Abstract
Results of calculations of temperature trends in the free atmosphere (troposphere and lower stratosphere) using the quantile regression apparatus are considered and analyzed. In traditional techniques used in climatology, trends are estimated by use of regression based on the least squares method. Quantile regression, in contrast to these techniques, makes it possible to estimate regression parameters for each quantile of predictand values in the quantile range from zero to one. Using quantile regression to estimate climate changes results in a detailed picture of the dependence of the climate trend on the variation range of meteorological parameters in the quantile range of these parameters from zero to one. In particular, climate trends can be estimated for meteorological parameter values close to extreme. This paper uses the global radiosonde data array from which the stations are selected if the completeness of their data meets the requirements stated. Using the radiosonde data from the selected stations, the dependences of climatic trends of temperature on isobaric surfaces on values of quantiles (so-called process diagrams), as well as vertical quantile cross sections of climate trend values, are calculated, plotted, and analyzed. For thirteen high-latitude stations in the Northern Hemisphere among the selected ones, temperature trends are estimated both using radiosonde data and based on the ERA 5/ERA 5.1 reanalyses. An analysis of the results allows one to note the nonuniform character of tropospheric warming trends in the range of quantile variation, which is more apparent in the winter season. The nonuniform (for the range of quantile variation) character of tropospheric temperature trends is due to the fact that the tropospheric warming rate in the “cold” part of the quantile range is higher than that in its “warm” part. This agrees with the results obtained previously by analysis of surface temperature trends using the quantile regression method (QRM). The nonuniform character of cooling trends in the lower stratosphere is noted for the range of quantile variations. In winter and, to a lesser extent, in spring, the rate of stratospheric cooling decreases in absolute magnitude with an increase in quantile values at some stations in northern latitudes. Moreover, for the quantiles close to 1.0, negative trends can change sign. This can be both due to incomplete data on lower stratospheric temperature, which is particularly inherent in the high-latitude regions of the Northern Hemisphere, and due to the influence of more frequently occurring sudden stratospheric warmings (SSWs) on the temperature trend structure that is detailed within the range of quantile values. In is noted that the detailed structures of climate temperature trends that are obtained on the basis of radiosonde data proved to be very similar to those obtained based on arrays of ERA 5/ERA 5.1 reanalysis.
REFERENCES
Butler, A., Seidel, D., Hardiman, S., Butchart, N., Birner, T., and Match, A., Defining sudden stratospheric warmings, Bull. Am. Meteorol. Soc., 2015, vol. 96, pp. 1913–1928.
Cao, C., Chen, Y., Rao, J., Liu, S., Li, S., Ma, M., and Wang, Y., Statistical characteristics of major sudden stratospheric warming events in CESM1-WACCM: A comparison with the JRA55 and NCEP/NCAR reanalyses, Atmosphere, 2019, vol. 10, no. 9, p. 519.
Hersbach, H., Bell, B., Berrisford, P., Biavati, G., Horányi, A., Muñoz Sabater, J., and Thépaut, J.N., ERA5 hourly data on single levels from 1979 to present, Copernicus Climate Change Service (C3S) Climate Data Store (CDS), 2018. https://doi.org/10.24381/cds.bd0915c6. Accessed February 20, 2021.
Huber, P., Robust Statistics, Wiley-Interscience, 1981.
Kim, J. and Son, S., Defining sudden stratospheric warming in climate models: Accounting for biases in model climatologies, J. Clim., 2017, vol. 30, pp. 5529–5246.
Koenker, R. and Bassett, G., Regression quantiles, Econometrica, 1978, vol. 46, no. 1, pp. 33–50.
McLandress, C. and Shepherd, T., Impact of climate change on stratospheric sudden warmings as simulated by Canadian Middle Atmosphere Model, J. Clim., 2009, vol. 22, pp. 5449–5463.
Simmons, A., Soci, C., Nicolas, J., et al., Global stratospheric temperature bias and other stratospheric aspects of ERA5 and ERA5.1., ECMWF Tech. Memo. no. 859.
Smola, A. and Scholkopf, B., A tutorial on support vector regression, Stat. Comput., 2004, vol. 14, pp. 199–222.
Sterin, A.M. and Lavrov, A.S., On long period trend estimates of upper-air extreme and sub-extreme temperatures by use of quantile regression, IOP Conf. Ser.: Earth Environ. Sci., 2020, vol. 611, p. 012043.
Sterin, A.M. and Timofeev, A.A., Estimation of surface air temperature trends over the Russian Federation territory using the quantile regression method, Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2016, vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 388–397.
Timofeev, A.A. and Sterin, A.M., Using the quantile regression method to analyze changes in climate characteristics, Russ. Meteorol. Hydrol., 2010, vol. 35, no. 5, pp. 310–319.
Funding
This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Translated by A. Nikol’skii
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Sterin, A.M., Lavrov, A.S. Temperature Trends in the Free Atmosphere: Calculations Using the Quantile Regression Method. Izv. Atmos. Ocean. Phys. 59 (Suppl 2), S223–S231 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143382314013X
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S000143382314013X