Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Conspiracy Theory Belief: A Sane Response to an Insane World?

  • Published:
Review of Philosophy and Psychology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Are conspiracy theory beliefs pathological? That depends on what is meant by "pathological." This paper begins by unpacking that ill-defined and value-laden term before making the case that widespread conspiracy theory belief should not be conceptualized through the “othering’ perspective of individual psychopathology. In doing so, it adopts a phenomenological perspective to argue that conspiracy theory beliefs can be reliably distinguished from paranoid delusions based on falsity, belief conviction, idiosyncrasy, and self-referentiality. A socio-epistemic model is then presented that characterizes the broader phenomenon of conspiracy theory belief as a product of a sick society plagued by epistemic mistrust and vulnerability to misinformation that is ubiquitous in today’s post-truth world. Finally, it is proposed that for individuals, the harmfulness of conspiracy theory belief is less related to belief content as it is to belief conviction and degree of self-relevant consequentiality. Staging conspiracy theory belief in terms of ideological commitment offers a conceptual framework to estimate behavioral risks and test hypotheses about the effectiveness of interventions along a continuum of belief conviction and associated socio-epistemic dynamics. Interventions should target not only individuals, but the dysfunctional social conditions that give rise to the pervasive and enduring phenomenon of conspiracy theory belief.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

N/A.

References

  • Alsuhibani, Azzam, Mark Shelvin, Daniel Freeman, Bryony Sheaves, and Richard P. Bentall. 2022. Why conspiracy theorists are not always paranoid: Conspiracy theories and paranoia form separate factors with distinct psychological predictors. PLoS One 17: e0259053.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 1994. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 4th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Google Scholar 

  • American Psychiatric Association. 2013. Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th ed. Washington, DC: American Psychiatric Association.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Aspernäs, Julia, Arvid Erlandsson, and Artur Nilsson. 2023. Misperceptions in a post-truth world: Effects of subjectivism and cultural relativism on bullshit receptivity and conspiracist ideation. Journal of Research in Personality 105: 104394.

  • Bago, Bence, David G. Rand, and Gordon Pennycook. 2022. Does deliberation decrease belief in conspiracies? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 103: 104395.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barnby, Joseph M., Vaughan Bell, Luke Sheridan Rains, Mitul A. Mehta, and Quinton Deeley. 2019. Beliefs are multidimensional and vary in stability over time – psychometric properties of the Belief and Values Inventory (BVI). PeerJ 7: e6819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartholomew, Robert E., and Simon Wessely. 2002. Protean nature of mass sociogenic illness: From possessed nuns to chemical and biological terrorism fears. British Journal of Psychiatry 180: 300–306.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Basit, Adbul. 2021. Conspiracy theories and violent extremism: Similarities, differences, and the implications. Counter Terrorist Trends and Analyses 13: 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell, Vaughn, Nichola Raihani, and Sam Wilkinson. 2020. Derationalizing delusions. Clinical Psychological Science 9: 24–37.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bergstrom, Carl T., and Jevin D. West. 2020. Calling bullshit: The art of skepticism in a data-driven world. New York, NY: Random House.

    Google Scholar 

  • Betsch, Cornelia, Lars Korn, and Holtmann C. Cindy. 2015. Don’t try to convert the antivaccinators, instead target the fence-sitters. PNAS 112: E6725–E6726.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biddlestone, Mikey, Ricky Green, Aleksandra Cichocka, Robbie Sutton, and Karen Douglas. 2021. Conspiracy beliefs and the individual, relational, and collective selves. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15: e12639.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Binnendyk, Jabin, and Gordon Pennycook. 2022. Intuition, reason, and conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101387.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, Lisa. 2023. Is it pathological to believe conspiracy theories? Transcultural Psychiatry. https://doi.org/10.1177/13634615231187243.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bortolotti, Lisa. Submitted. Are conspiracy beliefs epistemically innocent? Philosophical Topics.

  • Bortolotti, Lisa, Anna Ichino, and Matteo Mameli. 2021. Conspiracy theories and delusions. Reti, Saperi, Linguaggi: Italian Journal of Cognitive Sciences 8: 183–200.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowes, Shauna M, Thomas H. Costello and Arber Tasimi. 2023. The conspiratorial mind: A meta-analytic review of motivational and personological correlates. Psychological Bulletin. Jun 26. Online ahead of print.

  • Brotherton, Robert, and Silan Eser. 2015. Bored to fears: Boredom proneness, paranoia, and conspiracy theories. Personality and Individual Differences 80: 1–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cermolacce, M., L. Sass, and J. Parnas. 2010. What is bizarre in bizarre delusions? A critical review. Schizophrenia Bulletin 36: 667–679.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coltheart, Max. 2010. The neuropsychology of delusions. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences 1191: 16–26.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Collins, Ben, and Brandy Zadrozny. 2020. Facebook bans QAnon across its platforms. NBCnews.com. https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/facebook-bans-qanon-across-its-platforms-n1242339. Accessed 1 May 2023

  • Compton, Josh, Sander van der Linden, John Cook, and Melisa Basol. 2022. Inoculation theory in the post-truth era: Extant findings and new frontiers for contested science, misinformation, and conspiracy theories. Social and Personality Psychology Compass 15: e12602.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Corlett, Philip R. 2019. Factor one, familiarity and frontal cortex: A challenge to the two-factor theory of delusions. Cognitive Neuropsychiatry 24: 165–177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dagnall, Neil, Kenneth Drinkwater, Andrew Parker, Andrew Denovan, and Megan Parton. 2015. Conspiracy theory and cognitive style: A worldview. Frontiers in Psychology 6: 206.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Darwin, Hannah, Nick Neave, and Joni Holmes. 2011. Belief in conspiracy theories. the role of paranormal belief, paranoid ideation and schizotypy. Personality and Individual Differences 50: 1289–1293.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Karen M. 2021. Are conspiracy theories harmless? The Spanish Journal of Psychology 24 (e13): 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Douglas, Karen, Joseph E. Uscinski, Robbie M. Sutton, Aleksandra Cichocka, Turkay Nefes, Chee Siang Ang, and Farzin Deravi. 2019. Understanding conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 40 (S1): 13–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ferrara, Emilio. 2020. On Twitter, bots spread conspiracy theories and QAnon talking points. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/on-twitter-bots-spread-conspiracy-theories-and-qanon-talking-points-149039. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Feyaerts, Jasper, Mads G. Henriksen, Stijn Vanheule, Inez Myin-Gerneys, and Louis A. Sass. 2021. Delusions beyond beliefs: A critical overview of diagnostic, aetiological, and therapeutic schizophrenia research from a clinical-phenomenological perspective. Lancet Psychiatry 8: 237–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Franks, Bradley, Adrian Bangerter, Martin W. Bauer, Matthew Hall, and Mark C. Noori. 2017. Beyond “monologicality”? Exploring conspiracist worldviews. Frontiers in Psychology 8: 861.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman, Daniel, Philippa A. Garety, E. Paul, Benjamin Smith Bebbington, Rebecca Rollinson, David Fowler, Elizabeth Kuipers, Katarzyna Ray, and Graham Dunn. 2005. Psychological investigation of the structure of paranoia in a non-clinical population. British Journal of Psychiatry 186: 427–435.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Garrett, R. Kelly., and Brian E. Weeks. 2017. Epistemic beliefs’ role in promoting misperceptions and conspiracist ideation. PLoS One 12: e0184733.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ginges, Jeremy, Scott Atran, Sonya Sachdeva, and Douglas Medin. 2011. Psychology out of the laboratory: The challenge of violent extremism. American Psychologist 66: 507–519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Goldberg, Jeffrey. 2021. Mass delusion in America. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2021/01/among-insurrectionists/617580. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Green, Ricky, Daniel Toribio-Flórez, Karen M. Douglas, James W. Brunkow, and Robbie M. Sutton. 2023. Making an impression: The effects of sharing conspiracy theories. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 104: 104398.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenburgh, Anna, and Nichola J. Raihani. 2022. Paranoia and conspiracy thinking. Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101362.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greve, Henrich R., Hayagreeva Rao, Paul Vincinanza, and Echo Yan Zhou. 2022. Online conspiracy groups: Micro-bloggers, bots, and coronoavirus conspiracy talk on Twitter. American Sociological Review 87: 919–949.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoffer, Eric. 1951. The true believer: Thoughts on the nature of mass movements. New York NY: Harper & Row.

    Google Scholar 

  • Horgan, John. 2008. Deradicalization or disengagement? A process in need of clarity and a counterterrorism initiative in need of evaluation. Perspectives on Terrorism 2: 3–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, Matthew J., and Kelly S. Fielding. 2017. Attitude roots and Jiu Jitsu persuasion: Understanding and overcoming the motivated rejection of science. American Psychologist 72: 459–473.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hornsey, Matthew J., Kinga Bierwiaczonek, Kai Sassenberg, and Karen M. Douglas. 2023. Individual, intergroup and nation-level influences on belief in conspiracy theories. Nature Reviews Psychology 2: 85–97.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, Roland, and Martin Bruder. 2014. Speaking (un)-truth to power: Conspiracy mentality as a generalized political attitude. European Journal of Personality 28: 25–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, Roland, and Pia Lamberty. 2018. How paranoid are conspiracy believers? Toward a more fine-grained understanding of the connect and disconnect between paranoia and belief in conspiracy theories. European Journal of Social Psychology 48: 909–926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, Roland, Lea Dieterle, and Pia Lamberty. 2021. Resolving the puzzle of conspiracy worldview and political activism: Belief in secret plots decreases normative but increases nonnormative political engagement. Social Psychological and Personality Science 12: 71–79.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Imhoff, Roland, Tisa Berlich, and Marius Frenken. 2022. Tearing apart the “evil” twins: A general conspiracy mentality is not the same as specific conspiracy theory beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology 46: 101349.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Daniel, and Karen M. Douglas. 2014. The effects of anti-vaccine conspiracy theories on vaccination intentions. PLoS ONE 9: e89177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Daniel, Karen M. Douglas, and Robbie M. Sutton. 2018. Blaming a few bad apples to save a threatened barrel: The system-justifying function of conspiracy theories. Political Psychology 39: 465–478.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Daniel, Karen M. Douglas, Ana C. Leite, and Tanya Schrader. 2019. Belief in conspiracy theories and intentions to engage in everyday crime. British Journal of Psychology 58: 534–549.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Daniel, and Jenny L. Paterson. 2020. Pylons ablaze: Examining the role of 5G COVID-19 conspiracy beliefs and support for violence. British Journal of Social Psychology 59: 628–640.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jolley, Daniel, Mathew D. Marques, and Darel Cookson. 2022. Shining a spotlight on the dangerous consequences of conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101363.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kapp, Steven K., Kristen Gillespie-Lynch, Lauren E. Sherman, and Ted Hutman. 2013. Deficit, difference, or both? Autism and neurodiversity. Developmental Psychology 49: 59–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kata, Anna. 2012. Anti-vaccine activists, Web 2.0, and the postmodern paradigm—An overview of tactics and tropes used online by the anti-vaccination movement. Vaccine 30: 3779–3789.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, C., P. Clutton, and V. Polito. 2018. Topic modeling reveals distinct interests within an Online Conspiracy Forum”. Frontiers in Psychology 9: 189.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klepper, David, and Manuel Valdes. 2023. Should media literacy be as important as driver’s ed? Some say yes. The Christian Science Monitor. https://www.csmonitor.com/USA/Education/2023/0322/Should-media-literacy-be-as-important-as-driver-s-ed-Some-say-yes. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Kruglanski, Arie W., Erica Molinario, Molly Ellenberg, and Gabriele Di Cicco. 2022. Terrorism and conspiracy theories: A view from the 3N model of radicalization. Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101396.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lantian, Anthony, Virginie Bagneux, Sylvain Delouvee, and Nicholas Gauvrit. 2021. Maybe a free thinking but not a critical one: High conspiracy belief is associated with low critical thinking ability. Applied Cognition 35: 674–684.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lee, Bruce Y. 2022. What is mass formation psychosis? Robert Malone makes unfounded COVID-19 vaccine claims on Joe Rogan Show. Forbes. https://www.forbes.com/sites/brucelee/2022/01/02/what-is-mass-formation-psychosis-robert-malone-makes-covid-19-vaccine-claims-on-joe-rogan-show. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Leonard, Marie-Jeanne., and Frederick L. Philippe. 2021. Conspiracy theories: A public health concern and how to address it. Frontiers in Psychology 12: 682931.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, Stephan. 2021. Conspiracist cognition: Chaos, convenience, and cause for concern. Journal for Cultural Research 25: 12–35.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, Stephan, Ullrich K.H.. Ecker, and John Cook. 2017. Beyond misinformation: Understanding and coping with the “post-truth” era. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition 6: 353–369.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lewandowsky, Stephan, and Sander van der Linden. 2021. Countering misinformation and fake news through inoculation and prebunking. European Review of Social Psychology 32: 348–384.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luvsannyam, Enkhmaa, Molly S. Jain, Maria Kezia Lourdes. Pormento, Hira Siddiqui, Ria A. Angela, Bernard O. Balagtas, and Teresa Poprawski Emuze. 2022. Neurobiology of schizophrenia: A comprehensive review. Cureus 14: e23959.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mancosu, Moreno, Salvatorre Vassallo, and Cristiano Vezzoni. 2017. Believing in conspiracy theories: Evidence from an exploratory analysis of Italian survey data. South European Society and Politics 22: 327–344.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martinez, Anton P., Mark Shelvin, Carmen Valiente, Philip Hyland, and Richard P. Bentall. 2022. Paranoid beliefs and conspiracy mentality are associated with different forms of mistrust: A three-nation study. Frontiers in Psychology 13: 1023366.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, Clark, and Sophia Moskalenko. 2008. Mechanisms of political radicalization: Pathways toward terrorism. Terrorism and Political Violence 203: 415–433.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCauley, Clark, and Sophia Moskalenko. 2017. Understanding political radicalization: The two-pyramids model. American Psychologist 72: 205–216.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McKay, Ryan, and Hugo Mercier. 2023. Delusions as epistemic hypervigilance. Current Directions in Psychological Science 32: 125–130.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meuer, Marcel, and Roland Imhoff. 2021. Believing in hidden plots is associated with decreased behavioral trust: Conspiracy belief as greater sensitivity to social threat or insensitivity to its absence? Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 93: 104081.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mikhaeil, Christina Abdalla, and Richard L. Baskerville. 2023. Explaining online conspiracy theory radicalization: A second-order affordance for identity-driven escalation. Information Systems Journal. https://doi.org/10.1111/isj.12427.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miyazono, Kenzo, and Alessando Salice. 2020. Social epistemological conception of delusion. Synthese 199: 1831–1851.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moskalenko, Sophia, and Clark McCauley. 2021. QAnon: Radical opinion versus radical action. Perspectives on Terrorism 15: 142–146.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nicholas, Peter. 2019. Trump needs conspiracy theories. The Atlantic; November 29, 2019. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2019/11/trump-conspiracy-theories-ukraine/602728/. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Nichols, Tom. 2021. Mass psychosis. The Atlantic. https://newsletters.theatlantic.com/peacefield/61900b460b037b00207258e5/mass-psychosis. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Noordhof, Paul, and Ema Sullivan-Bissett. 2021. The clinical significance of anomalous experience in the explanation of monothematic delusions. Synthese 199: 10277–10309.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. Eric., and Thomas J. Wood. 2014a. Conspiracy theories and the paranoid style(s) of mass opinion. American Journal of Political Science 58: 952–966.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oliver, J. Eric., and Thomas Wood. 2014b. Medical conspiracy theories and health behaviors in the United States. JAMA Internal Medicine 174: 817–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’Mahony, Cian, Maryanne Brassil, Gillian Murphy, and Conor Linehan. 2023. The efficacy in reducing belief in conspiracy theories: A systematic review. PLoS One 18: e0280902.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papaioannou, Kostas, Myrto Pantazi, Jan-Willem van Prooijen. 2023. Is democracy under threat? Why belief in conspiracy theories predicts authoritarian attitudes. European Journal of Social Psychology 53: 846–856.

  • Pennycook, Gordon, Jonathan A. Fugelsang, and Derek J. Koehler. 2015. Everyday consequences of analytic thinking. Current Directions in Psychological Science 24: 425–432.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pennycook, Gordon, James Allan Cheyne, Derek J. Koehler, and Jonathan A. Fugelsang. 2020. On the belief that beliefs should change according to evidence: Implications for conspiratorial, moral, paranormal, political, religious, and science beliefs. Judgment and Decision Making 15: 476–498.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, E.R., S.A. Joseph, and P.A. Garety. 1999. Measurement of delusional ideation in the normal population: Introducing the PDI (Peters et al. Delusions Inventory). Schizophrenia Bulletin 25: 553–76.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Philips, James, Allen Frances, Michael A. Cerullo, John Chardavoyne, Hannah S. Decker, Michael B. First, Nassir Ghaemi, Gary Greenberg, Andrew C. Hinderliter, Warren A. Kinghorn, Steven G. LoBello, Elliot B. Martin, Aaron L. Mishara, Joel Paris, Joseph M. Pierre, Ronald W. Pies, Harold A. Pincus, Douglas Porter, Claire Pouncey, Michael A. Schwartz, Thomas Szasz, Jerome C. Wakefield, G. Scott Waterman, Owen Whooley, and Peter Zachar. 2012. The six most essential questions in psychiatric diagnosis: A pluralogue part 1. Conceptual and definitional issues in psychiatric diagnosis. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine 7: 3.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2001. Faith or delusion? At the crossroads of religion and psychosis. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 7: 163–172.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2010a. The borders of mental disorder in psychiatry and the DSM: Past, present, and future. Journal of Psychiatric Practice 16: 375–386.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2010b. Mental disorder vs. normality: Defining the indefinable. Bulletin of the Association for the Advancement of Philosophy and Psychiatry 17: 9–11.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2012. Mental illness and mental health: Is the glass half empty of half full? Canadian J Psychiatry 57: 651–658.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2013. Overdiagnosis, underdiagnosis, synthesis: A dialectic for psychiatry and the DSM. In Making the DSM-5: Concepts and Controversies, eds. Joel Paris and James Philips, 105–124. New York: Springer.

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2015. Culturally sanctioned suicide: Euthanasia seppuku and terrorist martyrdom. World Journal of Psychiatry 5: 4–10.

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2019. Integrating non-psychiatric models of delusion-like beliefs into forensic psychiatric assessment”. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 47: 171–179.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2020a. Forensic psychiatry versus the variety of delusion-like beliefs”. Journal of the American Academy of Psychiatry and the Law 48: 327–334.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2020b. Mistrust and misinformation: A two component, socio-epistemic model of belief in conspiracy theories. Journal of Social and Political Psychology 8: 617–641.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2021. Conspiracy theory or delusion? 3 questions to tell them apart. Current Psychiatry 20 (44): 60.

    Google Scholar 

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2023a Delusions and conspiracy theories. In Routledge Handbook of the Philosophy of Delusion, ed. Ema Sullivan-Bisset. Oxford UK: Routledge. In press.

  • Pierre, Joseph M. 2023b. Down the conspiracy theory rabbit hole: How does one become a follower of QAnon? In The Social Science of QAnon, ed. Monica Miller, 17-32. Cambridge UK: Cambridge University Press.

  • Pierre, Joseph M. Submitted. Conspiracy theories gone wild: A psychiatric perspective on conspiracy theory belief, mental illness, and the potential for “lone actor” ideological violence. Terrorism and Political Violence.

  • Pies, Ron W. and Joseph M. Pierre. 2021. Believing in conspiracy theories in not delusional. Medscape. https://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/945290. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Ren, Zhiying (Bella)., Andrew M. Carton, Eugen Dimant, and Maurice E. Schweitzer. 2022. Authoritarian leaders share conspiracy theories to attack opponents, galvanize followers, shift blame, and undermine democratic institutions. Current Opinion in Psychology 46: 101388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripp, Tilli, and Jan Philipp Roer. 2022. Systematic review on the association of COVID-19-related conspiracy belief with infection-preventative behavior and vaccine willingness. BMC Psychology 10: 66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, Kaleigh. 2021. Why it’s so hard to gauge support for QAnon. FiveThirtyEight. https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/why-its-so-hard-to-gauge-support-for-qanon/. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Rousselet, M., O. Duretete, J.B. Hardouin, and M. Grall-Bronnec. 2017. Cult membership: what factors contribute to joining or leaving? Psychiatric Research 257: 27–33.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruiz, Rebecca. 2021. Conspiracy theories are a mental health crisis. Mashable. https://mashable.com/article/mental-health-disinformation-conspiracy-theories-depression. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Sakakibara, Eisuke. 2019. Intensity of experience: Maher’s theory of schizophrenic delusion revisited. Neuroethics 12: 171–182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stasielowicz, Lukasz. 2022. Who believes in conspiracy theories? A meta-analysis on personality correlates. Journal of Research in Personality 98: 104229.

  • Sterzer, Philipp, Rick A. Adams, Paul Fletcher, Chris Frith, Stephen M. Lawrie, Lars Muckli, Predrag Petrovic, Peter Uhlhaas, Martin Voss, and Philip R. Corlett. 2018. The predictive coding account of psychosis. Biological Psychiatry 84: 634–643.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sapountzis, Antonis, and Susan Condor. 2013. Conspiracy ‘accounts as intergroup theories: Challenging dominant understandings of social power and political legitimacy. Political Psychology 34: 731–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schaffner, Brian. 2020. QAnon and conspiracy beliefs. https://www.isdglobal.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/qanon-and-conspiracy-beliefs.pdf . Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Shimizu, Mitsue, Yasutaka Kubota, Motomi Toichi, and Hisamitsu Baba. 2007. Folie á deux and shared psychotic disorder”. Current Psychiatry Reports 9: 200–205.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, Manfred. 1990. On defining delusions. Comprehensive Psychiatry 31: 377–397.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Spitzer, Robert L., Michael B. First, Kenneth S. Kendler, and Dan J. Stein. 1993. The reliability of three definitions of bizarre delusions. American Journal of Psychiatry 150: 880–884.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Starcevic, Vladan, and Vlasios Brakoulias. 2021. ‘Things are not what they seem to be’: A proposal for the spectrum approach to conspiracy beliefs. Australasian Psychiatry 29: 535–539.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stein, D.J., K.A. Philips, D. Bolton, K.W.M. Fulford, J.Z. Sadler, and K.S. Kendler. 2010. What is a mental/psychiatric disorder? From DSM-IV to DSM-v. Psychological Medicine 40: 1759–1765.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stojanov, Ana, and Jamin Halberstadt. 2019. The conspiracy mentality scale: Distinguishing between irrational and rational suspicion. Social Psychology 50: 215–232.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sunstein, Cass R., and Adrian Vermeule. 2009. Conspiracy theories: Causes and cures. The Journal of Political Philosophy 17: 202–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sutton, Robbie M., and Karen Douglas. 2022. Rabbit hole syndrome: Inadvertent, accelerating, and entrenched commitment to conspiracy beliefs. Current Opinion in Psychology 48: 101462.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Swami, Viren, Martin Voracek, Stefan Stieger, Ulrich S. Tran, and Adrian Furnham. 2014. Analytic thinking reduces belief in conspiracy theories. Cognition 133: 572–585.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Theocharis, Yannis, Ana Cardenal, Soyeon Jin, Toril Aalberg, David Nicolas Hopmann, Jesper Strömbäck, Laia Castro, Frank Esser, Peter Van Aelst, Claes de Vreese, Nicoleta Corbu, Karolina Koc-Michalska, Joerg Matthes, Christian Schemer, Tamir Sheafer, Sergio Splendore, James Stanyer, Agnieszka Stępińska, and Václav. Štětka. 2021. Does the platform matter? Social media and COVID-19 conspiracy theory beliefs in 17 countries. New Media & Society. https://doi.org/10.1177/14614448211045666.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Toribio-Flórez, Daniel, Ricky Green, Robbie M. Sutton, and Karen M. Douglas. 2023. Does belief in conspiracy theories affect interpersonal relationships? The Spanish Journal of Psychology 26 (e9): 1–8.

    Google Scholar 

  • Uscinski, Joseph, and Adam Enders. 2020. Don’t blade social media for conspiracy theories—they would still flourish without it. The Conversation. https://theconversation.com/dont-blame-social-media-for-conspiracy-theories-they-would-still-flourish-without-it-138635. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Uscinski, Joseph, and Joseph Parent. 2014. American Conspiracy Theories. New York: Oxford University Press.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Uscinski, Joseph, and Joseph Parent. 2022. Have beliefs in conspiracy theories increased over time? PLoS One 17: e0270429.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Uzarevic, Filip, and Thomas J. Coleman III. 2021. The psychology of nonbelievers. Current Opinion in Psychology 40: 131–138.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, Jan-Willem. 2022. Psychological benefits of believing conspiracy theories. Current Opinion in Psychology 47: 101352.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, Jan-Willem., and Eric van Dijk. 2014. When consequence size predicts belief in conspiracy theories: The moderating role of perspective taking. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology 55: 63–73.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • van Prooijen, Jan-Willem., André P. M. Krouwel, and Thomas V. Pollet. 2015. Political extremism predicts belief in conspiracy theories. Social Psychological and Personality Science 6: 570–578.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vegetti, Frederico, and Levente Littvay. 2022. Belief in conspiracy theories and attitudes toward political violence. Italian Political Science Review 52: 18–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Veling, W., B. Sizoo, J. van Buuren, C. van den Berg, W. Sewbalak, G.H.M. Pijnenborg, N. Boonstra, S. Castelein, and L. van der Meer. 2021. Are conspiracy theories psychotic? A comparison between conspiracy theories and paranoid delusions. Tijdschrift Voor Psychiatrie 63: 775–881.

    Google Scholar 

  • Vosoughi, Soroush, Deb Roy, and Sinan Aral. 2018. The spread of true and false news online. Science 359: 1146–1151.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vranic, Andrea, Ivana Hromatko, and Mirjana Tonković. 2022. “I Did My Own Research”: Overconfidence (Dis)trust in Science and Endorsement of Conspiracy Theories Frontiers in Psychology 13: 931865.

  • Wakabayashi, Daisuke. 2019. YouTube Moves to make conspiracy videos harder to find. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2019/01/25/technology/youtube-conspiracy-theory-videos.html Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Wakefield, Jerome C. 2007. The concept of mental disorder: Diagnostic implications of the harmful dysfunction analysis. World Psychiatry 6: 149–156.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wehmeier, Peter M., Nikolaus Barth, and Helmut Remschmidt. 2003. Induced delusional disorder: A review of the concept and an unusual case of folie á famille. Psychopathology 36: 37–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yablokov, Ilya. 2022. Russian disinformation finds fertile ground in the West. Nature Human Behavior 6: 766–767.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • YouGov. 2019. Cambridge Globalism Project – Conspiracy Theories. Fieldwork Dates 28th February to 26th March 2019. https://d25d2506sfb94s.cloudfront.net/cumulus_uploads/document/2c6lta5kbu/YouGov%20Cambridge%20Globalism%20Project%20-%20Conspiracy%20Theories.pdf. Accessed May 1, 2023.

  • Zachar, Peter. 2015. Psychiatric disorders: Natural kinds made by the world or practical kinds made by us? World Psychiatry 14: 288–290.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funds, grants, or other support was received for preparation of this manuscript.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, 94143, USA

    Joseph M. Pierre

Authors
  1. Joseph M. Pierre
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Joseph M. Pierre.

Ethics declarations

Ethics Approval

N/A (no human or animal subjects involved)

Consent to Participate

N/A (no human or animal subjects involved)

Consent for Publication

N/A (no human or animal subjects involved)

Conflict of Interest

The author has no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Pierre, J.M. Conspiracy Theory Belief: A Sane Response to an Insane World?. Rev.Phil.Psych. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00716-7

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13164-023-00716-7

Search

Navigation