Abstract
Purpose
Uterine sarcomas are a rare group of uterine malignancies. Due to the low incidence and changes in uterine sarcoma classification, risk factors are not well characterized. Our objective was to evaluate risk factors for uterine sarcoma and compare risk factors between uterine sarcoma, malignant mixed Mullerian tumors (MMMTs), and type I endometrial carcinomas.
Methods
This nested case–control study utilized linked data from population-based medical birth and cancer registries in Denmark, Finland, Norway, and Sweden. Up to 10 controls were matched on country and birth year for each uterine cancer case. Using multivariable adjusted multinomial logistic regression, estimates of the associations between pregnancy-related factors and risk of uterine sarcoma, MMMTs, and type I endometrial carcinomas were determined.
Results
Having a very-low-birth-weight infant (< 1500 vs. 2500–3999 g: OR [95% CI] 2.83 [1.61–4.96]) was associated with an increased risk of uterine sarcoma. Whereas, having a more recent pregnancy was associated with reduced risks of MMMT (< 10 vs. ≥ 30 years: 0.66 [0.20–2.23]) and type 1 endometrial carcinomas (0.35 [0.30–0.41]) but not uterine sarcomas (1.33 [0.90–1.98], p-heterogeneity < 0.01).
Conclusion
Our study provides evidence that risk factors for uterine sarcoma and MMMT, previously grouped with uterine sarcomas, vary substantially. Additionally, MMMT and type I endometrial carcinomas are more similar than uterine sarcoma in that pregnancy complications like gestational hypertension and preeclampsia were associated with reduced risks of both but not uterine sarcoma, suggesting different etiologies.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets analyzed as part of the current study are not publicly available due to national regulations.
References
D’Angelo E, Prat J (2010) Uterine sarcomas: a review. Gynecol Oncol 116(1):131–139. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.09.023
Prat J (2009) FIGO staging for uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynecol Obstet 104(3):177–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.12.008
Sherman ME, Devesa SS (2003) Analysis of racial differences in incidence, survival, and mortality for malignant tumors of the uterine corpus. Cancer 98(1):176–186. https://doi.org/10.1002/cncr.11484
Clarke MA, Devesa SS, Hammer A, Wentzensen N (2022) Racial and ethnic differences in hysterectomy-corrected uterine corpus cancer mortality by Stage and histologic subtype. JAMA Oncol 8(6):895–903. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaoncol.2022.0009
Harlow BL, Weiss NS, Lofton S (1986) The epidemiology of sarcomas of the uterus. J Natl Cancer Inst 76(3):399–402
Felix AS, Cook LS, Gaudet MM et al (2013) The etiology of uterine sarcomas: a pooled analysis of the epidemiology of endometrial cancer consortium. Br J Cancer 108(3):727–734. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.2
Schwartz SM, Thomas DB (1989) A case—control study of risk factors for sarcomas of the uterus: the World Health Organization Collaborative study of neoplasia and steroid contraceptives. Cancer 64(12):2487–2492.
Prat J (2015) Mbatani ’nomonde. uterine sarcomas. Int J Gynecol Obstet 131:S105–S110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijgo.2015.06.006
McCluggage WG (2002) Uterine carcinosarcomas (malignant mixed mullerian tumors) are metaplastic carcinomas. Int J Gynecol Cancer 12(6):687–690. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1525-1438.2002.01151.x
Benson C, Miah AB (2017) Uterine sarcoma–current perspectives. Int J Womens Health 9:597–606. https://doi.org/10.2147/IJWH.S117754
Schwartz SM, Weiss NS (1990) Marital status and the incidence of sarcomas of the uterus. Cancer Res 50(6):1886–1889
Lavie O, Barnett-Griness O, Narod Sa, Rennert G (2008) The risk of developing uterine sarcoma after tamoxifen use. Int J Gynecol Cancer 18(2):352–356. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1438.2007.01025.x
Jaakkola S, Lyytinen HK, Pukkala E, Ylikorkala O (2011) Use of estradiol–progestin therapy associates with increased risk for uterine sarcomas. Gynecol Oncol 122(2):260–263. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ygyno.2011.04.003
Kvåle G, Heuch I, Ursin G (1988) Reproductive factors and risk of cancer of the uterine corpus: a prospective study. Cancer Res 48(21):6217–6221
Laugesen K, Ludvigsson JF, Schmidt M et al (2021) Nordic health registry-based research: a review of health care systems and key registries. Clin Epidemiol 13:533–555. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S314959
Troisi R, Gulbech Ording A, Grotmol T et al (2018) Pregnancy complications and subsequent breast cancer risk in the mother: a nordic population-based case–control study. Int J Cancer 143(8):1904–1913. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31600
Bjørge T, Gissler M, Ording AG et al (2016) Reproductive history and risk of colorectal adenocarcinoma in parous women: a nordic population-based case–control study. Br J Cancer 115(11):1416–1420. https://doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2016.315
Troisi R, Bjørge T, Gissler M et al (2018) The role of pregnancy, perinatal factors and hormones in maternal cancer risk: a review of the evidence. J Intern Med 283(5):430–445. https://doi.org/10.1111/joim.12747
Sköld C, Bjørge T, Ekbom A et al (2018) Preterm delivery is associated with an increased risk of epithelial ovarian cancer among parous women. Int J Cancer 143(8):1858–1867. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.31581
Trabert B, Troisi R, Grotmol T et al (2020) Associations of pregnancy-related factors and birth characteristics with risk of endometrial cancer: a nordic population-based case–control study. Int J Cancer 146(6):1523–1531. https://doi.org/10.1002/ijc.32494
Barlow L, Westergren K, Holmberg L, Talbäck M (2009) The completeness of the Swedish cancer register–a sample survey for year 1998. Acta Oncol 48(1):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1080/02841860802247664
Gjerstorff ML (2011) The danish cancer registry. Scand J Public Health 39(7suppl):42–45. https://doi.org/10.1177/1403494810393562
Larsen IK, Småstuen M, Johannesen TB et al (2009) Data quality at the cancer registry of Norway: an overview of comparability, completeness, validity and timeliness. Eur J Cancer 45(7):1218–1231. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.037
Leinonen MK, Miettinen J, Heikkinen S, Pitkäniemi J, Malila N (2017) Quality measures of the population-based Finnish Cancer Registry indicate sound data quality for solid malignant tumours. Eur J Cancer 77:31–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.017
Schmidt M, Schmidt SAJ, Sandegaard JL, Ehrenstein V, Pedersen L, Sørensen HT (2015) The Danish National Patient Registry: a review of content, data quality, and research potential. Clin Epidemiol 7:449–490. https://doi.org/10.2147/CLEP.S91125
Hong K, Kim SH, Cha DH, Park HJ (2021) Defective uteroplacental vascular remodeling in preeclampsia: key molecular factors leading to long term cardiovascular disease. Int J Mol Sci 22(20):11202. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms222011202
Funding
This work was supported by the following: Nordic Cancer Union; Program for Clinical Research Infrastructure (PROCRIN) established by the Lundbeck Foundation and the Novo Nordisk Foundation; Danish Cancer Society; Swedish Cancer Society (CAN 2016/440); and the intramural research program of the U.S. National Cancer Institute, National Institutes of Health, Department of Health and Human Services. Dr. Trabert received support from the Huntsman Cancer Institute/Huntsman Cancer Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
The first draft of the manuscript was written by JA. All authors contributed to study conceptualization, editing, revising, and critical review of the analytic results. Data curation was led by TB and TG. Material preparation and analyses were performed by BT. BT takes responsibility for the content of the manuscript. RT, TG, AE, AE, MG, IG, LMH, AGO, HTS, ST, TB, and BT participated in the working group that developed numerous projects to evaluate pregnancy factors and female cancer risk in the Nordic countries database. All authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript and read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interest
The authors declare no competing interests.
Ethical approval
We obtained approval for this study from Ethics Committees in Norway and Sweden, from the Data Protection Agency in Denmark, and from the Finnish Institute for Health and Welfare in Finland after consulting its Data Protection Authority.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abril, J., Trabert, B., Troisi, R. et al. Associations between pregnancy-related factors and birth characteristics with risk of rare uterine cancer subtypes: a Nordic population-based case–control study. Cancer Causes Control 35, 741–747 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01832-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01832-6