Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Monitoring of optic sheath diameter during acute migraine attack: an objective criteria for the severity of disease

  • Original article
  • Published:
Acta Neurologica Belgica Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

The etiology of migraine can be complex and multifactorial but not clear, also, intracranial pressure has been already associated with migraine attacks. This study aimed to monitor intracranial pressure during migraine attack to understand the possible relations with disease and severity.

Methods

A prospective randomized study was designed. Patients with a definitive diagnosis of migraine underwent ultrasonography for optic nerve sheath diameter (ONSD) measurement before treatment and were re-measured after the attack was resolved. The severity of the migraine was assessed with Headache Impact Test-6 (HIT-6) and Migraine Disability Assessment (MIDAS) questionnaire before the treatment and after the symptoms regressed. ONSD values and scores from the questionnaires were compared before and after the migraine attack.

Results

The study included 11 (52.4%) women and 10 (47.6%) men, and 42 eyes were evaluated. ONSD was detected as 4.23 ± 0.26 mm in the right eye and 4.10 ± 0.32 mm in the left eye during the migraine attack and decreased to 3.65 ± 0.41 mm in the right eye and 3.50 ± 0.33 mm in the left eye after the attack was treated (p < 0.001, both). A similar statistical improvement was found in HIT-6 and MIDAS scores with ONSD after treatment (p < 0.001). A significant positive correlation was found between the ONSD value in both eyes and HIT-6/MIDAS scores during the migraine attack, and also, after the migraine attack.

Conclusion

A subjective increase of ONSD values during the migraine attack decreased after the disease resolved, also changes in ONSD values were significantly correlated with the severity of symptoms.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data that support the findings of this study are available from the corresponding author upon reasonable request.

References

  1. Gupta VK (2019) Pathophysiology of migraine: an increasingly complex narrative to 2020. Future Neurol 14(2):FNL12

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Colombo B, Libera DD, Comi G (2011) Brain white matter lesions in migraine: what’s the meaning? Neurol Sci 32(SUPPL. 1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  3. Puledda F, Silva EM, Suwanlaong K, Goadsby PJ (2023) Migraine: from pathophysiology to treatment. J Neurol. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00415-023-11706-1

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Al-Karagholi MA-M (2023) Involvement of potassium channel signalling in migraine pathophysiology. Pharmaceuticals 16(3):438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Wang Z, Yang X, Zhao B, Li W (2023) Primary headache disorders: from pathophysiology to neurostimulation therapies. Heliyon 9(4):e14786. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.heliyon.2023.e14786

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Kokoti L, Al-Karagholi MAM, Ashina M (2020) Latest insights into the pathophysiology of migraine: the ATP-sensitive potassium channels. Curr Pain Headache Rep 24(12):1–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Christensen SL, Munro G, Petersen S, Shabir A, Jansen-Olesen I, Kristensen DM et al (2020) ATP sensitive potassium (KATP) channel inhibition: a promising new drug target for migraine. Cephalalgia 40(7):650–664. https://doi.org/10.1177/0333102420925513

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Edvinsson L, Haanes KA, Warfvinge K (2019) Does inflammation have a role in migraine? Nat Rev Neurol 15(8):483–490. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41582-019-0216-y

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Komut E, Kozaci N, Sönmez BM, Yilmaz F, Komut S, Yildirim ZN et al (2016) Bedside sonographic measurement of optic nerve sheath diameter as a predictor of intracranial pressure in ED. Am J Emerg Med 34(6):963–967

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Moretti R, Pizzi B (2011) Ultrasonography of the optic nerve in neurocritically ill patients. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 55(6):644–652

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. De Simone R, Ranieri A, Montella S, Cappabianca P, Quarantelli M, Esposito F et al (2014) Intracranial pressure in unresponsive chronic migraine. J Neurol 261(7):1365–1373

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Olesen J (2018) Headache classification committee of the international headache society (IHS) the international classification of headache disorders, 3rd edition. Cephalalgia 38(1):1–211

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Wang LJ, Chen LM, Chen Y, Bao LY, Zheng NN, Wang YZ et al (2018) Ultrasonography assessments of optic nerve sheath diameter as a noninvasive and dynamic method of detecting changes in intracranial pressure. JAMA Ophthalmol 136(3):250–256

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Lochner P, Coppo L, Cantello R, Nardone R, Naldi A, Leone MA et al (2016) Intra- and interobserver reliability of transorbital sonographic assessment of the optic nerve sheath diameter and optic nerve diameter in healthy adults. J Ultrasound 19(1):41–45. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40477-014-0144-z

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kim SE, Hong EP, Kim HC, Lee SU, Jeon JP (2019) Ultrasonographic optic nerve sheath diameter to detect increased intracranial pressure in adults: a meta-analysis. Acta radiol 60(2):221–229

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Geeraerts T, Merceron S, Benhamou D, Vigué B, Duranteau J (2008) Non-invasive assessment of intracranial pressure using ocular sonography in neurocritical care patients. Intensive Care Med 34(11):2062–2067

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Soldatos T, Karakitsos D, Chatzimichail K, Papathanasiou M, Gouliamos A, Karabinis A (2008) Optic nerve sonography in the diagnostic evaluation of adult brain injury. Crit Care 12(3):1–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Hamamci M, Songur MS, Aslan Bayhan S, Bayhan HA (2021) Is ocular vascularity affected in young migraine patients? A pilot study. J Clin Neurosci. 91:144–151. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jocn.2021.06.045

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Sörös P, Vo O, Husstedt IW, Evers S, Gerding H (2003) Phantom eye syndrome: its prevalence, phenomenology, and putative mechanisms. Neurology 60(9):1542–1543

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Taylor FR (2010) A neural mechanism for exacerbation of headache by light: comments. Headache 50(7):1225

    Google Scholar 

  21. Gökçen E, Hamamcı M (2020) Ultrasonographic measurement of the optic nerve sheath in the differential diagnosis and follow-up of migraine with and without aura: a pilot study. Clin Neurol Neurosurg 198:106191

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schankin CJ, Maniyar FH, Seo Y, Kori S, Eller M, Chou DE et al (2016) Ictal lack of binding to brain parenchyma suggests integrity of the blood–brain barrier for 11 C-dihydroergotamine during glyceryl trinitrate-induced migraine. Brain 139(7):1994–2001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Vaiman M, Abuita R, Bekerman I (2015) Optic nerve sheath diameters in healthy adults measured by computer tomography. Int J Ophthalmol 8(6):1240–1244

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Goeres P, Zeiler FA, Unger B, Karakitsos D, Gillman LM (2016) Ultrasound assessment of optic nerve sheath diameter in healthy volunteers. J Crit Care 31(1):168–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrc.2015.10.009

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Carta A, Mora P, Aldigeri R, Gozzi F, Favilla S, Tedesco S, Calzetti G, Farci R, Barboni P, Bianchi-Marzoli S, Fossarello M, Gandolfi S, Sadun AA (2018) Optical coherence tomography is a useful tool in the differentiation between true edema and pseudoedema of the optic disc. PLoS ONE 13(11):e0208145. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0208145. (PMID: 30496251; PMCID: PMC6264818)

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Sadullah Şimşek.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The author declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Informed consent

Written informed consent for the study was obtained from the patients.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Şimşek, S., Gültekin, E. & İşlek, A. Monitoring of optic sheath diameter during acute migraine attack: an objective criteria for the severity of disease. Acta Neurol Belg (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02454-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13760-023-02454-0

Keywords

Navigation