Hostname: page-component-76fb5796d-x4r87 Total loading time: 0 Render date: 2024-04-28T08:58:34.337Z Has data issue: false hasContentIssue false
  • English
  • Français

Complexity in the Au–Ag–Hg system: New information from a PGE (‘osmiridium’) concentrate at Waratah Bay, Victoria, Australia

Published online by Cambridge University Press:  13 December 2023

William D. Birch Open the ORCID record for William D. Birch [Opens in a new window]  and
Chi Ma Open the ORCID record for Chi Ma [Opens in a new window]
William D. Birch*
Affiliation:
Geosciences, Museums Victoria, GPO Box 666 Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Chi Ma
Affiliation:
Division of Geological and Planetary Sciences, California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, USA.
*
Corresponding author: William D. Birch; Email: bbirch@museum.vic.gov.au
Get access Rights & Permissions [Opens in a new window]

Abstract

Au–Hg–Ag phases have been described from a variety of metallogenic orebodies and the placer deposits derived from them. In many documented placer deposits, the phases typically occur intergrown as ‘secondary’ rims to primary Au–Ag grains. The origin of these rims has been ascribed to supergene redistribution reactions during deposition or to the effects of amalgamation (i.e. use of mercury) during mining for gold. Difficulties in determining compositions and crystal structures on such a small scale have made full characterisation of these phases problematic. This paper describes a new occurrence of these phases, found by accident during investigation of a historical concentrate of ‘osmiridium’ containing a number of gold grains from beach sands at Waratah Bay, in southern Victoria, Australia. The phases occur as rims to gold grains and are intergrown on a scale of tens of micrometres or less. Application of electron microprobe analysis (EPMA) and limited electron back-scattered diffraction (EBSD) was required to characterise them. These techniques revealed the presence of the approved mineral weishanite (Au–Hg–Ag) and a phase with compositional range Au2Hg–Au3Hg surrounding primary Au–Ag (electrum) containing trace amounts of Hg. EBSD analysis showed weishanite is hexagonal P63/mmc and Au2Hg to be hexagonal P63/mcm. Comparison with published data from other localities (Philippines, British Columbia and New Zealand) suggests weishanite has a wide compositional field. Textures shown by these phases are difficult to interpret, as they might form by either supergene processes or by reaction with anthropogenic mercury used during mining. However, in the absence of any historical evidence for the use of mercury for gold mining at Waratah Bay, we consider the formation of the Au–Hg phases is most probably due to supergene alteration of primary Au–Ag alloy containing small amounts of Hg. In addition to revealing some of the reaction sequences in the development of these secondary Au–Hg–Ag rims, this paper illustrates methods by which these phases can be more fully characterised and thereby better correlated with the Au–Hg synthetic system.

Keywords

Au–Hg–Ag phasesweishaniteEBSD analysissynthetic Au–Hg systemWaratah BayVictoria
Type
Article
Information
Mineralogical Magazine , Volume 87 , Issue 6 , December 2023 , pp. 819 - 829
Copyright
Copyright © The Author(s), 2023. Published by Cambridge University Press on behalf of The Mineralogical Society of the United Kingdom and Ireland

Access options

Get access to the full version of this content by using one of the access options below. (Log in options will check for institutional or personal access. Content may require purchase if you do not have access.)

Footnotes

Associate Editor: David J. Good

References

Atanasov, V. and Iordanov, L. (1983) Amalgams of gold from the Palakharya River alluvial sands, District of Sofia (Bulgaria). Doklady Bolgarskoi Akademii Nauk, 36, 465–468.Google Scholar
Baptista, N.R. and Baptista, A. (1987) Gold amalgam, a possible new species, from Sumidouro de Mariano, Minas Gerais (Brazil). Anais da Academia Brasileira de Ciencias, 58, 457–463 [in Portuguese].Google Scholar
Barkov, A.Y., Nixon, G.T., Levson, V. and Martin, R.F. (2009) A cryptically zoned amalgam (Au1.5–1.9Ag1.1–1.4)Σ2.8–3.0Hg1.0–1.2 from a placer deposit in the Tulameen–Similkameen river system, British Columbia, Canada: natural or man-made? The Canadian Mineralogist, 47, 433–440.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Berndt, A.F. and Cummins, J.D. (1970) The crystal structure of the Au2Hg phase. Acta Crystallographica, B26, 864–867.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Bindi, L., Keutsch, F.N. and Lepore, G.O. (2018) Structural and chemical study of weishanite, (Au,Ag,Hg), from the Keystone mine, Colorado, USA. Mineralogical Magazine, 82, 1141–1145, doi.org/10.1180/mgm.2018.113CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Birch, W.D. (2003). The Jamieson mercury deposit, Victoria. Australian Journal of Mineralogy, 9, 33–38.Google Scholar
Butt, C.R.M., Hough, R.M. and Verrall, M. (2020) Gold nuggets: the inside story. Ore and Energy Resource Geology, 4–5, 100009 [viewed online on 17/5/2017].CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Cao, Enkui (1991) The discovery and research of yiyangite in the Hanjiang River. Geology of Shannai, 91, 89–92 [in Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Cayley, R.A., Taylor, D.H., VandenBerg, A.H.M. and Moore, D.H. (2002) Proterozoic ‒ Early Palaeozoic rocks and the Tyennan Orogeny in central Victoria: The Selwyn Block and its tectonic implications. Australian Journal of Earth Sciences, 49, 225–254, https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1440-0952.2002.00921.xCrossRefGoogle Scholar
Chen, K., Yang, H. Ma, L. and Peng, Z. (1981) The discovery of two new minerals — γ-goldamalgam and leadamalgam. Dizhi Pinglum, 27, 107–115 [in Chinese with English abstract; summary in: New mineral names. American Mineralogist, 70, 214–221 (1985)].Google Scholar
Davies, P., Lawrence, S. and Turnbull, J. (2015) Mercury use and loss from gold mining in nineteenth-century Victoria. Proceedings of the Royal Society of Victoria, 127, 44–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Desborough, G.A. and Foord, E.E. (1992) A monoclinic, pseudo-orthorhombic Au–Hg mineral of potential economic significance in Pleistocene alluvial deposits of southeastern Idaho. The Canadian Mineralogist, 30, 1033–1038.Google Scholar
Healy, R.E. and Petruk, W. (1990) Petrology of the Au–Ag–Hg alloy and “invisible” gold in the Trout Lake massive sulphide deposit, Flin Flon, Manitoba. The Canadian Mineralogist, 28, 189–206.Google Scholar
Huang, S. (2011) Mineralogical characteristics of gold–mercury mineral in the Davao gold deposits of Mindanao Islands, Philippines, and its prospecting significance. Geology and Exploration, 47, 935–942 [in Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Li, Y., Ouyang, S. and Tian, P. (1984) Weishanite – a new gold-bearing mineral. Acta Mineralogica Sinica, 4, 102–105 [in Chinese with English abstract].Google Scholar
Lindahl, T. (1970) The crystal structure of Au6Hg5. Acta Chemica Scandinavica, 24, 946–952.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, C. and Rossman, G.R. (2008) Barioperovskite, BaTiO3, a new mineral from the Benitoite Mine, California. American Mineralogist, 93, 154–157.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Ma, C. and Rossman, G.R. (2009) Tistarite, Ti2O3, a new refractory mineral from the Allende meteorite. American Mineralogist, 94, 841–844.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Mackenzie, D.J. and Craw, D. (2005) The mercury and silver contents of gold in quartz vein deposits, Otago Schist, New Zealand. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 48, 265–278.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Meisser, N. and Brugger, J. (2000) Alluvial native gold, tetraauricupride and AuSn2 from Western Switzerland. Schweizerische Mineralogische und Petrographische Mitteilungen, 80, 291–298.Google Scholar
Nishio-Hamane, D., Tanaka, T. and Minakawa, T. (2018) Aurihydrargyrumite, a natural Au6Hg5 phase from Japan. Minerals, 8, 415, doi:10.3390/min8090415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Nysten, P. (1986) Gold in the volcanogenic mercury-rich sulfide deposit Langsele, Skellefte ore district, northern Sweden. Mineralium Deposita, 21, 116–120.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Oberthür, T and Saager, R. (1986) Silver and mercury in gold particles from the Proterozoic Witwatersrand placer deposits of South Africa: metallogenic and geochemical implications. Economic Geology, 81, 20–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Okamoto, H. and Massalski, T.B. (1989) The Au–Hg (gold-mercury) system. Bulletin of Alloy Phase Diagrams, 10, 50–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Plaksin, I.N. (1938) The system gold-mercury. Izvestiya Sektora fiziko-khimicheskogo Analiza, 10, 129–159 [in Russian].Google Scholar
Rolfe, C. and Hume-Rothery, W. (1967) The constitution of alloys of gold and mercury. Journal of less-common metals, 13, 1–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Seeliger, E. and Mücke, A. (1972) Para-schachnerit, Ag1.2Hg0.8, und schachnerit, Ag1.1Hg0.9, vom Landsberg bei Obermoschel, Pfalz. Neues Jahrbuch für Mineralogie Abhandlungen, 117, 1–18.Google Scholar
Shikazono, N. and Shimizu, M. (1988) Mercurian gold from the Tsugu gold-antimony vein deposit in Japan. The Canadian Mineralogist, 26, 423–428.Google Scholar
Svetlitskaya, T.V., Nevolko, P.A., Kolpakov, V.V. and Tolstykh, N.D. (2018) Native gold from the Inagli Pt-Au placer deposit (the Aldan Shield, Russia): geochemical characteristics and implications for possible bedrock sources. Mineralium Deposita, 53, 323–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Youngson, J.H., Woperis, P., Kerr, L.C. and Craw, D. (2002) Au–Ag–Hg and Au–Ag alloys in Nokomai and Nevis valley placers, northern Southland and Central Otago, New Zealand, and their implications for placer-source relationships. New Zealand Journal of Geology and Geophysics, 45, 53–69.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
Zhao, J., Brugger, J., Xia, F., Ngothai, Y., Chen, G. and Pring, A. (2013) Dissolution-reprecipitation v. solid-state diffusion: mechanism of mineral transformation in sylvanite (AuAg)2Te4 under hydrothermal conditions. American Mineralogist, 98, 19–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar