Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative study of ratio and spectral shape discrimination technique in case of physics event selection for point contact germanium detector in sub-\(keV_{ee}\) range

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Indian Journal of Physics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As a result of the p-type point contact germanium detectors’ ability to produce kg-scale radiation sensors with sub-\(keV_{ee}\) (electron equivalent energy) sensitivity, they have been preferred for light dark matter WIMP searches and the study of low energy neutrino physics. These detectors display anomalous behavior to events placed at the surface layer. The spectral shape and ratio methods are utilized to separate the bulk–surface events. The spectral shape technique relies on spectral shape assumptions and the use of external calibration sources to discriminate bulk–surface events. Whereas in ratio method to distinguish between bulk–surface events by employing ratios between several in situ event sample types as calibration sources. Here in this article we will present the comparison study of the two improved methods to separate the bulk–surface events. The bulk–surface separation results for both techniques are found to be comparable, but the main advantage of the ratio technique is its ability to calibrate systems using on-site data; this property makes it easier to collect long-term data and conduct large-scale multidetector research by reducing or eliminating the need for external \(\gamma\)-ray sources for calibration.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. X H Meng et al J. Inst. 14 P02019 (2019)

    Google Scholar 

  2. A Jany et al Eur. Phys. J. C 81 38 (2021)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. M Agostini et al Eur. Phys. J. C 79 978 (2019)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. C E Aalseth et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 106 131301 (2011)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. W H Dai et al Appl. Rad. and Isot. 193 110638 (2023)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. J L Ma et al Appl. Rad. and Isot. 127 130 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. H Jiang et al Chin. Phys. C 40 096001 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. R D Martin et al Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 678 98 (2012)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. A K Soma et al Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 836 67 (2016)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. M K Singh et al Indian J. Phys. 91 1277 (2017)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. H B Li et al Astro. Phys. 56 1 (2014)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. H B Li et al Phys. Rev. Lett. 110 261301 (2013)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. L T Yang et al Nucl. Instr. Meth. Phys. Res. A 886 13 (2018)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. W. H. Press et al., Num. Rec. C, second ed., Cambridge University Press, Chapter14 650 (2002)

Download references

Acknowledgements

The TEXONO Collaboration’s work is represented in this article by the research initiatives and findings. The efforts of each and every team member are appreciated by the authors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. K. Singh.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Karmakar, S., Singh, M.K. & Wong, H.T. Comparative study of ratio and spectral shape discrimination technique in case of physics event selection for point contact germanium detector in sub-\(keV_{ee}\) range. Indian J Phys 98, 2181–2188 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-03001-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12648-023-03001-6

Keywords

Navigation