Skip to main content
Log in

Evaluation of claims data from a commercial value-based insurance product shows pediatric imaging is not a major driver of overall or pediatric healthcare expenditures

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Pediatric Radiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Initiatives to reduce healthcare expenditures often focus on imaging, suggesting that imaging is a major driver of cost.

Objective

To evaluate medical expenditures and determine if imaging was a major driver in pediatric as compared to adult populations.

Methods

We reviewed all claims data for members in a value-based contract between a commercial insurer and a healthcare system for calendar years 2021 and 2022. For both pediatric (<18 years of age) and adult populations, we analyzed average per member per year (PMPY) medical expenditures related to imaging as well as other categories of large medical expenses. Average PMPY expenditures were compared between adult and pediatric patients.

Results

Children made up approximately 20% of members and 21% of member months but only 8–9% of expenditures. Imaging expenditures in pediatric members were 0.2% of the total healthcare spend and 2.9% of total pediatric expenditures. Imaging expenditures per member were seven times greater in adults than children. The rank order of imaging expenditures and imaging modalities was also different in pediatric as compared to adult members.

Conclusion

Evaluation of claims data from a commercial value-based insurance product shows that pediatric imaging is not a major driver of overall, nor pediatric only, healthcare expenditures.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

All data generated during this study are included in this published article.

References

  1. House SA, Hall M, Ralston SL, Marin JR, Coon ER et al (2021) Development and use of a calculator to measure pediatric low-value care delivered in US children’s hospitals. JAMA Netw Open 4:e2135184

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Marfi JN, Russel K, Bortz BA, Dachary M, Hazel WA Jr, Fendrick AM (2017) Low-cost, high-volume health services contribute the most to unnecessary health spending. Health Aff 36:1701–1704

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Mafi JN, Reid RO, Baseman LH, Hickey S, Totten M et al (2021) Trends in low-value health service use and spending in the US Medicare fee-for-service program, 2014–1018. Jama Netw Open 4:e2037328

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Chua KP, Conti RM, Freed GL (2018) Appropriately framing child health care spending: a prerequisite for value improvement. JAMA 319:1087–1088

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Milliman. MedInsight: health waste calculator. https://www.milliman.com/en/insight/health-data-analytics-for-identifying-wasteful-services. Accessed 30 Jun 2023

  6. Chua KP, Schwartz AL, Volerman A, Conti RM, Huang ES (2016) Use of low-value pediatric services among the commercially insured. Pediatrics 138:e20161809

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  7. Chua KP, Schwartz AL, Volerman A, Conti RM, Huang ES (2020) Differences in the receipt of low-value services between publicly and privately insured children. Pediatrics 145:e20192325

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bai Lu (2020) Gao S, Bursein F, Kerr D, Butine P, Law N A systematic literature review on unnecessary diagnostic testing: the role of ICT use. Int J Med Inform 143:104269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Hiscock H, Neely RJ, Warren H, Soon J, Georgiou A (2018) Reducing unnecessary imaging and pathology tests: a systematic review. Pediatrics 141:e20172862

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Rubin GD (2017) Costing in radiology and health care: rationale, relativity, rudiments, and realities. Radiology 282:333–347

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Donnelly LF, Lee GM, Sharek PJ (2018) Costs of quality and safety in radiology. RadioGraphics 38:1682–1687

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. CMS List of CPT / HCPCS Codes. https://www.cms.gov/medicare/fraud-and-abuse/physicianselfreferral/list_of_codes (Accessed 7/5/2023)

  13. Guimaraes CV, Smith LA, Garza JA, Blado ME, Lokey CS, Donnelly LF (2018) Implementing a systematic approach to improve governance and deployment of imaging codes in radiology. Curr Prob Diagn Radiol 47:215–219

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Lane F. Donnelly.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

None

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Donnelly, L.F., Dellva, B.P., Jarmul, J.A. et al. Evaluation of claims data from a commercial value-based insurance product shows pediatric imaging is not a major driver of overall or pediatric healthcare expenditures. Pediatr Radiol 54, 842–848 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05845-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00247-023-05845-w

Keywords

Navigation