Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-5g6vh Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-27T06:18:31.103Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Remarks on Naimark dilation theorem

Part of: Nontrigonometric harmonic analysis Normed linear spaces and Banach spaces; Banach lattices

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  28 November 2023

Sergiusz Kużel Open the ORCID record for Sergiusz Kużel [Opens in a new window]
Sergiusz Kużel*
Affiliation:
AGH University of Science and Technology, al. A. Mickiewicza 30, Kraków, 30-059, Poland
*
e-mail: kuzhel@agh.edu.pl
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Although Naimark dilation theorem was originally stated in 1940, it still finds many important applications in various areas. The objective of this paper is to introduce a method for explicitly constructing the vectors of complementary frames in the Naimark dilation theorem, specifically in cases where the initial Parseval frame contains a Riesz basis as a subset. These findings serve as a foundation for the construction of dual frames.

Keywords

Naimark dilation theoremParseval framedual frameRiesz basis

MSC classification

Primary: 46B15: Summability and bases
Secondary: 42C15: General harmonic expansions, frames
Type
Article
Information
Canadian Mathematical Bulletin , First View , pp. 1 - 9
Check for updates
Copyright
© The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Canadian Mathematical Society

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

This work was partially supported by the Faculty of Applied Mathematics AGH UST statutory tasks within subsidy of the Ministry of Science and Higher Education of Poland.

References

Bakić, D. and Berić, T., On excesses of frames . Glas. Mat. 50(2015), 415–427.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Balan, R., Casazza, P., Heil, C., and Landau, Z., Deficits and excesses of frames . Adv. Comput. Math. 18(2003), 93–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Christensen, O., An introduction to frames and Riesz bases, Birkhäuser, Boston, 2016.Google Scholar
Czaja, W., Remarks on Naimark’s duality . Proc. Amer. Mat. Soc. 136(2008), 867–871.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Han, D. and Larson, D. R., Frames, bases and group representations . Mem. Amer. Math. Soc. 147(2000), 697.Google Scholar
Heil, C., A basis theory primer: expanded edition, Springer, New York, 2010.Google Scholar
Holevo, A. S., Probabilistic and statistical aspects of quantum theory, North-Holland, Oxford–Amsterdam, 1982.Google Scholar
Holub, J. R., Pre-frame operators, Besselian frames and near-Riesz bases in Hilbert spaces . Proc. Amer. Mat. Soc. 122(1994), 779–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Kamuda, A. and Kużel, S., On description of dual frames . Appl. Comput. Harmon. Anal. 56(2021), 351–367.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Naimark, M. A., Spectral functions of a symmetric operator . Izv. Akad. Nauk SSSR Ser. Mat. 4(1940), 271–318.Google Scholar
Nilsen, M. A. and Chuang, I. L., Quantum computation and quantum information, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, 2000.Google Scholar
Pares, A., Neumark’s theorem and quantum inseparability . Found. Phys. 20(1990), 1441–1453.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Schmüdgen, K., Unbounded self-adjoint operators on Hilbert space, Springer, Berlin, 2012.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Terekhin, P. A., Representation systems and projections of bases . Math. Notes 75(2004), 881–884.CrossRefGoogle Scholar