Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A Numerical Investigation into the Influence of Bionic Ridge Structures on the Cavitation Performance of Marine Propellers

  • Original article
  • Published:
Journal of Marine Science and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

With the development of the large and high-speed ships, the cavitation and radiated noise of marine propellers have been more and more concerned. This paper presents a numerical simulation of marine propellers with the ridge structures, inspired by the airfoils with the bionic ridge surfaces. The bionic method is applied to redesign the blade sections of a marine propeller, and the ridge structures are arranged between the leading edge and the thickest point. Four bionic propellers are established by changing the style and distribution area of the ridge structures on the blade surface. The cavitation morphology, pressure distribution and open water characteristics are analyzed with the software STAR CCM + . The numerical model is validated with the test data and the results show that the ridged structures can make the low-pressure area on the blade surface more dispersed and suppress cavitation. Compared with the prototype propeller, the four bionic propellers with the ridge structures can reduce the cavitation area by 26% (with an advance speed coefficient of 0.5) to 30% (with an advance speed coefficient of 0.3) at medium and low advance speeds. Besides, one of the bionic propellers can improve the thrust and efficiency by 14.93% and 1.61% respectively at high advance speeds.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20
Fig. 21
Fig. 22
Fig. 23
Fig. 24
Fig. 25

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The datasets analyzed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. IMO. (2012). International Maritime Organization Resolution MSC.337 (91), Code on Noise Levels on Board Ships.

  2. Maxwell BK, Susan S (2016) A coming boom in commercial shipping? The potential for rapid growth of noise from commercial ships by 2030. Marine Policy, v 73:119–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Halliday WD, Insley SJ, Hilliard RC, De JT, Pine MK (2017) Potential impacts of shipping noise on marine mammals in the western Canadian Arctic. Mar Pollut Bull, v123(1–2): 73–82.

  4. Moore SE, Reeves BL, Southall TJ, Ragen RS, Suydam CW (2012) A new framework for assessing the effects of anthropogenic sound on marine mammals in a rapidly changing Arctic. Bioscience v62(3): 289–295.

  5. Tewari AK, Vijayakumar R (2019) A review of methods for hydro-acoustic analysis of non-cavitating marine propellers. Int J Maritime Eng 161:201–218

    Google Scholar 

  6. Adrian L (2020) A DES-SST Based assessment of hydrodynamic performances of the wetted and cavitating PPTC propeller. J Mar Sci Eng 8:297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Ji B, Luo X, Peng X (2012) Numerical analysis of cavitation evolution and excited pressure fluctuation around a propeller in non-uniform wake. Int J Multiphase Flow 43:13–21

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Yang Q, Wang Y, Zhang Z (2013) Scale effects on propeller cavitating hydrodynamic and hydroacoustic performances with non-uniform inflow. Chin J Mech Eng v26 (2): 414–426.

  9. Yilmaz N, Dong X, Aktas B (2020) Experimental and numerical investigations of tip vortex cavitation for the propeller of a research vessel, “The Princess Royal.” Ocean Eng 215:107881

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Sajedi H, Mahdi M (2019) Numerical investigation of the rake angle effect on the hydrodynamic performance of propeller in a uniform and non-uniform flow. Proc Inst Mech Eng C J Mech Eng Sci 233(18):6326–6338

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Andersen SV, Andersen P (1986) Hydrodynamic Design of Propellers with Unconventional Geometry. Trans R Inst Naval Architects 129:201–221

    Google Scholar 

  12. Andersen P, Friesch J, Kappel JJ, Lundegaard L, Patience G (2005) Development of a marine propeller with nonplanar lifting surfaces. Mar Technol v42 (3): 144–158.

  13. Gao HT, Zhu WC, Liu YT, Yan YY (2019) Effect of various winglets on the performance of marine propeller. Appl Ocean Res 86:246–256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Feng XR, Lu JM (2019) Effects of balanced skew and biased skew on the cavitation characteristics and pressure fluctuations of the marine propeller. Ocean Eng 184:184–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ibrahim IH, New TH (2015) Tubercle modifications in marine propeller blades. Tenth Pacific Symposium on Flow Visualization and Image Processing, Naples, Italy.

  16. Stark C, Shi WC, Troll M (2021) Cavitation funnel effect: Bio-inspired leading-edge tubercle application on ducted marine propeller blades. Appl Ocean Res 116:102864

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chamorro LP, Arndt REA, Sotiropoulos F (2013) Drag reduction of large wind turbine blades through riblets: evaluation of riblet geometry and application strategies. Renewable Energy 50:1095–1105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lietmeyer C, Oehlert K, Seume JR (2013) Optimal application of riblets on compressor blades and their contamination behavior. J Turbomach 135:011036–011041

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang SL, Li SG, Liu M (2019) Aerodynamic noise characteristics of NACA0018 airfoil with ridged structure. Science Technology and Engineering v19(7): 166–171.

  20. Yazaki A, Takahashi M, Minakata J (1967) Open water test series of modified AU-type five-bladed propeller models of area ratio 0.80. J Zosen Kiokai 122:77–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Menter FR (1994) Two-equation Eddy-viscosity turbulence models for engineering applications. AIAA J 32(8):1598–1605

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Schnerr, G.H., & Sauer, J. (2001). Physical and numerical modeling of unsteady cavitation dynamics. Fourth Int Conf Multiphase Flow, New Orleans, La, USA.

  23. Star CCM. (2018). Siemens, Star CCM 13.02, user guide.

  24. Ӧzden MC, Gürkan AY, Ӧzden YA, Canyurt TG, Korkut E (2016) Underwater radiated noise prediction for a submarine propeller in different flow conditions. Ocean Eng v126: 488–500.

  25. Barkmann U (2011) Potsdam propeller test case (PPTC) open water tests with the model propeller VP1304.SVA- Report 3752, Schiffbau Versuchsanstalt Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

  26. Heinke H (2011) Potsdam propeller test case (PPTC) cavitation tests with the model propeller VP1304.SVA- Report 3753, Schiffbau Versuchsanstalt Potsdam, Potsdam, Germany.

  27. Malmir R (2019) A CFD study on the correlation between the skew angle and blade number of hydrodynamic performance of a submarine propeller. J Brazilian Soc Mech Sci Eng v41 (8): 321.

  28. Yari E, Ghassemi H (2015) The unsteady hydrodynamic characteristics of a partial submerged propeller via a RANS solver. J Mar Eng Technol v14 (3): 111–123.

  29. Wang Z, Xiong Y (2013) Effect of time step size and turbulence model on the open water hydrodynamic performance prediction of contra-rotating propellers. China Ocean Eng v27 (2): 193–204.

  30. Zhu WC, Gao HT (2021) Hydrodynamic characteristics of bio-inspired marine propeller with various blade sections. Ships Offshore Structures, v16 (2): 156–171.

  31. Feng XM, Lu CJ, Wu Q, Cai RQ (2012) Numerical simulation of propeller cavitation in uniform flow. Shipbuilding of China, v53 (03): 18–27.

  32. Chen Y, Yu L (2022) Numerical simulation of PPTC propeller tip vortex cavitation based on adaptive mesh refinement (AMR) method. J Ship Mech v26 (04): 499–510.

  33. Gaggero S (2020) Influence of laminar-to-Turbulent transition on model scale propeller performances. Part II: cavitating conditions. Ships and Offshore Structures 17(4):772–791.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the Research Funds of the Maritime Safety Administration of the People's Republic of China (2012_27), the Special Project of Central Government for Local Science and Technology Development of Liaoning Province (2021JH6/10500153) and the Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities (3132019305).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. College of Marine Engineering, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, 116026, People’s Republic of China

    Jie Yang

  2. Naval Architecture & Ocean Engineering College, Dalian Maritime University, Dalian, 116026, People’s Republic of China

    Hongtao Gao

  3. Fluids & Thermal Engineering Research Group, Faculty of Engineering, University of Nottingham, NG7 2RD, University Park, Nottingham, UK

    Yuying Yan

Authors
  1. Jie Yang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hongtao Gao
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yuying Yan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Hongtao Gao.

Ethics declarations

Competing Interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Yang, J., Gao, H. & Yan, Y. A Numerical Investigation into the Influence of Bionic Ridge Structures on the Cavitation Performance of Marine Propellers. J Mar Sci Technol 29, 105–122 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00976-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00773-023-00976-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation