Abstract
The idea that humans are clearly distinguished from other animals and from the natural world in general is a cornerstone of European philosophy and culture at least from the sixteenth century onward. Often, this idea is related to understandings of ‘humanism’ that emerged in that period and legitimized regimes of power and control over non-European cultures; it also sanctioned the exploitation of the natural world in the form of extractive capitalism. Critiques of Eurocentric mindsets hinge on certain understandings of ‘humanism,’ arguing for a transformation or even abandoning of humanist traditions in the sense of ‘posthumanism’ or ‘critical posthumanities.’ In their selective interpretation of European humanism—exemplified with Immanuel Kant’s philosophy—the current critique shows elements of an Occidentalist construction of humanism. If we want to overcome the idea that humans—and within that group particularly the white, male, educated Europeans—are the ‘masters of the world,’ we are confronted with conceptual challenges that need philosophical and theoretical reflection. The ontological and epistemological implications of non-anthropocentric ways of thinking and knowing provide a clear alternative to some problematic aspects of European philosophy and humanism. Engaging with new interpretations of other-than-human agency, relational understandings of animism, and intra-active production of knowledge can provide a relevant contribution to the ongoing discussion across intellectual, cultural, and political fields, an approach that takes the specificity of human animals seriously without identifying them as the center of knowledge and power.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The author confirm that the data supporting the findings of this study are available within the article.
References
Barad, K. (2014). Diffracting diffraction: cutting together-apart. Parallax, 20(3), 168–187.
Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the universe halfway: Quantum physics and the entanglement of matter and meaning. Duke University Press.
Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.
Benjamin, A. (2015). Towards a relational ontology. State University of New York Press.
Braidotti, R. (2019). A theoretical framework for the critical posthumanities. Theory, Culture & Society, 36(6), 31–61.
Braidotti, R. (2015). The posthuman in feminist theory. In L. Disch, & M. Hawkesworth (Eds.), Oxford handbook of feminist theory. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199328581.013.35
Braidotti, R. (2022). Posthuman feminism. Polity.
Brooks Pribac, T. (2021). Enter the animal: Cross-species perspectives on grief and spirituality. Sydney University Press.
Calarco, M. R. (2021). Animal studies: The key concepts. Routledge.
Chidester, D. (2005). Animism. In T. Bron (Ed.), The encyclopedia of religion and nature, 2 vols. (vol. 1, pp. 78–81). Thoemmes Continuum.
de Castro, E. V. (2014). Cannibal metaphysics. Univocal.
De Landa, M. (2006). A new philosophy of society: Assemblage theory and social complexity. Continuum.
De Waal, F. (2016). Are we smart enough to know how smart animals are? Norton.
Derrida, J. (1982). Margins of philosophy. University of Chicago Press.
Eisenstein, Ch. (2019). Earth spirituality. In A. Kothari, A. Salleh, A. Escobar, F. Demaria, & A. Acosta (Eds.), Pluriverse: A post-development dictionary (pp. 157–160). Tulika Books.
Emden, Ch. J. (2017). Normativity matters: Philosophical naturalism and political theory. In S. Ellenzweig & J. H. Zammito (Eds.), The New politics of materialism: History, philosophy, science (pp. 269–299). Routledge.
Emden, Ch. J. (2018). Agency without humans: Normativity and path dependence in the nineteenth-century life sciences. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 53–77). Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
Escobar, A. (2020). Pluriversal politics: The real and the possible. Duke University Press.
Grosz, E. (2011). Becoming undone: Darwinian reflections on life, politics, and art. Duke University Press.
Harvey, G. (2005). Animism: Respecting the living world. Wakefield Press.
Harvey, G. (Ed.) (2013). The handbook of contemporary animism. Routledge.
Herbrechter, S. (2013). Posthumanism: A critical analysis. Bloomsbury.
Johnston, J. (2021). Stag and stone: Religion, archaeology and esoteric aesthetics. Equinox.
Kant, I. (1956). Kritik der reinen Vernunft. Werke in sechs Bänden, herausgegeben von Wilhelm Weischedel, vol. II. Wissenschaftliche Buchgesellschaft.
Kohn, E. (2013). How forests think: Toward an anthropology beyond the human. University of California Press.
Latour, B. (2017). Facing Gaia: Eight lectures on the new climatic regime. Polity.
Lloyd, G. (1984). The man of reason: “Male” and “female” in western philosophy. Methuen.
McFarland, S. E., & Hediger, R. (Eds.) (2009). Animals and agency: An interdisciplinary exploration. Brill.
Mignolo, W. D. (2011). The darker side of Western modernity: Global futures, decolonial options. Duke University Press.
Rorty, R. (1990). Objectivity, relativism, and truth: Philosophical papers. Cambridge University Press.
Shaviro, S. (2009). Without criteria: Kant, Whitehead, Deleuze, and aesthetics. MIT Press.
Smith, J. H. (2018). Steps to an ecology of Geist: Hegel, Bateson, and the spirit of posthumanism. In E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 165–181). Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
Steel, K. (2017). Medieval. In B. Clarke, & M. Rossini (Eds.), The Cambridge companion to literature and the posthuman (pp. 3–15). Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091227.004
Strathausen, C. (2018). Kant and posthumanism. E. Landgraf, G. Trop, & L. Weatherby (Eds.), Posthumanism in the age of humanism: Mind, matter, and the life sciences after Kant (pp. 106–125). Bloomsbury Academic & Professional.
von Stuckrad, K. (2023a). The revival of animism in the 21st century. In Oxford research encyclopedia of religion. Oxford University Press. https://doi.org/10.1093/acrefore/9780199340378.013.1172.
von Stuckrad, K. (2023b). Undisciplining the study of religion: Critical posthumanities and more-than-human ways of knowing. Religion (21 September 2023), https://doi.org/10.1080/0048721X.2023.2258705.
Wheeler, W. (2016). Expecting the Earth: Life, culture, biosemiotics. Lawrence & Wishart.
Whitehead, A. N. (1968). Modes of thought. Free Press.
Wiredu, K. (1995). Conceptual decolonization in African philosophy: 4 essays by Kwasi Wiredu, selected and introduced by Olusegun Oladipo. Hope Publications.
Wolfe, C. (2010). What is posthumanism? University of Minnesota Press.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of Interest
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
von Stuckrad, K. Decentering Humanism in Philosophy and the Sciences: Ecologies of Agency, Subversive Animism, and Diffractional Knowledge. SOPHIA 62, 709–722 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00990-z
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11841-023-00990-z