Abstract
Purpose
The effectiveness of the Colorectal Cancer (CRC) screening program is assessed based on the reduction in CRC mortality and incidence rates over time. To accurately estimate the long-term impact, it is advisable to monitor additional indicators such as age and stage-specific incidence rates. Our objective is to evaluate the effectiveness of the National CRC Screening Program in Turkey and analyze its influence on disease stage at diagnosis and survival rates.
Methods
The National CRC Screening Program was considered an intervention and the distribution of local, regional, and distant diseases, and survival estimates were assessed before and after the intervention to evaluate the effectiveness of the intervention.
Results
518 patients were included in the study. At the time of diagnosis, localized, regional, and distant disease in pre-intervention were 31.3%, 42.9%, 25.8%, while post-intervention were 42.8%, 33.3%, 23.9%, respectively (p = 0.020). The relative effectiveness of the intervention in males, females, and 50–70 ages were calculated as 1.2[95% CI 0.95–1.73], 1.5[95% CI 1.04–2.18], and 1.6[95% CI 1.21–2.28] in localized disease, 0.8[95% CI 0.67–1.18], 0.6[95% CI 0.43–0.90], and 0.6[95% CI 0.46–0.81] in regional diseases, 0.8[95% CI 0.57–1.20], 1.1[95% CI 0.66–1.84], and 1.0[95% CI 0.70–1.57] in distant disease, respectively.
Conclusion
A noticeable shift in the disease stage at the time of diagnosis was observed; however, this shift varied among gender and age groups. To effectively evaluate the impact of a cancer screening program on reducing the incidence and mortality rates of the disease, it is essential to monitor and analyze these indicators alongside 5–10-year survival estimates and stage changes at the time of diagnosis.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The original data of this study were obtained from the archive of the Medical Oncology Clinic of Kartal Dr. Lütfi Kırdar City Hospital, Ministry of Health, Republic of Turkey, by the investigators following the approval of all relevant ethics committees. Further information is available from the corresponding author upon request.
References
Sung H, Ferlay J, Siegel RL, Laversanne M, Soerjomataram I, Jemal A, Bray F (2021) Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 71(3):209–249. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21660
T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health (2021) Turkey cancer statistics 2017. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/tr/kanser-istatistikleri/yillar/2017-turkiye-kanser-i-statistikleri.html
World Health Organization, Internacional Agency for Research on Cancer. Turkey Fact Sheet: GLOBACAN 2020. https://gco.iarc.fr/today/data/factsheets/populations/792-turkey-fact-sheets.pdf
Øines M, Helsingen LM, Bretthauer M, Emilsson L (2017) Epidemiology and risk factors of colorectal polyps. Best Pract Res Clin Gastroenterol 31(4):419–424
American Cancer Society (2020) Colorectal Cancer Facts & Figures 2020–2022. https://www.cancer.org/content/dam/cancer-org/research/cancer-facts-and-statistics/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures/colorectal-cancer-facts-and-figures-2020-2022.pdf
World Health Organization, Geneva (2017) Guide to cancer early diagnosis. https://apps.who.int/iris/handle/10665/254500
Segnan N, Patnick J, Karsa LV (2010) European guidelines for quality assurance in colorectal cancer screening and diagnosis, first edition, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg. https://www.stopdarmkanker.be/BOEKJE/boekEU.pdf
T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health, Department of Cancer (2016) Turkey Cancer Control Program. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/yayinlar/raporlar/Ulusal_Kanser_Kontrol_Plani_2013_2018.pdf
T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health, Department of Cancer (2021) Turkey Cancer Control Program. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/yayinlar/raporlar/2021_Kanser_Kontrol_Programi_/Turkey_NCCP_18_April_2022.pdf
T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Treatment Services (2010) Turkey Oncology Services Restructuring Program 2010–2023. https://www.kanser.org/saglik/userfiles/file/11Mayis2011/turkiye_onkoloji_hizmetleri_kitapcik.pdf
Guner AE, Surmeli A, Turan G, Kural K, Simsek EE, Maral I (2022) A large-scale pilot breast cancer screening program: findings and recommendations for National Screening Programs. Med Bull Haseki/Haseki Tip Bulteni. https://doi.org/10.4274/haseki.galenos.2021.7793
Ding H, Lin J, Xu Z, Chen X, Wang HHX, Huang L, Huang J, Zheng Z, Wong MCS (2022) A global evaluation of the performance indicators of colorectal cancer screening with fecal immunochemical tests and colonoscopy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Cancers 14(4):1073. https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers14041073
Guimarães DP, Mantuan LA, de Oliveira MA, Junior RL, Costa AMD, Rossi S, Fava G, Taveira LN, Giardina KM, Talarico T, Costa M, Scapulatempo-Neto C, Matsushita MM, Véo CA, Fregnani JHT, Reis RM, Hawk ET, Mauad EC (2021) The performance of colorectal cancer screening in Brazil: The first two years of the implementation program in Barretos Cancer Hospital. Cancer Prev Res (Phila) 14(2):241–252. https://doi.org/10.1158/1940-6207.CAPR-20-017)
World Health Organization Regional Office for Europe (2017) Turkey Household Health Survey: prevalence of risk factors for noncommunicable diseases. https://hsgm.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kronik-hastaliklar-engelli-db/hastaliklar/kalpvedamar/raporlar/turkey-risk-factors-tur_STEPS-2017.pdf
Özdemir R, Turkmen Çevik F, Kes D, Karacali M, Özguner S (2020) Level and factors associated with participation in population-based cancer screening in Safranbolu District of Karabuk, Turkey. Iran J Public Health 49(4):663–672
Tuncez IH, Aksoy N, Koc M (2021) Ulusal kanser tarama programı Sonuçları; Bir İl Örneği. Phnx Med J 3(2):69–73. https://doi.org/10.38175/phnx.922780
Bakar C, Oymak S, Maral I (2017) Turkey’s epidemiological and demographic transitions: 1931–2013. Balkan Med J 34(4):323–334
T.R. Ministry of Health General Directorate of Public Health, Department of Cancer. Cancer Department Evaluation Reports, Colorectal Cancer Screenings. https://hsgmdestek.saglik.gov.tr/depo/birimler/kanser-db/yayinlar/raporlar/kolorektal.pdf
Levin TR, Corley DA, Jensen CD, Schottinger JE, Quinn VP, Zauber AG, Lee JK, Zhao WK, Udaltsova N, Ghai NR, Lee AT, Quesenberry CP, Fireman BH, Doubeni CA (2018) Effects of organized colorectal cancer screening on cancer incidence and mortality in a large community-based population. Gastroenterology 155(5):1383-1391.e5. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.gastro.2018.07.017
Navarro M, Nicolas A, Ferrandez A, Lanas A (2017) Colorectal cancer population screening programs worldwide in 2016: an update. World J Gastroenterol 23(20):3632–3642. https://doi.org/10.3748/wjg.v23.i20.3632
Binefa G, Garcia M, Milà N, Fernández E, Rodríguez-Moranta F, Gonzalo N, Benito L, Clopés A, Guardiola J, Moreno V (2016) Colorectal Cancer Screening Programme in Spain: results of key performance indicators after five rounds (2000–2012). Sci Rep 20(6):19532. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep19532
von Wagner C, Baio G, Raine R, Snowball J, Morris S, Atkin W, Obichere A, Handley G, Logan RF, Rainbow S, Smith S, Halloran S, Wardle J (2011) Inequalities in participation in an organized national colorectal cancer screening programme: results from the first 2.6 million invitations in England. Int J Epidemiol 40(3):712–718. https://doi.org/10.1093/ije/dyr008
Logan RF, Patnick J, Nickerson C, Coleman L, Rutter MD, von Wagner C, Committee EBCSE (2012) Outcomes of the Bowel Cancer Screening Programme (BCSP) in England after the first 1 million tests. Gut 61(10):1439–1446. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2011-300843
Senore C, Basu P, Anttila A, Ponti A, Tomatis M, Vale DB, Ronco G, Soerjomataram I, Primic-Žakelj M, Riggi E, Dillner J, Elfström MK, Lönnberg S, Sankaranarayanan R, Segnan N (2019) Performance of colorectal cancer screening in the European Union Member States: data from the second European screening report. Gut 68(7):1232–1244. https://doi.org/10.1136/gutjnl-2018-317293
Neo EL, Beeke C, Price T, Maddern G, Karapetis C, Luke C, Roder D, Padbury R (2011) South Australian clinical registry for metastatic colorectal cancer. ANZ J Surg 81(5):352–357. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1445-2197.2010.05589.x
Funding
No funding was obtained for this study.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
GT: Conceptualization, methodology, formal analysis, investigation, data curation, writing—original draft, writing—review and editing, visualization, project administration; MT: Conceptualization, investigation, resources, data curation, writing—review and editing; HI: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; MEY: Conceptualization, resources, writing—review and editing; MC: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing; IM: Conceptualization, methodology, writing—review and editing, supervision.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare no potential conficts of interest in the research, authorship and publication of this article.
Ethical approval
This study received ethical approval from the Turkish Ministry of Health, Istanbul Medeniyet University Goztepe Training and Research Hospital Clinical Research Ethics Committee (Approval No. 2021/0066) on January 27, 2021.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Turan, G., Turan, M., Ikiisik, H. et al. Evaluation of the effectiveness of colorectal cancer screening intervention. Cancer Causes Control 35, 761–769 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01839-z
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10552-023-01839-z