Abstract
The purpose of this paper is twofold. First, it proposes a compositional semantic analysis for approximative kaada in Classical Arabic which has the property of being a clause-level rather than predicate-level operator: [KAADA α] is paraphrased as [α is false but there exists β close to α such that β is true]. The analysis is based on the integrated semantics of Penka (Penka, Doris. 2006. Almost there: The meaning of almost. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. 275–286) in which the negativity component of kaada is interpreted as part of its lexical meaning within a situation semantics framework. It also makes a novel use of the concept of semantic closeness among situations in terms of the intuitively appealing dimension of the relative completion of an event. Second, the paper presents and analyzes an instance of a puzzle noted by most descriptive Classical Arabic grammarians (see, for example, al-Ahmad, Ayman. 2021. Dalalit KAADA l-manfiah fi l-Qurʾaan l-kareem. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Literature 9(2). 838–859) in which negated kaada has an interpretation where the negativity implication disappears altogether. The paper offers a solution to the puzzle based on a previous suggestion made by Kilbourn-Ceron (Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana. 2016. Embedded exhaustification: Evidence from almost. Journal of Semantics 34(1). 43–60) in which an instance of embedded exhaustification appears to apply in approximatives in certain contexts in such a way that the negativity inference is obscured.
Funding source: The Deanship of Scientific Research at Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan
Award Identifier / Grant number: [grant number QF21/1803-3.0]
References
Ababneh, Taleb, Saleh Ramadan & Ibrahim Abushihab. 2017. Perspectives on Arabic semantics. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science 7(7). 58–65.Search in Google Scholar
Abu Helal, Abdel-Rahman. 2021. A puzzle related to negated approximative Kaada in Standard Arabic. Dirasat: Human and Social Sciences 48(4). 517–522.Search in Google Scholar
al-Ahmad, Ayman. 2012. Dalalit KAADA l-manfiah fi l-Qurʾaan l-kareem. Journal of the Association of Arab Universities for Literature 9(2). 838–859.Search in Google Scholar
al-Ansari, Ibn Hisham. 1985. Muɣni l-abeeb fi kuutb al-aʕareeb. Beirut: Dar al-fiker.Search in Google Scholar
al-Jurjani, Abdel-Qader. 1978. Dalaaʔil al-ʕijaaz. Beirut: Dar al-maʕarifa.Search in Google Scholar
al-Tˠabari, Mohammed. 1992. Jaamiʕ l-biaan fi taʔweel al-Qurʾaan. Beirut: Dar al-kuutb al-ʕilmayah.Search in Google Scholar
Armstrong, David. 1978. Universals and scientific realism: Nominalism and realism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Assamiraaʔi, Faadil. 2000. Maʕaani nnaħu. Beirut: Dar l-fiker.Search in Google Scholar
Chierchia, Gennaro, Danny Fox & Benjamin Spector. 2012. Scalar implicature as a grammatical phenomenon. In Claudia Maienborn, Klaus von Heusinger & Paul Portner (eds.), Semantics: An international handbook of natural language meaning, vol. 3, 2297–2331. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.Search in Google Scholar
Crnič, Luka. 2013. Focus particles and embedded exhaustification. Journal of Semantics 30(5). 533–558. https://doi.org/10.1093/jos/ffs018.Search in Google Scholar
Crnič, Luka. 2018. A note on connected exceptives and approximatives. Journal of Semantics 35(4). 741–756.10.1093/jos/ffy011Search in Google Scholar
Elbourne, Paul. 2013. Definite descriptions. Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199660193.001.0001Search in Google Scholar
Fox, Danny & Benjamin Spector. 2018. Economy and embedded exhaustification. Natural Language Semantics 26. 1–50. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-017-9139-6.Search in Google Scholar
Grice, Paul. 1989. Studies in the way of words. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Search in Google Scholar
Hasan, Abbas. 1986. L-naħw al-wafi. Cairo: Dar al-maʕari.Search in Google Scholar
Hilpinen, Risto. 1976. Approximate truth and truthlikeness. In Marian Przełęcki, Klemens Szaniawski & Ryszard Wójcicki (eds.), Formal methods in the methodology of empirical sciences, 19–42. Kufstein: Reidel.10.1007/978-94-010-1135-8_2Search in Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 1989. A natural history of negation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Search in Google Scholar
Horn, Laurence R. 2011. Almost forever. In Etsuyo Yuasa, Tista Bagchi & Katharine Beals (eds.), Pragmatics and autolexical grammar: In honor of Jerry Sadock, 3–21. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/la.176.01horSearch in Google Scholar
Jayez, Jacques & Lucia M. Tovena. 2008. Presque and almost: How argumentation derives from comparative meaning. In Olivier Bonami & Patricia Cabredo Hofherr (eds.), Empirical issues in syntax and semantics, vol. 7, 1–23. Oxford, UK: Université Paris 7.Search in Google Scholar
Kilbourn-Ceron, Oriana. 2016. Embedded exhaustification: Evidence from almost. Journal of Semantics 34(1). 43–60.10.1093/jos/ffw002Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 1989. An investigation of the lumps of thought. Linguistics and Philosophy 12. 607–653. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00627775.Search in Google Scholar
Kratzer, A. 2010. Situations in natural language semantics. In E. N. Zalta (ed.), The Stanford encyclopedia of philosophy, Fall 2010 edn. Stanford, CA: Standard University. Available at: http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/fall2010/entries/situations-semantics/.Search in Google Scholar
Krifka, Manfred. 1992. A compositional semantics for multiple focus constructions. In Joachim Jacobs (ed.), Informationsstruktur und Grammatik, 17–53. Opladen: Westdeutscher Verlag.10.1007/978-3-663-12176-3_2Search in Google Scholar
Lewis, David. 1973. Counterfactuals. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Nouwen, Rick. 2006. Remarks on the polar orientation of almost. In Jeroen van de Weijer & Bettelou Los (eds.), Linguistics in The Netherlands 2006, 162–173. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.10.1075/avt.23.17nouSearch in Google Scholar
Paseau, A. C. 2022. Non-metric propositional similarity. Erkenntnis 87. 2307–2328. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10670-020-00303-7.Search in Google Scholar
Penka, Doris. 2006. Almost there: The meaning of almost. Proceedings of Sinn und Bedeutung 10. 275–286. https://doi.org/10.21248/zaspil.44.2006.317.Search in Google Scholar
Rooth, Mats. 1992. A theory of focus interpretation. Natural Language Semantics 1. 75–116. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02342617.Search in Google Scholar
Sadock, Jerrold M. 1981. Almost. In Peter Cole (ed.), Radical pragmatics, 257–271. New York: Academic Press.Search in Google Scholar
Sainsbury, Mark. 2001. Logical forms, 2nd edn. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Schwarz, Bernhard. 2005. Scalar additive particles in negative contexts. Natural Language Semantics 13. 125–168. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11050-004-2441-0.Search in Google Scholar
Spector, Benjamin. 2014. Global positive polarity items and obligatory exhaustivity. Semantics and Pragmatics 7(11). 1–61. https://doi.org/10.3765/sp.7.11.Search in Google Scholar
Stalnaker, Robert. 1968. A theory of conditionals. In Nicholas Rescher (ed.), Studies in logical theory, 98–112. American Philosophical Quarterly Monograph Series 2. Oxford: Blackwell.Search in Google Scholar
Zyoud, Munther & Hareth Zyoud. 2022. The pronoun reference and its effect on textual coherence in Surat AlRahman. Al-Zaytoonah University of Jordan Journal for Human and Social Studies 3(2). 1–28.Search in Google Scholar
© 2023 Walter de Gruyter GmbH, Berlin/Boston
