Skip to main content
Log in

Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization Prevention Practices in Pregnancy at Tertiary Care Level Hospitals in Islamabad, Pakistan: a Cross-sectional Study

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
SN Comprehensive Clinical Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Red cell alloimmunization has been estimated to cause more than 100,000 babies’ death worldwide. Factors like physician’s knowledge, anti-D availability, and affordability are associated globally with the prevalence of rhesus disease. The purpose of this study was to find out factors and assess the current practices followed in Pakistan for the prevention of rhesus disease. This cross-sectional study was conducted at the two tertiary care hospitals in Islamabad from January to November 2022. The data was collected from 150 D− women and 30 physicians on a self-designed questionnaire. The British Committee for Standards in Hematology (BCSH) is used to provide practical guidelines to healthcare providers for the management of blood group incompatibilities in pregnancy. We compared the prevention practices followed in Pakistani hospitals with the BCSH guidelines. The antibody status was identified in only 18 (12%) pregnancies in the third trimester and no women received routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis (RAADP) during pregnancy to prevent complications in pregnancy. The anti-D injection was administered to 33(22%) women when the potentially sensitive event occurred in pregnancy and 143 (95%) mothers received anti-D after the birth of rhesus-positive fetuses. According to physicians, 83% of families ca not afford anti-D injection and 67% believe the anti-D supply is limited in Pakistan. The rhesus-negative women were not receiving the standard prophylactic treatment as mentioned in guidelines and the reasons attributed to non-adherence were the physician’s poor knowledge, the low family income, along with the non-availability and non-affordability of anti-D injections.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Upon special request, all the collected data can be made available.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

Abbreviations

RAADP :

Routine antinatal anti-D prophylaxis injection

BCSH :

British committee for standards in hematology

References

  1. Saha SC, Rai R, Bagga R, Jain A, Mukhopadhyay K, Kumar P. Pregnancy outcome of Rh D alloimmunized pregnancies: a tertiary care institute experience of a developing country. J Obstet Gynaecol India. 2021;71(6):583–90.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Pegoraro V, Urbinati D, Visser GH, Di Renzo GC, Zipursky A, Stotler BA, Spitalnik SL. Hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn due to Rh (D) incompatibility: a preventable disease that still produces significant morbidity and mortality in children. PloS One. 2020;15(7):e0235807.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Visser GH, Di Renzo GC, Spitalnik SL, Ayres-de-Campos D, Escobar MF, Barnea E, et al. The continuing burden of Rh disease 50 years after the introduction of anti-Rh (D) immunoglobin prophylaxis: call to action. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2019;221(3):227. e1-. e4.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Zipursky A, Bhutani VK. Impact of Rhesus disease on the global problem of bilirubin-induced neurologic dysfunction. Semin Fetal Neonatal Med. 2015;20(1):2–5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Zipursky A, Paul VK. The global burden of Rh disease. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed. 2011;96(2):F84–F5.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Castleman JS, Kilby MD. Red cell alloimmunization: a 2020 update. Prenat Diagn. 2020;40(9):1099–108.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Qureshi H, Massey E, Kirwan D, Davies T, Robson S, White J, Jones J, Allard S; British Society for Haematology. BCSH guideline for the use of anti-D immunoglobulin for the prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):8–20. https://doi.org/10.1111/tme.12091.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. De Haas M, Finning K, Massey E, Roberts D. Anti-D prophylaxis: past, present and future. Transfus Med. 2014;24(1):1–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. De Haas M, Thurik F, Koelewijn J, Van der Schoot C. Haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Vox Sang. 2015;109(2):99–113.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. (NICE) NIfCE. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis for women who are rhesus D negative. Rev NICE Technol appraisal Guid. 2008;41:41–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Kumpel BM, Saldova R, Koeleman CA, Abrahams JL, Ederveen AH, Armour KL, et al. Anti-D monoclonal antibodies from 23 human and rodent cell lines display diverse IgG Fc-glycosylation profiles that determine their clinical efficacy. Sci Rep. 2020;10(1):1–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Turner RM, Lloyd-Jones M, Anumba DO, Smith GC, Spiegelhalter DJ, Squires H, et al. Routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in women who are Rh (D) negative: meta-analyses adjusted for differences in study design and quality. PloS One. 2012;7(2):e30711.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  13. Wikman A, Mörtberg A, Jalkesten E, Jansson Y, Karlsson A, Tiblad E, Ajne G. Altered strategy of prophylactic anti-D administration in pregnancy to cover term and post-term–a pilot study. Vox Sang. 2021;116(9):1005–11.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mbalibulha Y, Natukunda B, Okwi AL, Kalyango JN, Isaac K, Ononge S. Alloimmunization to Rh antigen (D, C, E, C, E) among pregnant women attending antenatal care in South Western Uganda. J Blood Med. 2022;13:747–52. https://doi.org/10.2147/JBM.S385737.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Tiblad E, Wikman AT, Ajne G, Blanck A, Jansson Y, Karlsson A, et al. Targeted routine antenatal anti-D prophylaxis in the prevention of RhD immunisation-outcome of a new antenatal screening and prevention program. PloS One. 2013;8(8):e70984.

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Gupta GK, Balbuena-Merle R, Hendrickson JE, Tormey CA. Immunohematologic aspects of alloimmunization and alloantibody detection: a focus on pregnancy and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. Transfus Apher Sci. 2020;59(5):102946.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Klein HG, Anstee DJ. Mollison’s blood transfusion in clinical medicine. John Wiley & Sons; 2014.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Urbaniak S, Greiss M. RhD haemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn. Blood Rev. 2000;14(1):44–61.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ahmed A, Saqlain M, Akhtar N, Hashmi F, Blebil A, Dujaili J, Umair MM, Bukhsh A. Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of WHOQOL-HIV Bref among people living with HIV/AIDS in Pakistan. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2021;19(1):48. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12955-021-01693-0.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Pourhoseingholi MA, Vahedi M, Rahimzadeh M. Sample size calculation in medical studies. Gastroenterol Hepatol Bed Bench. 2013;6(1):14–7.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Karim F, Moiz B, Kamran N. Risk of maternal alloimmunization in Southern Pakistan–a study in a cohort of 1000 pregnant women. Transfus Apher Sci. 2015;52(1):99–102.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Velati C. A survey of the current use of anti-D immunoprophylaxis and the incidence of haemolytic disease of the newborn in Italy. Blood Transfus. 2007;5(1):7–14.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Al-Dughaishi T, Al-Rubkhi IS, Al-Duhli M, Al-Harrasi Y, Gowri V. Alloimmunization due to red cell antibodies in Rhesus positive omani pregnant women: maternal and perinatal outcome. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2015;9(2):150–4.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Eleje GU, Ilika CP, Ezeama CO, Umeobika JC, Oguejiofor CB. Feto-maternal outcomes of women with Rhesus iso-immunization in a Nigerian tertiary health care institution. J Pregnancy Neonatal Med. 2017;1(1):21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  25. Zonneveld R, Lamers M, Schonewille H, Brand A, Kanhai HH, Zijlmans WC. Prevalence of positive direct antiglobulin test and clinical outcomes in Surinamese newborns from D-negative women. Transfusion. 2017;57(10):2496–501.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Bollason G, Hjartardottir H, Jonsson T, Gudmundsson S, Kjartansson S, Halldorsdottir AM. Red blood cell alloimmunization in pregnancy during the years 1996-2015 in Iceland: a nation-wide population study. Transfusion. 2017;57(11):2578–85.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. MINON J-M, Gerard C, CHANTRAINE F, Nisolle M. Anti-D prophylaxis reviewed in the Erea of foetal RHD genotyping. J Blood Disord Transfus. 2015;6(5):21–7.

    Google Scholar 

  28. McSweeney E, Kirkham J, Vinall P, Flanagan P. An audit of anti-D sensitisation in Yorkshire. BJOG. 1998;105(10):1091–4.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Weinberg L. Use of anti-D immunoglobulin in the treatment of threatened miscarriage in the accident and emergency department. Emerg Med J. 2001;18(6):444–7.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  30. Ahmad R, De Hass M. Prevention of haemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn with reference to anti-D: MedCrave Group LLC; 2017. Available from: http://medcraveonline.com/ebooks/.

    Google Scholar 

  31. Howard HL, Martlew VJ, McFadyen IR, Clarke CA. Preventing Rhesus D haemolytic disease of the newborn by giving anti-D immunoglobulin: are the guidelines being adequately followed? BJOG. 1997;104(1):37–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Vause S, Maresh M. Indicators of quality of antenatal care: a pilot study. BJOG. 1999;106(3):197–205.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Bolton-Maggs P, Davies T, Poles D, Cohen H. Errors in anti-D immunoglobulin administration: retrospective analysis of 15 years of reports to the UK confidential haemovigilance scheme. BJOG. 2013;120(7):873–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Pahuja S, Gupta SK, Pujani M, Jain M. The prevalence of irregular erythrocyte antibodies among antenatal women in Delhi. Blood Transfus. 2011;9(4):388–93.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  35. Sidhu M, Bala R, Akhtar N, Sawhney V. Prevalence, specificity and titration of red cell alloantibodies in multiparous antenatal females at a Tertiary Care Centre from North India. Indian J Hematol Blood Transfus. 2016;32(3):307–11.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Variane GF, Sant’Anna GM. Rhesus disease in Brazil: a multi-professional national survey. Semin Perinatol. 2021;45(1):151357.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We express our gratitude to all the women who participated in this study. Moreover, the authors like to thank the institutional review board committee of the federal government polyclinic hospital, Islamabad, and the Pakistan Institute of medical sciences, Islamabad, for providing the necessary permission to perform this study.

Funding

None.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

F.D., G.M., and A.A. conceptualize the idea. A.F., A.A., G.M., and F.D. worked on questionnaire, amd then, A.F. collected the data. A.F., F.D., and A.A. analyzed the data. A.F. write the first draft of manuscript, and then, F.D., G.M., and A.A. edited the manuscript and supervised the study. All authors read and approved the final version of manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Fakhar-ud-din, Gul Majid Khan or Ali Ahmed.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

The study was ethically approved by the institutional review board committee at the Quaid-i-Azam University, Islamabad (letter diary number 2796), Pakistan Institute of Medical Sciences, Islamabad, and Federal Government Polyclinic Hospital, Islamabad.

Consent to Participate

Written informed consent was obtained from all the participants included in the study.

Consent for Publication

On behalf of all authors, corresponding author take all mentioned authors consent for publication.

Conflict of Interest

The authors declare no competing interests.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

This article is part of the Topical Collection on Medicine

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Fatima, A., Fakhar-ud-din, Khan, G.M. et al. Red Blood Cell Alloimmunization Prevention Practices in Pregnancy at Tertiary Care Level Hospitals in Islamabad, Pakistan: a Cross-sectional Study. SN Compr. Clin. Med. 5, 284 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01627-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s42399-023-01627-5

Keywords

Navigation