Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic analysis of piezolaminated shell structures reinforced with agglomerated carbon nanotubes using an enhanced solid-shell element

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Engineering with Computers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This work introduces a linear dynamic analysis of composite smart solid-shell structures reinforced with agglomerated Carbone Nanotubes and embedded at external faces with piezolayers. The coupled electro-mechanical governing equation of solid-shell structures under dynamic loads is obtained by the estimation of the displacement field with the First-Order Shear Deformation Theory (FSDT). In this proposed model, the shear and thickness locking were solved by the use of the Assumed Natural Strain (ANS) method as well as the Enhanced Assumed Strain (EAS) method is adopted for enhancing of the membrane and transversal strains. Each element of the structure is modeled by an eight-node hexahedron with four degrees of freedom: three displacements and an electrical potential. The middle part of the structure is made of a composite reinforced with agglomerated Carbone Nanotubes (CNTs) along the thickness. Different agglomeration schemes are investigated by means of a two-parameter agglomeration model. The external faces of the shell structure are made with piezoelectric material which accentuates the smart aspect of such structures. The mechanical properties of such a reinforced composite are evaluated using Mori–Tanaka (EMT)’s technique. An enhanced finite-element solid-shell model is implemented to investigate the effects of nanotubes agglomeration on the transient response of solid shells, such as the impact of various configurations of agglomerations, the volume fraction of CNTs, and some geometrical parameters of solid-shell structures. From deduced numerical results, it is exposed that the reinforcing fibers with different agglomeration schemes retain a significant impact on the dynamic performances of the solid-shell structure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Odegard GM, Gates TS, Wise KE, Park C, Siochi EJ (2003) Constitutive modeling of nanotube–reinforced polymer composites. Compos Sci Technol 63(11):1671–1687

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Liew KM, Pan Z, Zhang LW (2020) The recent progress of functionally graded CNT reinforced composites and structures. Science China Physics, Mechanics & Astronomy 63(3):1–17

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Wang JF, Yang JP, Tam LH, Zhang W (2022) Effect of CNT volume fractions on nonlinear vibrations of PMMA/CNT composite plates: a multiscale simulation. Thin-Walled Structures 170:108513

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Garg A, Chalak HD, Zenkour AM, Belarbi MO, Sahoo R (2022) Bending and free vibration analysis of symmetric and unsymmetric functionally graded CNT reinforced sandwich beams containing softcore. Thin-Walled Structures 170:108626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Mallek H, Jrad H, Algahtani A, Wali M, Dammak F (2019) Geometrically non-linear analysis of FG-CNTRC shell structures with surface-bonded piezoelectric layers. Comput Methods Appl Mech Eng 347:679–699

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  6. Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Kessentini A, Gamaoun F, Dammak F (2020) Dynamic analysis of FG-CNT reinforced shell structures with piezoelectric layers under dynamic loads. J Vib Control 26:13–14

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mallek H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2021) Nonlinear dynamic analysis of piezoelectric-bonded FG-CNTR composite structures using an improved FSDT theory. Eng Comput 37:1389–1407

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Mellouli H, Jrad H, Wali M, Dammak F (2020) Free vibration analysis of FG-CNTRC shell structures using the meshfree radial point interpolation method. Comput Math Appl 79(11):3160–3178

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  9. Song ZG, Zhang LW, Liew KM (2016) Active vibration control of CNT reinforced functionally graded plates based on a higher-order shear deformation theory. Int J Mech Sci 105:90–101

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Mellouli H, Mallek H, Wali M, Dammak F, Gamaoun F, Abdurrahman A (2022) An extensible double director 3D shell formulation for FGM-CNTRC shell bending analysis. Eng Anal Boundary Elem 145:258–270

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  11. Shachar-Michaely G, Pinsk N, Cullari LL, Nadiv R, Regev O (2021) Mixed dimensionality: highly robust and multifunctional carbon-based composites. Carbon 176:339–348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Zhan H, Chen YW, Shi QQ, Zhang Y, Mo RW, Wang JN (2022) Highly aligned and densified carbon nanotube films with superior thermal conductivity and mechanical strength. Carbon 186:205–214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dabbagh A, Rastgoo A, Ebrahimi F (2021) Static stability analysis of agglomerated multi-scale hybrid nanocomposites via a refined theory. Engineering with Computers 37:2225–2244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Maurya MC, Jawaid SM, Chakrabarti A (2023) Flexural behaviour of nanocomposite plate with CNT distribution and agglomeration effect. Mech Adv Compos Struct 10(1):123–136

    Google Scholar 

  15. Mallek H, Mellouli H, Ben Said L, Wali M, Dammak F, Boujelbene M (2023) Bending and free vibration analyses of CNTRC shell structures considering agglomeration effects with through-the-thickness stretch. Thin-Walled Structures 191:111036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Tornabene F, Fantuzzi N, Bacciocchi M (2017) Linear static response of nanocomposite plates and shells reinforced by agglomerated carbon nanotubes. Compos B Eng 115:449–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Hedayati H, Sobhani Aragh B (2012) Influence of graded agglomerated CNTs on vibration of CNT-reinforced annular sectorial plates resting on Pasternak foundation. Appl Math Comput 218(17):8715–8735

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  18. Cao Q, Rogers JA (2008) Random networks and aligned arrays of single-walled carbon nanotubes for electronic device applications. Nano Res 1:259–272

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Zhu P, Lei ZX, Liew KM (2012) Static and free vibration analyses of carbon nanotube-reinforced composite plates using finite element method with first-order shear deformation plate theory. Compos Struct 94(4):1450–1460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Shen HS (2013) Thermal buckling and post-buckling of functionally graded fiber-reinforced composite laminated plates. J Compos Mater 47(22):2783–2795

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Yas MH, Heshmati M (2012) Dynamic analysis of functionally graded nanocomposite beams reinforced by randomly oriented carbon nanotube under the action of moving load. Appl Math Model 36(4):1371–1394

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Punera D (2021) The effect of agglomeration and slightly weakened cnt–matrix interface on free vibration response of cylindrical nanocomposites. Acta Mech 232(6):2455–2477

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  23. Chu K, Wu Q, Jia C, Liang X, Nie J, Tian W, Gai G, Guo H (2010) Fabrication and effective thermal conductivity of multi-walled carbon nanotubes reinforced cumatrix composites for heat sink applications. Compos Sci Technol 70(2):298–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Patti A, Russo P, Acierno D, Acierno S (2016) The effect of filler functionalization on dispersion and thermal conductivity of polypropylene/multi wall carbon nanotubes composites. Compos B Eng 94:350–359

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Shi Y, Li J, Tan Y, Chen Y, Wang M (2019) Percolation behavior of electromagnetic interference shielding in polymer/multi-walled carbon nanotube nanocomposites. Compos Sci Technol 170:70–76

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Shi DL, Feng XQ, Huang YY, Hwang KC, Gao H (2004) The effect of nanotube waviness and agglomeration on the elastic property of carbon nanotube-reinforced composites. J Eng Mater Technol 126(3):250–257

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kamarian S, Salim M, Dimitri R, Tornabene F (2016) Free vibration analysis of conical shells reinforced with agglomerated carbon nanotubes. Int J Mech Sci 108–109:157–165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Mallek H, Mellouli H, Said LB, Wali M, Dammak F, Boujelbene M (2023) Bending and free vibration analyses of CNTRC shell structures considering agglomeration effects with through-the-thickness stretch. Thin-Walled Structures 191:111036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Milić P, Marinković D, Klinge S, Ćojbašić Ž (2023) Reissner-Mindlin based isogeometric finite element formulation for piezoelectric active laminated shells. Tehnički vjesnik 30(2):416–425

    Google Scholar 

  30. Milić P, Marinković D, Ćojbašić Ž (2023) Geometrically nonlinear analysis of piezoelectric active laminated shells by means of isogeometric fe formulation. Facta Univ Series: Mech Eng. https://doi.org/10.22190/FUME050123059M

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Cook-Chennault KA, Thambi N, Sastry AM (2008) Powering MEMS portable devices—a review of non-regenerative and regenerative power supply systems with special emphasis on piezoelectric energy harvesting systems. Smart Mater Struct 17:043001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Marinković D, Rama G (2017) Co-rotational shell element for numerical analysis of laminated piezoelectric composite structures. Compos B Eng 125:144–156

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Rama G (2017) A 3-node piezoelectric shell element for linear and geometrically nonlinear dynamic analysis of smart structures. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 15:31–44

    Google Scholar 

  34. Rama G, Marinković D, Zehn M (2018) Efficient three-node finite shell element for linear and geometrically nonlinear analyses of piezoelectric laminated structures. J Intell Mater Syst Struct 29:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Marinković D, Rama G, Zehn M (2019) Abaqus implementation of a corotational piezoelectric 3-node shell element with drilling degree of freedom. Facta Univ Ser Mech Eng 17:269–283

    Google Scholar 

  36. Tuloup C, Harizi W, Aboura Z, Meyer Y, Khellil K, Lachat R (2019) On the use of in-situ piezoelectric sensors for the manufacturing and structural health monitoring of polymer-matrix composites: a literature review. Compos Struct 215:127–149

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Park G, Cudney H, Inman D (2000) Impedance-based health monitoring of civil structural components. J Infrastruct Syst 6:153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Duan WH, Wang Q, Quek ST (2010) Applications of piezoelectric materials in structural health monitoring and repair: selected research examples. Materials 3:5169–5194

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. An YK, Kim MK, Sohn H (2014) Piezoelectric transducers for assessing and monitoring civil infrastructures. Sens Technol Civil Infrastruct 1:86–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zhang X, Lu J, Shen Y (2003) Active noise control of flexible linkage mechanism with piezoelectric actuators. Comput Struct 81:2045–2051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Hasheminejad SM, Rajabi M (2008) Scattering and active acoustic control from a submerged piezoelectric-coupled orthotropic hollow cylinder. J Sound Vib 318:50–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Wixom AS, Anderson MJ, Bahr DF, Morris DJ (2012) A new acoustic transducer with a pressure-deformed piezoelectric diaphragm. Sens Actuators A Phys 179:204–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Kpeky F, Abed-Meraim F, Boudaoud H, Daya EM (2018) Linear and quadratic solid–shell finite elements SHB8PSE and SHB20E for the modeling of piezoelectric sandwich structures. Mech Adv Mater Struct 25(7):559–578

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Zouari W, Ayad R, Zineb TB, Benjeddou A (2012) A piezoelectric 3D hexahedral curvilinear finite element based on the space fiber rotation concept. Int J Numer Meth Eng 90(1):87–115

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  45. Klinkel S, Wagner W (2006) A geometrically non-linear piezoelectric solid shell element based on a mixed multi-field variational formulation. Int J Numer Meth Eng 65:349–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Klinkel S, Wagner W (2008) A piezoelectric solid shell element based on a mixed variational formulation for geometrically linear and nonlinear applications. Comput Struct 86(1–2):38–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  47. Yao L, Sze KY (2009) A hybrid-stress solid-shell element for non-linear analysis of piezoelectric structures. Sci China Ser E: Technol Sci 52(3):575–583

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Kulikov GM, Plotnikova SV (2015) The use of 9-parameter shell theory for development of exact geometry 12-node quadrilateral piezoelectric laminated solid-shell elements. Mech Adv Mater Struct 22(6):490–502

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Simo JC, Rifai MS (1990) A class of mixed assumed strain methods and the method of incompatible modes. Int J Numer Meth Eng 29:1595–1638

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  50. Hajlaoui A, Triki E, Frikha A, Wali M, Dammak F (2017) Nonlinear dynamics analysis of FGM shell structures with a higher order shear strain enhanced solid-shell element. Latin American Journal of Solids and Structures 14:72–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  51. Zhang SQ, Schmidt R (2014) Static and dynamic FE analysis of piezoelectric integrated thin-walled composite structures with large rotations. Compos Struct 112:345–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  52. Barai P, Weng GJ (2011) A theory of plasticity for carbon nanotube reinforced composites. Int J Plast 27(4):539–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been funded by Scientific Research Deanship at University of Ha’il–Saudi Arabia through project number RG-23 095.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to H. Mellouli.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that there is no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Mellouli, H., Mallek, H., Louhichi, R. et al. Dynamic analysis of piezolaminated shell structures reinforced with agglomerated carbon nanotubes using an enhanced solid-shell element. Engineering with Computers (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01923-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00366-023-01923-7

Keywords

Navigation