Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Hydrogen-Based Reduction Technologies in Low-Carbon Sustainable Ironmaking and Steelmaking: A Review

  • Thematic Section: New Approaches for Sustainable Steel Production and Processing
  • Published:
Journal of Sustainable Metallurgy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The traditional ironmaking technologies (including coking, sintering, pelletizing, and BF ironmaking process) are carbon-intensive, which makes the industry a significant contributor to global CO2 emissions. Hydrogen replacement of carbon in steelmaking processes is a sustainable way to reduce CO2 emissions. First, the reduction thermodynamics and kinetics of iron oxide by carbon and hydrogen are compared. Then, the latest researches on different hydrogen reduction technologies in ironmaking industry are compared and analyzed. Based on this, the advantages and problems faced by hydrogen-based reduction over carbon-based reduction are presented. And finally, the possible pathways for the future development of hydrogen metallurgy are proposed, hoping to provide guidance for the hydrogen metallurgy in the steel industry. The reduction product of hydrogen metallurgy is H2O, and has a faster reduction rate than CO reduction. Therefore, hydrogen metallurgy is considered to be an effective way to achieve low-carbon green transformation in the metallurgical industry.

Graphical Abstract

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. United States Environmental Protection Agency. Overview of greenhouse gases. https://www.epa.gov/ghgemissions/overview-greenhouse-gases

  2. Calise F, Cappiello FL, Cimmino L, Vicidomini M (2023) Dynamic modelling and energy, economic, and environmental analysis of a greenhouse supplied by renewable sources. Appl Sci 13:1

    Google Scholar 

  3. Sesana E, Gagnon AS, Ciantelli C, Cassar J, Hughes JJ (2021) Climate change impacts on cultural heritage: a literature review. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev 12:e710

    Google Scholar 

  4. Hickmann T, Widerberg O, Lederer M, Pattberg P (2021) The United Nations framework convention on climate change secretariat as an orchestrator in global climate policymaking. Int Rev Adm Sci 87(1):21–38

    Google Scholar 

  5. Verschuuren J (2022) Climate change adaptation under the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change and related documents Research handbook on climate change adaptation law. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham, pp 14–30

    Google Scholar 

  6. Miyamoto M, Takeuchi K (2019) Climate agreement and technology diffusion: impact of the Kyoto protocol on international patent applications for renewable energy technologies. Energy Policy 129:1331–1338

    Google Scholar 

  7. Lawrence MG, Schäfer S, Muri H, Scott V, Oschlies A, Vaughan NE et al (2018) Evaluating climate geoengineering proposals in the context of the Paris agreement temperature goals. Nat Commun 9(1):1–19

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Rogelj J, Huppmann D, Krey V, Riahi K, Clarke L, Gidden M et al (2019) A new scenario logic for the Paris agreement long-term temperature goal. Nature 573(7774):357–363

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hall BD, Crotwell AM, Kitzis DR, Mefford T, Miller BR, Schibig MF et al (2021) Revision of the World Meteorological Organization global atmosphere watch (WMO/GAW) CO2 calibration scale. Atmos Meas Tech 14(4):3015–3032

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Lei R, Sheng Z, Xunmin O (2023) The carbon reduction potential of hydrogen in the low carbon transition of the iron and steel industry: the case of China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 171(1):1130261–1130317

    Google Scholar 

  11. International Energy Agency (2020) Hydrogen. https://www.iea.org/reports/iron-and-steel-technology-roadmap

  12. Sun M, Pang K, Barati M, Meng X (2023) Development and problems of fluidized bed ironmaking process: an overview. J Sustain Metall. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-023-00746-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Gu W, Zhao X, Yan X, Wang C, Li Q (2019) Energy technological progress, energy consumption, and CO2 emissions: empirical evidence from China. J Clean Prod 236:117666

    Google Scholar 

  14. Lei W, Xie Y, Hafeez M, Ullah S (2022) Assessing the dynamic linkage between energy efficiency, renewable energy consumption, and CO2 emissions in China. Environ Sci Pollut Res 29(13):19540–19552

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Choi J, Kim W, Choi S (2022) The economic effect of the steel industry on sustainable growth in China—a focus on input–output analysis. Sustainability 14:4110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Wulf C, Linssen J, Zapp P (2019) Review of power-to-gas projects in Europe. 12th international renewable energy storage conference: IRES 2018, Dusseldorf, Germany, 13–15 March 2018, 367–378

  17. Rechberger K, Andreas Sasiain C, Wolfmeir A, Harris H (2020) Green hydrogen-based direct reduction for low-carbon steelmaking. Steel Res Int 91(11):202000110

    Google Scholar 

  18. (2023) 2022 Steel Industry Green Development Level Assessment Report by Environmental Engineering Evaluation Center of the Ministry of Ecology and Environment

  19. Yu X, Tan C (2022) China’s pathway to carbon neutrality for the iron and steel industry. Glob Environ Chang 76:102574

    Google Scholar 

  20. Qazi UY (2022) Future of hydrogen as an alternative fuel for next-generation industrial applications. Challenges Expect Opportunities Energies 15(13):4741

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Dutta S (2014) A review on production, storage of hydrogen and its utilization as an energy resource. J Ind Eng Chem 20(4):1148–1156

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bailera M, Lisbona P, Pea B, Romeo LM (2021) A review on CO2 mitigation in the iron and steel industry through power to X processes. J CO2 Util 46:101456

  23. As D, Sabrina G, Sven L, Gilles K, Anand A, Miriam V et al (2021) Reduction of CO2 emission from off-gases of steel industry by dry reforming of methane. Angew Chem 60(21):11852–11857

    Google Scholar 

  24. Zhidong T, Qi Z, Yongsheng S, Peng G, Yuexin H (2022) Prospects of green extraction of iron from waste dumped flotation tailings by H2: A pilot case study. J Clean Prod 330(1):1298531–1298612

    Google Scholar 

  25. Chen Y, Zuo H (2021) Review of hydrogen-rich ironmaking technology in blast furnace. Ironmaking Steelmaking 48(6):749–768

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Zhang C, Vladislav L, Xu R, Sergey G, Jiao K, Zhang J et al (2022) Blast furnace hydrogen-rich metallurgy-research on efficiency injection of natural gas and pulverized coal. Fuel 311:122412

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Rechberger K, Spanlang A, Sasiain Conde A, Wolfmeir H, Harris C (2020) Green hydrogen-based direct reduction for low-carbon steelmaking. Steel Res Int 91:2000110

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang R, Zhao Y, Babich A, Senk D, Fan X (2021) Hydrogen direct reduction (H-DR) in steel industry—an overview of challenges and opportunities. J Clean Prod 329:129797

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Liu W, Zuo H, Wang J, Xue Q, Ren B, Yang F (2021) The production and application of hydrogen in steel industry. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(17):10548–10569

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Badr K (2007) Smelting of iron oxides using hydrogen based plasmas. University of Leoben

  31. Souza Filho IR, Ma Y, Kulse M, Ponge D, Gault B, Springer H et al (2021) Sustainable steel through hydrogen plasma reduction of iron ore: process, kinetics, microstructure, chemistry. Acta Mater 213:116971

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Geerdes M, Chaigneau R, Lingiardi O (2020) Modern blast furnace ironmaking: an introduction. Ios Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  33. Manuel B (2023) Comparing different syngas for blast furnace ironmaking by using the extended operating line methodology. Fuel 333(1):1265331–1265413

    Google Scholar 

  34. Sfi R, Hauke S, Yan M, Ankita M et al (2022) Green steel at its crossroads: Hybrid hydrogen-based reduction of iron ores. J Clean Prod 340(15):1308051–1308115

    Google Scholar 

  35. Jozwiak W, Kaczmarek E, Maniecki T, Ignaczak W, Maniukiewicz W (2007) Reduction behavior of iron oxides in hydrogen and carbon monoxide atmospheres. Appl Catal A 326(1):17–27

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Yan M, R. SFI, Xue Z, Supriya N, Pere BV, Guillermo R, et al (2022) Hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron oxide at 700°C: heterogeneity at pellet and microstructure scales. Int J Miner Metall Mater 29(10):1901–1907

    Google Scholar 

  37. Yan M et al (2022) Hierarchical nature of hydrogen-based direct reduction of iron oxides. Scr Mater 1:114571

    Google Scholar 

  38. Zhenxiao X, Zeyi J, Xinru Z, Zhen L, Yuanxiang L, Yewei H et al (2022) The CO2 reduction potential for the oxygen blast furnace with CO2 capture and storage under hydrogen-enriched conditions. Int J Gas Control 121:1

    Google Scholar 

  39. Ea A, Sl T, SeHo K, Baptiste G, Dierk R (2023) The fate of water in hydrogen-based iron oxide reduction. Adv Sci 10(24):e2300626

    Google Scholar 

  40. Spreitzer D, Schenk J (2019) Reduction of iron oxides with hydrogen—a review. Steel Res Int 90(10):1900108

    Google Scholar 

  41. Wei Z, Jing D, Chengzhi L, Xiaobing Y, Zhengliang X, Henrik S (2020) A review on explorations of the oxygen blast furnace process. Steel Res Int 92:1

    Google Scholar 

  42. Ubando AT, Chen WH, Show PL, Ong HC (2020) Kinetic and thermodynamic analysis of iron oxide reduction by graphite for CO2 mitigation in chemical-looping combustion. Int J Energy Res 44(5):3865–3882

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. Mondal K, Lorethova H, Hippo E, Wiltowski T, Lalvani S (2004) Reduction of iron oxide in carbon monoxide atmosphere—reaction controlled kinetics. Fuel Process Technol 86(1):33–47

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  44. Barde AA, Klausner JF, Mei R (2016) Solid state reaction kinetics of iron oxide reduction using hydrogen as a reducing agent. Int J Hydrogen Energy 41(24):10103–10119

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Zhang X (2022) Kinetic analysis of iron ore powder reaction with hydrogen-carbon monoxide. J Miner Metall Mater 29:1882–1890

    Google Scholar 

  46. Zuo H-b, Wang C, Dong J-j, Jiao K-x, Xu R-s (2015) Reduction kinetics of iron oxide pellets with H2 and CO mixtures. Int J Miner Metall Mater 22(7):688–696

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Aidin H, Niusha N, Mikko I, Timo F (2021) A review on the kinetics of iron ore reduction by hydrogen. Materials 14(24):7540–7540

    Google Scholar 

  48. Li ZZTCWZW (2022) Direct reduction swelling behavior of pellets in hydrogen-based shaft furnaces under typical atmospheres. J Miner Metall Mater 29:1891–1900

    Google Scholar 

  49. Metolina P, Ribeiro TR, Guardani R (2022) Hydrogen-based direct reduction of industrial iron ore pellets: statistically designed experiments and computational simulation. Int J Miner Metall Mater 29:1908–1921

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  50. Thomas W, Daniel S, Johannes S (2022) Using iron ore ultra-fines for hydrogen-based fluidized bed direct reduction—a mathematical evaluation. Materials 15:1

    Google Scholar 

  51. Pineau A, Kanari N, Gaballah I (2006) Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H2: part I: low temperature reduction of hematite. Thermochim Acta 447(1):89–100

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Pineau A, Kanari N, Gaballah I (2007) Kinetics of reduction of iron oxides by H2: Part II. Low temperature reduction of magnetite. Thermochim Acta 456(2):75–88

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Ueno H, Endo S, Tomomura S, Ishiwata N (2015) Outline of CO2 ultimate reduction in steelmaking process by innovative technology for cool earth 50 (COURSE50 project). J Jpn Inst Energy 94:1277–1283

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  54. Tonomura S (2013) Outline of course 50. Energy Proc 37:7160–7167

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  55. Quader MA, Ahmed S, Ghazilla RAR, Ahmed S, Dahari M (2015) A comprehensive review on energy efficient CO2 breakthrough technologies for sustainable green iron and steel manufacturing. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:594–614

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Zhang N, Zhou P, Choi Y (2013) Energy efficiency, CO2 emission performance and technology gaps in fossil fuel electricity generation in Korea: a meta-frontier non-radial directional distance functionanalysis. Energy Policy 56:653–662

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  57. Choi J, Cho H, Yun S, Jang M-G, Oh S-Y, Binns M et al (2019) Process design and optimization of MEA-based CO2 capture processes for non-power industries. Energy 185:971–980

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  58. Jeong S-J (2015) System dynamics approach for the impacts of FINEX technology and carbon taxes on steel demand: case study of the POSCO. Int J Precis Eng Manuf Green Technol 2:85–93

    Google Scholar 

  59. Ariyama T, Takahashi K, Kawashiri Y, Nouchi T (2019) Diversification of the ironmaking process toward the long-term global goal for carbon dioxide mitigation. J Sustain Metall 5(3):276–294

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tang J, Chu M-s, Li F, Feng C, Liu Z-g, Zhou Y-s (2020) Development and progress on hydrogen metallurgy. Int J Miner Metall Mater 27(6):713–723

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  61. Bhaskar A, Assadi M, Nikpey SH (2020) Decarbonization of the iron and steel industry with direct reduction of iron ore with green hydrogen. Energies 13(3):758

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  62. Ren L, Zhou S, Peng T, Ou X (2021) A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 143:110846

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  63. Lin Y, Yang H, Ma L, Li Z, Ni W (2021) Low-carbon development for the iron and steel industry in China and the world: status quo, future vision, and key actions. Sustainability 13:12548

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Zhao J, Zuo H, Wang Y, Wang J, Xue Q (2020) Review of green and low-carbon ironmaking technology. Ironmaking Steelmaking 47(3):296–306

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Pei M, Petäjäniemi M, Regnell A, Wijk O (2020) Toward a fossil free future with HYBRIT: development of iron and steelmaking technology in Sweden and Finland. Metals 10(7):972

    Google Scholar 

  66. Varling AS, Christensen TH, Bisinella V (2023) Life cycle assessment of alternative biogas utilisations, including carbon capture and storage or utilisation. Waste Manag 157:168

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  67. ArcelorMittal (2019) World first for steel: ArcelorMittal investigates the industrial use of pure hydrogen-ArcelorMittal. https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/news-and-media/news/2019/mar/28-03-2019

  68. Langner AL, L (2019) ArcelorMittal (2023) The carbon reduction potential of hydrogen in the low carbon transition of the iron and steel industry: the case of China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 171 in Hamburg. https://corporate.arcelormittal.com/news-andmedia/news/2019/sep/16-09-2019

  69. Vaughan A (2019) Zero carbon’s hard problem. New Sci 244(3256):38–41

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  70. Kar SK, Sinha ASK, Harichandan S, Bansal R, Balathanigaimani MS (2022) Hydrogen economy in India: a status review. Wiley Interdiscipl Rev 1:e459

    Google Scholar 

  71. Buergler T, Prammer J (2019) Hydrogen steelmaking: technology options and R&D projects. BHM 164(11):447–451

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  72. Wang Y, Zuo H, Zhao J (2020) Recent progress and development of ironmaking in China as of 2019: an overview. Ironmaking Steelmaking 47(6):640–649

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  73. Li J, Kuang S, Jiao L, Liu L, Zou R, Yu A (2022) Numerical modeling and analysis of hydrogen blast furnace ironmaking process. Fuel 323:1243681–1243716

    Google Scholar 

  74. Nishioka K, Ujisawa Y, Tonomura S, Ishiwata N, Sikstrom P (2016) Sustainable aspects of CO2 ultimate reduction in the steelmaking process (COURSE50 project), part 1: hydrogen reduction in the blast furnace. J Sustain Metall 2(3):200–208

    Google Scholar 

  75. Onoda M, Matsuzaki Y, Chowdhury FA, Yamada H, Goto K, Tonomura S (2016) Sustainable aspects of ultimate reduction of CO2 in the steelmaking process (COURSE50 project), part 2: CO2 capture. J Sustain Metall 2(3):209–215

    Google Scholar 

  76. Junjie Y (2018) Progress and future of breakthrough low-carbon steelmaking technology (ULCOS) of EU. Int J Miner Process Extract Metall 3(2):15–15

    Google Scholar 

  77. Quader MA, Ahmed S, Dawal SZ, Nukman Y (2016) Present needs, recent progress and future trends of energy-efficient ultra-low carbon dioxide (CO2) steelmaking (ULCOS) program. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 55:537–549

    Google Scholar 

  78. Alexandra H, Jan VDS, Dominique S (2012) ULCOS top gas recycling blast furnace. Stahl Undsen 132(4):31–40

    Google Scholar 

  79. World Steel Capacity News (2023) EU commission approves funds for Thyssenkrupp's tkH2Steel Programme. World Steel Capacity News

  80. Peng S, Binglang R, Jingsong W, Guang W, Haibin Z, Qingguo X (2023) Current situation and development prospects of metallurgical by-product gas utilization in China’s steel industry. Int J Hydrogen Energy 48(74):28945–28969

    Google Scholar 

  81. Yichao H, Yinxuan Q, Jian C, Liangyuan H, Edward RT, Victor R et al (2022) Integrating a top-gas recycling and CO2 electrolysis process for H2-rich gas injection and reduce CO2 emissions from an ironmaking blast furnace. Materials 15(6):2008–2008

    Google Scholar 

  82. Michael B, Kyriakos P, Panos S, Spyridon V, Ismael M, Alice P et al (2021) Integration of renewable hydrogen production in steelworks off-gases for the synthesis of methanol and methane. Energies 14(10):2904–2904

    Google Scholar 

  83. Joakim A, Stefan G (2021) A comparison of two hydrogen storages in a fossil-free direct reduced iron process. Int J Hydrogen Energy 46(56):28657–28674

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ansteel Beijing Research Institute CO. LTD., Beijing, 102209, People’s Republic of China

    Minmin Sun, Keliang Pang & Xinyang Meng

  2. Department of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Toronto, Wallberg Building, Toronto, ON, M5S 3E4, Canada

    Mansoor Barati

Authors
  1. Minmin Sun
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Keliang Pang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Mansoor Barati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Xinyang Meng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

MS is the corresponding author contributed toward writing—review and editing. KP contributed toward review and editing. MB contributed toward conceptualization and supervision. XM contributed toward review and editing.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Minmin Sun or Mansoor Barati.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

The contributing editor for this article was Yan Ma.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sun, M., Pang, K., Barati, M. et al. Hydrogen-Based Reduction Technologies in Low-Carbon Sustainable Ironmaking and Steelmaking: A Review. J. Sustain. Metall. 10, 10–25 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-023-00772-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40831-023-00772-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation