Skip to main content
Log in

Agroforestry on runoff nitrogen and phosphorus losses from three paired watersheds after 25 years of implementation

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Non-point source pollution and agriculture have been correlated in a negative context. Conservation practices such as upland agroforestry buffers can help reduce the adverse impact of agriculture on water quality by reducing erosion and retaining nutrients in the fields. This study used a paired watershed approach to determine the effect of agroforestry buffers on runoff flow, total suspended solids (TSS), nitrate–nitrite (NN), total nitrogen (TN), and total phosphorus (TP) after 25 years of establishment and management. Linear models were developed for each parameter of interest during the treatment period and compared to previous models during the calibration period. Three paired watersheds were the subject of this study with a control watershed (no treatment), an agroforestry buffer (AB) watershed (trees + grasses), and a grass buffer (GB) watershed. The agroforestry watershed had 4.5 m wide buffers with [Pin Oak (Quercus palustris Muenchh.), Swamp White Oak (Q. bicolor Willd.), and Bur oak (Q. macrocarpa Michx.) with Redtop (Agrostis gigantea Roth), brome grass (Bromus inermys Leyss.) and birdsfoot trefoil (Lotus corniculatus L.)]. The grass buffer watershed had 4.5 m wide buffers with the same grasses planted in the agroforestry buffer watershed. The AB watershed had 62%, 25%, 64%, and 23% reductions in TSS, NN, TN, and TP losses, respectively, compared to the expected values without buffers. However, only NN and TN reductions were significant (ρ < 0.05). The GB watershed had 71%, 14%, and 33% lower TSS, NN, and TP losses than the expected values, no significant reductions were found. Even though the TSS reductions were not significant, they were greater than reductions reported on studies in the same watersheds in 1999 and 2008. The AB and GB watersheds had the greatest TN and TP reductions reported on these watersheds, respectively. Both watersheds had increased runoff compared to the calibration period due to unexpected inflow from surrounding areas. The results of this study show that upland agroforestry buffers can reduce sediment and nutrient losses long after their implementation and that it is worth to further study these types of long-term settings.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

AB:

Agroforestry buffers

GB:

Grass buffers

OP:

Orthophosphate

SOC:

Soil organic carbon

TN:

Total nitrogen

TP:

Total phosphorus

TSS:

Total suspended solids

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the University of Missouri Center for Agroforestry and the USDA–ARS Dale Bumpers Small Farm Research Center, Agreement number 58-6020-0-007 from the USDA Agricultural Research Service. We thank Donald Hubble and the University of Missouri Greenley Jr. Memorial Research Center staff for field assistance and the management of watersheds.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Miguel Salceda wrote the original draft and collected and analyzed the data for the manuscript. Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis and investigation, writing-original draft, writing-review and editing. Ranjith Udawatta conceived the idea, set the experimental units, revised the manuscript versions, planned the experiment, provided funding, and helped with technical advice. Conceptualization, methodology, writing-review and editing, funding acquisition, resources, supervision. Stephen Anderson revised the manuscript and provided feedback to improve it. Writing-review and editing, supervision. All the authors discussed the results and contributed to the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Miguel Salceda-Gonzalez.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no financial or non-financial conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Salceda-Gonzalez, M., Udawatta, R.P. & Anderson, S.H. Agroforestry on runoff nitrogen and phosphorus losses from three paired watersheds after 25 years of implementation. Agroforest Syst 98, 603–617 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00932-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00932-1

Keywords

Navigation