Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Jurisdictional homogeneity and coterminous local government borders: a comparison of counties in New Jersey and New York State

  • Special Issue Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Tiebout (J Polit Econ 64:416–424, 1956) argues that local public goods will be provided efficiently if households vote with their feet to move to the jurisdiction that best matches their preferences. This outcome may be impeded by overlapping jurisdictions of municipalities, school districts, and police agencies. To investigate the impact of coterminous borders on Tiebout sorting, two counties with similar demographics are chosen within the New York City metropolitan area. Differing histories lead to municipalities in Bergen County, NJ, always being coterminous with elementary school districts and police agencies, while few municipalities in Nassau County, NY, have their own police agencies and even fewer have their own school districts. Heterogeneity of sociodemographics and service quality are calculated between neighboring Census block groups, and absolute difference in median household income is regressed on these measures and interactions between the three kinds of service area borders. School district and police agency borders and quality are found to not be individually significant (with one minor exception). Police agency borders interacted with municipal borders increase income sorting, while school district borders interacted with police agency borders decrease income sorting. Income differences are also correlated with differences in the proportion of White and Black population in neighboring block groups, supporting previous findings that Tiebout sorting may exacerbate segregation. Municipal borders are an independently significant influence on income sorting across all specifications, indicating the important and independent role of local public goods other than education and public safety in residential location.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. The only exceptions are Indian Reservations, which are legally distinct from cities and towns. There are no Indian Reservations in Nassau County.

  2. A FOIL request for UCR crime by precinct from the Nassau County Police Department led to a comedy of errors. The first result was a paper (!) table of UCR crime for 2019 for the entire NCPD, which I had already downloaded from NYS (NYS DCJS 2022). A phone call to clarify my request was very politely agreed to, after which NCPD became unresponsive. PDFs of part-year crime statistics (“Strat-Com”) are inconsistently published on the NCPD website (NCPD 2023). I was able to obtain UCR data by precinct for January through August 2019 from these PDFs. I calculated the proportion of total NCPD crime that occurred in each precinct in 2019, then used these proportions and the full-year NCPD UCR data to calculate crimes and crime rates for each precinct.

References

  • Bickers K, Engstrom RN (2006) Tiebout sorting in metropolitan areas. Rev Policy Res 23(6):1181–1198. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1541-1338.2006.00259.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bivand R, Altman M, Anselin L, Assunção R, Berke O, Bernat A, Blanchet G, Blankmeyer E, Carvalho M et al (2023) Spdep: Spatial dependence: weighting schemes, statistics.

  • Buckley J, Schneider M (2006) School choice, parental information, and Tiebout sorting: evidence from Washington, DC. In: Fischel WA (ed) The Tiebout model at fifty: essays in public economics in honor of Wallace Oates. Lincoln Institute of Land Policy, Cambridge, pp 101–122

    Google Scholar 

  • Center for Survey Research (2007) A tale of two suburbs: survey report on jobs, taxes and governance on Long Island and in Northern Virginia. Long Island Index

  • Cerra MF (2007). Forms of Government: everything you’ve always wanted to know, but were afraid to ask. N Jersey Munic 84(3)

  • Dawkins CJ (2005) Tiebout choice and residential segregation by race in US Metropolitan Areas, 1980. Reg Sci Urban Econ 35(6):734–755. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2005.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DOS, NYS (2009) Local government handbook, 6th edn. New York State Department of State, Albany

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowding K, John P (1994) Tiebout: a survey of the empirical literature. Urban Stud. 31(4/5):767–797. https://doi.org/10.1080/00420989420080671

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eberts RW, Gronberg TJ (1981) Jurisdictional homogeneity and the tiebout hypothesis. J Urban Econ 10(2):227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fischel WA (2001) The homevoter hypothesis: how home values influence local government taxation, school finance, and land-use policies. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fischel WA (2009) Making the grade: the economic evolution of American school districts. University of Chicago Press, Chicago Ill.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Hachadoorian L (2016) Homogeneity tests of tiebout sorting: a case study at the interface of city and suburb. Urban Stud 53(5):1000–1021. https://doi.org/10.1177/0042098015571808

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Heikkila EJ (1996) Are municipalities tieboutian clubs? Reg Sci Urban Econ 26(2):203–226

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hilber CAL, Mayer C (2009) Why do households without children support local public schools? Linking house price capitalization to school spending. J Urban Econ 65(1):74–90. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2008.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill RC (1974) Separate and unequal: governmental inequality in the metropolis. Am Political Sci Rev 68(4):1557–1568

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirschman AO (1970) Exit, voice, and loyalty; responses to decline in firms, organizations, and states. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Mass.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jackson KT (1985) Crabgrass frontier: the suburbanization of the United States. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lowery D (1999) Sorting in the fragmented metropolis: updating the social stratification-government inequality debate. Pub Manag Int J Res Theory 1(1):7–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MCDC (2016) Geocorr. Missouri Census Data Center, Jefferson

    Google Scholar 

  • Munley VG (1982) An alternate test of the tiebout hypothesis. Public Choice 38(2):211–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • NCPD, Nassau County Police Department (2023). STRAT-COM. Nassau County Police, NY. https://www.pdcn.org/296/Strat-Com

  • NJSP, New Jersey State Police (2023) Uniform crime reports. New Jersey State Police. https://nj.gov/njsp/ucr/uniform-crime-reports.shtml

  • NYS DCJS, Division of Criminal Justice Services (2022) Index crimes by county and agency: beginning 1990 | State of New York. The Official Website of New York State. https://data.ny.gov/Public-Safety/Index-Crimes-by-County-and-Agency-Beginning-1990/ca8h-8gjq

  • NYPD, New York Police Department. (2023). Historical New York city crime data. New York City Police Department. https://www.nyc.gov/site/nypd/stats/crime-statistics/historical.page

  • Ostrom V, Tiebout CM, Warren R (1961) The organization of government in metropolitan areas: A theoretical inquiry. Am Political Sci Rev 55(4):831–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pack H, Pack JR (1977) Metropolitan fragmentation and suburban homogeneity. Urban Stud 14(2):191–201

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park HG (2021) Income sorting by specialized services: service differentiation by overlapping governments. Soc Sci Q 102(6):2761–2775. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.13078

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reardon, SF, Andrew DH, Shear BR. Fahle EM, Kalogrides D, Jang H, Chavez B (2021) Stanford education data archive.

  • Ross A (1999) The celebration chronicles: life, liberty and the pursuit of property value in Disney’s new town. Ballantine Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Samuelson PA (1954) The pure theory of public expenditure. Rev Econ Stat 36(4):387. https://doi.org/10.2307/1925895

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz AE (2001) Tax and the city. In: Mollenkopf JH, Emerson K (eds) Rethinking the Urban Agenda: reinvigorating the liberal tradition in New York City and Urban America. Century Foundation Press, New York City, pp 63–74

    Google Scholar 

  • Stein RM (1987) Tiebout’s sorting hypothesis. Urban Aff Q 23(1):140–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone SB (2014) A more accurate measure of local public goods: overlapping government combinations as units of analysis. Urban Stud Res 2014:1–8. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/963503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teske P, Schneider M, Mintrom M, Best S (1993) Establishing the micro foundations of a macro theory: information, movers, and the competitive local market for public goods. Am Political Sci Rev 87(3):702–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tiebout CM (1956) A pure theory of local expenditures. J Polit Econ 64(5):416–424

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Woo YL (2004) Income inequality and racial segregation: jurisdictional fragmentation or exclusionary zoning laws? The City University of New York, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Wright K (1994) Punkin duster finds the woodchuck borough: a centennial review of Bergen county borough fever 1894–95. Newsletter of the Bergen County Historical Society, River Edge

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Temple University, Philadelphia, USA

    Lee Hachadoorian

Authors
  1. Lee Hachadoorian
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lee Hachadoorian.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Hachadoorian, L. Jurisdictional homogeneity and coterminous local government borders: a comparison of counties in New Jersey and New York State. Ann Reg Sci (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01252-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-023-01252-z

JEL codes

Search

Navigation