Skip to main content
Log in

The Effect of Variation of Stories’ Plan Size along Height of Relatively Tall Steel Buildings on Their Seismic Behavior

  • Published:
International Journal of Steel Structures Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In urban environments, in many cases, buildings with unequal story plan sizes are desired, resulting in non-uniform mass/stiffness distributions along the buildings’ height. In this study, three groups of 12-story steel buildings with uniform, ascending, and descending story plan size distribution (PSD) along their height, but having the same total architectural space, were investigated to determine how this distribution affects their seismic performance. First, three site conditions—stiff, medium, and soft—were considered, and all buildings were designed by considering moment frames with concentrical bracings as their lateral load-bearing systems. Then, for each site class, seven appropriate sets of accelerograms were selected, and using nonlinear time history analyses, the buildings’ seismic performance levels were compared based on the formation of plastic hinges (PHs). Results show that non-uniform PSD can be quite effective on the seismic performance of buildings’ structures, so that on hard and soft sites, the number of PHs exceeding the collapse prevention performance level in buildings with ascending and descending PSD, respectively, decreases by approximately 30–45% and 20–40% compared with the uniform buildings. Therefore, it is explicitly concluded that employing buildings with uniform plan sizes does not necessarily lead to a higher seismic performance level.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdul Rahman, S. A. A., & Deshmukh, G. (2013). Seismic response of vertically irregular RC frame with stiffness irregularity at fourth floor. International Journal of Emerging Technology and Advanced Engineering, 3(8), 377–385.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Ali, A.K., & Krawinkler, H. (1998). Effects of vertical irregularities on seismic behavior of building structures. John A. Blume Earthquake Engineering Center Rep. No. 130, Dept. of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Stanford Univ., Stanford, Calif.

  • Andalib, Z., Caputo, P., Dorafshan, S., Maguire, M., & Collins, W. (2018a). Investigation into the behavior of an open web steel joist bridge. In International bridge conference, National Harbor 18(64).

  • Andalib, Z., Kafi, M. A., Kheyroddin, A., & Bazzaz, M. (2014). Experimental investigation of the ductility and performance of steel rings constructed from plates. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 103, 77–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andalib, Z., Kafi, M. A., Kheyroddin, A., Bazzaz, M., & Momenzadeh, S. (2018b). Numerical evaluation of ductility and energy absorption of steel rings constructed from plates. Engineering Structures, 169, 94–106.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ANSI, AISC 360-10 (2010): Specification for structural steel buildings. American Institute of Steel Construction.

  • ASCE 7-10 Standard (2013) Minimum design loads for buildings and. other structures. American Society of civil Engineers

  • Athanassiadou, C. J. (2008). Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation. Engineering Structures, 30(5), 1250–1261.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, M., Andalib, Z., Kafi, M. A., & Kheyroddin, A. (2015a). Evaluating the performance of OBS-CO in steel frames under monotonic load. Journal of Earthquakes and Structures, 8(3), 697–710.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, M., Andalib, Z., Kheyroddin, A., & Kafi, M. A. (2015b). Numerical comparison of the seismic performance of steel rings in off-centre bracing system and diagonal bracing system. Journal of Steel and Composite Structures, 19(4), 917–937.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, M., Kafi, M. A., Kheyroddin, A., Andalib, Z., & Esmaeili, H. (2014). Evaluating the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with circular element in optimum place. International Journal of Steel Structures, 14, 293–304.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bazzaz, M., Kheyroddin, A., Kafi, M. A., & Andalib, Z. (2012). Evaluation of the seismic performance of off-centre bracing system with ductile element in steel frames. Steel and Composite Structures, 12(5), 445–464.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chintanapakdee, C., & Chopra, A. K. (2004). Seismic response of vertically irregular frames: Response history and modal pushover analyses. Journal of Structural Engineering, 130(8), 1177–1185.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, B. J. (2004). Hysteretic energy response of steel moment-resisting frames with vertical mass irregularities. Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 13(2), 123–144.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • CSI. SAP2000 V-19 (2017). Integrated Finite Element Analysis and Design of Structures. Computers and Structures, Berkeley

  • CSI. PERFORM-3D 2000 V-5 (2013). Integrated software for the inelastic modeling and nonlinear analysis building structures.

  • Das, S., & Nau, M. (2003). Seismic design aspects of vertically irregular reinforced concrete buildings. Earthquake Spectra, 19(3), 455–477.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • De Stefano, M., & Pintucchi, B. (2008). A review of research on seismic behaviour of irregular building structures since 2002. Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering, 6, 285–308.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • FEMA 356. (2000). Prestandard and commentary for the seismic rehabilitation of buildings. ASCE.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hosseini, M., Mirzaei, R., & Kourehli S. (2009). A study on using earthquake input energy as a target function for optimizing the seismic design of building systems. Third International Conference on Modeling, Simulation and Applied Optimization, Sharjah, U.A.E.

  • https://www.alamy.es/file-vista-aerea-de-un-apartamento-en-forma-de-piramide-en-la-ciudad-de-kunshan-provincia-de-jiangsu-al-este-de-china-14-de-diciembre-de-2019-image369503052.html, (Accessed January, 2022).

  • https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Slovak_Radio_Building, (Accessed in January, 2022).

  • https://www.trip.com/travel-guide/attraction/san-francisco/transamerica-pyramid-79077/, (Accessed January, 2022).

  • Naveen, S. E., Abraham, N. M., & Kumari, A. S. D. (2019). Analysis of irregular structures under earthquake loads. Procedia Structural Integrity, 14, 806–819.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pirizadeh, M., & Shakib, H. (2013). Probabilistic seismic performance evaluation of non-geometric vertically irregular steel buildings. Journal of Constructional Steel Research, 82, 88–98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarkar, P., Prasad, A. M., & Menon, D. (2010). Vertical geometric irregularity in stepped building frames. Engineering Structures, 32(8), 2175–2182.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sehgal, V. K., Saini, B., & Varadharajan, S. (2011). Seismic response of building frames with vertical setback and stiffness irregularity. IUP Journal of Structural Engineering, 4(1), 52–61.

    Google Scholar 

  • SeismoSignal, V4.3.0 (2011). Earthquake Engineering Software Solutions, http://www.seismosoft.com.

  • Shahbazi, F. (2019). A Study on the effect of mass distribution pattern along height of steel frame buildings on their seismic behavior, MSc thesis submitted to the Science and Research Branch of the Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran.

  • Shelke, R. N., & Ansari, U. S. (2017). Seismic analysis of vertically irregular RC building frames. International Journal of Civil Engineering and Technology, 8(1), 155–169.

    Google Scholar 

  • Soni, A. G., Agrawal, D. G., & Pande, A. M. (2015). Effect of irregularities in buildings and their consequences. International Journal of Modern Trends in Engineering and Research, 2(4), 14–21.

    Google Scholar 

  • Subramanya, K. G., Govindaraju, L., & Ramesh Babu, R. (2020). An experimental investigation on the dynamic response of building frame with mass irregularity. International Journal of Advanced Research in Engineering and Technology, 11(10), 152–160.

    Google Scholar 

  • Tremblay, R., & Poncet, L. (2005). Seismic performance of concentrically braced steel frames in multistory buildings with mass irregularity. Journal of Structural Engineering, 131(9), 1363–1375.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Valmundsson, E. V., & Nau, J. M. (1997). Seismic response of building frames with vertical structural irregularities. Journal of Structural Engineering, 123(1), 30–41.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Varadharajan, S., Sehgal, V. K., & Saini, B. (2014). Seismic behavior of multistory RC building frames with vertical setback irregularity. The Structural Design of Tall and Special Buildings, 23(18), 1345–1380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

The authors received no financial support for the research, authorship, and/or publication of this article.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mahmood Hosseini.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no potential conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shahbazi, F., Hosseini, M. The Effect of Variation of Stories’ Plan Size along Height of Relatively Tall Steel Buildings on Their Seismic Behavior. Int J Steel Struct 24, 1–13 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00794-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13296-023-00794-4

Keywords

Navigation