State-dependent memory retrieval: insights from neural dynamics and behavioral perspectives

  1. Ji-Song Guan1,8
  1. 1School of Life Science and Technology, ShanghaiTech University, Shanghai 201210, China
  2. 2Cerebrovascular Disease Center, Renji Hospital, School of Medicine, Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200025, China
  3. 3Institute of Neuroscience, CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Sciences and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
  4. 4Life of Science, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
  5. 5Headache Center, Department of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing 100070, China
  6. 6Headache Center, China National Clinical Research Center for Neurological Diseases, Beijing 100070, China
  7. 7Institute of Photonic Chips, University of Shanghai for Science and Technology, Shanghai 200093, China
  8. 8CAS Center for Excellence in Brain Science and Intelligence Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shanghai 200031, China
  1. Corresponding authors: guanjs{at}shanghaitech.edu.cn, zliang{at}ion.ac.cn, hongxie{at}usst.edu.cn
  1. 9 These authors contributed equally to this work.

Abstract

Memory retrieval is strikingly susceptible to external states (environment) and internal states (mood states and alcohol), yet we know little about the underlying mechanisms. We examined how internally generated states influence successful memory retrieval using the functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) of laboratory mice during memory retrieval. Mice exhibited a strong tendency to perform memory retrieval correctly only in the reinstated mammillary body-inhibited state, in which mice were trained to discriminate auditory stimuli in go/no-go tasks. fMRI revealed that distinct auditory cues engaged differential brain regions, which were primed by internal state. Specifically, a cue associated with a reward activated the lateral amygdala, while a cue signaling no reward predominantly activated the postsubiculum. Modifying these internal states significantly altered the neural activity balance between these regions. Optogenetic inhibition of those regions in the precue period blocked the retrieval of type-specific memories. Our findings suggest that memory retrieval is under the control of two interrelated neural circuits underlying the neural basis of state-dependent memory retrieval.

Footnotes

  • Received October 5, 2023.
  • Accepted November 28, 2023.

This article is distributed exclusively by Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press for the first 12 months after the full-issue publication date (see http://learnmem.cshlp.org/site/misc/terms.xhtml). After 12 months, it is available under a Creative Commons License (Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International), as described at http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

| Table of Contents