Abstract
In the generalized continuum mechanics (GCM) theory framework, asymmetric wave equations encompass the characteristic scale parameters of the medium, accounting for microstructure interactions. This study integrates two theoretical branches of the GCM, the modified couple stress theory (M-CST) and the one-parameter second-strain-gradient theory, to form a novel asymmetric wave equation in a unified framework. Numerical modeling of the asymmetric wave equation in a unified framework accurately describes subsurface structures with vital implications for subsequent seismic wave inversion and imaging endeavors. However, employing finite-difference (FD) methods for numerical modeling may introduce numerical dispersion, adversely affecting the accuracy of numerical modeling. The design of an optimal FD operator is crucial for enhancing the accuracy of numerical modeling and emphasizing the scale effects. Therefore, this study devises a hybrid scheme called the dung beetle optimization (DBO) algorithm with a simulated annealing (SA) algorithm, denoted as the SA-based hybrid DBO (SDBO) algorithm. An FD operator optimization method under the SDBO algorithm was developed and applied to the numerical modeling of asymmetric wave equations in a unified framework. Integrating the DBO and SA algorithms mitigates the risk of convergence to a local extreme. The numerical dispersion outcomes underscore that the proposed SDBO algorithm yields FD operators with precision errors constrained to 0.5‱ while encompassing a broader spectrum coverage. This result confirms the efficacy of the SDBO algorithm. Ultimately, the numerical modeling results demonstrate that the new FD method based on the SDBO algorithm effectively suppresses numerical dispersion and enhances the accuracy of elastic wave numerical modeling, thereby accentuating scale effects. This result is significant for extracting wavefield perturbations induced by complex microstructures in the medium and the analysis of scale effects.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Lee, K.I., Humphrey, V.F., Kim, B.N., et al., 2007, Frequency dependencies of phase velocity and attenuation coefficient in a water-saturated sandy sediment from 0.3 to 1.0 MHz: The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America, 121(5), 2553–2558.
Wang, Z. Y., Li, Y. M., and Bai, W. L., 2021a, Numerical modelling and analysis for elastic wave equations in the frame of the couple stress theory: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 64(5), 1721–1732.
Wang, Z. Y., Li, Y. M., and Bai, W. L., 2021b, Scale effect of microstructure interaction in elastic wave propagation: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 64(9), 3257–3269.
Wang, Z. Y., Li, Y. M., Chen, C. P., et al., 2021c, Numerical modelling for elastic wave equations based on the second-order strain gradient theory: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 64(7), 2494–2503.
Wang, Z. Y., Li, Y. M., and Bai, W. L., 2020, Numerical modelling of exciting seismic waves for a simplified bridge pier model under high-speed train passage over the viaduct: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 63(12), 4473–4484.
Yang, F., Chong, A., Lam, D., et al., 2002, Couple stress based strain gradient theory for elasticity: Int J Solids Struct, 39(10), 2731–43.
Aifantis, E. C., 1999, Strain gradient interpretation of size effects: International Journal of Fracture, 95(1–4), 299–314.
Bai, W. L., Chen, C. P., Liu, H., et al., 2023, Seismic wave propagation analysis in the framework of generalized continuum mechanics theory: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 215, 105092.
Liu, Y., Sen, M. K., 2011, Finite-difference modeling with adaptive variable-length spatial operators: Geophysics, 76(4), T79–T89.
Kelly, K. R., Ward, R. W., Treitel, S., et al., 1976, Synthetic seismograms: A finite-difference approach: Geophysics, 41(1), 2–27.
Madariaga, R., 1976, Dynamics of an expanding circular fault: Bull. Seismol. Soc. Amer, 66(3), 639–666.
Wang, Z. Y., Bai, W. L., Liu, H., 2019, An optimized finite-difference scheme based on the improved PSO algorithm for wave propagation: SEG Technical Program Expanded Abstracts, 3780–3784
Li, S. Z., Sun, C. Y., and Peng, P. P., 2018, Seismic wave field forward modeling of variable staggered grid optimized difference coefficient method: Geophysical Prospecting for Petroleum, 57(3), 378–388.
Liang, W., Wang, Y., and Yang, C., 2017, Acoustic wave equation modeling with rectangle grid finite diff erence operator and its linear time space domain solution: Shiyou Diqiu Wuli Kantan/Oil Geophysical Prospecting, 52(1), 56–62.
Ren, Y. J., Huang, J. P., Yong P., et al., 2018, Optimized staggered-grid finite-difference operators using window functions: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 15(2), 253–260.
Wang, J., Meng, X. H., Liu, H., et al., 2017, Optimization of finite difference forward modeling for elastic waves based on optimum combined window functions: Journal of Applied Geophysics, 138, 62–71.
Liu, L., Liu H., and Liu H W., 2013, Optimal 15-point finite difference forward modeling in frequency- space domain: Chinese J. Geophysics, 56(2), 644–652.
Yang, L., Yan, H. Y., and Liu, H., 2014, Least squares staggered-grid finite-difference for elastic wave modelling: Exploration Geophysics, 45(4), 255–260.
Wang, M., and Chen, H., 2020, Chaotic multi-swarm whale optimizer boosted support vector machine for medical diagnosis: Appl Soft Comput, 88, 105946.
Xu, Y. T., Chen, H. L., L, J., et al., 2019, Enhanced Moth-flame optimizer with mutation strategy for global optimization: Information Sciences: an International Journal, 492(C), 181–203.
Chen, H. L., Zhang, Q., Lou, J., et al., 2020, An enhanced bacterial foraging optimization and its application for training kernel extreme learning machine: Applied Soft Computing, 86(C), 105884.
Zhang, J. H., and Yao, Z. X., 2013, Optimized finite-difference operator for broadband seismic wave modeling: Geophysics, 78(1), A13–A18.
Zhu, M. Q., Wang Z. Y., and Liu, H., et al., 2021, Numerical modeling of elastic waves using the random-enhanced QPSO algorithm: Applied Geophysics, 18(3), 1–13.
Zhao, P. Q., He, S. M., Ni, T. L., et al., 2021, Numerical modelling of elastic waves based on BFO-PSO algorithm: Chinese Journal of Geophysics (in Chinese), 64(7), 2461–2470.
He, Z., Zhang, J. H., and Yao, Z. X., 2019, Determining the optimal coefficients of the explicit finite-difference scheme using the Remez exchange algorithm: GEOPHYSICS, 84(3), S137–S147.
Bai, W. L., Wang, Z. Y., and Liu, H., et al., 2021, Optimisation of the finite-difference scheme based on an improved PSO algorithm for elastic modelling: Exploration Geophysics, 52, 419–430.
Xue, J. K., and Shen, B., 2023, Dung beetle optimizer: a new meta-heuristic algorithm for global optimization: Journal of Supercomputing, 79(7), 7305–7336.
Kirkpatrick, S., Gelatt, C. D., and Vecchi, M. P., 1983, Optimization by simulated annealing: Science, 220(4598), 671–680.
Javidrad, F., and Nazari, M., 2017, A new hybrid particle swarm and simulated annealing stochastic optimization method: Applied Soft Computing, 60(1), 634–654.
Ashutosh, B., Sanjay, M., and Vikram, K. K., 2021, A solution to statistical and multidisciplinary design optimization problems using hGWO-SA algorithm: Neural Computing and Applications, 33(8).
Bi, J., Yuan, H. T., Duanmu, S. F., et al., 2021, Energy-Optimized Partial Computation Offloading in Mobile-Edge Computing With Genetic Simulated-Annealing-Based Particle Swarm Optimization: IEEE Internet of Things Journal, 8(5), 3774–3785.
Zhan, C. J., Zheng Y. F., Lai, Z. K., et al., 2021, Identifying epidemic spreading dynamics of COVID-19 by pseudocoevolutionary simulated annealing optimizers: Neural Computing and Applications, 33(10), 4915–4928.
Yuan, H. T., and Zhou, M. C., 2021, Profit-Maximized Collaborative Computation Offloading and Resource Allocation in Distributed Cloud and Edge Computing Systems: IEEE Transactions on Automation Science & Engineering, 18(3), 1277–1287.
Yu, C. Y., Chen M. X., Cheng, K., et al., 2021, SGOA: annealing-behaved grasshopper optimizer for global tasks: Engineering with Computers, 38(5), 3761–3788.
Acknowledgments
Thanks to the Asymmetric Seismology and Application Research Group, this research project is supported by the “HYXD” national project XJZ2023050044, A2309002, XJZ2023070052.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This work was supported by project XJZ2023050044, A2309002 and XJZ2023070052.
Xu-ruo Wei received her B.S. degree from the School of Modern Science & Technology, Hebei Agricultural University, China, in 2021. She is currently pursuing a master’s degree at the College of Information Science and Technology, Beijing University of Chemical Technology, China. Her primary research focus is numerical analysis of seismic waves.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Wei, Xr., Bai, Wl., Liu, L. et al. A Hybrid Dung Beetle Optimization Algorithm with Simulated Annealing for the Numerical Modeling of Asymmetric Wave Equations. Appl. Geophys. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-024-1039-1
Received:
Revised:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11770-024-1039-1