Skip to main content
Log in

Understanding Users’ Voluntary Switching Behavior for User Interfaces of Intelligent Personal Assistant Devices

  • Published:
Information Systems Frontiers Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Intelligent voice user interfaces (UIs) are increasingly accepted by users to replace traditional ones to operate intelligent personal assistant devices. This study developed a model to explicate the key factors influencing users’ voluntary switching behavior between traditional UIs and intelligent voice ones from push-pull-mooring framework perspective, which considers the push effect from two dimensions of perceived inconvenience, the pull effect from three factors based on perceived value, and the mooring effect from switching costs. A mixed-methods approach is adopted to explore pull factors (qualitative) and validate model (quantitative). The model was validated based on 259 respondents using both traditional UI and intelligent voice one of smart home devices from China. The results indicated that all push (extrinsic and intrinsic inconvenience), pull (interface adaptivity, playfulness, and social presence) and mooring (switching costs) factors significantly affect switching intention and then affect actual behavior. The implications for research and practice are discussed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Smart home device (SHD) refers to an end-device that is used at home and can be requested by users to perform features through voice commands, which is being widely pushed to market by suppliers, such as smart speakers, smart home appliances and so on.

  2. In the extrinsic stage, the interaction between end-user and traditional UI requires end-user’s limb to contact with UIs in space, while the interaction with intelligent voice UI does not; In the intrinsic stage, the interaction between end-user and traditional UI is fixed because traditional UI is a clearly distinguishable systems in bounded contexts, while the interaction with intelligent voice UI is not fixed because intelligent voice UI is a flexible and unrestricted framework, for example, the intelligent voice UI can execute a deep feature of system in one step operation by understanding semantics, while the traditional one needs to operate step-by-step by clicking.

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Shuang Cheng.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

None.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix

Appendix

Table A Measurement items

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cheng, S. Understanding Users’ Voluntary Switching Behavior for User Interfaces of Intelligent Personal Assistant Devices. Inf Syst Front (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10459-6

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10796-023-10459-6

Keywords

Navigation