no orientation error

RGB-D Camera, ft300 F/T sensor

N/A

UR5 robot arm, robotiq ft300 F/T Sensor, Intel D435i RGB-D camera

Type-2

Visual servo control; Hue saturation value (HSV); Reinforcement Learning (RL) position control; Proportional Integral (PI) force control; PyBullet simulation; 6-DOF

18

PD, RM

Liu et al. (2021)

94% success rate of insertion experiments;Insertion time since the first contact: 8 s; Time from the initial position to the first contact: 15 s; Insertion initial position error is 1 cm with orientation error. Accuracy of classifier is 92.59%

3D Camera, F/T sensor

N/A

AUBO robot, AT-S1000-06C camera, Axia80-M8 F/T sensor

GB/T

Point-cloud template matching algorithm; Space Vector Machine (SVM); 6-DOF

19

PD, RM

Bucher et al. (2021)

Category 7:

Using an endoscope camera with an IR-pass filter to detect and locate the socket and insert the charging plug

97% success rate of insertion experiment

Endoscope camera with IR-pass filter; 4 IR-LEDs as active markers

Elastic compensator

Endoscope camera: CMOS 1/6-inch camera sensor, ROS (Ver. Melodic Morenia on Ubuntu 18.04), IR-LED pattern

Type-2 CCS (CCS2)

Four infrared (IR)-LEDs marker and an endoscope camera with an IR-pass filter; A 4-DOF ACD consists of a 3-DOF articulator, a translational platform, and an elastic compensation unit

20

PD, RM

Bdiwi et al. (2015)

Category 8:

Using camera and F/T sensor but focus on force or impidance control for charging plug insertion into the socket

Success rate: NA; Insertion time: 80 s; Initial position error is limited to 1 cm without orientation error

Camera; F/T sensor

N/A

KUKA KR6/2 robot, FT Delta SI-660–60 force sensor

IEC 60309 splug-socket

Integral force control with the force error as the input and position correction as the output; Parallel position/force control using a spiral motion; 6-DOF

21

PD, RM

Jokesch et al. (2016)

100% success rate of insertion experiments; Insertion time: 13 s; Initial position in front of the socket 30 mm with a maximum error of 7.35 mm; Insertion initial orientation error is 5.1°

3D Camera; F/T sensor

Torque sensor in every joint

KUKA LWR iiwa 7 R800

Type-2

Impedance control; Compliant blind-search strategy; Phase shifted Lissajous path; 7-DOF

22

PD, RM

Zhang et al. (2022)

99% success rate of insertion experiments; Insertion time: 6–8 s. Insertion initial position in front of the socket: 10 mm

Camera, F/T sensor

Impedance control

UR5e robot, L515 camera

Type-2

D-H coordinate system; Impedance control; Active Remote Centre Compliance (ARCC)-based insertion strategy; 6-DOF

23

PD

Park et al. (2021)

Category 9:

Using a camera with the help of a squared unique marker or QR code. Do not explicitly address charging socket localisation and plug insertion

N/A

Stereo Camera

N/A

NA

N/A

Geometry

24

PD, RM

Harik (2021)

N/A

RGB-Camera

NA

Superdroid mecanum robot, UR5e robot, two fingered Robotiq 2F-85 gripper, NVDIA Jetson TX2 (ROS), Logitech C920 web-camera

Connector (2P)

The high-level computer runs Ubuntu with ROS as the middleware. The main node subsribes and publishes from/to different nodes: usb-cam ROS package, aruco-ros ROS package, and rosserial_python ROS package; 6-DOF

25

PD

Gungor and Kiyak (2021)

N/A

Camera

N/A

N/A

QR code

Calculate the difference between the center of the QR code and the center of the camera in the x–y plane; calculate the QR code’s width to control the plug-in z direction

26

PD, RM

Shen et al. (2012)

Category 10:

Battery swapping for EVs

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

27

PD

Wu et al. (2012)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

28

PD

Jiang et al. (2019)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

29

PD

Pingpittayakul and Mitsantisuk (2022)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

30

PD, RM

Peng et al. (2019)

Category 11:

Aviation chargingpeng (Peng et al. 2019); Obstacle avoidance of a small mobile robot (Sarker et al. 2020); A design concept of ACS (Luo and Shen 2020); Robot arm for electronic components disassembly (Farhan et al. 2021); Concept of robotic plugging (Cernohorsky et al. 2022); Underground inspection robot (Xi et al. 2022)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

31

PD

Sarker et al. (2020)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

32

PD, RM

Luo and Shen (2020)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

33

PD, RM

Farhan et al. (2021)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

34

PD, RM

Cernohorsky et al. (2022)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

35

PD, RM

Xi et al. (2022)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

Primary articles belonging to the robot manipulator (RM) cluster

1

RM

Yuan et al. (2020)

Category 1:

A design of a hybrid serial-parallel robot with 6-DOF movements to provide a larger payload and cable arrangement convenience

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

N/A

The charging robot has nine actuating DOFs and achieves six DOFs movements –kinematic and static models; optimization of the manipulator configuration

2

RM

Lou and Di (2020)

Category 2:

A 4-DOF cable-driven automatic charging robot (CDACR) with a 3-DOF cable-driven manipulator and a moving platform. The robot can control the position and pitch angle of the end-effector (Lou & Di 2020);

A collision localisation and classification method based on machine learning for the CDACR (Lin et al. 2022)

Insertion success rate: NA; From experiments by varying displacement along the x-axis from -78 to 123 mm and a yaw angle from -5 to 5 degrees, the forces could satisfy the requirement while all cable tension kept positive

Camera, ATI F/T sensor, Encoders

Flexible plug with elastic element

Cable-driven auto-charging robot (CDACR)

CHAdeMO

A flexible plug at the end-effector to accommodate small rotational elastic deformation due to angular errors of the end-effector relative to the charging socket; Machine vision; PI Controller; 4-DOF

3

RM

Lin et al. (2022)

From simulated experiments, they claimed the method could simultaneously provide collision localisation and classificattion

Camera, ATI F/T sensor, Encoders, IMU

Elastic compensator

CPU: Intel Core i7-10700 K @ 3.80 GHz, GPU: NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3080

GB/T (DC)

Machine learning, CLC, DCNN–SVM, CNN and LSTM; PI Controller; 4-DOF

4

RM

Chablat et al. (2022)

Category 3:

A 3-DOF robot for charging EVs at home with the socket on its front side

Insertion success rate: NA. The insertion experiment can be seen at: https://youtu.be/P5wCgRqSyDQ

Camera, QR code

N/A

Planar parallel robot, Rasberry Pi 4, Arduino board, 42BYG Geared Stepper Motor, OpenCV

DC connector

The robot comprised parallel links that move the reference point in the x–y plane and a linear actuator that moves the charging plug in a line constrained in the y–z plane; 3-DOF

5

RM

Okunevich et al. (2021a)

Category 4:

A parallel link structure is installed on a 2WD mobile robot for charging small mobile robots. It uses CCN to perceive tactile that predicts misalignment

The system could predict the angle, vertical, and horizontal values of end effector misalignment with an accuracy of 95.46%, 98.2%, and 86.9%, respectively

Tactile sensor

Tactile perception system

Inverted Delta Mechanism, Three Dynamixel MX64, Intel NUC comp. + OpenCM 9.04 Dynamixel Contr

Delta mechanism

CCN-based tactile perception; The electrode’s misalignment in 3 directions can be compensated by controlling the angle of each link using the corresponding motor;

Machine Learning, deep learning; 3-DOF

6

RM

Okunevich et al. (2021b)

Electrode localisation success rate: 83 out of 10; execution time: 60 s

Tactile, RGB-D camera, LiDAR

Tactile sensor

Mobile robot, Intel NUC7i5BNK, OpenCM 9.04, RPLiDAR A3, RealSense D435 camera

Delta mechanism

CNN, OpenCM 9.04 Dynamixel; 3-DOF; The contact force is controlled by the motor current

7

RM

GS and PS (2022)

Category 5:

A concept of a rigid-flexible manipulator for conductive charging

Insertion success rate: NA; Only provided joint angle tracking and the end effector 2D trajectory;

Camera

Rigid-flexible arms

Rigid- flexible manipulator,

Type-2

Euler–Bernoulli beam theory; Adaptive Fault-tolerant control (AFTC); PD controller; 4-DOF

8

RM

Hu et al. (2020)

Category 6:

A passive, compliant mechanism for the automatic charging robot end-effector

Insertion success rate: NA; It could insert the plug reliably with a maximum insertion force of less than 100 N

Binocular camera, F/T sensor

N/A

UR5 robot arm, F/T sensor

N/A

The passive complaint mechanism was developed based on Stewart parallel mechanism

9

RM

Barzegaran et al. (2017)

Category 7:

Adaptive robot for inductive charging of EV

N/A

Camera, ultrasonic

N/A

N/A

N/A

Inverse kinematics, mathematical adaptive: extremum seeking; 3-DOF

10

RM

Wang et al. (2012a, b)

Category 8:

Robot mechanisms for EV battery swapping (Sun et al. 2014; J. Wang et al. 2012a, b; Wang and Wang 2014); Battery swapping for electric buses (Lin et al. 2012; Wang et al. 2015); A robot for small mobile robot battery swapping (Dandan et al. 2012); Robots for small UAV battery-swapping systems (Barrett et al. 2018; Dong et al. 2018)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

11

RM

Sun et al. (2014)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

12

RM

Wang and Wang (2014)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

13

RM

Lin et al. (2012)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

14

RM

Wang et al. (2015)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

15

RM

Dandan et al. (2012)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

16

RM

Dong et al. (2018)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

17

RM

Barrett et al. (2018)

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

Primary articles belonging to the robot manipulator (RM) cluster Category 9:

18

RM

Jiang et al. (2017)

A manipulator for the maintenance of HV transmission lines

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

19

RM

Akbaripour and Masehian (2016)

Semi-lazy probabilistic roadmap (SLPRM) for motion planning of industrial manipulators

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

20

RM

Zhou et al. (2022)

A 3D point-cloud technology is adopted to measure the shapes and depth of targeted objects in SME production

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

21

RM

Di Lillo et al. (2018)

An underwater vehicle manipulator system

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

22

RM

Fleischer et al. (2021)

A flexible disassembly system for drive train components of EVs

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

23

RM

Afaq et al. (2015)

A customizable system for implementing the control algorithm of 5 DOF manipulator

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

24

RM

Khonji et al. (2017)

A robotic rover with a 2D lidar to localize a drone and a robotic arm with an inductive charging pad

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

25

RM

Zhang and Huang (2020)

A control strategy for multiple unmanned ground vehicle-manipulator systems

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

26

RM

Sujati et al. (2021)

A charging system is installed on a mobile manipulator

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

NDR

  1. AD auto-docking/auto parking, PD port detection-recognition, RM robot manipulator, N/A not available, NDR no deep review. AD = 13; PD = 11; RM = 26; AD & RM = 2; PD & RM = 24

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Saputra, H.M., Nor, N.S.M., Rijanto, E. et al. A review of robotic charging for electric vehicles. Int J Intell Robot Appl 8, 193–229 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s41315-023-00306-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s41315-023-00306-x

Keywords

Navigation