Abstract
For QFT on a lattice of dimension \(d\geqslant 3\), the vacuum energy (both bosonic and fermionic) is zero if the Hamiltonian is a function of the square of the momentum, and the calculation of the vacuum energy is performed in the ring of residue classes modulo \(N\). This fact is related to a problem from number theory about the number of ways to represent a number as a sum of \(d\) squares in the ring of residue classes modulo \(N\).
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
\(\left\langle \tau^{k} \mid f_N(\tau) \right\rangle =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{l=1}^N \tau(l)^* f_N(\tau(l)) \), where \(\tau(l)\) are roots of unity in \(\mathbb{C}\) given by \(\tau(l)=\mathrm{e}^{2\pi \mathrm{i} \, l/N} \).
References
J. C. Collins, Renormalization (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1984).
V. S. Vladimirov, I. V. Volovich and E. I. Zelenov, \(p\)-Adic Analysis and Mathematical Physics (World Scientific, Singapore, 1994).
I. V. Volovich, “Number theory as the ultimate physical theory,” \(p\)-Adic Num. Ultrametr. Anal. Appl. 2, 77–87 (2010).
H. Bondi, Assumption and Myth in Physical Theory (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1967).
M. G. Ivanov, “Binary representation of coordinate and momentum in quantum mechanics,” Theor. Math. Phys. 196 (1), 1002–1017 (2018).
M. G. Ivanov and A. Yu. Polushkin, “Ternary and binary representation of coordinate and momentum in quantum mechanics,” AIP Conf. Proceed. 2362, 040002 (2021).
M. G. Ivanov and A. Yu. Polushkin, “Digital representation of continuous observables in Quantum Mechanics,” [arXiv:2301.09348 [quant-ph]], (2023), accepted in Theor. Math. Phys..
V. V. Dotsenko, Arithmetic of Quadratic Forms, [in Russian] (MCCME, Moscow, 2015).
N. A. Vavilov, “The computer as a new reality of mathematics. II. The Waring problem,” [in Russian], In: Computer Tools in Education (2020).
I. M. Vinogradov, Elements of Number Theory, [in Russian] (Nauka, Moscow (1965); English transl. Dover Publications, 2016).
I. R. Shafarevich and Z. I. Borevich, Number Theory, [in Russian] (Nauka, Moscow (1985); English transl. Elsevier Science, 1986).
Acknowledgments
The authors thank the participants of the seminar of the Department of Mathematical Physics of Steklov Mathematical Institute of Russian Academy of Sciences and the seminar of the Laboratory of Infinite Dimensional Analysis and Mathematical Physics of the Faculty of Mechanics and Mathematics of Moscow State University for valuable comments and discussion. We are especially grateful for the fruitful and friendly discussion to I. V. Volovich, E. I. Zelenov, N. N. Shamarov, S. L. Ogarkov, Z. V. Khaydukov, D. I. Korotkov, V. V. Dotsenko.
Funding
This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding authors
Appendix
Appendix A. Quadratic Congruences
1. Quadratic Congruences to Prime Modulus
Simplest quadratic congruence
Quadratic congruence
The Legendre symbol is defined for integers \( a \in{\mathbb{Z}} \):
Legendre symbol is group theoretical character and we denote it like \(\chi(a)\) for \(p\) fixed. From Fermat’s and Legendre theorems it follows that
2. Quadratic Congruence to \(p^m\) Modulus
We can consider all solutions \(x\) of congruence with parameter \(a\)
The greatest common divisor of \(a\) and \(p\) in this case is 1
We go further with \(a_0\) as quadratic residue, so \(\; x_0=\pm\sqrt{a_0}\in \mathbb{Z}(p)\). From (A.6) and (A.7) from next \(p^2\)-modulo congruence \(x^2\equiv a (\mathrm{mod} {p^2})\;\) we get
From next \(p^3\)-modulo congruence \(x^2\equiv a (\mathrm{mod} {p^3})\) we get linear congruence with unknown \(x_2\)
All digits \(x_\alpha\) are found sequentially step by step. Let us consider arbitrary step of finding \(x_\alpha\) from \(p^{\alpha+1}\)-modulo congruence \(x^2\equiv a (\mathrm{mod} {p^{\alpha+1}})\).
Thus multiplicities in one dimension
From \(p^2\)-modulo congruence \(x^2\equiv a (\mathrm{mod} {p^2})\;\) we get
We put the lowest non-zero digit in \(x\) as \(x_\alpha\neq0\). Then congruence (A.5) takes the form
From \(p^2\)-modulo congruence \(x^2\equiv a (\mathrm{mod} {p^2})\;\) we get
In solution \(x\) we see that the lowest \(\alpha\) digits are zero and the highest \(\alpha\) digits one can take arbitrarily. And between them \(m-2\alpha\) digits are calculated step by step from linear congruences.
Therefore multiplicities as number of solutions of (A.5) are greater by \(p^{\alpha}\)
We denote the lowest non-zero digit in \(x\) by index \(\alpha\).
Appendix B. Generating Functions for Multiplicities
We define the polynomial of \(\tau\)
We use brackets Footnote
\(\left\langle \tau^{k} \mid f_N(\tau) \right\rangle =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{l=1}^N \tau(l)^* f_N(\tau(l)) \), where \(\tau(l)\) are roots of unity in \(\mathbb{C}\) given by \(\tau(l)=\mathrm{e}^{2\pi \mathrm{i} \, l/N} \).
to extract multiplicity \( c_{N\,d}(k) \) from generating function:\(\left\langle \tau^{k} \mid f_N(\tau) \right\rangle =\frac{1}{N} \sum_{l=1}^N \tau(l)^* f_N(\tau(l)) \), where \(\tau(l)\) are roots of unity in \(\mathbb{C}\) given by \(\tau(l)=\mathrm{e}^{2\pi \mathrm{i} \, l/N} \).
We treat \(\tau\) as a formal variable with the equivalence relation:
The introduced equivalence (B.3) doesn’t violate the commutativity and distributivity of multiplication. Thereby, we reduce our investigation of multiplicities (2.7) to problems of polynomial algebra and arithmetic of quadratic forms [8, 9].
One can assume that variable \(\tau\) takes values in the set of complex \(N\)th roots of unity:
Polynomial \(\phi_N(\tau)\).
We define the polynomial \(\phi_N(\tau)\) with all coefficients equal to 1:
If \(\tau\) runs over complex roots of unity then
For any \(k\in\mathbb{Z}(N)\) we have
Appendix C. Case $$N=p$$ , $$p\not=2$$
Now \(p\) is prime odd number and we put \(N=p\) hereafter in section C. During intermediate calculations we sometimes skip the index \(p\) (or \(N\)).
For the one-dimensional case we can derive the explicit expression for the multiplicities \( c_{N\,1}(k) =c_{N}(k)\) in terms of quadratic congruences [10].
Polynomial \(g_p(\tau)\).
Coefficients \(c_{p}(k)\) take values \(0\) or \(2\), or \(1\) (square root of \(0\)); and the generating function is
Next we introduce the polynomial \( g_p(\tau)\) using the character \(\chi(k)\) (defined in section A):
So, the generating function for multiplicities in the one-dimensional case is the sum of polynomials \(g_p(\tau)\) and \(\phi_p(\tau)\):
1. Properties of Polynomials \(g_p\) and \(\phi_p\) in Multiplication
Due to (B.7) we have
The explicit result for \(g_p^{\,2}\) is:
Proof.
Writing out \(g_p^{\,2}\) as a double sum and remembering about (B.3), we will make a transition at fixed \(a\) from summation variable \(b\) to the new summation variable \(t\) by simple rule \(b\equiv a\cdot t (\mathrm{mod} p)\), since \(\mathbb{Z}(p)\) is field. In third line, we split the sum over \(t\) into two parts.
As a consequence of (C.3), (C.4), (C.5) we have the equation for arbitrary powers \(m\) and \(n\)
2. Multiplicities in \(d=2\)
From generation function (C.2) we have in two-dimensional case due to (C.7)
3. Multiplicities in \(d=3\)
Using (C.7) and (C.9) for \(f^3_p\) we have
And for \( d>3 \) formula
Appendix D. Case $$N=p^m$$ , $$p\not=2$$
Cyclotomic Polynomials \(\Phi_n(\tau)\).
In this section \(N=p^m\), \(p\) is prime odd and \(m\in\mathbb{N}\), \(m>1\). The equivalence relation (B.3) now is
In addition to \(\phi_N(\tau)\) as sum of all powers in (B.5) we introduce cyclotomic polynomials for \(N=p^m\):
One can easily derive that the product of cyclotomic polynomials of successive powers of \(p\) is the sum of all powers of \(\tau\) in \(\phi_N(\tau)\):
We have similar to (C.3) equalities
1. Similarity of Successive Generating Functions in \(d=1\)
The recurrent formula for \(f_{p^m}(\tau)=\mathcal{F}\left( f_{p^{m-1}}(\tau)\right) \) is
For example, if we take \(k=1 \in\mathbb{Z}(p^{m})\) then from (A.10) in \(d=1\) it follows that \(c_{p^{m}}(1) = c_{p\,}(1)\). Using notation with brackets (B.2) we write
We can obtain formula more general than (D.7). Due to (A.15) \(c_{p^m}(a)=c_{p^{m-1}}\left( a{\scriptstyle\mod p^{m-1}}\right)\) and then
We will consider odd \(m\) and even separately.
For example, if we take \(k=0\in\mathbb{Z}(p^{m})\) then
If we take \(k=0\in\mathbb{Z}(p^{m})\) then due to (A.17)
2. Multiplicities in \(d=2\)
In two-dimensional case due to (D.4) from one-dimensional (D.5) we have
3. Multiplicities in \(d=3\)
In three-dimensional case
It is clear that if \(f^3_{p^{m-1}}\) is divisible by \(p^{m-1}\) than \(f^3_{p^{m}}\) is also divisible by \(p^{m}\). In section C the Theorem is proved for \(N=p^1\) and hence by induction we proved the Theorem for \(N=p^m\).
Appendix E. Definitions for Proof-2
1. \(d\)-Dimensional Integer Space
Let us consider the \(d\)-dimensional space \(\mathbb{Z}^d\) of integer vectors
In the figures, the elements of space \(\mathbb{Z}^d\) is represented by cells of unit size in all coordinates.
Let \(\mathrm L\) be some finite subset of \(\mathbb{Z}^d\)
Notation
The notation \(\mathrm L + \mathbf{a}\) is equivalent to \(1 \cdot \mathrm L + \mathbf{a}\).
The notation \(n \cdot \mathrm L\) is equivalent to \(n \cdot \mathrm L + \mathbf{0}\), where \(\mathbf{0}\) is the null vector in \(\mathbb{Z}^d\).
2. Sets of Integers
Definition E.1.
\(\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\) is the set of integers from \(0\) to \(\alpha-1\), i.e.
Definition E.2.
\(n\mathbb{Z}(\alpha) + a\) is the set of all numbers from \(\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\), multiplied by \(n\) and shifted by \(a\), i.e.
The notation \(\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)+a\) is equivalent to \(1\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)+a\).
The notation \(n\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\) is equivalent to \(n\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)+0\).
3. Lattices
Let us introduce the notation for the \(b\)-dimensional lattice \(\underbrace{N \times N \times \ldots \times N}_b\).
Definition E.3.
\(\operatorname{lattice}^b(N)\) for \(a\leqslant d\) is the set of \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\in\mathbb{Z}^d\) such that \(\xi_1,\dots,\xi_b\in\mathbb{Z}(N)\), and \(\xi_{b+1}=\dots=\xi_d=0\).
Definition E.4.
\(\operatorname{lattice}_{i_1\dots i_b}^b(N)\) for \(b\leqslant d\) is the set of \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\in\mathbb{Z}^d\) such that \(\xi_{i_1},\dots,\xi_{i_b}\in\mathbb{Z}(N)\), and \(\xi_j=0\) if \(j\not\in\{i_1,\dots,i_b\}\).
For example, if \(d=6\), then \(\operatorname{lattice}^3_{2,3,5}(N)\) is the set of \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\in\mathbb{Z}^6\) such that \(\xi_2,\xi_3,\xi_5\in\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\), and \(\xi_1=\xi_4=\xi_6=0\).
4. Functions
Definition E.5.
\(\operatorname{ncells}(\mathrm L, \alpha, k)\) (”the number of cells”) is the number of cells \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\in\mathrm L\subset\mathbb{Z}^d\), such that
In terms of \(\operatorname{ncells}\) the multiplicity function \(c_{Nd}\) (2.7) has the following form
Definition E.6.
The logical function \(\operatorname{zrf}(\mathrm L, \alpha, \beta)\) (”zerofy”) is equal to “\(true\)” if
The notation \(\operatorname{zrf}(\mathrm L, \alpha, \beta)\) is equivalent to \(\operatorname{zrf}(\mathrm L, \alpha, \beta) = true\).
The parameter \(\alpha\) of the functions \(\operatorname{ncells}\) and \(\operatorname{zrf}\) is called the momentum ring parameter, and \(\beta\) is called the energy ring parameter.
In terms of fumction \(\operatorname{zrf}\) the theorem (2.8) has the following form
Appendix F. Lemmas
To simplify the proof we introduce several simple lemmas. For obvious lemmas, the proofs are skipped.
Lemma F.1 (on increasing of the momentum ring parameter).
Proof.
The number \(k \in \mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\) corresponds to the numbers \(k\), \(k+\alpha\), \(k+2\alpha\), \(k+3\alpha\),... , \(k+( n-1)\alpha\) in \(\mathbb{Z}(n\alpha)\). To go from modulus \(n\alpha\) to modulus \(\alpha\), one needs to sum the corresponding numbers of cells. \(\quad\square\)
Lemma F.2 (on decreasing of the momentum ring parameter).
Lemma F.3 (on decreasing of the energy ring parameter).
Lemma F.4 (on lattice stretching).
Lemma F.5 (on lattice shift).
Proof.
Let \(\xi_i\) be the coordinates of a cell in the set \(\mathrm L\). \(n\xi_i\) are the coordinates of a cell in the set \(n\cdot \mathrm L\). When shifted by the vector \(n\alpha\mathbf{a}\), the coordinates of the cells of the set \(n\cdot\mathrm L\) are shifted by the corresponding components of this vector:
Lemma F.6 (on sum of lattices).
Lemma F.7 (on subtraction of lattices).
Lemma F.8 (on multiple lattices).
Let \(\mathrm L_i \cap \mathrm L_j = \varnothing\) if \(i \neq j\), and \(\operatorname{ncells}(\mathrm L_i,\alpha,k) = \operatorname{ncells}(\mathrm L_j,\alpha,k)\). Then
Lemma F.9 (on periodicity).
Let
Proof.
By Lemma F.1 (on increasing of the momentum ring parameter) and taking into account the periodicity of \(\operatorname{ncells}(\mathrm L, P\alpha, k)\),
Lemma F.10 (on permutation of remainders).
Let \(\alpha\) and \(n\) be coprime, \(A\) be the set of the remainders of the division of elements \(n\mathbb{Z}(\alpha)+a\) by \(\alpha\). Then \(A = \mathbb{Z}(\alpha)\).
Appendix G. Proof-2
Theorem on number-theory renormalization (2.8) formulated in terms of the function \(\operatorname{zrf}\): for \(d\geqslant3\) and any natural \(N\), as well as for \(d=2\) and \(N=2^ m, m \in \mathbb{N}\)
The theorem is obvious in the trivial case \(N=1\), easily verified for \(N=2\), and proved in the Appendix C for odd primes \(N\). It remains to prove the theorem for composite \(N\).
We will prove the theorem separately for each of the following \(3\) cases of composite \(N\):
-
•
\(N\) is a power of an odd prime \(p\),
-
•
\(N\) is a power of \(2\),
-
•
\(N\) is not a prime power.
1. Powers of Odd Primes
Let us prove the theorem (G.1) for the \(m\)-th power of an odd prime \(p\):
Unless otherwise specifically stated, we will assume that \(d=3\).
We will prove by induction, assuming that the hypothesis is true for \(p^{m-1}\) and for \(p^{m-2}\):
The basis of the induction is the proven above validity of the hypothesis for \(d=3\) for \({m=0,1}\), i.e. for \(N=1\) and \(N=p\):
Divide the \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\) (Fig. 1) into 2 parts: \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) and \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N ) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\).
The first part (\(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\)) consists of all cells of \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\) such that each of their coordinates \(\xi_i\) is a multiple of \(p\) (Fig. 2).
The second part (\(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\)) consists of all other cells of \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\), i.e. those with at least one of their coordinates \(\xi_i\) is not a multiple of \(p\) (Fig. 3).
Similarly, we divide the \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) into 2 parts: \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\) and \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1 }) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\). (Fig. 1)
We will prove zerofying for each of the 2 parts of \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\) separately:
Since the set \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\) is \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\) stretched by \(p\) times, by virtue of the hypothesis for \( p^{m-2}\) (G.4), Lemma F.4 (on lattice stretching) and the fact that \(N=p^m\) (G.2)
Note that the set \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) can be divided into \(p^d\) subsets \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2}) + p^{ m-1}\mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf{a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d(p)\). One of these subsets is \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\), and the rest are obtained from \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\) by such a shift of all its cells, that each coordinate difference is a multiple of \(p^{m-1}\) (Fig. 2).
Since \(p^{m-1}\) and the coordinates of all cells from \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})\) are divisible by \(p\), by Lemma F.5 (on lattice shift) for each set \({p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2}) + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}}\) the value of \(\operatorname{ncells}(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^ {m-2}) + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}, N, k)\) does not depend on \(\mathbf{a}\). Therefore, since one of the sets \({p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2}) + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}}\) is the set \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p ^{m-2})\), and there are \(p^d\) such sets, due to (G.9) and Lemma F.8 (on multiple lattices)
From (G.9) and by Lemma F.2 (on decreasing of the momentum ring parameter) it follows that
From the validity of the hypothesis for \(p^{m-1}\) (G.3) and by virtue of the Lemma F.3 (on decreasing of the energy ring parameter), it follows that
Due to (G.12), (G.13) and Lemma F.7 (on subtraction of lattices)
Now we divide the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) into subsets \([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})] + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf {a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d(p)\) (Fig. 3) in the same way as the set \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) was divided into sets \(p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2}) + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf{a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d(p)\).
Similarly, by Lemma F.5 (on lattice shift), for each of these sets the values of \(\operatorname{ncells}([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m- 2})] + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}, p^{m-1}, k)\) does not depend on \(\mathbf{a}\). Therefore, since one of these sets is \({\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})}\), and there are \(p^d \) such sets, due to (G.14) and Lemma F.8 (on multiple lattices)
Now we divide the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) into disjoint sets of the form
Suppose we have selected a cell \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\), and \(\xi_1\) is the first coordinate not a multiple of \(p\). We will shift \(\xi_1\) by multiples of \(p^{m-1}\). We get the set \(p^{m-1} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots)\). The elements of the set has the form
The sum of squares of the coordinates (G.16) of cells from this set is
Consider the sum (G.17) modulo \(N\). If \(m \geqslant 2\), then \(p^{2m-2}\) is a multiple of \(N=p^m\), so the term \(k^2p^{2m-2}\) can be dropped:
Consider the the remainder of the division of the term \(2kp^{m-1}\nu_1\) by \(N\) (the other terms of (G.18) are constant):
Therefore, for the set \(p^{m-1} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots)\) the function \(\operatorname{ncells}(p^{m-1} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots), N,k)\) is periodic in \(k\) with period \(p^{m-1}\):
Since the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) consists entirely of such disjoint sets with property (G.20), and for union of disjoint sets, these functions add up, then for the entire set \({\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})}\) this function is periodic in \(k\) with period \(p ^{m-1}\), that is
2. Proof for \(d\geqslant2\), \(N=2^m\)
If we apply the proof for powers of primes for the case \(d=2\), \(p=2\), then it turns out that the proof for the first part of the lattice works, but the proof for the second part of the lattice is valid up to the formula (G.15) before the assumptions \(p\not=2\) and \(d\geqslant3\) are used. A closer look shows that for \(d=p=2\) we need to retreat to the formula (G.10).
Now, as an induction hypothesis, we take the validity of the hypothesis not for the previous two powers (\(m-1\), \(m-2\)), but for three (\(m-1\), \(m-2\), \(m-3\)):
Since we now use the hypothesis for the previous three powers as the induction hypothesis, we can use the proof using the previous two powers by substituting \(p^{m-1}\) instead of \(N\) (that is, lowering the required powers of \(p\) by \(1\)). For \(d\geqslant2\) from (G.10) by reducing the powers of \(p\) by \(1\) it follows
From the validity of the hypothesis for \(p^{m-1}\) (G.24), due to (G.27) and the Lemma F.7 (on subtraction of lattices)
In the same way as (G.15) was obtained from (G.14), we obtain (G.29) from (G.24).
Divide the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) into subsets \([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})] + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf{a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d(p)\) (Fig. 3).
Similarly, by Lemma F.5 (on lattice shift), for each of these sets the values of \(\operatorname{ncells}([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m- 2})] + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}, p^{m-1}, k)\) does not depend on \(\mathbf{a}\). Therefore, since one of these sets is \({\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})}\), and there are \(p^d\) such sets, due to (G.28) and Lemma F.8 (on multiple lattices)
Now (similarly to derivation of (G.15)) we need to apply the F.9 Lemma (on periodicity) to increase the momentum ring parameter by decrease the energy ring parameter.
For \(p=2\), the set of possible values (G.19) no longer coincides with \(p^{m-1}\mathbb{Z}(p)\), which was based on the fact that \(2\nu_1\) and \(p\) are coprime, but this is not true for the case \(p=2\).
Therefore, for \(p=2\) we will divide into sets of \(p\) cells not the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) as a whole, but each of the \(p^d\) subsets \([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})-p\cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})]+p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf{a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d(p)\). So, the coordinate in each of the resulting sets will be shifted by a value that is a multiple of \(p^{m-2}\), not \(p^{m-1}\).
The set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) is divided into disjoint sets of the form
This partition is performed as follows. Take an arbitrary cell \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\) from \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\), select from its \(d\) coordinates the first non-multiple of \(p\) (according to the definition of this set, at least one of the coordinates is not a multiple of \(p\)), and then we will shift this coordinate by multiples of \(p^{m-2}\), so as not to go beyond a specific set \([\operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1}) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-2})] + p^{m-1}\mathbf{a}\) (Fig. 5). Collect the resulting \(p\) cells into a set. Regardless of which point of this set we start from, we will collect the same set, that is, such a partition of \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) into subsets is unique.
Suppose we have selected a cell \(\boldsymbol{\xi}\), and the first coordinate not a multiple of \(p\) is \(\xi_1\). We will shift \(\xi_1\) by multiples of \(p^{m-2}\). We get the set \(p^{m-2} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots)\) from the cells
The sum of squares of the coordinates (G.30) of cells from this set is
Consider this sum of squares modulo \(N\). If \(m \geqslant 4\), then \(p^{2m-4}\) is a multiple of \(N\), and the term \(k^2p^{2m-4}\) can be dropped:
Due to the fact that it is possible to pass from the expression (G.31) to the expression (G.32) only when \(m \geqslant 4\), for \(p=2\) we have to choose as induction basis not \( m=0,1,2\), but \(m=1,2,3\).
Taking into account that \(p=2\), so \(\nu_1=1\) (since \(\nu_1 \mod{p}\ne0\)), we rewrite (G.32) as
Consider the remainder of the division of the term \(2kp^{m-1}\nu_1\) by \(N\) (the other terms of (G.33) are constant):
Therefore, for the set \(p^{m-2} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots)\) the function \(\operatorname{ncells}(p^{m-2} \cdot \operatorname{lattice}(p) + (\nu_1, \xi_2, \xi_3, \ldots), N, k)\) is periodic in \(k\) with period \(p^{m-1}\):
Since the set \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})\) consists entirely of such disjoint sets, for each of which this function is periodic with period \(p^{m-1 }\), and for union of disjoint sets, these functions add up, then for the entire set \({\operatorname{lattice}^d(N) - p \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(p^{m-1})}\) this function is periodic in \(k\) with period \(p ^{m-1}\), that is
Further, similarly to the statement (G.22) we obtain
The induction base (\(N=2,4,8\)) is verified numerically.
3. Composite Numbers that are not Prime Powers
A composite number \(N\) can be represented as a product of powers of unequal primes \(p_i\) (if \(i \neq j\), then \(p_i \neq p_j\)):
We will prove by induction. As a step of induction, we deduce the validity of the hypothesis for \(N\) from its validity for \(M\) and \(K\):
Represent the lattice \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\) as \(K^d\) pairwise disjoint lattices \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\), where \(\mathbf{a} \in \operatorname{lattice}^d (K)\) (Fig. 6).
We prove that for each lattice \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\)
Each lattice coordinate \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(M)\) runs through all values in \(\mathbb{Z}(M)\). By Lemma F.10 (on permutation of remainders), each coordinate of the lattice \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\) modulo \(M\) also runs through all values in \(\mathbb{ Z}(M)\). That is, the lattices \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(M)\) and \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\) consist of the same cells if their coordinates are taken modulo \(M\). Therefore, the validity of the hypothesis for \(M\) (G.42) implies
Consider two cells in \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\):
So, the difference between the sums of squared coordinates of two cells from \({K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}}\) is a multiple of \(K\).
Compare the functions \(\operatorname{ncells}(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}, M, z)\) and \(\operatorname{ncells}(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}, N, y)\).
Each \(z\in\mathbb{Z}(M)\) corresponds to \(K\) different values of \(y\in\mathbb{Z}(N)\) such that \(z= y \mod{M}.\)
Let \(\operatorname{ncells}(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}, M, z_0)=0\), then \(\operatorname{ncells}(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}, N, y_0)=0\) for all \(z_0= y_0 \mod{M}.\)
Let \(\operatorname{ncells}(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}, M, z_1)\ne0\), then there exists a non-empty subset of the lattice \(K \cdot \operatorname{lattice}^d(M) + \mathbf{a}\) such that for each of its cells the sum of squared coordinates modulo \(M\) is equal to \(k_1\). That is, in this subset, the sums of squares of cell coordinates differ from each other by multiples of \(M\). But we came to the conclusion that these quantities are multiples of \(K\) as well. Therefore, they are multiples of the least common multiple of \(M\) and \(K\). Since \(M\) and \(K\) are coprime, these quantities are multiples of \(N = MK\) (G.41). Since \(y_1\in\mathbb{Z}(N)\), among all \(K\) distinct \(y_1\equiv z_1 \mod{M}\) there is one value \(\tilde y_1\) for which
Therefore, due to (G.46)
By permutation of \(M\) and \(K\), we similarly prove that
Since \(M\) and \(K\) are coprime and \(N = MK\) (G.41), their least common multiple is equal to \(N\), so by (G.50) and (G.52) lattice \(\operatorname{lattice}^d(N)\) is zerofied modulo \(N\):
Conflict of Interest
The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivanov, M.G., Dudchenko, V.A. & Naumov, V.V. Number-Theory Renormalization of Vacuum Energy. P-Adic Num Ultrametr Anal Appl 15, 284–311 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070046623040039
Received:
Revised:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2070046623040039