Skip to main content
Log in

Lessen Pressure Drop and Forecasting Thermal Performance in U-Tube Heat Exchanger Using Chimp Optimization and Deep Belief Neural Network

  • Published:
Optical Memory and Neural Networks Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the chemical, pharmaceutical, and petroleum industries, Shell and U-Tube Heat Exchangers (STHX) were extensively utilized. Baffles must be positioned at the right distance and angle to increase the heat exchangers' capacity to convey heat and, as a result, lower pressure in the shell. The rate of heat transfer in an STHX has been improved, and pressure drop has been reduced using a variety of models. But those methods are not provided satisfactory pressure drop reduction. In the proposed model, an optimal Unilateral Ladder-Type Helical Baffles (ULHB) design and intelligent performance prediction system based U-tube heat exchanger was designed to reduce the pressure drop as well as predict the heat exchanger performance. The shell and tubes were made up of steel and copper material, respectively. A baffle was placed above tubes to barrier the flow of cold water. The design of the baffle was accomplished by using Chimp Optimization Algorithm (ChOA) and is motivated by the hunting behaviour of chimpanzees. After designing the exchanger, its fluid analysis was verified, and the parameter values of the heat exchanger were collected to create a dataset. Based on that data, the intelligent performance prediction-system was designed. The controlling system analysed the given data to predict the performance of the heat exchanger. The suggested model has a pressure drop of 55 Pa, a heat transfer coefficient of 411 U, and 86% accuracy for the thermal performance prediction process. The proposed model provides better performance by improving heat transfer efficiency and significantly reduces pressure drop.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig.7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.
Fig. 14.
Fig. 15.
Fig. 16.
Fig. 17.
Fig. 18.
Fig. 19.
Fig. 20.
Fig. 21.

Similar content being viewed by others

REFERENCES

  1. Xiao, J., Wang, S., Ye, S., Wen, J., and Zhang, Z., Multiphysics field coupling simulation for shell-and-tube heat exchangers with different baffles, Numer. Heat Transfer, Part A, 2020, vol. 77, no. 3, pp. 266–283.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Javadi, H., Urchueguia, J.F., Mousavi Ajarostaghi, S.S., and Badenes, B., Numerical study on the thermal performance of a single U-tube borehole heat exchanger using nano-enhanced phase change materials, Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 5156.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Andrzejczyk, R. and Muszynski, T., An experimental investigation on the effect of new continuous core-baffle geometry on the mixed convection heat transfer in shell and coil heat exchanger, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2018, vol. 136, pp. 237–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Biçer, N., Engin, T., Yaşar, H., Büyükkaya, E., Aydın, A., and Topuz, A., Design optimization of a shell-and-tube heat exchanger with novel three-zonal baffle by using CFD and taguchi method, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2020, vol. 155, p. 106417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, J., Volf, M., and Bajić, S., CFD evaluation of the influence of the parts of a shell and tube heat exchanger on heat transfer, in MATEC Web of Conferences, EDP Sciences, 2021, vol. 345, p. 00007

  6. Abu-Hamdeh, N.H., Alsulami, R.A., Rawa, M.J., Aljinaidi, A.A., Alazwari, M.A., Eltaher, M.A., Almitani, K.H., Alnefaie, K.A., Abusorrah, A.M., Sindi, H.F., and Goodarzi, M., A detailed hydrothermal investigation of a helical micro double-tube heat exchanger for a wide range of helix pitch length, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2021, vol. 28, p. 101413.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Bhattad, A., Sarkar, J., and Ghosh, P., Discrete phase numerical model and experimental study of hybrid nanofluid heat transfer and pressure drop in plate heat exchanger, Int. Commun. Heat Mass Transfer, 2018, vol. 91, pp. 262–273.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ligus, G., Wasilewski, M., Kołodziej, S., and Zając, D., CFD and PIV investigation of a liquid flow maldistribution across a tube bundle in the shell-and-tube heat exchanger with segmental baffles, Energies, 2020, vol. 13, no. 19, p. 5150.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang, K., Bai, C., Wang, Y., and Liu, M., Flow dead zone analysis and structure optimization for the trefoil-baffle heat exchanger, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2019, vol. 140, pp. 127–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Xiao, J., Wang, S., Ye, S., Wang, J., Wen, J., and Tu, J., Experimental investigation on pre-heating technology of coal water slurry with different concentration in shell-and-tube heat exchangers with ladder-type fold baffles, Int. J. Heat Mass Transfer, 2019, vol. 132, pp. 1116–1125.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Li, Z.X., Sun, S.Q., Wang, C., Liang, C.H., Zeng, S., Zhong, T., Hu, W.P., and Feng, C.N., The effect of trapezoidal baffles on heat and flow characteristics of a cross-corrugated triangular duct, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2022, vol. 33, p. 101903.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Liu, Y., Wen, J., Wang, S., and Tu, J., Numerical investigation on the shell and tube heat exchanger with baffle leakage zones blocked, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2021, vol. 165, p. 106959.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Arani, A.A.A. and Uosofvand, H., Double-pass shell-and-tube heat exchanger performance enhancement with new combined baffle and elliptical tube bundle arrangement, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2021, vol. 167, p. 106999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Said, Z., Rahman, S.M.A., Assad, M.E.H., and Alami, A.H., Heat transfer enhancement and life cycle analysis of a Shell-and-Tube Heat Exchanger using stable CuO/water nanofluid, Sustainable Energy Technol. Assess., 2019, vol. 31, pp. 306–317.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Fares, M., Mohammad, A.M., and Mohammed, A.S., Heat transfer analysis of a shell and tube heat exchanger operated with graphene nanofluids, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2020, vol. 18, p. 100584.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zebua, M.A. and Ambarita, H., September. Numerical simulation of the effect of baffle spacing to the effectiveness of a shell and tube heat exchanger, in IOP Conf. Ser.:Mmater. Sci. Eng., 2018, vol. 420, no. 1, p. 012036.

  17. Martic, I., Maslarevic, A., Milovanovic, N., and Markovic, M., Effect of baffle cut and baffle spacing on pressure drop in shell and tube heat exchanger with U tubes, 2020.

  18. Maghrabie, H.M., Attalla, M., and Mohsen, A.A., Performance assessment of a shell and helically coiled tube heat exchanger with variable orientations utilizing different nanofluids, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2021, vol. 182, p. 116013.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Chen, J., Zhao, P., Wang, Q., and Zeng, M., Experimental investigation of shell-side performance and optimal design of shell-and-tube heat exchanger with different flower baffles, Heat Transfer Eng., 2021, vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 613–626.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Iyer, V.H., Mahesh, S., Malpani, R., Sapre, M., and Kulkarni, A.J., Adaptive range genetic algorithm: A hybrid optimization approach and its application in the design and economic optimization of shell-and-tube heat exchanger, Eng. Appl. Artif. Intell., 2019, vol. 85, pp. 444–461.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Jradi, R., Marvillet, C., and Jeday, M.R., Application of an artificial neural networks method for the prediction of the tube-side fouling resistance in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger, Fluid Dyn. Mater. Process, 2022, vol. 18, pp. 1511–1519.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Xie, C., Yan, G., Ma, Q., Elmasry, Y., Singh, P.K., Algelany, A.M., and Wae-hayee, M., Flow and heat transfer optimization of a fin-tube heat exchanger with vortex generators using Response Surface Methodology and Artificial Neural Network, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2022, vol. 39, p. 102445.

    Google Scholar 

  23. Çolak, A.B., Açıkgöz, Ö., Mercan, H., Dalkılıç, A.S., and Wongwises, S., Prediction of heat transfer coefficient, pressure drop, and overall cost of double-pipe heat exchangers using the artificial neural network, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2022, vol. 39, p. 102391.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. García-Morales, J., Cervantes-Bobadilla, M., Hernández-Pérez, J.A., Saavedra-Benítez, Y.I., Adam-Medina, M., and Guerrero-Ramírez, G.V., Inverse artificial neural network control design for a double tube heat exchanger, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2022, vol. 34, p. 102075.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Zolghadri, A., Maddah, H., Ahmadi, M.H., and Sharifpur, M., Predicting parameters of heat transfer in a shell and tube heat exchanger using aluminum oxide nanofluid with artificial neural network (ANN) and self-organizing map (SOM), Sustainability, 2021, vol. 13, no. 16, p. 8824.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhand, D., Kumar, P., and Grewal, J.S., A review of thermal spray coatings for protection of steels from degradation in coal fired power plants, Corros. Rev., 2021, vol. 39, no. 3, pp. 243–268.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. More, L.J., Mandavkar, D., Patil, N., and Jagdale, K., Analysis of Temperature Distribution Over the Tubes Of Heat Exchanger Withdifferent Material, 2022.

  28. Bahiraei, M., Naseri, M., and Monavari, A., A second law analysis on flow of a nanofluid in a shell-and-tube heat exchanger equipped with new unilateral ladder type helical baffles, Powder Technol., 2021, vol. 394, pp. 234–249.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Khishe, M. and Mosavi, M.R., Chimp optimization algorithm, Expert Syst. Appl., 2020, vol. 149, p. 113338.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Liu, X., Zhu, H., Yu, C., Jin, H., Wang, C., and Ou, G., Analysis on the corrosion failure of U-tube heat exchanger in hydrogenation unit, Eng. Failure Anal., 2021, vol. 125, p. 105448.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. El-Said, E.M., Elsheikh, A.H., and El-Tahan, H.R., Effect of curved segmental baffle on a shell and tube heat exchanger thermohydraulic performance: Numerical investigation, Int. J. Therm. Sci., 2021, vol. 165, p. 106922.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mohammed, M.S., Dakel, S.F., Alshara, A.K., and Alsayah, A.M., Numerical and experimental study of heat transfer in shell-and U-tube heat exchanger with baffles, Chin. J. Geotech. Eng., 2022, vol. 44, no. 5.

  33. Prasad, S.K. and Sinha, M.K., Analysis of Performance for Shell and tube heat exchangers using Baffles, 2021.

  34. Promvonge, P. and Skullong, S., Enhanced thermal performance in tubular heat exchanger contained with V-shaped baffles, Appl. Therm. Eng., 2021, vol. 185, p. 116307.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Mashoofi, N., Pourahmad, S., and Pesteei, S.M., Study the effect of axially perforated twisted tapes on the thermal performance enhancement factor of a double tube heat exchanger, Case Stud. Therm. Eng., 2017, vol. 10, pp. 161–168.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Kumar, P.G., Thangapandian, N., Vigneswaran, V.S., Vinothkumar, S., Prasanth, B.M., and Kim, S.C., Heat transfer, pressure drop, and exergy analyses of a shot-peened tube in the tube heat exchanger using Al2O3 nanofluids for solar thermal applications, Powder Technol., 2022, vol. 401, p. 117299.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work was supported by ongoing institutional funding. No additional grants to carry out or direct this particular research were obtained.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

The corresponding author claims the major contribution of the paper including formulation, analysis and editing. The co-author provides guidance to verify the analysis result and manuscript editing.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shailandra Kumar Prasad.

Ethics declarations

COMPLIANCE WITH ETHICAL STANDARDS

This article is a completely original work of its authors; it has not been published before and will not be sent to other publications until the journal’s editorial board decides not to accept it for publication.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

AVAILABILITY OF DATA AND MATERIAL

Not applicable.

CODE AVAILABILITY

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note.

Allerton Press remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Shailandra Kumar Prasad, Mrityunjay Kumar Sinha Lessen Pressure Drop and Forecasting Thermal Performance in U-Tube Heat Exchanger Using Chimp Optimization and Deep Belief Neural Network. Opt. Mem. Neural Networks 32, 275–294 (2023). https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X23040033

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.3103/S1060992X23040033

Keywords:

Navigation