Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Could agroforestry restore ecosystem services in arid lands? An analysis through the weight of the evidence approach

  • Published:
Agroforestry Systems Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Degradation is limiting the ability of arid lands to provide ecosystem services. Agroforestry Systems can supply several of these ecosystem services. In this context, we carried out a systematic review of literature, to find the ecosystem services provided by Agroforestry Systems in arid lands irrigated by rainwater harvesting systems in worldwide. The ecosystem services most mentioned (soil quality, productivity increase, carbon sequestration, biodiversity conservation, cultural values, water regulation and purification, and pollination), that were provided by the four Agroforestry Systems (protein banks, intercropping, windbreaks and homegardens) were used to apply the Weight of Evidence Approach. The regions where Agroforestry Systems practices were carried out, the species most used and their multipurpose were also evaluated. Most of the experiences were documented in Africa (42%) and Asia (37%). We registered 82 species, being the Fabaceae and Chenopodiaceae families were the most used. These species (49% shrubs) were mainly integrated in Agroforestry Systems by homegardens (43%), intercropping (40%), and windbreaks (23%). The most evaluated species uses were medicine (58%), food (28%), and forage (27%). We found several positive evidence of Agroforestry Systems in all ecosystem services evaluated. We also found some evidence that Agroforestry Systems can cause drawbacks such as salinization, or species invasion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Atangana A, Khasa D, Chang S, Degrande A (2014) Definitions and classification of agroforestry systems. In: Atangana A, Khasa D, Chang S, Degrande (eds) Tropical agroforestry. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 35–47

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Azfaw Z (2002) Homegardens in ethiopia: some observations and generalizations. In: Watson, JW (ed). Homegardens and in situ conservation of plant genetic resources in farming systems: proceedings of the second international home gardens. Witzenhausen, Federal Republic of Germany, Bioversity International, pp 17–19

  • Bayala J, Sanou J, Teklehaimanot Z, Kalinganire A, Ouédraogo SJ (2014) Parklands for buffering climate risk and sustaining agricultural production in the Sahel of West Africa. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 6:28–34. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2013.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benjamin EO, Sauer J (2018) The cost effectiveness of payments for ecosystem services-smallholders and agroforestry in Africa. Land Use Policy 71:293–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2017.12.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bhattacharya SC (2015) Wood energy in India: status and prospects. Energy 85:310–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ceccon E (ed) (2013) Restauración en bosques tropicales: fundamentos ecológicos, prácticos y sociales. Ediciones Díaz de Santos, pp 165–168

  • Ceccon E (2020) Productive restoration as a tool for socioecological landscape conservation: the case of “La Montaña” in Guerrero, Mexico. In: Baldauf C (ed) Participatory biodiversity conservation—concepts, experiences and perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 113–128. ISBN 978-3-030-41685-0

  • Dagar JC, Gupta SR (2020) Agroforestry interventions for rehabilitating salt-affected and waterlogged marginal landscapes. In: Dagar JC, Gupta SR, Teketay D (eds) Agroforestry for degraded landscapes. Springer, Singapore, pp 111–162. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-6807-7_5

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Dagar JC, Tewari JC (eds) (2016) Agroforestry research developments. Nova Science Publishers, New York, USA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dalsgaard B (2020) Land-use and climate impacts on plant–pollinator interactions and pollination services. Diversity 12:168. https://doi.org/10.3390/d12050168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Oliveira RE, Carvalhaes MA (2016) Agroforestry as a tool for restoration in Atlantic forest: can we find multi-purpose species? Oecol Aust 20(4)

  • Derib SD, Assefa T, Berhanu B, Zeleke G (2009) Impacts of micro-basin water harvesting structures in improving vegetative cover in degraded hillslope areas of north-east Ethiopia. Rangel J 31(2):259–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Droppelmann KJ, Ephrath JE, Berliner PR (2000) Tree/crop complementarity in an arid zone runoff agroforestry system in northern Kenya. Agroforest Syst 50(1):1–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ECLAC (Economic Commission for Latin America and the Caribbean) (2016) South America Social and Economic Panorama. United Nations, Santiago, Chile, pp 7–67

  • FAO (2015) Global guidelines for the restoration of degraded forests and landscapes in drylands: building resilience and benefiting livelihoods. Rome, Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations

  • Genda S, Kuppusamy V, Rathod TR (1999) Effect of intercropping on the growth of multipurpose trees and the associated crop in Indian desert. Range Manag Agrofor 20(1):26–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Guevara JC, Colomer JS, Estevez OR, Paez JA (2003) Simulation of the economic feasibility of fodder shrub plantations as a supplement for goat production in the north-eastern plain of Mendoza, Argentina. J Arid Environ 53:85–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gul B, Ansari R, Ali H, Adnan MY, Weber DJ, Nielsen BL, Khan MA (2014) The sustainable utilization of saline resources for livestock feed production in arid and semi-arid regions: a model from Pakistan. Emir J Food Agric 1032–1045

  • Karlin MS, Zapata RM, Coirini RO (2021) Soil organic carbon and dead biomass pools in woodlands from Monte region (Argentina). Bosque 42:67–79. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0717-92002021000100067

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaushik N, Arya S, Yadav PK, Bhardwaj KK, Gaur KK (2020) Khejri (Prosopis cineraria L. Druce) based agroforestry systems in the arid and semi-arid region: supporting ecosystem services. Indian J Agrofor 23

  • Kelt DA, Meserve PL (2016) To what extent can and should revegetation serve as restoration? Restor Ecol 24:441–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krishnamurthy L, Krishnamurthy PK, Rajagopal I, Peralta Solares A (2019) Can agroforestry systems thrive in the drylands? Characteristics of successful agroforestry systems in the arid and semi-arid regions of Latin America. Agroforest Syst 93:503–513. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-017-0143-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kubkomawa HI, Kenneth–Chukwu AM, Krumah JL, Yerima IN, Audu Z, Nafarnda WD (2019) Fodder bank establishment and management for dry season maintenance of small-scale livestock industry: a review. Nigerian J Anim Prod 46(4):211–221

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar V (2016) Multifunctional agroforestry systems in tropics region. Nat Environ Pollution Technol 15:365

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Kumar P, Mishra AK, Chaudhari SK, Basak N, Rai P, Singh K, Sharma DK (2018) Carbon pools and nutrient dynamics under Eucalyptus-based agroforestry system in semi-arid region of north-west India. J Indian Soc Soil Sci 66:188–199. https://doi.org/10.5958/0974-0228.2018.00024.5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lehmann J, Weigl D, Droppelmann K, Huwe B, Zech W (1999) Nutrient cycling in an agroforestry system with runoff irrigation in Northern Kenya. Agroforest Syst 43:49–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li Q, Jia Z, Feng L, He L, Yang K (2018) Dynamics of biomass and carbon sequestration across a chronosequence of Caragana Intermedia plantations on alpine sandy land. Sci Rep 8:1–9. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-30595-3

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Linkov I, Welle P, Loney D, Tkachuk A, Canis L, Kim JB, Bridges T (2011) Use of multicriteria decision analysis to support weight of evidence evaluation. Risk Anal Int J 31:1211–1225. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.2011.01585.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • MAZSS (Manual de Agroforestería para Zonas Secas y Semiáridas) (2009) Ministerio De Ambiente Y Recursos Naturales. Guatemala/Mecanismo Mundial de la UNCCD

  • Middendorp RS, Vanacker V, Lambin EF (2018) Impacts of shaded agroforestry management on carbon sequestration, biodiversity and farmers income in cocoa production landscapes. Landsc Ecol 33:1953–1974. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10980-018-0714-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005) Ecosystems and human well-being: synthesis about desertification. Island Press, Washington

    Google Scholar 

  • Mirhasani M, Rostami N, Bazgir M, Tavakoli M (2019) Living windbreak design for wind erosion control in arid regions: a case study in Dehloran, Iran. Desert 24(1):33–42

    Google Scholar 

  • Mudabber M, Oweis T, Suifan M, Shawahneh N, Sattar Y, Ziadat F, Bruggeman A, Karrou M (2011) Effect of water harvesting techniques on water productivity and spill erosion. In: Karrou M, Oweis T, Ziadat F, Awawdeh F (eds) Rehabilitation and integrated management of dry rangelands environments with water harvesting. Community-based optimization of the management of scarce water resources. ICARDA, Alepo, Syria, pp 29–53

    Google Scholar 

  • Naseef TA, Thomas R (2016) Identification of suitable sites for water harvesting structures in Kecheri River basin. Procedia Technol 24:7–14. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.protcy.2016.05.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norfolk O, Gilbert F (2014) Insect visitation rates to wildflowers increase in the presence of arid agriculture in South Sinai, Egypt. J Arid Environ 109:83–87

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Panigrahi S (2020) Exotic tree species in India: problems and prospects. Int J Bot Stud 5:417–421

    Google Scholar 

  • Pérez D, Farinaccio F, Aronson J (2019) Towards a dryland framework species approach. Research in progress in the Monte Austral of Argentina. J Arid Environ 61:1–10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2018.09.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pérez D, Pilustrelli C, Farinaccio F, Sabino G, Aronson J (2020) Evaluating success of various restorative interventions through drone- and field‐collected data, using six putative framework species in Argentinian Patagonia. Restor Ecol 28:A44–A53. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.13025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pouliot M, Bayala J, Raebild A (2011) Testing the shade tolerance of select crops under Parkia bigolosa (Jacq.) Benth. in an agroforestry parkland in Burkina Faso, West Africa. Agrofor Syst 85:477–488. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-011-9411-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyes-Garcia V, Fernández-Llamazares A, Mc Elwee P, Molnár Z, Öllerer K, Wilson SJ, Brondizio E (2019) The contributions of Indigenous peoples and local communities to ecological restoration. Restor Ecol 27:3–8. https://doi.org/10.1111/rec.12894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reynolds JF, Maestre FT, Kemp PR, Stafford-Smith DM, Lambin E (2007) Natural and human dimensions of land degradation in drylands: causes and consequences. Terrestrial ecosystems in a changing world. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, Berlin, Heidelberg, pp 247–257

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Sabino W, Costa L, Andrade T, Teixeira J, Araújo G, Acosta AL, Giannini TC (2022) Status and trends of pollination services in Amazon agroforestry systems. Agric Ecosyst Environ 335:108012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Safriel U, Adeel Z, Niemeijer D, Puigdefabregas J, White R, Lal R, Winslow M, Prince J, Archer E, King E et al (2005) Dryland systems. In: Hassan R, Scholes R, Ash N (ed) Ecosystems and human well-being: current state and trends: findings of the condition and trends working group, Island Press, pp 623–662

  • Santoro A, Venturi M, Ben Maachia S, Benyahia F, Corrieri F, Piras F, Agnoletti M (2020) Agroforestry heritage systems as agrobiodiversity hotspots. The case of the mountain oases of Tunisia. Sustainability 12(10):4054

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shackleton SE, Shackleton RT (2018) Local knowledge regarding ecosystem services and disservices from invasive alien plants in the arid Kalahari, South Africa. J Arid Environ 159:22–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2017.07.001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sharma R, Mina U, Kumar BM (2022) Homegarden agroforestry systems in achievement of sustainable development goals. A review. Agron Sustain Dev 42(3):44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Shi L, Feng W, Xu J, Kuzyakov Y (2018) Agroforestry systems: Meta-analysis of soil carbon stocks, sequestration processes, and future potentials. Land Degrad Dev 29:3886–3897. https://doi.org/10.1002/ldr.3136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Shukla M, Regar PL, Jangid BL (2012) Henna (Lawsonia inermis L.) cultivation: a viable agri-enterprise in arid fringes of western Rajasthan

  • Sib O, Vall E, Bougouma-Yaméogo V, Blanchard M, Navarro M, González-García E (2020) Establishing high-density protein banks for livestock in Burkina Faso (West Africa): agronomic performance under contrasting edaphoclimatic conditions. Agrofor Syst 94:319–333. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-019-00394-4

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh J, Bishnoi M (2012) The role of Khejri in indigenous agroforestry systems of Thar Desert. Environ Sci 7:263–266

    Google Scholar 

  • Strohmeier S, Fukai S, Haddad M, Al Nsour M, Mudabber M, Akimoto K, Oweis T (2021) Rehabilitation of degraded rangelands in Jordan: the effects of mechanized micro water harvesting on hill-slope scale soil water and vegetation dynamics. J Arid Environ 185:104338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tanwar SP, Kumar P, Verma A, Bhatt RK, Singh A, Lal K, Mathur BK (2019) Carbon sequestration potential of agroforestry systems in the Indian arid zone. Curr Sci 117:2014–2022. https://doi.org/10.18520/cs/v117/i12/2014-2022

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Trumper K, Ravilious C, Dickson B (2008) Carbon in drylands: desertification, climate change and carbon finance, Istanbul, Turkey, UNEP-UNDP-UNCCD

  • Ülker D, Ergüven O, Gazioğlu C (2018) Socio-economic impacts in a changing climate: case study Syria. Int J Environ Geoinform 5(1):84–93

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UN (United Nations) (2020) Strategy of the United Nations decade on ecosystem restoration. www.decaderestoration.org Accessed Sep 2022

  • Urrútia G, Bonfill X (2010) Declaración PRISMA: una propuesta para mejorar la publicación de revisiones sistemáticas y metaanálisis. Med Clínica 135:507–511. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medcli.2010.01.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • USDA (United States Department of Agriculture) (2022) https://www.usda.gov/topics/forestry/agroforestry, Accessed Jul 2022

  • Vallejo M, Casas A, Moreno-Calles AI, Blancas J (2016) Los sistemas agroforestales del Valle de Tehuacán: una perspectiva regional. Etnoagroforesteria en México 194–216

  • Varah A, Jones H, Smith J, Potts SG (2020) Temperate agroforestry systems provide greater pollination service than monoculture. Agric Ecosyst Environ 301:107031. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agee.2020.107031

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Verbist K, Santibañez F, Gabriels D, Soto G (2010) Atlas De Zonas áridas De América Latina Y El Caribe. Dentro del marco del proyecto Elaboración del mapa de zonas áridas, semiáridas y subhúmedas de América Latina Y El Caribe. CAZALAC, Documentos Técnicos del PHI-LAC, N°25

    Google Scholar 

  • Verma A, Shiran K, Tewari JC, Kalia RK, Saresh NV, Gaur M, Kumar S (2017) Agroforestry: a sustainable, multifunctional and diversified production system for hot arid zone of India. In: Pandey CB, Kumar M, Goyal RK (eds) Climate change and agroforestry. New India Publishing Agency, New Delhi, India, pp 251–272

    Google Scholar 

  • Vetter T, Rieger AK (2019) Ancient water harvesting in the old-world dry belt–synopsis and outlook. J Arid Environ 169:42–53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaridenv.2019.103996

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang G, Munson SM, Yu K, Chen N, Gou Q (2020) Ecological effects of establishing a 40-year oasis protection system in a northwestern China desert. CATENA 187:104374. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catena.2019.104374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Weninger T, Scheper S, Lackóová L, Kitzler B, Gartner K, King N, Michel K (2021) Ecosystem services of tree windbreaks in rural landscapes–a systematic review. Environ Res Lett 16:10302. https://doi.org/10.10888/1748-9326/ac1d0d

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yanfeng B, Yuguang H, Yingming Z, Zhiming X, Xue D, Yonghua L (2020) Windbreak effects of shelterbelts in oases of the Ulan Buh Desert based on the analysis of wind speed field. J Beijing For Univ 42(8):122–131

    Google Scholar 

  • Yazar A, Kuzucu M, Celik I, Sezen SM, Jacobsen SE (2014) Water harvesting for improved water productivity in dry environments of the Mediterranean region case study: Pistachio in Turkey. J Agron Crop Sci 200:361–370. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12070

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yosef BA, Asmamaw DK (2015) Rainwater harvesting: an option for dry land agriculture in arid and semi-arid Ethiopia. Int J Water Resour Environ Eng 7:17–28. https://doi.org/10.5897/IJWREE2014.0539

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yu RP, Yang H, Xing Y, Zhang WP, Lambers H, Li L (2022) Belowground processes and sustainability in agroecosystems with intercropping. Plant Soil 476(1–2):263–288

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Fernando Farinaccio and Daniel Pérez thanks Project 04/U007 (LARREA-FACIAS-UNCo), for the funding. To school of language (FADEL-UNCo), for their collaboration in reviewing the article. Eliane Ceccon thanks the UNAM Academic Personnel Improvement Support Program (PASPA OF2250DFA) for the academic exchange scholarship in Alicante, Spain.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratorio de Rehabilitación y Restauración Ecológica de Ecosistemas Áridos y Semiáridos, Facultad de Ciencias del Ambiente y la Salud, Universidad Nacional del Comahue, Buenos Aires 1400, 8300, Neuquén, Argentina

    F. M. Farinaccio & D. R. Pérez

  2. Centro Regional de Investigaciones Multidisciplinarias, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Cuernavaca, Morelos, México

    E. Ceccon

Authors
  1. F. M. Farinaccio
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. E. Ceccon
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. D. R. Pérez
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

FF compiled the data for the manuscript and prepared the figures and tables. All authors wrote the main text of the manuscript and revised it.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. M. Farinaccio.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this article.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary Material 1

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Farinaccio, F.M., Ceccon, E. & Pérez, D.R. Could agroforestry restore ecosystem services in arid lands? An analysis through the weight of the evidence approach. Agroforest Syst 98, 507–521 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00927-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10457-023-00927-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation