Abstract
In the recent decade, increasing vessel sizes, infrastructure developments, intermodal connections, and digital transformation again have raised questions about the development of container ports. This transformation is expected to continue to affect the port industry in the future. While the Port of Rotterdam is the busiest container port in Europe, its top-ranking place is under pressure, and competition between the top three ports has become fiercer. This contribution provides insights into the concentration, inequality and competition evolution of Europe’s top three ports through several measurement methods and the ternary diagram. Several measurement methods are used to report the concentration, inequality, and competition of these ports. The study confirms that ternary diagram indicators and traditional measures reveal similar results. Findings also suggest that no port has a dominating position in this competitive port system, and these ports are engaging in efficient competition. SSA analysis indicates that the Port of Hamburg is the major loser in the last two periods; the Port of Rotterdam and Port of Antwerp are the major winners respectively in the last two periods. Moreover, the prospects are salient for a tendency towards concentration and inequality. The findings of the study provide insights and visualizations for policymakers, enabling them to gain a deeper understanding of the development and prospects of the three major port hubs in Europe.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data Availability
The data used in this study are publicly available and the references are given in the manuscript.
Notes
Calculated based on the THC imports of ZIM, CMA CGM and Hamburg SUD (Corporate websites, 2021)
A higher value is associated with better connectivity. Annual index is calculated as the average of the year’s four quarters.
References
Castelein, R. B., Geerlings, H., & van Duin, J. H. R. (2019). The ostensible tension between competition and cooperation in ports: A case study on intra-port competition and inter-organizational relations in the Rotterdam container handling sector. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 4(7), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-019-0046-5
Chambers, S. (2021). German port giants Eurogate and HHLA discuss cooperation. https://splash247.com/german-port-giants-eurogate-and-hhla-discuss-cooperation/. Accessed December 4, 2021.
Chang, Y. T., & Lee, P. T. (2007). Overview of interport competition: Issues and methods. Journal of International Logistics and Trade, 5(1), 99–121. https://doi.org/10.24006/jilt.2007.5.1.99
Constantinos, C., & Theodore, S. (2019). Concentration of container flows in the port phase: The case of the U.S West and East Coast port ranges. Issues in Business Management and Economics, 7(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.15739/IBME.19.001
Corporate websites. (2021). ZIM. https://www.zim.com/tools/tariff-calculator; CMA-CGM. https://www.cma-cgm.com/static/NL/attachments/CMA%20CGM%20news%20-%20THC%202021%20as%20from%2015th%20July%202021.pdf; HAMBURGSUD. https://www.hamburgsudline.com/liner/en/liner_services/ecommerce/tariffs_and_surcharges/info_and_others_1/thc_calculator/thc_calculator.html. Accessed September 14, 2021.
Ducruet, C., & Notteboom, T. (2020). Revisiting port system delineation through an analysis of maritime interdependencies among seaports. GeoJournal. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10708-020-10341-x
EUROSTAT. (2020). Maritime freight and vessels statistics. https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/statistics-explained/pdfscache/6652.pdf. Accessed January 15, 2021.
Farhan, J., & Ong, G. P. (2018). Forecasting seasonal container throughput at international ports using SARIMA models. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 20(1), 131–148. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2016.13
Feng, H., Grifoll, M., Yang, Z., Zheng, P., & Martin-Mallofre, A. (2020). Visualization of container throughput evolution of the Yangtze River Delta multi-port system: The ternary diagram method. Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142(October). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102039
Feng, H., Grifoll, M., Zheng, P., Mallofre, A. M., Murphy, F., & Li, S. (2021). Evolution and container traffic prediction of Yangtze River Delta multi-port system (2001–2017). International Journal of Shipping and Transport Logistics, 13(1/2), 44. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJSTL.2021.112912
Fung, M. K., Cheng, L. K., & Qiu, L. D. (2003). The impact of terminal handling charges on overall shipping charges: An empirical study. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 37(8), 703–716. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-8564(03)00026-0
Grifoll, M., Karlis, T., & Ortego, M. (2018). Characterizing the evolution of the Container Traffic Share in the Mediterranean Sea using hierarchical clustering. Journal of Marine Science and Engineering, 6(4). https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse6040121
Grifoll, M., Ortego, M. I., & Egozcue, J. J. (2019). Compositional data techniques for the analysis of the container traffic share in a multi-port region. European Transport Research Review, 11(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12544-019-0350-z
Hayut, Y. (1981). Containerization and the load center concept. Economic Geography, 57(2), 160–176.
Herfindahl, O. C. (1950). Concentration in the steel industry. Doctoral Dissertation.
HHLA. (2020). HHLA 2020 Annual-Report. https://report.hhla.de/annual-report-2020/servicepages/downloads/files/HHLA_2020_Annual-Report.pdf. Accessed October 7, 2021.
Hirschman, A. O. (1945). National power and the structure of foreign trade. University of California Press.
Howarth, R. J. (1996). Sources for a history of the ternary diagram. The British Journal for the History of Science, 29(3), 337–356. https://doi.org/10.1017/S000708740003449X
Hyndman, R. J., & Athanasopoulos, G. (2018). Forecasting: principles and practice, 2nd edition, OTexts: Melbourne, Australia. https://OTexts.com/fpp2/non-seasonal-arima.html. Accessed January 20, 2021.
Hyndman, R. J., & Koehler, A. B. (2006). Another look at measures of forecast accuracy. International Journal of Forecasting, 22(4), 679–688. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2006.03.001
Jong, O. (2021). TEU traffic jam about to arrive, ready to roll? Railfreight. https://www.railfreight.com/policy/2021/04/09/blog-teu-traffic-jam-about-to-arrive-ready-to-roll/?gdpr=accept&gdpr=accept. Accessed November 05, 2021.
Klemann, H. A. (2017). The ports in the Hamburg– Le Havre range. Ports and networks: Strategies, Operations and perspectives. Routledge.
Knowler, G. (2021). Drop in China trade drags down Hamburg’s 2020 volume. Journal of Commerce. https://www.joc.com/port-news/drop-china-trade-drags-down-hamburg%E2%80%99s-2020-volume_20210225.html. Accessed November 05, 2021.
Koutsandreas, D., Spiliotis, E., Petropoulos, F., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2022). On the selection of forecasting accuracy measures. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 73(5), 937–954. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2021.1892464
La Peña Zarzuelo, I., Freire Soeane, M. J., & López Bermúdez, B. (2020). Industry 4.0 in the port and maritime industry: A literature review. Journal of Industrial Information Integration, 20(December). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jii.2020.100173
Lee, S. W., & Ducruet, C. (2009). Spatial glocalization in Asia-Pacific Hub Port cities: A comparison of Hong Kong and Singapore. Urban Geography, 30(2), 162–184. https://doi.org/10.2747/0272-3638.30.2.162
Lipczynski, J., Wilson, J. O. S., & Goddard, J. A. (2005). Industrial organization: Competition, strategy, policy (2nd ed.). Prentice Hall/Financial Times.
Liu, M., Kang, S. H., & Ahn, W. C. (2016). Analysis of the market structure and shift-effects in North China ports. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(3), 179–186. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.09.007
Low, J. M. W., & Tang, L. C. (2012). Network effects in the East Asia container ports industry. Maritime Policy & Management, 39(4), 369–386. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2012.689879
Makridakis, S., Spiliotis, E., & Assimakopoulos, V. (2020). The M4 competition: 100,000 time series and 61 forecasting methods. International Journal of Forecasting, 36(1), 54–74. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2019.04.014
Marasco, A., & Romano, A. (2018). Inter-port interactions in the Le Havre-Hamburg range: A scenario analysis using a nonautonomous Lotka Volterra model. Journal of Transport Geography, 69(May), 207–220. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2018.04.018
Martínez Moya, J., & Feo Valero, M. (2017). Port choice in container market: A literature review. Transport Reviews, 37(3), 300–321. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2016.1231233
Merk, O., & Notteboom, T. (2015). Port hinterland connectivity. International Transport Forum Discussion Papers, OECD. https://www.econstor.eu/handle/10419/121944. Accessed June 29, 2021.
Merkel, A. (2017). Spatial competition and complementarity in European port regions. Journal of Transport Geography, 61(May), 40–47. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.04.008
Merkel, A. (2018). Competitive intensity and inefficiency in European container ports. Maritime Business Review, 3(2), 165–184. https://doi.org/10.1108/MABR-01-2018-0003
Monios, J., Notteboom, T., Wilmsmeier, G., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2016). Competition and complementarity between seaports and hinterlands for locating distribution activities. Port Economics Discussion Report 04/2016. https://core.ac.uk/download/pdf/74028294.pdf. Accessed March 25, 2021.
Nazemzadeh, M., & Vanelslander, T. (2015). The container transport system: Selection criteria and business attractiveness for North-European ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 17, 221–245. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2015.1
Nguyen, P. N., & Woo, S. H. (2021). Port connectivity and competition among container ports in Southeast Asia based on Social Network Analysis and TOPSIS. Maritime Policy and Management, 1–18. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2021.1908637
Nguyen, P. N., Woo, S. H., Beresford, A., & Pettit, S. (2020). Competition, market concentration, and relative efficiency of major container ports in Southeast Asia. Journal of Transport Geography, 83(February). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2020.102653
Notteboom, T. (1997). Concentration and load centre development in the European container port system. Journal of Transport Geography, 5(2), 99–115. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(96)00072-5
Notteboom, T. (2006). Traffic inequality in seaport systems revisited. Journal of Transport Geography, 14(2), 95–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2004.12.003
Notteboom, T. (2007). Spatial dynamics in the container load centers of the Le Havre-Hamburg range. Zeitschrift für Wirtschaftsgeographie, 51(1), 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1515/zfw.2007.0008
Notteboom, T. (2009a). The relationship between seaports and the intermodal hinterland in light of global supply chains. OECD/ITF Joint Transport Research Centre Discussion Papers, No. 2008/10, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/235371341338
Notteboom, T. (2009b). Complementarity and substitutability among adjacent Gateway ports. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 41(3), 743–762. https://doi.org/10.1068/a40220
Notteboom, T. (2010). Concentration and the formation of multi-port gateway regions in the European container port system: An update. Journal of Transport Geography, 18(4), 567–583. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.03.003
Notteboom, T. (2016). The adaptive capacity of container ports in an era of mega vessels: The case of upstream seaports Antwerp and Hamburg. Journal of Transport Geography, 54(June), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2016.06.002
Notteboom, T., Pallis, A., & Rodrigue, J. P. (2022). Port economics, management and policy. Routledge.
Ogundana, B. (1970). Patterns and problems of Seaport Evolution in Nigeria. In B. S. Hoyle & D. Hilling (Eds.), Seaports and Development in Tropical Africa (pp. 167–182). Palgrave Macmillan UK.
Pallis, A. A., Vitsounis, T. K., De Langen, P. W., & Notteboom, T. (2011). Port Economics, policy and management: Content classification and survey. Transport Reviews, 31(4), 445–471. https://doi.org/10.1080/01441647.2010.530699
Pavia, R., & Zevi, T. (2021). Ports and Global Cities: What Future? ISPI. https://www.ispionline.it/en/pubblicazione/ports-and-global-cities-what-future-29829. Accessed July 5, 2021.
Peng, W. Y., & Chu, C. W. (2009). A comparison of univariate methods for forecasting container throughput volumes. Mathematical and Computer Modelling, 50(7–8), 1045–1057. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.mcm.2009.05.027
Pham, T. Y., Jeon, J. W., Dang, V. L., Cha, Y. D., & Yeo, G. T. (2016). A longitudinal analysis of concentration developments for container terminals in Northern Vietnam. The Asian Journal of Shipping and Logistics, 32(3), 157–164. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ajsl.2016.09.004
Pomberger, R., Sarc, R., & Lorber, K. E. (2017). Dynamic visualisation of municipal waste management performance in the EU using Ternary Diagram method. Waste Management, 61(March), 558–571. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2017.01.018
Port of Antwerp (2020). Facts and Fig. 2020. https://www.portofantwerp.com/sites/default/files/Facts%20and%20figures%202020_0.pdf. Accessed September 6, 2021.
Port of Antwerp (2021a). Port of Antwerp. https://www.portofantwerp.com/en. Accessed April 6, 2021.
Port of Antwerp (2021b). Largest container ship in the world calls on Port of Antwerp. https://newsroom.portofantwerp.com/largest-container-ship-in-the-world-calls-on-port-of-antwerp. Accessed June 23, 2021.
Port of Antwerp. (2021c). Deepsea terminals. https://www.portofantwerpbruges.com/en/deepsea-terminals. Accessed October 18, 2021.
Port of Hamburg (2021a). Container Handling by Trade Areas. https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/statistics/tradearea/. Accessed June 23, 2021.
Port of Hamburg (2021b). Welcome to the Port of Hamburg. https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/corona. Accessed April 6, 2021.
Port of Hamburg (2021c). Welcome to the Port of Hamburg. https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/news/hhla-handles-world-s-largest-container-ship-at-burchardkai---36834. Accessed June 23, 2021.
Port of Hamburg (2021d). Container Handling. https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/statistics/containerhandling/. Accessed September 6, 2021.
Port of Hamburg (2021e). Terminals. https://www.hafen-hamburg.de/en/terminals/. Accessed October 20, 2021.
Port of Rotterdam (2011). Port Vision 2030. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/sites/default/files/upload/Port-Vision/Port-Vision-2030/files/assets/basic-html/page5.html. Accessed March 11, 2021.
Port of Rotterdam (2020a). Highlights of 2020 Annual Report. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/sites/default/files/2021-06/Annual-report-highlights-Port-of-Rotterdam-2020.pdf. Accessed September 12, 2021.
Port of Rotterdam (2020b). HMM Algeciras, the largest container ship worldwide, on its way to Rotterdam. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/news-and-press-releases/hmm-algeciras-the-largest-container-ship-worldwide-on-its-way-to-rotterdam. Accessed June 23, 2021.
Port of Rotterdam (2021a). All about Port of the future. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/en/doing-business/all-about-port-of-the-future. Accessed April 6, 2021.
Port of Rotterdam. (2021b). Container terminals and depots. https://www.portofrotterdam.com/sites/default/files/2021-06/container-terminals-and-depots-in-the-rotterdam-port-area.pdf. Accessed October 16, 2021.
Rashed, Y., Meersman, H., Van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2017). Short-term forecast of container throughout: An ARIMA-intervention model for the port of Antwerp. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 19(4), 749–764. https://doi.org/10.1057/mel.2016.8
Rashed, Y., Meersman, H., Sys, C., van de Voorde, E., & Vanelslander, T. (2018). A combined approach to forecast container throughput demand: Scenarios for the Hamburg-Le Havre range of ports. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 117(November), 127–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2018.08.010
Sánchez, R. J., Perrotti, D. E., & Fort, A. G. P. (2021). Looking into the future ten years later: Big full containerships and their arrival to south American ports. Journal of Shipping and Trade, 6(1), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41072-021-00083-5
Shepherd, W. G., & Shepherd, J. M. (2003). The economics of industrial organization. Waveland Press.
Song, D. W., Cheon, S., & Pire, C. (2015). Does size matter for port coopetition strategy? Concept, motivation and implication. International Journal of Logistics Research and Applications, 18(3), 207–227. https://doi.org/10.1080/13675567.2015.1032229
Svindland, M., Monios, J., & Hjelle, H. M. (2019). Port rationalization and the evolution of regional port systems: The case of Norway. Maritime Policy & Management, 46(5), 613–629. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2019.1574988
Sys, C. (2009). Is the container liner shipping industry an oligopoly? Transport Policy, 16(5), 259–270. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2009.08.003
Taaffe, E. J., Morrill, R. L., & Gould, P. R. (1963). Transport expansion in underdeveloped countries: A comparative analysis. Geographical Review, 53(4), 503–529. https://doi.org/10.2307/212383
UNCTAD. (2020). Review of Maritime Transport. United Nations.
UNCTAD (2021). Port liner shipping connectivity index, quarterly. https://unctadstat.unctad.org/wds/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=170026. Accessed June 16, 2021.
Veenstra, A., & Notteboom, T. (2011). The development of the Yangtze River container port system. Journal of Transport Geography, 19(4), 772–781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2010.09.006
Veldman, S. J., & Bückmann, E. H. (2003). A model on Container Port Competition: An application for the West European Container Hub-ports. Maritime Economics & Logistics, 5, 3–22. https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.mel.9100058
Wan, Y., Zhang, A., & Li, K. X. (2018). Port competition with accessibility and congestion: A theoretical framework and literature review on empirical studies. Maritime Policy & Management, 45(2), 239–259. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088839.2017.1403053
Wang, T. F., & Cullinane, K. (2004). Measuring competition and concentration of container port industry. İzmir: International Association of Maritime Economists Annual Conference.
Wang, C., & Ducruet, C. (2012). New port development and global city making: Emergence of the Shanghai–Yangshan multilayered gateway hub. Journal of Transport Geography, 25(November), 58–69. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2012.07.008
Wang, J. J., & Slack, B. (2000). The evolution of a regional container port system: The Pearl River Delta. Journal of Transport Geography, 8(4), 263–275. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0966-6923(00)00013-2
Wang, L., Notteboom, T., Lau, Y., & Ng, A. (2017). Functional differentiation and sustainability: A new stage of development in the Chinese container port system. Sustainability, 9(3). https://doi.org/10.3390/su9030328
Wilmsmeier, G., & Monios, J. (2016). Institutional structure and agency in the governance of spatial diversification of port system evolution in Latin America. Journal of Transport Geography, 51(February), 294–307. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2015.02.004
Wilmsmeier, G., Monios, J., & Pérez-Salas, G. (2014). Port system evolution – the case of Latin America and the Caribbean. Journal of Transport Geography, 39(July), 208–221. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2014.07.007
Woo, S. H., Pettit, S. J., Kwak, D. W., & Beresford, A. K. (2011). Seaport research: A structured literature review on methodological issues since the 1980s. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 45(7), 667–685. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tra.2011.04.014
Yang, D., Wang, K. Y., Xu, H., & Zhang, Z. (2017). Path to a multilayered transshipment port system: How the Yangtze River bulk port system has evolved. Journal of Transport Geography, 64(October), 54–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2017.08.011
Yang, Z., Xiu, Q., & Chen, D. (2019). Historical changes in the port and shipping industry in Hong Kong and the underlying policies. Transport Policy, 82(October), 138–147. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2018.03.007
Zhang, Q., Yan, K., & Yang, D. (2021). Port system evolution in Chinese coastal regions: A provincial perspective. Journal of Transport Geography, 92(April), 103031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtrangeo.2021.103031
Zondag, B., Bucci, P., Gützkow, P., & Jong, G. (2010). Port competition modeling including maritime, port, and hinterland characteristics. Maritime Policy & Management, 37(3), 179–194. https://doi.org/10.1080/03088831003700579
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interests
The authors of the manuscript declare that there is no conflict of interest.
Competing interests
The author declares no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Solak Fiskin, C. Inter-Port Evolutions and Prospects of Three Major Port Hubs in Europe: a Visualization Perspective Using Ternary Diagram Method. Appl. Spatial Analysis (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09553-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12061-023-09553-8