Skip to main content
Log in

Cytokinin biosynthesis in Hexapoda and Insecta: a bioinformatic analysis

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Arthropod-Plant Interactions Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Cytokinins (CKs) are widespread in a variety of organisms from bacteria to humans, and are particularly abundant in insects and hexapods. However, how organisms other than bacteria and plants obtain CKs has not been thoroughly studied. We examined the transcriptomes of 670 species of Hexapoda (predominantly Insecta) to determine if transcripts that encode proteins homologous to any of the known enzymes involved in CK biosynthesis and metabolism are widespread in these groups (occur in > 80% of species). We found that transcripts encoding proteins homologous to the enzymes tRNA-dimethylallyltransferase (EC: 2.5.1.75) and tRNA-2-methylthio-N6-dimethylallyladenosine synthase (EC: 2.8.4.3) are widespread in insects and hexapods. These enzymes could allow insects and hexapods to synthesize iP-based CKs and methylthiolated iP-based CKs via a tRNA-degradation pathway whereby tRNA is first prenylated and possibly methylthiolated prior to releasing CKs or methylthiolated CKs upon degradation. We also found widespread occurrence in insects and hexapods of transcripts encoding proteins that are homologous to five enzymes in the adenine salvage pathway: 5’- nucleotidase (EC: 3.1.3.5), adenosine kinase (EC:2.7.1.20), purine-nucleoside phosphorylase (EC: 2.4.2.1), purine nucleosidase (EC: 3.2.2.1), and adenine phosphoribosyltransferase (EC: 2.4.2.7). These enzymes could allow insects and hexapods to convert CK nucleotides to nucleosides and free base CKs. We found few transcripts encoding proteins homologous to enzymes that would convert CKs to storage forms such as their O-glucosides and no transcripts encoding proteins homologous to enzymes that would degrade CKs such as CK oxidases. We suggest that insects and hexapods have the enzymatic pathways necessary to synthesize and metabolize CKs, in contrast to the presumption that CKs are merely obtained via consumption and sequestration from plants or via microbial symbiosis.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

All data used in this paper were obtained from publically accessible data bases. The specific list of transcriptomes used from NCBI is provided in the supplemental tables. The list of exemplar enzymes and their NCBI protein ID numbers are given in the supplemental tables. The list of NCBI annotated genomes used in this paper are also provided in the supplemental tables.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We would like to thank Dr. José R. de la Torre for his guidance and computational assistance throughout this research. We also thank Tomáš Furmánek and Daniel Johnson from the SFSU Department of Academic Technology for their timely configuration and maintenance of our virtual server to support our computation. We also thank Natalie Fiutek, Stephannie Seng, and Joshua Natahusada for their support and encouragement during this period of pandemic impacted research. We thank two anonymous reviewers who made thoughtful and extensive suggestions on an earlier version of this manuscript which lead to substantial improvements to this paper.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Material preparation, data collection and analysis were performed by NM and EFC. The first draft of the manuscript was written by NM and EFC and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Edward F. Connor.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Handling Editor: Heikki Hokkanen.

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mooi, N., Roy, S.W. & Connor, E.F. Cytokinin biosynthesis in Hexapoda and Insecta: a bioinformatic analysis. Arthropod-Plant Interactions 18, 1–14 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-10022-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11829-023-10022-9

Keywords

Navigation