Skip to main content
Log in

Chelation Agent As Potential Target Antioxidant: DFT, Physicochemical Properties, Topological Analysis, and Molecular Docking Studies into Intramolecular Interactions

  • BIOPHYSICAL CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICAL AND CHEMICAL BIOLOGY
  • Published:
Russian Journal of Physical Chemistry A Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The electronic characterization of monomer and dimer molecule’s C6H6O4 was also calculated using the DFT (B3LYP/6311G++(d,p)) method. The calculated TDOS, HOMO, and LUMO were performed through intramolecular charge transfer to investigate the molecule’s stability. In dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO), the UV spectrum has been determined. According to Swiss-ADME, Aspergillus oryzae is not mutagenic or carcinogenic. Additionally calculated were the Mulliken charges, Fukui indices and MEP. Swiss-ADME was used to forecast predictions and significant descriptors of the compounds’ physicochemical characteristics. The intermolecular interactions were examined using topological analysis techniques like RDG and IRI. For the 1JNK Protein, Aspergillus oryzae has a binding affinity of –6.21.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. J. D. Bos and M. M. Meinardi, Exp. Dermatol. 9, 165 (2000).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. W. J. Balfour, Spectrochim. Acta, Part A 39, 795 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. V. Ashok Babu, B. Lakshmaiah, K. Sree Ramulu, and G. Ramana Rao, Ind. J. Pure Appl. Phys. 25, 58 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  4. G. A. Burdock, M. G. Soni, and I. G. Carabin, Regulat. Toxicol. Pharmacol. 33, 80 (2001).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. H. S. Rho, C. S. Lee, S. M. Ahn, Y. D. Hong, S. S. Shin, Y.-H. Park, et al., Bull. Korean Chem. Soc. 32, 4411 (2011).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Naoki, N. Shusuke, T. Satosi, and E. Takeaki, Opt. Commun. 260, 25 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. J. C. Espin, J. Tudela, and F. Garcia-Canovas, Anal. Biochem. 259, 118 (1998).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. L. Saghaie, M. Pourfarzam, A. Fassihi, and B. Sartippour, Res. Pharm. Sci. 8, 233 (2013).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. M. Mohammadpour, A. Sadeghi, A. Fassihi, L. Saghaei, A. Movahedian, and M. Rostami, Res. Pharm. Sci. 7, 171 (2012).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. T. Lu and F. Chen, J. Comput. Chem. 33, 580 (2012).

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. 3D QSAR in Drug Design, Ed. by H. Kubinyi, G. Folkers, and Y. C. Martin (Kluwer, The Netherlands, 1997), Vols. 2, 3.

    Google Scholar 

  12. H. van de Waterbeemd, Structure Property Correlations in Drug Research (Academic, New York, 1996).

    Google Scholar 

  13. The Practice of Medicinal Chemistry, Ed. by C. Wermuth (Academic, New York, 1998).

    Google Scholar 

  14. D. A. Filimonov and V. V. Poroikov, in Bioactie Compound Design: Possibilities for Industrial Use (BIOS Sci., Oxford, 1996), p. 47.

  15. T. A. Gloriozova, D. A. Filimonov, A. A. Lagunin, and V. V. Poroikov, Pharm. Chem. J. 32, 658 (1998).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. V. Poroikov and D. Filimonov, in Rational Approaches to Drug Design (Prous Science, Barcelona, 2001), p. 403.

    Google Scholar 

  17. A. Kubaib, P. M. Imran, and A. A. Basha, Comput. Theor. Chem. 1217, 113934 (2022).

  18. R. G. Pearson, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U. S. A. 83, 84408441 (1986).

  19. M. D. Aytemir and G. Karakaya, in Medicinal Chemistry and Drug Design, Ed. by D. Ekinci (InTech Open, Rijeka, 2012).

    Google Scholar 

  20. A. Kubaib and P. M. Imran, J. Mater. Sci. 58, 4005 (2023).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. N. O. Eddy, P. O. Ameh, and N. B. Essien, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 12, 545 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

  22. A. Kubaib and P. M. Imran, J. Indian Chem. Soc. 100, 100804 (2023).

  23. A. A. Basha, F. L. A. Khan, P. Muzammil, and G. S. Fasiuddin, Mater. Res. Express 9, 075303 (2022).

  24. M. Yeo, P. M. Niamien, E. B. A. Bilé, and A. Trokourey, J. Comput. Methods Mol. Des. 8, 13 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. M. Yeo, P. M. Niamien, E. B. A. Bilé, and A. Trokourey, J. Comput. Methods Mol. Des. 8, 13 (2018).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Y. S. D. N’Guessan, G. G. D. Diomandé, S. J. Akpa, A. Ouédraogo, L. A. G. Pohan, P. M. Niamien, and A. Trokourey, Int. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. Res. 3 (4), 41 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. A. A. Basha et al., J. Mol. Liq. 363, 119853 (2022).

  28. Y. S. D. N’Guessan, G. G. D. Diomandé, S. J. Akpa, A. Ouédraogo, L. A. G. Pohan, P. M. Niamien, and A. Trokourey, Int. J. Appl. Pharm. Sci. Res. 3 (4), 41 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. N. O. Eddy, P. O. Ameh, and N. B. Essien, J. Taibah Univ. Sci. 12, 545 (2018).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Attar Kubaib: conceptualization, methodology, validation, data curation, writing–original draft. Predhanekar Mohamed Imran: supervisor, formal analysis, software. K. Anandaratchagan: investigation, visualization, resource. M. Selvakumaran: writing–review and editing. S. Sulthanudeen: investigation. S. Sanjeev: visualization. A. Aathif Basha: resource.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Attar Kubaib, Predhanekar Mohamed Imran or K. Anandaratchagan.

Ethics declarations

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kubaib, A., Imran, P.M., Anandaratchagan, K. et al. Chelation Agent As Potential Target Antioxidant: DFT, Physicochemical Properties, Topological Analysis, and Molecular Docking Studies into Intramolecular Interactions. Russ. J. Phys. Chem. 97, 2884–2893 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423120038

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036024423120038

Keyword:

Navigation