Skip to main content
Log in

An Asymptotic Analysis of Methods for Predicting the Fracture Toughness of Multiaxial Carbon Fiber Composite Laminates Using the Elastic Constants of the 0° Plies

  • Published:
Strength of Materials Aims and scope

Carbon fiber composite laminates are an important alternative to metal in many mechanical structural applications. Carbon fiber composite laminates usually have multidirectional plies with different angles. In this study, a simple analytical model is derived to predict the notch strength of these multidirectional plies from the unidirectional strength of the 0° ply. The first method considers the orthogonal analysis of the forces introduced in each ply at the Cartesian coordinates in each of the 2 axes with their direction, and then calculates the resulting forces. The second method considers the percentage of layers inside the laminates and then orthogonally analyzes the induced forces on the entire laminate sheets. The resulting stress induced by these forces is calculated according to the theory of maximum failure shear or principal stress. In addition, the fracture toughness \({{\text{G}}}_{{\text{IC}}}\) was predicted based on the strength of the unnotched laminates calculated by previous methods. In addition, the size effect of the open-hole specimen was measured based on the predicted fracture toughness and strength of the unnotched laminates. The model was compared with available experimental and other published models. The optimum values for the two methods of fracture toughness were determined. The average percent accuracy of size effect prediction based on the first method is 3.24%, while it is 6.82% for the second method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.
Fig. 6.
Fig. 7.
Fig. 8.
Fig. 9.
Fig. 10.
Fig. 11.
Fig. 12.
Fig. 13.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Y. Mohammed, M. K. Hassan, H. A. El-Ainin, and A. M. Hashem, “Size effect analysis of open-hole glass fiber composite laminate using two-parameter cohesive laws,” Acta Mech, 226, No. (4), 1027–1044 (2015).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. R. Bhattacharyya and D. Adams, “Multiscale analysis of multi-directional composite laminates to predict stiffness and strength in the presence of micro-defects,” JCOMC, 6, 100189 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  3. T. Q. Bui and X. Hu, “A review of phase-field models, fundamentals and their applications to composite laminates,” Eng Fract Mech, 248, 107705 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. T. Bian, Q. Lyu, X. Fan, et al., “Effects of fiber architectures on the impact resistance of composite laminates under low-velocity impact,” Appl Compos Mater, 29, 1125–1145 (2022).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. C. Furtado, A. Arteiro, M. A. Bessa, et al., “Prediction of size effects in open-hole laminates using only the Young’s modulus, the strength, and the R-curve of the 0 ply,” Compos Part A-Appl Sci, 101, 306–317 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. M. Y. Abdellah, “Delamination modeling of double cantilever beam of unidirectional composite laminates,” J Fail Anal Preven, 17, No. 5, 1011–1018 (2017).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. A. Cutolo, A. R. Carotenuto, S. Palumbo, et al., “Stacking sequences in composite laminates through design optimization,” Meccanica, 56, No. (6), 1555–1574 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. F.-L. Guo, P. Huang, Y.-Q. Li, et al., “Multiscale modeling of mechanical behaviors of carbon fiber reinforced epoxy composites subjected to hygrothermal aging,” Compos Struct, 256, 113098 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. C. Soutis, N. Fleck, and P. Smith, “Failure prediction technique for compression loaded carbon fibre-epoxy laminate with open holes,” J Compos Mater, 25, No. 11, 1476–1498 (1991).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. M. K. Hassan, Y. Mohammed, T. M. Salem, and A. M. Hashem, “Prediction of nominal strength of composite structure open hole specimen through cohesive laws,” Int J Mech Mech Eng IJMME-IJENS, 12, 1–9 (2012).

    Google Scholar 

  11. P. Rozylo, “Experimental-numerical study into the stability and failure of compressed thin-walled composite profiles using progressive failure analysis and cohesive zone model,” Compos Struct, 257, 113303 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. S. Tan, “Effective stress fracture models for unnotched and notched multidirectional laminates,” J Compos Mater, 22, No. 4, 322–340 (1988).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Z. P. Bažant and Q. Yu, “Designing against size effect on shear strength of reinforced concrete beams without stirrups: I. Formulation,” J Struct Eng, 131, No. 12, 1877–1885 (2005).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. J. Planas and M. Elices, “Asymptotic analysis of a cohesive crack: 2. Influence of the softening curve,” Int J Fract, 64, No. 3, 221–237 (1993).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Y. Mohammed, M. K. Hassan, H. A. El-Ainin, and A. M. Hashem, “Size effect analysis in laminated composite structure using general bilinear fit,” Int J Nonlinear Sci Numer Simul, 14, Nos. 3–4, 217–224 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. D. Fanteria, L. Lazzeri, E. Panettieri, et al., “Experimental characterization of the interlaminar fracture toughness of a woven and a unidirectional carbon/epoxy composite,” Compos Sci Technol, 142, 20–29 (2017).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. E. Özaslan, M. A. Güler, A. Yetgin, and B. Acar, “Stress analysis and strength prediction of composite laminates with two interacting holes,” Compos Struct, 221, 110869 (2019).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. P. P. Camanho, G. H. Erçin, G. Catalanotti, et al., “A finite fracture mechanics model for the prediction of the open-hole strength of composite laminates,” Compos Part A-Appl Sci, 43, No. 8, 1219–1225 (2012).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. G. H. Erçin, P. P. Camanho, J. Xavier, et al., “Size effects on the tensile and compressive failure of notched composite laminates,” Compos Struct, 96, 736–744 (2013).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Z. P. Bažant, “Size effect,” Int J Solid Struct, 37, Nos. 1–2, 69–80 (2000).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Z. P. Bazant and E.-P. Chen, “Scaling of structural failure,” Appl Mech Rev, 50, No. 10, 593–627 (1997).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. P. Camanho and G. Catalanotti, “On the relation between the mode I fracture toughness of a composite laminate and that of a 0 ply: analytical model and experimental validation,” Eng Fract Mech, 78, No. 13, 2535–2546 (2011).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Y. Mohammed, M. K. Hassan, and A. Hashem, “Analytical model to predict multiaxial laminate fracture toughness from 0 ply fracture toughness,” Polym Eng Sci, 54, No. 1, 234–238 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. M. Y. Abdellah, “Comparative study on prediction of fracture toughness of CFRP laminates from size effect law of open hole specimen using cohesive zone model,” Eng Fract Mech, 191, 277–285 (2018).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. C. Soutis and P. Curtis, “A method for predicting the fracture toughness of CFRP laminates failing by fibre microbuckling,” Compos Part A-Appl Sci, 31(, No. 7, 733–740 (2000).

    Google Scholar 

  26. P. P. Camanho, P. Maimí, and C. Dávila, “Prediction of size effects in notched laminates using continuum damage mechanics,” Compos Sci Technol, 67, No. 13, 2715–2727 (2007).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. S. Jose, R. Ramesh Kumar, M.K. Jana, and G. Venkateswara Rao, “Intralaminar fracture toughness of a cross-ply laminate and its constituent sub-laminates,” Compos Sci Technol, 61, No. 8, 1115–1122 (2001).

  28. K. D. Cowley and P. W. Beaumont, “The interlaminar and intralaminar fracture toughness of carbon-fibre/polymer composites: the effect of temperature,” Compos Sci Technol, 57, No. 11, 1433–1444 (1997).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. A. C. Garg, “Intralaminar and interlaminar fracture in graphite/epoxy laminates,” Eng Fract Mech, 23, No. 4, 719–733 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. M. Y. Abdellah, “An approximate analytical model for modification of size effect law for open-hole composite structure under biaxial load,” P I Mech Eng C-J Mec, 235, No. 18, 3570–3583 (2021).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. P. R. Barnett, S. A. Young, N. J. Patel, and D. Penumadu, “Prediction of strength and modulus of discontinuous carbon fiber composites considering stochastic microstructure,” Compos Sci Technol, 211, 108857 (2021).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. M. Y. Abdellah, M. K. Hassan, A. F. Mohamed, and K. A. Khalil, “A novel and highly effective natural vibration modal analysis to predict nominal strength of open hole glass fiber reinforced polymer composites structure,” Polymers, 13, No. 8, 1251 (2021).

    Google Scholar 

  33. P. P. Camanho and M. Lambert, “A design methodology for mechanically fastened joints in laminated composite materials,” Compos Sci Technol, 66, No. 15, 3004–3020 (2006).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. C. G. Dávila, C. A. Rose, and P. P. Camanho, “A procedure for superposing linear cohesive laws to represent multiple damage mechanisms in the fracture of composites,” Int J Fracture, 158, No. 2, 211–223 (2009).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Z. P. Bažant, “Size effect in blunt fracture: concrete, rock, metal,” J Eng Mech, 110, No. 4, 518–535 (1984).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. G. T. Hahn and A. R. Rosenfield, “Local yielding and extension of a crack under plane stress,” Acta Metall Mater, 13, No. 3, 293–306 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. N. Perez, Crack Tip Plasticity, in: Fracture Mechanics, Springer (2017), pp. 187–225.

  38. B. Esp, Stress Distribution and Strength Prediction of Composite Laminates with Multiple Holes, The University of Texas at Arlington (2007).

  39. V. Birman and G. M. Genin, 1.15 Linear and Nonlinear Elastic Behavior of Multidirectional Laminates, in: P. W. R. Beaumont and C. H. Zweben (Eds.), Comprehensive Composite Materials II, Vol. 1, Academic Press, Oxford (2018), pp. 376–398.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  40. R. Amacher, J. Cugnoni, J. Botsis, et al., “Thin ply composites: experimental characterization and modeling of size-effects,” Compos Sci Technol, 101, 121–132 (2014).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. P. Berbinau and C. Soutis, “A study of 0°-fibre microbuckling in multidirectional composite laminates,” in: Proc. of the Twelfth Int. Conf. on Composite Materials (ICCM-12, Paris, France, July 5–9, 1999), Paper 237 (1999).

  42. S. Biswas and A. Satapathy, “A comparative study on erosion characteristics of red mud filled bamboo–epoxy and glass–epoxy composites,” Mater. Design, 31, No. 4, 1752–1767 (2010).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  43. A. L. Fairchild, D. Rosner, J. Colgrove, et al., “The EXODUS of public health what history can tell us about the future,” Am J Public Health, 100, No. 1, 54–63 (2010).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. C. Furtado, A. Arteiro, G. Catalanotti, et al., “Selective ply-level hybridisation for improved notched response of composite laminates,” Compos Struct, 145, 1–14 (2016).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Y. Abdellah.

Additional information

Translated from Problemy Mitsnosti, No. 5, p. 126, September – October, 2023.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Abdellah, M.Y. An Asymptotic Analysis of Methods for Predicting the Fracture Toughness of Multiaxial Carbon Fiber Composite Laminates Using the Elastic Constants of the 0° Plies. Strength Mater 55, 1030–1046 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00594-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11223-023-00594-5

Keywords

Navigation