Abstract
A four-dimensional (4D, in concentration–temperature coordinates) computer model of the isobaric phase diagram of uranium, sodium, magnesium, and plutonium chlorides, as well as four three-dimensional (3D) computer models of the phase diagrams of the ternary systems forming it, has been constructed. The technology of assembling a 4D model of 46 hypersurfaces and 17 phase regions was used in the design. The obtained 4D model of the UCl3–NaCl–MgCl2–PuCl3 phase diagram makes it possible to visualize a four-dimensional object as a whole (with all its hypersurfaces and phase regions) by any arbitrarily given 2D and 3D sections, as well as it is able to reproduce published (experimental or thermodynamically calculated) 2D sections. The scope of application of the results of the work is the development of materials for fuel components of fourth-generation molten salt reactors and pyrochemical recycling of spent fuel rods. For the first time, a comprehensive, complete description of phase diagrams composed of uranium, plutonium, sodium, and magnesium chlorides has been obtained.
REFERENCES
H. Yin, S. Wu, X. Wang, et al., J. Fluorine Chem. 217, 90 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfluchem.2018.09.008
P. P. Fedorov, Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 66, 245 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023621020078
A. Mourogov and P. M. Bokov, Energy Convers. Manage. 47, 2761 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2006.02.013
A. D. Pelton and P. Chartrand, Metall. Mater. Trans. A 32A, 1361 (2001). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11661-001-0227-2
V. Trnovcova, L. S. Garashina, A. Skubla, et al., Solid State Ionics 157, 195 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-2738(02)00209-6
P. P. Fedorov, I. I. Buchinskaya, O. S. Bondareva, et al., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 45, 949 (2000).
O. Beneš and R. J. M. Konings, J. Nucl. Mater. 375, 202 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.01.007
O. Beneš, Thermodynamics of Molten Salts for Nuclear Applications, PhD. Dissertation (Chech Rep., Prague, 2008).
L. Bulavin, Yu. Plevachuk, V. Sklyarchuk, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 433, 329 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2012.08.045
H. Yin, X. Wu, C. Ling, et al., CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem. 77, 102427 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2022.102427
H. Yin, J. Lin, B. Hu, et al., CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem. 70, 101783 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2020.101783
J. A. Yingling, J. Schorne-Pinto, M. Aziziha, et al., J. Chem. Thermodyn. 179, 106974 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jct.2022.106974
O. Beneš, J. P. M. van der Meer, and R. J. M. Konings, CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem. 31, 209 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2006.12.004
O. Beneš and R. J. M. Konings, J. Nucl. Mater. 377, 449 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2008.04.004
O. Beneš and R. J. M. Konings, CALPHAD: Comput. Coupling Phase Diagrams Thermochem. 32, 121 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.calphad.2007.07.006
J. P. M. van der Meer, R. J. M. Konings, and H. A. J. Oonk, J. Nucl. Mater. 357, 48 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2006.05.042
R. N. Savchuk, N. V. Faidyuk, A. A. Omel’chuk, et al., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 59, 600 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023614060175
L. I. Ponomarev, M. B. Seregin, A. A. Mikhalichenko, et al., Atom. Energ. 112, 341 (2012).
P. Masset, R. J. M. Konings, R. Malmbeck, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 344, 173 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2005.04.038
T. Murakami, A. Rodrigues, M. Ougier, et al., J. Nucl. Mater. 466, 502 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2015.08.045
S. Ghosh, R. Ganesan, R. Sridharan, et al., Thermochim. Acta 653, 16 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tca.2017.03.024
V. P. Vorob’eva, A. E. Zelenaya, V. I. Lutsyk, et al., Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623601174
G. L. Fredrickson and T. -S. Yoo, J. Nucl. Mater. 528, 151883 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jnucmat.2019.151883
V. P. Vorob’eva, A. E. Zelenaya, V. I. Lutsyk, et al., J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 42, 175 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-021-00863-3
A. Prince, Alloy Phase Equilibria (Elsevier Publ. Comp, Amsterdam–London–New York, 1966).
R. G. Connell, J. Phase Equilib. Diffus. 15, 6 (1994). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11669-021-00863-3
V. I. Lutsyk and V. P. Vorob’eva, J. Therm. Anal. Calorim. 101, 25 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-010-0855-0
H. L. Lukas, E. T. Henig, and G. Petzow, Z. Metallkd. 77, 360 (1986).
Funding
This work was been performed in the framework of a program of fundamental research of the Institute of Physical Materials Science, Siberian Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, project no. 0270-2021-0002.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note.
Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Vorob’eva, V.P., Zelenaya, A.E., Lutsyk, V.I. et al. Spatial Computer Model of the UCl3–NaCl–MgCl2–PuCl3 Isobaric Phase Diagram. Russ. J. Inorg. Chem. 68, 1622–1631 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623602039
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S0036023623602039