Skip to main content
Log in

Comparative Analysis of The Results of Studying Fabrics of Knidian Amphorae by Various Natural-Scientific Methods

  • METHODS OF NATURAL SCIENCES IN THE STUDY OF CULTURAL HERITAGE OBJECTS
  • Published:
Nanobiotechnology Reports Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A comparison of the results of analyzing the main and trace elemental compositions of clays used for Knidian amphorae (using seven samples as an example) is presented; the elemental composition is studied by scanning electron microscopy with energy-dispersive X-ray analysis and inductively coupled plasma-mass spectrometry. Data are also obtained by the mineralogical and petrographic investigation of the same samples. In general, studies conducted using two different methods show similar results. The elemental analysis reveals differences in the content of individual elements (Sr, Nd, Th, Cu, and Y) in samples 55, 90, and 168. According to the petrographic study, features in the composition of artificial additives used as a thinning agent are also recorded in samples 55 and 90. The noted differences in the number of some elements in sample 166 are not recorded during the study of the petrographic thin section.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 3.
Fig. 4.

Notes

  1. Detailed results of the study are currently being prepared for publication.

REFERENCES

  1. S. Yu. Monakhov, Greek Amphorae in the Black Sea Region: Typology of Amphorae from Leading Centers Exporting Goods in Ceramic Containers (Kimmerida, Moscow; Izd. Saratov Univ., 2003) [in Russian].

  2. S. Yu. Monakhov and E. V. Kuznetsova, Stratum Plus, No. 6, 183 (2021). https://doi.org/10.55086/sp216183205

  3. V. A. Mandrykina, V. B. Kvartalov, E. V. Kuznetsova, et al., Nanobiotechnol. Rep. 16, 684–703 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S1992722321050174

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. V. A. Mandrykina, V. B. Kvartalov, and E. V. Kuznetsova, Nanobiotechnol. Rep. 16, 684 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167621050177

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. P. S. Quinn, Thin Section Petrography, Geochemistry and Scanning Electron Microscopy of Archaeological Ceramics (Archaeopress, Oxford, 2022).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. J.-Y. Empereur and M. Picon, Recherches sur les amphores grecques. Actes du Colloque international organise pa le Centre national de la recherché scientifique, l’Université de Rennes II et l’École française d’Athènes, Ed. by J.‑Y. Empereur and Y. Garlan (Paris, 1984), p. 109. https://doi.org/10.3406/bch.1986.4761

  7. J.-Y. Empereur, Producteurs d’amphores dans les Ateliers de Reșadiye (peninsule de Datça) (Araștirma Sonuçları Toplantısı, Ankara, 1988).

    Google Scholar 

  8. N. V. Efremov, “Black Sea Region in Ancient and Early Medieval Times,” in Collection of Scientific Works Dedicated to the 70th anniversary of Professor V. P. Kopylov, Ed. by A. N. Kovalenko (Arkheol. Obshch. “Nasledie,” Rostov-on-Don, 2018) [in Russian].

Download references

Funding

This work was financially supported by the Russian Science Foundation (project no. 22-28-00375, https://rscf.ru/project/22-28-00375/).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to E. V. Kuznetsova.

Ethics declarations

The authors of this work declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

Additional information

Translated by N. Saetova

Publisher’s Note.

Pleiades Publishing remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kuznetsova, E.V., Shelepov, D.A. & Andrushkevich, S.O. Comparative Analysis of The Results of Studying Fabrics of Knidian Amphorae by Various Natural-Scientific Methods. Nanotechnol Russia 18, 734–741 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167623600281

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1134/S2635167623600281

Navigation